Slashdot Log In
Sim Plague
Posted by
Hemos
on Thu Apr 27, 2000 09:37 AM
from the happy-fun-bus dept.
from the happy-fun-bus dept.
Brian Kingsbury writes: "The New York Times has an
article on a new twist in the world of the Sims --- a "virus" that
can kill off a player's characters. In a particularly sadistic twist,
the virus is carried by a guinea pig that players download from the
Sims Web site. I wonder what's next, maybe the Black Death?
" That's all Nate would have needed to complete his House of Fear - locked doors, no food, two ghosts, and the kitchen on fire. Will Wright, you're a genius.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Re:If I had The Sims... (Score:1)
If I had the sim progamming language, I'd design an RMS sim that would go around yelling GNU/Linux, GNU/Linux.
Then I'd build a cluster of bloodthirsty monsters, and call them Grendels.
/. inspired Sim site (Score:1)
Re:Um... this is a computer virus? (Score:1)
--synaptik
If you want to flame me, do so here [slashdot.org].
Re:Um... this is a computer virus? (Score:1)
--synaptik
If you want to flame me, do so here [slashdot.org].
It's only a matter of time.. (Score:1)
Actually, I was looking for something to do tonight....hmm.
(evil snicker)
Re:About time (Score:1)
Yes, I've researched this a bit.
Re:Take another look at *the* picture (Score:1)
Because there's no evidence to that. But that the relatives were kidnappers is quite clear; thanks to the media the entire nation witnessed it.
I can't believe so many people are defending a gross abuse of power, committed with a neglect of the courts.
While I do agree that they did go a bit extreme, I'm not sure this was an abuse of power. The child was, for all intents and purposes, kidnapped. He was being held hostage, and negotiations were not working. Was sending in armed agents a bad thing? Yes. But did they have any other choice? I'm not so sure they did. And when you run out of options, you do what you have to do.
I'm not surprised that Reno ordered it, though, as she has a long history of such acts.
Agreed. But for once I think she may well have been right. In the past she's been more than a little trigger-happy, and many people died senselessly as a result. But this time she showed a great deal of restraint, actually waiting until there was no other option.
Going into a house, in the way those agents did, was just asking for somebody to be killed.
Quite true. But no one was killed; that is what's important. Going into a building with guns to rescue hostages is also just asking for someone to be killed, and that's more or less what this was. The relatives managed to pull a rather inane political-ideology bit to manipulate a lot of people and hide the truth of their actions, but they did what they did.
If people suddenly find that agents have broken into a house, and are pointing automatic weapons at them, people will often react defensively.
They'll react defensively if anyone breaks into a house with automatic weapons. They'll also react defensively if their children have been kidnapped.
We *do* still have a right to keep arms in our house, and bear them to defend ourselves.
Yes, that's true. From all reports, there were guns in the house; that is why the agents were sent in armed. It would have been stupid to send in unarmed agents which could have been mowed down in front of the child, making this even more of a tragedy than it would have been.
If the agents had a warrant, and it very much looks like they did, then they did nothing wrong. If they didn't have one that's another matter, but the vast majority of reports seems to show that they had one. Displays of force are Bad Things, and should only be used in very rare cases when there is no other option. However, this seems to have been exactly such a case.
Re:Buffy Plug-in? (Score:1)
Ah, Yohko-chan...
Re:About time (Score:1)
>and burn em at the stakes.
We'd need the "sim-scales" patch too. And a duck.
Re:Playing God, or the devil? (Score:1)
Take another look at *the* picture (Score:1)
Looks different now, doesn't it?
Re:Playing God, or the devil? (Score:1)
It's kind of scary how much this does to explain all the suffering in the world.
Re:Um... this is a computer virus? (Score:2)
Christopher A. Bohn
Re:Um... this is a computer virus? (Score:2)
Harm to a person's financial well-being (Score:2)
Wait 'til the multi-player version comes out, when people can exchange characters. I build up a great family, looking to sell it on eBay. Mr. Wright gets cute and throws in another virus. My family's wiped out, and I've got nobody left to sell on eBay. Time for my lawyers to have a little talk with Mr. Wright. You just wait. :)
Personally, I think the guinea pig thing is a great idea, and should just be seen as part of the game. Who's to say that there isn't someone going around to animal shelters injecting guinea pigs with nasty viruses? Sure it's far-fetched, but so is life -- how many people expected their Tylenol to be laced with cyanide back in the '80s?
Cheers,
ZicoKnows@hotmail.com
Re:Virus to deter piracy? (Score:2)
Sims meets Resident Evil (Score:2)
And they could still have babies, and baby zombies like Dead Alive. Ah, Peter Jackson...
Doh! Should have sued him a long time ago! (Score:2)
On a more serious note, I don't think it's "damage " when your game character dies. You might as well sue him for not making the Sim guy live forever.
Go get your free Palm V (25 referrals needed only!)
Re:Arrrgh! (Score:2)
You did see who wrote the article, right? That bufoon Markoff has made his living pulling crap like this. Besides, it's easier than doing any kind of research or something.
----
Dave
Purity Of Essence
Re:It's only a matter of time.. THE HORRIBLE TRUTH (Score:2)
simcastro! simcastro! simcastro!
Chso the Clockwork Maus
Throwing Stones.... (Score:2)
It's a bit hypocritical to bitch about something you yourself are guilty of, my homey.
http://slashdot.org/co mments.pl?sid=00/04/13/1939221&cid=152 [slashdot.org]
The Divine Creatrix in a Mortal Shell that stays Crunchy in Milk
Re:Sims meets Resident Evil (Score:2)
Or SimLepracy... I can see the digitized extremeties falling off now...
[Slightly OT] Problems with the Sims? (Score:2)
Does anyone else have problems running this game?
There's a page on the EA support website for my problem. "Sims crashed with a page fault in module " meaning, basically, I can run it for about five minutes, and then it crashes.
Their solutions are to kill all the other programs, and to make sure your drivers are up-to-date.
I've contacted EA support, and while they've suggested numerous solutions to the problem, none have worked.
Is anyone else getting this? I see good reviews and (mostly) positive comments on this game everywhere, but almost no mention of my problem.
If anyone had this problem, and has fixed it, I'd really appreciate hearing how!
Unauthorized virus hacks? (Score:2)
Re:Virus to deter piracy? (Score:2)
This sounds a little like the Intel PIII CPU ID, doesn't it?
I'm going to buy this game right now! (Score:2)
Don't know if anyone read the article .. (Score:2)
I guess I don't blame them for making the game for linux from the get go ... that would have taken production costs higher, but now that the game is going no where but up I don't thi8nk it would be so unlikely to make it for linux. I like Loki, but just because they make games for linux doesn't mean they're cheap ...
Now that's just twisted... (Score:2)
But truly, you would have to trust Maxis 100% with any bonus material they give you for the game... the next thing you know is that your nieghbours in the game open a crack house...
Re:Arrrgh! (Score:2)
Anomalous: inconsistent with or deviating from what is usual, normal, or expected
The story with no registration required (Score:2)
Edith (Score:2)
no need for me to worry (Score:3)
no censor "hack":
create a file
"\Sims\GameData\Skins\adult-censor.cmx"
in it put:
version 300
0
1
adult-censor
1
0
0
if you want the children naked (sicko!), its:
"\Sims\GameData\Skins\child-censor.cmx"
version 300
0
1
child-censor
1
0
0
This may sound heretical... (Score:3)
The (alleged) AI in this game seems no more advanced than some expert system based Starcraft clone. Was this just a testing ground for Maxis to play around with neural networks, and happened to become stable enough to release as a game? This game needs to go through a little more improvements to the neural network before it even comes close to what a real human would do.
That, plus the fact that the premise is so *dull*. Oh, joy. I get to simulate a person who gets a job as a medical test subject or a race track announcer. Yeehaw. Woohoo.
Oh, please. I'd much rather spend time blowing away enemy starfighters in X-Wing Alliance or giant robots in Mechwarrior 3 than guide a person around a house, doing chores in The Sims.
Just ranting. Flames are welcome.
Re:Arrrgh! (Score:3)
They're not implying that this well affect the entire Internet. What they're saying is that, were Sims a multiplayer game, the potential would exist for the virus (that kills characters in the game) to spread from character to character.
--
Ian Peters
Re:Arrrgh! (Score:3)
Clearly you know nothing about computers! Everyone knows this happened on X-files with that hot S&M digital chick with the sword.
Wright could be in trouble (Score:3)
Whoever knowingly causes the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damage without authorization, to a protected computer;....incurs a penalty of: (c) (3)(A) a
fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both, in the case of an offense...of this section which does not occur after a conviction for another offense under this section...and no more than ten years imprisonment if previously convicted,...or an attempt to commit an offense punishable under this subparagraph.
Intentionally causing damage without authorization sounds about right....
More Sims Mayhem (Score:3)
Someone with far too much time on his hands decided to see how badly he could break the game on ISCA BBS -- here's the results:
http://us4n6.dnaco.net/simz/ [dnaco.net]I particularly like the fireman watching people keel over dead in the street....
--
Re:Now we just need The Sims for linux... (Score:3)
LINUX IS VULNERABLE TO VIRUS
only to explain later in the body of the article that it was a virus that only characters in the SIM game were vulnerable to, and then only if you download the Guinea Pig patch.
Re:Virus to deter piracy? (Score:3)
That the 'ginea pig' virus made news is odd; they tell you point-blank that characters handling it might get sick. Maybe I came in late and they had added that after several complaints -- but I've been playing several weeks and always knew.
"The Sims" is incredibly addictive -- the ONLY reason I still have MicroDos on my system. The various add-ons they offer on their site, coupled with pre-made characters & houses from fan sites (one UK site features dead-on renditions of various celebrities) have cost me more sleep-time than I care to admit.
Re:More Sims Mayhem (Score:3)
~=Keelor
Re:Arrrgh! (Score:3)
Think about this for a second. Outside of the very recent past, people with diseases were locked away. Personal "rights" were stripped for the good of the whole. What will happen in the game when someone gets a character that is running around trying to kill everyone with disease.
It will be interesting to see if people are as forgiving in a game atmosphere (where it costs even less) to someone that has a disease. Will names of the diseased be posted. Flags put outside their houses? Neighbors take up collections to pay for the cure?
I look forward to the answer to these questions and more when people can behave however they want.
Re:Arrrgh! (Score:3)
It's already happened.
Back in 1991 or 1992, text-based MUCKs already had programming languages. One enterprising programmer wrote a virus that attached itself to a person's description.
Whenever someone would look at an infected person, they would also be infected.
I forget what the 'payoff' of the virus was, but the 'antivirus' command even now exists in places like Furrymuck. [furry.org]
stupid little creatures (Score:4)
you know, given that my sim just tends to pass out on the floor when he gets tired, i doubt he could be trusted to take care of another living creature. no wonder the hamster bites them and gives them diseases.
---
Virus to deter piracy? (Score:4)
I'm sure people won't like that and a patch would certainly be created in no time, and it could be a PR problem, but it's an idea.
Creator (Score:4)
In some aspect he also controls the people who play his game. He has the power to teach them, to change them, to manipulate them.
for this ultimate goal all means are justified.
hale
Media Sensationalism and Reader Rabbit (Score:4)
"Right now it would be hard to convince a prosecutor to attempt to convict someone for such a program, but that may change," said Mark Rasch, a former assistant United States attorney who successfully prosecuted a Cornell graduate student for releasing the first Internet worm in 1989. "These things become more important as online gaming proliferates. With online gambling it will become even more problematic."
WTF??? I read about this Guinea Pig mod to this game two months ago in Computer Gaming World, and I thought, "No way! That is so cool!" All it did was prove to me that this thing really simulated real life, and was versitile enough that they could release such a hugely new feature into the game months after its release. It almost made me go out and buy it then and there.
It's a fscking game! The point of a game is for it to be difficult! If Sims players are so upset that they would, as this litigous Mark Rasch put it, attempt to CONVICT the programmer, then perhaps they should move to more easy to play games, like Reader Rabbit. That way, they'd always win.
To me, this is adding value to the product. For the same low price of $50 (or whatever it is), you get a game that is always changing, always becoming more challenging. Sounds to me like you're not likely to get bored of The Sims within the first two weeks of game play, like so many other games I've played. Again, if people want an easy game where they always win, then leave the computer alone and watch sitcoms.
I don't see where they get off saying "gamers may have been forced to confront the same challenges that face e-mail users whose computers are frequently attacked by hostile programs." What??? I don't see where anyone's hard drives have been deleted. I don't see where anyone's been forced. Sim players choose to download mods. Worm recipients don't choose to receive worms. And even then he's sensational about it. I'm an e-mail user, and I'm not frequently attacked by hostile programs. I've gotten maybe 3 infected emails in my entire life, and even then, was not stupid enough to open "prettypark.exe".
To me, this article didn't get bad in the middle, like a lot of you said. This article was doomsday from the very beginning. There was a lot of negative and dark language from the headline to the last sentance with only a few minor positive highlights.
Incidentally, the virus he refers to in Snowcrash only worked on hackers, so you'd think the media would like that... Get rid of the hackers, and all your problems will be solved.
John Markoff is at it again... (Score:5)
Well, if you look at the author of the article, it's none other than John Markoff! If the name doesn't ring a bell, he's the same guy who wrote sensational articles about Kevin Mitnick many years ago which ultimately resulted in Kevin getting treated so badly by "the system". You can read more at http://www.freekevin.com/ [freekevin.com].
Markoff wouldn't know good journalism if it bit him on the ass. Why the New York Times continues to employ someone as irresponsible as him is beyond me.
Arrrgh! (Score:5)
From the article:
Although there is no easy possibility that the guinea pig virus will escape from Sims and cause havoc in the Internet world, the specter of software viruses in the future of computer gaming is real, Mr. Smith said. "When they introduce a future multiplayer version of Sims, it will create an interesting social dynamic," he said.
Why can't they just tell the story, and not try to inflame the public with these false potentialities? JESUS. The article was great right up until this point. One of the (many) things that I loathe about the media is how they have this uncontrollable desire to make issues appear as nasty and brutish as possible. This is a perfect example. Virus in a computer game? We must surreptitiously imply that it might affect the entire Internet! That's MUCH more interesting!
FUCK THAT. Just tell the story! Grrrr....
-Rev.The real story of Quicksilver (Score:5)
Another thing the virus did was overlay each person's ability to communicate. The virus had its own special versions of the basic "say", "pose", "spoof", "write", and "whisper". (It could only create these through a big in the MUCK code on Furry, I'll note.) The payoff of the command was that after midnight (ie. one New Years), all infected users would have their communications silenced and rerouted to a special log file. Actually, the messages got printed out to the user's screen so that it _looked_ like everyone could hear them, but in fact they couldn't.
This "fun" went on for a good half hour until one of the administrators figured out what was going on because of a bug in the modified page program. (Note to coders: *always* test your code before you install it in public.) Eventually they just reinstalled an older DB to clean out the virus.
Incidently, they people perpetrating this took the log file, flamed it, and then posted it to usenet. In retrospect, that was a bad idea, but you do stupid stuff when you're 15...
If you're curious about the aftermath, a lot of clueless users on Furry complained to the programmer's sysadmin. Of course, the clueless users blew everything out of proportion, not understanding what really went on. When word finally got back to the programmer, apparently he had written an "internet worm, capable of copying itself between different servers on the internet." I only wish I was that good of a coder! Apparently the FBI got involved for a short time, until they realized that the Furry server was located in Canada, so any felonous charges would have to be tried in an international court. Once the feds finally realized it was just some stupid prank with no lasting harm, the programmer never heard a thing from them again.
Anyway, the guy lost his internet access, which was through a university. He spent the 9 months of downtime (before getting another account) working on a program to let people play several variants of Poker on MUCKs. Ironally, this program is still popular on Furry to this day. Consider it one last bit of both apology and spite.
But that was a long time ago, and I was a different person then.
-Ted
Um... this is a computer virus? (Score:5)
~=Keelor