Slashdot Log In
Warcraft Movie In The Works?
Posted by
Zonk
on Tue May 09, 2006 08:32 AM
from the very-big-zug-zug dept.
from the very-big-zug-zug dept.
The New York Times is reporting that World of Warcraft maker Blizzard plans to make a big-screen adaptation of its very popular gameworld. From the article: "Many details of the film deal remained unsettled or undisclosed on Monday, including the choice of director, cast, the planned release date and the exact budget (rarely a firm number in the movie business anyway). But Blizzard and Legendary appeared united in wanting the project to be a major departure from Hollywood's undistinguished record in turning games into films. 'We try to make big, epic, immersive games at Blizzard, and we have a track record of making some of the best games in the world,'" Paul Sams, Blizzard's chief operating officer, said in an interview. 'Similarly, our goal is to make one of the best films in the world. With Legendary, they have a creative and management team that is so attuned with us it was like we were separated at birth. We want to make a movie that will not only appeal to our existing fans, but will also bring in people that have never heard of Warcraft before.'"
Related Stories
[+]
Diablo Movie Now in the Works? 101 comments
To go along with the still fairly-mysterious World of Warcraft movie, via CVG comes the word at Blizzplanet that a movie based on Blizzard's Diablo games may be in the works. "Few weeks ago, a rumor circulated the net that Gary Whitta would be working with Legendary Pictures to develop a Diablo film. The participation of Gary Whitta hasn't been confirmed, but surprise-surprise. Legendary Pictures website is listing DIABLO under the 'In Development' section. No press release has been made available. The news section has been replaced by a 'Legendary 2.0 is coming soon' notice. A week ago, the news section over at Legendary Pictures website had not been updated since Q3 2006. Stay tuned for any updates. A press release could be posted by them in a few days. Diablo is coming to the big screen!"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Blizard have been working on this for a while. (Score:5, Funny)
The animation is fantastic - far above what I thought modern PCs were capable of producing
Re:Blizard have been working on this for a while. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Blizard have been working on this for a while. (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re:Blizard have been working on this for a while. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Blizard have been working on this for a while. (Score:2)
Personally, I prefer the version with the two cute girls lypsynching it into a webcam. However, while I don't like to criticize, I think the artistic effect would have been enhanced if the "for porn" girl flashed each time.
I'm all game... (Score:4, Funny)
Why not do it themselves? (Score:4, Interesting)
Why would they go for live action if they're so talented at this?
(Though it isn't my favorite, this is their introduction to Diablo II: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=869465555
Re:Why not do it themselves? (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Why not do it themselves? (Score:2, Informative)
Final Fantasy (Score:2)
The CG was the best thing about FF:TSW, and it really wasn't as great as what we can do now. But don't say that the Final Fantasy movie failed because it was CG, it failed because as a movie it was grade B cra
Re:Why not do it themselves? (Score:2, Insightful)
Given Blizzard's track record for censorship, that is the funniest thing I've heard stated about Warcraft in weeks.
I'd take the early Bungie, easily (Score:2)
Bungie's ham-fisted. Just listen to the voice acting on, say, Warcraft II, and tell me it wasn't painful. No way can that stand up to an hour and a half at theater volumes. I could hardly stand it for thirty seconds at a time in the game, just to hear the
Re:I'd take the early Bungie, easily (Score:2)
How do you forget a company like Blizzard? Honestly, you just lost a lot of geek points.. You should turn your membership card in.
Re:Why not do it themselves? (Score:2, Insightful)
In related news... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:In related news... (Score:2, Funny)
Get ready for WoW is a rip-off of LOTR! (Score:2)
Frankly, even if the broader constructs of WoW are "Tolkeinesque," I look forward to anything that even trys to be as good as the LOTR films were.
Lowes is about to become the ultimate RP server.
Re:Get ready for WoW is a rip-off of LOTR! (Score:2, Informative)
Hobbits are, as anyone who was into "Dungeons & Dragons" back when TSR had to quietly rename theirs to "Halflings" remembers.
Re:Get ready for WoW is a rip-off of LOTR! (Score:2)
It's not just the races. When I played through WC3 I noticed names of places taken directly from Tolkien, and a lot of the plot was suspiciously similar to e.g. parts of the Silmarillion.
There's also Arthas turning into an obvious knockoff of Moorcock's Elric.
Re:Get ready for WoW is a rip-off of LOTR! (Score:4, Insightful)
Does that mean it's not good? No. It just means that art is often derivative from other art. Is the whole of Impressionism soiled by the fact that it wasn't all done by one guy?
So what if WoW is derivative? You certainly can't say they didn't do anything original, which is a hell of a lot more than you can say for any of the other multitude of copies out there.
Parent
Re:Get ready for WoW is a rip-off of LOTR! (Score:2)
I've seen it before, so it doesn't add anything to the story. There's nothing surprising about it.
I thought there were some good things about WC3, but I also thought it would have been a *lot* better if it had more originality.
Re:Get ready for WoW is a rip-off of LOTR! (Score:2)
Re:Get ready for WoW is a rip-off of LOTR! (Score:2, Informative)
Actually, if you get a chance to read "Tales Before Tolkien", you will see that a lot of the premises he used were from writings going back to the 1800's. It also seems a lot of them were from Germany.
His style was much more captivating and expansive than pretty much all of those works though, and therefore had a much broader appeal (and therefore exposure).
Voice (Score:5, Funny)
"Don't you have a kingdom to run"? -Footman
"Stop rocking the boat! you're making me seasick *puking sound*" -Elven destroyer
"Yeeessss Massssterr" - Death Knight
"I'm the smart one! No, I'M the smart one!" - Ogre mage
Movie Line (Score:2)
The WarCraft series had quite a bit of personality prior to going MMORPG, and (although I haven't had a chance to play it) I would assume they have quite a large base of backstory to draw from in the World of WarCraft game.
Sounds interesting...
MTW
Re:Movie Line (Score:2)
With games it is all about the gameplay and if that doesn't work then no matter how good the story is the game will suck.
With movies it is all about the story and without a good storey it just comes off as a string of empty special effects and lots of meaningless CGI.
Re:Movie Line (Score:2)
Ooooh (Score:4, Funny)
Then when you get into the theatre just as the action hots up random people are ejected forcefully and then forced to stand back in line outside.
Of course they want it to be big, they always do. Its not like it will be the first movie to hit the spot.
They are standing on the shoulders of such greats as Street Fighter, Tomb Raider, Pokemon and Doom..
Re:Ooooh (Score:2)
Super Mario Bros http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108255/ [imdb.com]
Alone in the dark http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0369226/ [imdb.com]
House of the Dead http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0317676/ [imdb.com]
BloodRayne http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0383222/ [imdb.com]
Mortal Kombat: Annihilation http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119707/ [imdb.com]
And many more travesties, hell thats not even all Uwe Boll's fiascos.
Only to be joined by all these on the aforementioned shoulders.
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/gaming/2006-04-26-mov ie-base [usatoday.com]
OMG Hunter item (Score:3, Funny)
My favorite part (Score:3, Funny)
director (Score:2)
My vote is for Uwe Boll.
Way better than StarCraft II (Score:2, Insightful)
Oh, please. (Score:2, Offtopic)
Blizzard, spend your money on infastructure upgrades first. This is a little more important to us, your subscribers of WoW.
Horde still suck.
Re:Oh, please. (Score:2)
Oh, the Horde does agree with you on the infrastructure upgrades though. With as much cash flow as Blizzard has, that should be their main priority. Period. Never let it be said we are in total opposition with the Alliance *heh*
Now log in, get in queue for WSG, and get ready for an ass-kicking!
Re:Oh, please. (Score:2)
Like all you people bitching about "Why are you spending time fixing balance issues, when you could be fixing the servers?" Well, because the guys who work on patches don't work on the fucking servers.
Re:Oh, please. (Score:2)
I've heard this said a lot, and I don't entirely agree with it. My primary character is a Forsaken mage. I consider the Tirisfal Glades area to be extremely atmospheric and as well populated with monsters and quests as any other area of the game that I've seen. Thunder Bluff and Mulgore are also beautiful, and the Barrens are a wonderful approximation of a savannah environment in my mind.
I will agree with anyone that Orgrimmar is probably the single least impressive city in the game, but
Intereted, but (Score:5, Funny)
Blizzard's Reputation (Score:3, Insightful)
While the gaming industry is getting more similar to the movie industry there are still differences that have been the bane of most game-based movies. I will optimistically have faith that Blizzard can navigate these pitfalls.
You only need to look at the stories and mini-movies in their games from the last five years: Diablo II chapter movie sequences are a good example. Ghost's story in Starcraft and the Undead Prince in Warcraft III are others.
I'd think they would have better luck making a Diablo movie first. I think the story is simpler, has more chances for pulling the audience in and obviously lots of opportunities for special effects and unique scenery. (Imagine a male barbarian, female paladin and male mage travel together.... oh wait, that's Conan. ;-)
Starcraft, too, would make a good movie.
The real questions that occur to me are:
-What time will they choose? (WC III, WoW, before?) Maybe there will just be lots of history explanation and flashbacks.
-What storylines will they follow? There are so many in WoW, but what is the "central" plot line?
-From which point of view will the movie be? I can guess Alliance, but it would be interesting if they did a second movie from the Horde perspective.
-Live action plus CGI special effects, or full digital animation? They'd get more general masses with live action, but they'd have the hardcore following of gamers and anime fans with full digital.
Regardless I think this will be worth seeing, and again, I trust that Blizzard will do a quality job. Let's hope the director and producer(s) they get listen to them.
plot (Score:2)
In related news... (Score:2)
Video game films obviously have a bright future.
Reverse Tie In (Score:2)
Naturally, it would be easy to have players re-enact certain quests or events that occur in the movie, but Blizzard could also introduce content within the movie and have players explore it
well... (Score:2, Insightful)
And that is why it is going to suck.
Script exerpt (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Oh please no... (Score:3, Funny)
-Rick
Re:love (Score:2)
Solo, and on the floor as soon as the night elves come on screen, sadly.
Re:Great !!! (Score:2)
*Ow* My desk doesn't support crossed legs.
Re:Nice (Score:2)
Plus, if the Warcraft movie opens against weak movies, people will see it because there's nothing else out.
Re:Age of Aquarius (Score:2)
Re:What I would give... (Score:2)
I like to moonfire bunnies and other level 1 critters. It's even funnier when they resist.
Who else hoped they could keep the orphan as a pet this year...