Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Peter Jackson Talks the Halo Movie

Posted by Zonk on Fri Sep 15, 2006 02:43 PM
from the master-chief-has-his-own-chair dept.
Via Kotaku, an interview on Ain't It Cool News with Peter Jackson talking about the in-conception Halo Movie. From the article: "QUINT: Now, there's no reason on Earth shouldn't easily and faithfully be adapted into a PG-13 movie. However, do you anticipate there being a harder cut considering how gruesome the Flood aspect of the story is? PETER JACKSON: That's interesting... It's something, I must admit, that's not a conversation I've had with anybody yet. It's a conversation that I'm sure will happen. Look, the reality of the budget is that I would imagine the studio are going to be pretty insistent on a PG-13, which, as you say, is certainly not an impossible thing pull off."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Doom on Xbox Live, Jackson Making Halo Game 206 comments
Microsoft is pulling out all the stops in its X06 Keynote today in Barcelona. The announcements are flying fast and furious: Ensemble studios is making a Halo RTS, and Peter Jackson is making a new Halo game (unrelated to Halo 3 or the RTS). The HD-DVD will be $200 in the U.S. with a release aimed at November of this year. They've got a good deal of 360 exclusive content including the next Splinter Cell and GTA IV Episodes, and (initially) Bioshock. Bioshock will also be on Windows, of course. Windows is also the platform on which Microsoft is announcing a new Massively Multiplayer game from Cryptic Studios, a new super-hero MMOG based on Marvel Comics' IP: Marvel Universe Online.
[+] Fox And Universal Say Goodbye To Halo Movie 310 comments
Master_of_Tumbleweeds writes "20th Century and Universal Pictures, the two studios that agreed to co-finance the film adaptation of Microsoft's Halo video game, have abruptly pulled out of the project. This leaves executive producers Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh without financing or distribution. A ballooning budget (rumored to have been closing in on the $200 Mil mark) and apparent lack of confidence in rookie feature film director Neill Blomkamp are being named the major culprits for Fox and Universal's decision."
[+] Halo Film Still On Track 70 comments
Eurogamer reports that, despite the decision by Fox and Universal to back out of the movie's production, the film version of Halo will move forward. From the article: "Now Microsoft has released an official statement via the Bungie website which reads: 'We are disappointed that Universal and Fox wanted to significantly renegotiate the financial points of the deal. But the Halo franchise is hugely popular and our goal remains the same - to find a partner that shares our passion and will creatively collaborate with us to best represent the story and spirit of the Halo franchise ... Peter Jackson, Fran Walsh and the rest of the creative team are dedicated to ensuring the Halo movie becomes a reality,' the statement continues.
[+] Halo Movie Postponed, Street Fighter Movie On 76 comments
FofR writes "Given the previous statements concerning the Halo Movie's stalled progress, it should come as no surprise that the movie is now officially on hold." From the article: "At this time Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh, along with their partner, Microsoft, have mutually agreed to postpone making a feature film based on the Halo video game universe until we can fulfill the promise we made to millions of Halo fans throughout the world that we would settle for no less than bringing a first class film to the big screen. We are fully supportive of Director Neill Blomkamp's vision of the film. Neill is a tremendously gifted filmmaker and his preliminary work on Halo is truly awe-inspiring. While it will undoubtedly take a little longer for Halo to reach the big screen, we are confident that the final feature film will be well worth the wait." You'll be happy to know even if a Jackson-inspired Halo isn't coming our way, at least we can look forward to another Street Fighter movie.
[+] Entertainment: Peter Jackson Will Not Be Making The Hobbit 467 comments
An anonymous reader writes "Due to legal wranglings with New Line Cinema over accounting issues for Lord Of The Rings, Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh will not be involved in the making of either The Hobbit or the planned Lord of the Rings prequel." I suppose there is still a chance that Jackson & Co. could end up involved, but at this point that looks unlikely.
[+] News: Peter Jackson Unlikely To Direct a Hobbit Film 298 comments
Petersko writes to mention a CNN article about an escalation between Peter Jackson and New Line that likely means we'll never see a Jackson-helmed "Hobbit" film. It already looked grim, but I'd say this is the nail in the coffin. From the article: "In an interview with the Sci Fi Channel news service Sci Fi Wire, [New Line co-chairman Bob] Shaye said Jackson will never make another movie for the studio and said the filmmaker just wants more money. 'I don't care about Peter Jackson anymore,' Shaye said. 'He wants to have another $100 million or $50 million, whatever he's suing us for. He doesn't want to sit down and talk about it. He thinks that we owe him something after we've paid him over a quarter of a billion dollars. ... Cheers, Peter.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by BWJones (18351) * on Friday September 15 2006, @02:44PM (#16116083) Homepage Journal
    If anyone can pull this off, it might be Peter Jackson. However, I spent a ton of time with Halo in the development of the Macintosh port (alpha, beta and QA) of Halo and I'll tell you that while it has a better storyline than most of the other games out there, it's going to be a bit of a stretch to turn it into a movie. There are some fundamental themes that played through Halo (and it's ethereal predecessor Marathon) that lend the story to development into a movie. I just hope that they hire a good set of writers to help suspend disbelief. Yo Peter, atmostphere and effects can only take you so far (Star Wars prequels). If you spend your time to do this, please do it right.

    • The first and third Halo novels were pretty good. There's enough material in those for at least one good movie, as long as its written and condensed well.

      (The novelization of the game, however, stunk to high-heaven. The only even slightly interesting thing about it is that it told bits of the story from the Covenant point-of-view.)
  • As long as Master Chief isn't played by Ben Affleck, this could be good. From the interview it sounded like they are taking their time and looking to put out a quality film. I'll be looking forward to updates.
    • Re:No Ben! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by jeffmeden (135043) on Friday September 15 2006, @02:53PM (#16116183) Homepage Journal
      I don't care who plays the MC, as long as he doesn't take his helmet off to have a intimate 'plot building' scene with Cortana. Oh god anything but that!!! If its going to be true to the game's theme, the actual on screen presence will be nothing but a stunt man in an impressive looking space suit, and they will get the original voiceover guy to do what (few) words are necessary.
      • I didn't know Cortana's last name was .jpg.
      • No way in hell will Hollywood ever spend 100s of millions on a flick where the main character never shows his face.
        • You mean like Hugo Weaving as V

          or

          Bill Nighy as Davy Jones.

          Nope. Never
            • If you think faces can't create an emotional attachment, you need to watch Red vs Blue. Ok, so it's a comedy, but... hell, play the game. Or watch the effect the Nightmare Armor suits will have on any fanboys when a Microsoft flunkie shows up in one.

              As for the aliens, I guess you could say they do, if you can call it a face. Eyes, yes. Nose, I'm not sure. Mouth, sort of a big hole. Lips, not so much.

              And you're right, it is difficult and risky. I guess that's why American Beauty, The Matrix, and V fo
      • I don't care who plays the MC, as long as he doesn't take his helmet off

        What would be so bad about it? Ok, the games didn't show is face either, but for what reason? I don't really see much importance in not showing his face.

        I can understand why we didn't get to see Hugo Weavings face in V for Vendetta or Darth Vaders face until the very end. But with Master Chief I don't really see the point, its just a random action-hero guy with guns who saves the day, not really that much different from the guy in

        • No one cares what the Doom guy looks like in Doom 3 for many reasons. It's a remake, he doesn't have a voice (so he's "you"), it's only in short cinematic sequences with pretty much no plot that you actually see his face...

          Compare that to Halo, where there's actually a point made about it. Beginning of Halo 2:
          CHIEF: I thought you said there weren't going to be any cameras.
          JOHNSON: And I thought you said you were going to wear something nice!

          Somewhat later:
          Cortana (cocking her head): You look nice!
          CHI
    • As long as he keeps his helmet on all throughout the movie, I don't care if it is Affleck. Anything'd be better better, though, than having the master chef played by toby macguire.
    • Come on, everyone knows that Master Chief is in reality none other than Spike Speigel.
    • I would vote for Ray Park... the guy is excellent moving, shooting, jumping, waving lightsabers... er, nevermind

      As long as he doesnt have to actually act, or even speak, he is great to look upon the screen, which kinda makes him perfect for the role of Master Chief
      • Well, height would be an issue. The Master Chief is supposed to be over 7' tall. Ray Park is only 5'9". Of course, if Peter Jackson could convince the world that Ian McKellen is a foot and a half taller than John Rhys-Davies, he could teach Halo's director a thing or two about forced perspective.

  • Ringworld (Score:2, Insightful)

    I'd rather see them make a film of Larry Niven's Ringworld.
    • I suspect the effect budget would be staggering, even by todays standards.

      Which is precisely why it would rock.
      • No kidding! Just imagine the kind of dough they'd have to burn just to construct the ringworld...not to mention the energy requirements to keep it gravitationally stable...everyone would have to see the movie 1e12 times just to make it economically viable!
      • Really? Why? You have movies that are 100% effects (see: anything by Pixar), movies that are live-action but where every scene has at least one effect (see: Star Wars prequels) and movies with just insane sets + effects (see: LOTR) - the budgets were certainly not tiny but they were by no means absurd. I don't see why Ringworld would be more expensive than any of those (in fact, I think it would be less expensive, since many of the challenges it would present would have been solved by the previously mention
        • Just the CGI to deptct the Fleet of Worlds in a way that does them justice would be... out of this world. Heehee.
    • With a movie such as that I could vaporize the earth! ...

      It was a natural thought.
    • Or the Integral Trees. :-)
    • Yeah, I can imagine it now: a 6 hour movie, the first 3 of which are spent just getting to Ringworld. Dear lord that was a boring book.
    • Apparently some folks are unaware of the origin of the setting for Halo. The physicist Dyson postulated the Dyson sphere. Larry Niven wrote the novel "Ringworld" set in a structure representing a variation (a slice) of a Dyson sphere. The first Halo game is set on a small version of the Ringworld.
  • by Kirin Fenrir (1001780) on Friday September 15 2006, @02:51PM (#16116160)
    It just wouldn't be Halo if half the sets didn't consist of identical, honeycomb-like corridors.
  • Master Chief Rocks (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Gallenod (84385) on Friday September 15 2006, @02:52PM (#16116162)
    The only choice for Master Chief is Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. Anyone else cool enough is too old for the role.

    (Sorry, Samuel L. Jackson.)
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward
      But Samuel L. Jackson would be superb as the Sergeant.
      • by SanityInAnarchy (655584) <ninja@slaphack.com> on Friday September 15 2006, @07:33PM (#16118053) Journal
        Oh, hell yes.

        "Men, we have led these dumb bastards far away to keep them from gettin' their filthy claws on Earth. Instead, we stumbled on something so hot for 'em, they're scrambling over each other to get it. Well, I don't care if its God's own anti-son-of-a-bitch machine or a giant hula hoop, but we won't let them have it! What we will let them have is a belly full of lead and a pool of their own blood to drown in! Am I right, Marines?"
    • by stunt_penguin (906223) on Friday September 15 2006, @03:20PM (#16116427)
      What about Chuck Norris? I've heard impressive things about him on t'internet.
    • The only choice for Master Chief is Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. Anyone else cool enough is too old for the role.

      Why not see if Steve Downes will do it? As the man who voices Master Chief in the games, I think it would be great to hear him in the movie.
      • I think it should be him for the voice, and maybe anonymous stuntmen in a suit, depending on whether he can or wants to actually play the walking role of the Chief.

        I mean, let's face it, he doesn't exactly look [bungie.org] like the Chief.
    • Sorry, Samuel L. Jackson

      maybe not MC, but he'd make one bad ass sergeant Johnson!
    • The only choice for Master Chief is Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. Anyone else cool enough is too old for the role.

      (Sorry, Samuel L. Jackson.)



      If MC never appears without his helmet then you can just have any suitably tall stunt guy or even yao ming be MC and have Keith David (deep deep voice) do the voice. Suitable authoratative and partially bad ass.
    • David Hyde Pierce is the only man for the role.

      -Eric

  • Not like we ever get to See Master Chiefs Face.
  • For A Semi-Preview (Score:4, Informative)

    by sesshomaru (173381) on Friday September 15 2006, @03:06PM (#16116299) Journal
    See "Alive in Joburg" a short, low budget film by the same director:

    http://www.spyfilms.com/sr_whatsnew/default.asp?mv =1.mov&&w=1001&h=731 [spyfilms.com]

  • RvB Cameo (Score:3, Interesting)

    by RumGunner (457733) <rumgunner@@@hotmail...com> on Friday September 15 2006, @03:31PM (#16116510) Homepage
    I really hope they will sneak in some red vs. blue references. I can't think of Halo and not think of that series.
  • The three Halo books would certainly not rank as rated R. Just because I would consider them PG13 however, doesn't mean the writing and story is not very competent and compelling. I highly recommend them - they're all really well written, and the storyline is fantastic. If you like military sci fi, you might want to check them out:

    http://www.amazon.com/Books-Flood-First-Strike-Re a ch/dp/0345473043/sr=8-3/qid=1158355563/ref=sr_1_3/ 102-4060738-4988146?ie=UTF8&s=books [amazon.com]

    For those that have already read

  • I'm far more interested in what, if anything, Peter Jackson has planed for Naomi Novik's "Temeraire" series [wikipedia.org] which he recently optioned.
    • I'm far more interested in what, if anything, Peter Jackson has planed for Naomi Novik's "Temeraire" series which he recently optioned.

      Same here. I just finished the latest book a couple of weeks ago.

      I read the first part of the interview [aintitcool.com], but it seems like Jackson is way too early in the process to have anything beyond, "This would be really cool."

  • I think the movie should draw from the book, and the events of the game should be the last 1/3 of the movie. To be honest, the events of the movie are far too little to make a whole 2 hour movie. The book, which described the events leading up to the game, was not bad though. That would format the movie more like 'Conan', with the first half of the movie the 'growing up' period of the protagonist.

    Also, The Chief wasn't so taciturn in the book.
    • Promotions don't get linked to movies because the cinemas make such HUGE profits they don't need to encourage people to come blow their money on $18 popcorn.
    • They had their feelers out for Half Life movie scripts... and they've all sucked. Which is probably a good thing, as I'd rather have no movie than a crppy half life movie. Source: