Crackdown Review

When it was first announced that Halo 3 Beta keys were being included in the retail release of an Xbox 360 game, I rolled my eyes. I assumed that whatever they were slapping that key onto was going to be a crappy bargain basement eyesore. It has been a great pleasure to learn that, maybe, they bundled the Halo 3 key with Crackdown so that more people would be exposed to the simple greatness this game contains. To be sure, the game has deep flaws; not much of a story, a few racial stereotypes, and somewhat unsatisfying boss fights mar the experience. At the core, though, this is a mindlessly fun game that does a lot of things right. If there's a sequel, and there's no reason not to think there won't be, it's good to know that Realtime Worlds has established an extremely solid base for future endeavors. Read on for my thoughts on this superjumping shooter.

• Title: Crackdown
• Developer/Publisher: Realtime Worlds, Microsoft Game Studios
• System: 360
• Genre: Sandbox-Style Action Shooter
• Score: 3/5 - This game is flawed, but will appeal to genre fans. Any gamer might enjoy renting it, but this won't ever be a classic.

The progression from weak to strong is a staple in videogaming. Leveling up in RPGs, scarfing a mushroom as Mario - they're all abstractions of improvement. The defining characteristic of Crackdown is this gain in power; more than killing gang members or taking out kingpins, the game is about developing from a fairly tough cop to an incredible supersoldier. Where with some titles you're inclined to become more powerful just because it's 'the point of the game', Crackdown makes you want it. More power isn't some minor increase in damage or a shinier sword. Over the course of the game your character moves from mighty hops to leaps that clear buildings effortlessly. Explosions go from minor pops to group-clearing blasts, and the ability to snap off a headshot in midair while falling from a 10-story building is ... pretty much always impressive.

This power progression is wrapped in a paper-thin story wrapping. You're a genetically engineered police officer cooked up to combat an overwhelming gang presence on the planet's capital city. As a part of a world-girding (kind of fascist-sounding) law enforcement organization called 'The Agency', your character is charged with the general task of 'killing all the bad guys'. As you bound and drive and run your way around the island-based city, you'll get intel on the kingpins who run the three gangs that run the town. You're given leave to take out the crime bosses and their henchmen any way you please. The only time the Agency gets cranky is when civilians get caught in the crossfire (or under an onrushing car). Individually, none of these criminals are a challenge to take out. The bosses are also fairly easy targets; all that separates them from their underlings is a bit more health. (Though you do get a well-voiced cut-scene after each.) The challenge here is that in a given fight you may be facing upwards of 15 or 20 gang members at once. If you allow them to surround you and set up a crossfire, even a super-powered agent can succumb to the stinging of gnats. This backdrop and the 'plot progression' of killing crime lords is all you'll get for a storyline. While it's disappointing, it's just barely enough to keep your attention.

Where the game fails with story, it excels with presentation. Over the course of the game you'll raise your character's skills by taking out gang members. It's immediately obvious what skills you are improving: kill a ganger with a gun, and little colored spheres with guns in them rush into your character. The game's voiceover enthusiastically calls that 'skills for kills'. Your five skills are Agility, Firearms, Explosives, Driving, and Strength. You start with zero stars, and can advance to four stars in each skill. Agility is the only skill that is raised through different means. Beautiful green glowing orbs on the tops of buildings (500 in all) tempt you to reach new heights and leap wider gaps. The collection of that sweet, sweet candy will probably be what catches your attention in the early part of the game. There's a wonderfully formed hum that alerts you to the presence of nearby orbs, and a cheery 'ping!' that sounds when you collect one. This mechanic is easily the most addictive in the game, but pretty much everything you can do is amusing in one way or another. Seeing how far you can throw things (like, say, cars in the later game), discovering the hidden orbs which improve all of your skills at once, running the rooftop and street-level races scattered across the map; giving you the chance to make your own fun is what this game excels at. The comparisons to Grand Theft Auto are understandable insofar as this is a well-made sandbox of a world, but Crackdown offers you even fewer barriers than GTA does in what you can and can't do.

And, on that note, anything you find you can't do by yourself can probably be achieved in co-op play. Online co-op mode is as flexible as any other portion of the game, allowing you and one friend to bound and race around the city in whatever fashion you desire. The whole city is open to your duo, and if you're not interested in staying together there's no reason to do so. Unlike with Gears, say, the co-op is only the icing on the cake for Crackdown; there's plenty of fun to be had on your own. It's still tremendous to play in such a wide-open environment with another voice ringing in your ears. We can only hope that GTA IV and future sandbox games take a page from Crackdown's very attractive book.

That attractiveness extends beyond the game's design to its visual style. Using a mild form of cell shading and an incredible draw distance, the city you've been charged with protecting is occasionally breathtaking. It's certainly not pushing the limits of UT-style imagery, but the game's look is still extremely appealing. The title's sound presentation is equally engaging, and especially in high places really adds to the game's sensation. Standing atop the Agency building, the highest in the gameworld, the wind rushing past you adds a real sense of vertigo to your extreme height. Beyond the sound, I especially enjoyed the city's architecture. Each portion of the city has a distinct look, and within the districts every building (it seems) has its own personality. From two-story flats to the black and neon skyscrapers, they've made your urban playground as varied as they can. They urge you to ever greater heights, and it's hard to overstate just how much fun it is to leap from a tall building into the midst of a firefight; it just never gets old.

Like a Burnout for action games, Crackdown has pared away superfluous things like 'characters', 'story' or 'originality' to get at the meat of the game mechanics on offer. For those that expect a little more from their games, be forewarned that you're not going to experience the next step in storytelling here. For a great time, though, and a heaping portion of extremely enjoyable mindless entertainment, it's hard to ignore Crackdown's charms. It doesn't hurt that, as advertised, you'll eventually get access to the Halo 3 multiplayer beta. There's talk that the beta for this retail offering may not be until May and, to be honest, this title won't keep you occupied until then. It's still a good few weeks worth of entertainment, and well worth your time for a rental or a borrow from a friend. Just don't forget to give co-op a try; racing from rooftop to rooftop with a friend is an experience not to be missed.

Correction

[gEvil (beta) (945888)]

I'd like to issue a correction for this review. The correct score should be 4/5.

Shai-gen's enigmatic Wang

[HTH NE1 (675604)]

Not a justification, just a note that X-Play [imdb.com] gave it a 5 out of 5 [g4tv.com].

Re:

[rnelsonee (98732)]

It's a Slashdot joke. It's pretty tough to find a /. review that isn't 4/5, that's all.

Re:

[Minwee (522556)]

This is Slashdot. I think you're looking for 'Normal'.

Still more questions...

[microTodd (240390)]

OK, this was a sub-par review. I still have way more questions about the game.

Can you go inside buildings? Or is everything outdoors?

What is the driving like? Are there decent car chases? Or are they a weak subgame?

Is there any depth to hand-to-hand melee fighting? Or is it just punch, but the goal is to get strong enough that punches do more damage?

Can I throw a bad guy? How far? What if I punch him really hard? Does he go flying?

*sigh* I guess I'll just rent it.

Re:

[webrunner (108849)]

Why not download the Demo off Live?

Re:

[steveo777 (183629)]

Many users lack the internet connection required for XBLive. That's why. Or, perhaps he doesn't have a HDD in his 360. There's another good reason.

Re:Still more questions...

[bmajik (96670)]

You can go into some buildings that are relevant to the plot. The average building, you can't go into.

The driving is something i haven't even bothered with. Jumping from building to building, shooting people you fly-over in mid air... what's the poitn of driving when you can do Matrix-esque leaps across the city?

The hand to hand fighting when you are actually standing right next to someone consists of elbowing them or kicking them, depending on what button you press.

however, most objects in the environment are things you can bash, pickup, and throw. You can throw "generally" or you can throw at a target. This includes things like boxes, barrels, dumpsters, cars. You can melee attack a street lamp, then it will fall over, then you can pick it up and run with it. When you see 5 guys abreast on a sidewalk that are coming at you, you can throw the lamp post at them and it take them out at once.

As you get stronger you can pickup heavier thigns (liek cars) and throw them farther.

You can also melee attack heavy objects as well. I've completely maxxed out my agility, firearms, and strength skills (i've also beaten the game). I can run up to a big truck and kick it and it rolls over. If you're fast and a gang car comes your way you can get over to it and kick it hard enough to knock it over the side of a bridge before the gang members even step out of the car.

Yes, you can pick up bad guys and throw them at other bad guys. Yes, at my level of strength, any person i punch or kick goes _flying_.

Some other enemies will pick up bodies and throw them at _you_.

When you get sufficiently strong and throw a dumpster at just one person they go splat :)

I love it. I've been playing it almost non-stop since i got it.

Re:

[Captain Splendid (673276)]

Cool, thanks for the useful info (Zonk, you paying attention?). This game actually makes me want to pick up a 360 now, instead of waiting for Halo 3.

Re:Still more questions...

[radish (98371)]

Can you go inside buildings? Or is everything outdoors?
You can go in some buildings, but very few. Most activity is outside (although many buildings have catwalks, tunnels, balconies etc to explore).

What is the driving like?
At first, very frustrating, but as your driving skill gets higher the handling and performance improves a lot. I'm currently on 3 stars for driving and it's pretty nice.

Are there decent car chases? Or are they a weak subgame?
There are fixed-course races which are essentially minigames. Not sure on what your definition of "weak" is though. In terms of chases, it's a lot like GTA. The cars are mainly used as ways of getting around, and as weapons (running bad guys down). There aren't any car-based missions like in GTA. Overall, this isn't a racing/driving game, but the cars aren't bad.

Is there any depth to hand-to-hand melee fighting? Or is it just punch, but the goal is to get strong enough that punches do more damage?
Your character will do different melee attacks (kick, punch, roundhouse, etc) but you don't really have much control over them.

Can I throw a bad guy?
Sure, you can throw anything if you're strong enough. If you're 3 or 4 star strength you can throw the car he's driving in too :)

How far?
Depends how strong you are and how high you are. If you can get a body to the top of a tall building I'm sure you can clear a couple hundred feet. The physics work pretty well.

What if I punch him really hard? Does he go flying?
Sure, and if you kick him off a bridge or building he'll fall down to the ground and stay there until you climb back down to get the weapons he dropped. Or if he ends up in water he'll float around for a while.

Re:

[HAKdragon (193605)]

1) For the most part, everything is outdoors. There are a few boss fights that are inside and you have ride an elevator or go through a tunnel

2)The driving is more or less the same as in GTA. There are some street races where you have to go through a number of checkpoints. There are also "stunt markers" where you have to jump a car through to complete it. Both of these allow you to gain driving points to increase your driving skills. My biggest problem with driving is that pedestrians don't know how to ge

Re:

[naoursla (99850)]

Just to clarify a few of the repsonses:
- You can throw anything that you can pick up.
- You cannot pick up a living bad guy.
- You cannot pick up a car that has people in it.

Being able to pick up cars is fun. You can sneak into the kingpin's complex. Pick up one of the cars, jump over the locked gate with the car you are carrying, put the car down on the street outsiede of the gate, get in and drive away.

Re:

[p0tat03 (985078)]

False, I routinely pick up cars that still have people in it. It's rather hilarious.

Re:

[naoursla (99850)]

I stand corrected.

Re:

[MBraynard (653724)]

This review isn't just sub-par, it's superfluous.

You can download the demo on XBL. It's pretty fun but lacks any depth to the AI. Very GTA though the targeting system seems to work better.

unsatisfying

[User 956 (568564)]

they bundled the Halo 3 key with Crackdown so that more people would be exposed to the simple greatness this game contains ... To be sure, the game has deep flaws; not much of a story, a few racial stereotypes, and somewhat unsatisfying boss fights marr the experience.

Yeah, basically, the boss fights are almost all the same. The driving isn't nearly on par with GTA. The "skill penalty" imposed for bad behavior is lame, and hinders enjoyment of just being out and about.

Re:

[radish (98371)]

If you don't like the driving try upgrading your driving skill before writing it off. I hated it at first, but by 2-stars it's much better. Easily on a par with GTA (not that that's saying much to be honest).

Re:unsatisfying

[User 956 (568564)]

If you don't like the driving try upgrading your driving skill before writing it off. I hated it at first, but by 2-stars it's much better.

It still sucked at 3.5 stars for me, and by that time I had finished the game, and there were no more enemies to run down to improve it.

I don't mean to just bag on the game, since they put a lot of work in creating a fantastic sandbox to play in. The only problem is, they didn't put toys that are ultimately all that fun in that sandbox.

Re:

[Itchyeyes (908311)]

I'm playing on the second difficulty. The Los Muertos bosses are still pretty easy, but the Volk and Shai Gen bosses get pretty tough. You're forced to adopt more hit and run tactics and you'll find yourself taking cover a lot. If you just rush in guns blazing, you'll get mowed down pretty quick. The key here is that the gang leaders aren't really the bosses in the game. The real boss fight is getting through the base to the gang leader.

This isn't not an awkward sentence

[spyrochaete (707033)]

If there's a sequel, and there's no reason not to think there won't be

Two wrongs don't make a write. This double negative, with a negative chaser, is painful.

Re:

[Dread Pirate Skippy (963698)]

Two wrongs don't make a write . This double negative, with a negative chaser, is painful.

Your post is grammar Naziism at its finest. I salute you sir.

And here I was...

[chris_eineke (634570)]

Like a Burnout for action games, Crackdown has pared away superfluous things like 'characters', 'story' or 'originality' to get at the meat of the game mechanics on offer.

That meat is rotten. I wouldn't even feed it to maggots. Burnout was fun -- for the first two hours. Then it became boring and repetitive. Like a good DJ, 'characters,' 'story,' or 'originality' mix in a new track when the song runs out.

the game has deep flaws; not much of a story, a few racial stereotypes, and somewhat unsatisfying boss f

Re:

[radish (98371)]

I'd give it a 5, it's one of the most addictive games I've played in years. All this goes to show is that tastes vary.

Re:And here I was...

[bmajik (96670)]

The game is really, really fun. It has none of the control/camera/this is a pointless task things that make the GTA series unfun. to be fair, it has none of the story of the GTA game either.

Tycho at Penny Arcade did a pretty good bit on it. Basically, it manages to be incredibly fun and addictive and you have to want to look for reasons to not like it.

I've played burnout and gete tired of it, because i only like simulation driving games (i.e. i don't like mario kart).

I _love_ Crackdown, because it combines a bunch of different things that i find fun
1) blowing stuff up (you have "explosion" skills and the more you power them up, the bigger your explosions are :)
2) jumping really, really, really long distances
3) platforming (seriously, collecting skill orbs in this huge 3d world is one of the most compelling 3d platformer experiences i've had. Many of the 2d classic platformers really lost something in the transition to 3d.. in crackdown trying to get the orb at the top of some amazing skyscraper is really quite fun for some reason)
4) sniping/sharpshooting

5) co-op. i've only gotten to try this a little and the networking code must have some bugginess because i get lots of drops, but basically, if making crazy jumps and blowing stuff up sounds fun by yourself, its even more fun when you and a friend make a contest out of it.. with the subtext that there is crazy gang violence going on all around you but your characters are powerful enough that you mostly don't care. the XBL 2 player co-op is a good time.

Re:

[Bacon Bits (926911)]

Probably because it was fun. You'll note that the criticisms he levels can be equally used against nearly every NES cart ever produced, and many people still find those much more enjoyable than the triple-A title shit coming from today's superstudios. Doom didn't do anything that hadn't been done before. It just looked good and was lots of fun.

Major Damage?

[davevr (29843)]

Does anyone else remember "Major Damage" from Capcom USA? For the Saturn and PS1. This sounds like a 3D version of that. Of course, I guess that "kill everything that moves and get powerups to do it better and faster" describes 95% of the games out there...

beautiful game...

[aapold (753705)]

The game has a certain quality that makes you keep playing it when you're playing it, looking for just one more orb or taking out one more boss or so on... its mindless fun and it taps into the improvement/levelling vibe in ways few games have... And for any of those who complain about its lack of social responsibility, its all okay because you're a cop. I'd love to see them come out with expansion areas for this via xbla...

Demo

[rapett0 (92674)]

Ok, I have not bought the full version yet, but I will soon. However, I thought I would comment on the demo (which basically times out 30 minutes after you make any skill reach level 2).

I had a blast. Granted, story line is moot, the boss fights are pretty much the same. When you increase the difficulty, it just makes your shield/life go down faster and enemies are stronger and come around faster.

The graphics I think are good, the style is great. It had a very E-SWAT feeling for me, which is extremely p

My Impressions

[ThinkFr33ly (902481)]

I've had the game since the day it came out, and I had been playing the demo for several weeks prior to that.

I am probably one of 6 people who bought the game for the game, and not the Halo 3 beta invite. The demo was a *blast* and was probably the most fun I've had on the 360. Yes, more than Gears of War.

The game starts off a bit slow. You're not really sure what to do. Eventually you'll realize that this open ended game play is what makes Crackdown so much damn fun. Don't feel like doing the missions or taking on the bad guys? Fine. Go have fun leaping from rooftop to rooftop, or leveling up your explosives skills to the point where a single grenade can take out a dozen cars sitting in traffic.

The whole concept of "leveling" your character through the various power ups turns out to be extremely, extremely addicting. It turns into an almost uncontrollable compulsion to get those green orbs. And the blue orbs? Forget about it. They're like heroin. Even the animation that you get when you reach the next level is addicting. You're guy does a highlander style quickening with a bit of an explosive blast wave added in for effect. Everything around you gets knocked over and thrown about 10 feet... including bad guys. I often find myself trying to time my level-ups so that I'm in a crowded area or next to a bunch of cars. Something very satisfying about having things blown away from you... quite the power trip.

Once you've defeated the baddies in Los Muertos, you'll probably wander over to Volk's territory. Previously, the game didn't really offer *that* much of a challenge on the default settings. As long as you weren't stupid and stayed in one place too long, dying wasn't all that common. That changes fast. The Volk will kick your ass. They're smarter. They have MUCH bigger guns (um... rocket launcher = pain), and they have double life meters. And don't get me started on the Shai Gen.

Are there flaws? Yes. The bosses are often too weak... although if you turn up the difficulty level a notch they can give you your money's worth. The story line is iffy. There aren't enough... um... structured missions. One of the strength's of GTA is that while it was very open and non-restrictive, it also had structure if your chose to participate. Crackdown lacks this.

There are also a few control glitches. I've found myself trying to pick up a car, but not be given the option for no real reason. It can also be frustratingly difficult to attack the correct baddie when there are lots of bodies laying around because you target all bad guys, not just the alive and kicking ones.

That said, the game is a LOT of fun. It's the first time on my 360 that I've had "Mario Thumb". (You know... the sore, red thumb caused by repeated button mashing.) And when you start playing co-op... wow. It really doesn't get much better. Honestly. Especially when you decide it's more fun to try and kill each other than complete the missions. (Supercop vs Supercop = BOOOOOOM!)

At one point I set a trap for my co-op nemesis. He was chasing me and I drove past a large group of cars stuck in traffic. In essentially one motion I leaped from my car, spun around, and fired a rocket into the group of cars just as he was passing them. The resulting explosion sent his car flying through the air uncontrollably. I then targeted his car and nailed it with 6 or 7 rockets, keeping it flipping through the air. It was like something out of a movie... and man was it fun.

This is one of those games that you really just have to play. Give it 30 minutes of you're time and all of a sudden you'll realize you've been playing it for 6 hours.

Re:

[drinkypoo (153816)]

One of the strength's of GTA is that while it was very open and non-restrictive, it also had structure if your chose to participate. Crackdown lacks this.

On the other hand, one of the weaknesses of GTA is that while it is supposedly very open and non-restrictive, you have to unlock areas and content by playing missions. Does this game suffer from the same syndrome?

One of the greatest annoyances I've found with sandbox games is that they made it a bitch to just get in and play in the sandbox!

Re:

[ThinkFr33ly (902481)]

On the other hand, one of the weaknesses of GTA is that while it is supposedly very open and non-restrictive, you have to unlock areas and content by playing missions. Does this game suffer from the same syndrome?

No. Crackdown doesn't restrict where you can go or what you can do, aside from the fact you'll probably get your ass kicked if you haven't spent some time leveling up your character.

It is also extremely difficult, although usually not impossible, to get to the rooftops of some of the higher buildings without having at least a level 2 agility.

X-Play had a better review..

[AnswerIs42 (622520)]

This game is not a "buy it game" which is why they put the Halo 3 stuff with it... to get people to buy a sub-par game.

Other than the interesting physics.. it is an average shooter game. Making stuff blow up was about the only fun they had with it. So yes, it is a "rent me" but not worth buying... unless you just gotta have Halo 3...

Re:X-Play had a better review?

[stonefry (968479)]

I just re-watched the x-play review and they didn't say anything like what you just said. They said that they though it wouldn't be any good when they found out that the halo 3 beta came with it but "wonders never cease." They loved the game and gave it a rare 5 out of 5 rating. Last 5 of 5 rating was Guitar Hero II which was about 100 reviews ago. Never did they mention renting it. The online review said "It's an absolute blast to play." They basically said the opposite of what you think they said.

I dont not need no subject that isnt not no...

[MrTester (860336)]

"and there's no reason not to think there won't be"

I love it when people use so many negatives that they get lost in their own sentance.

Much fun

[Sarusa (104047)]

Everyone I know who has this game loves it. One has even temporarily given up Burning Crusade for it. The physics and the jumping (and searching for agility orbs) really make it for me.

It's more of a two week game than a two month game, but I think you get your money worth in sheer fun and 'Ahahaha did you see THAT?'

The problem with the game. Why microsoft loves it.

[kinglink (195330)]

I've played about 10-20 hours of the game, so I gotta say I know a little about this game. I've beat it completely and I'm done.

There's a few problem that just stick out. The biggest is the game is not fun alone, and it doesn't mesh well with co-op. You never have to do anything together so why is there co-op? On the other hand the co-op is why the game excels, the game is just not that interesting solo.

The only way to play co-op is system link (over a lan) or to pay for Xbox live. So now you're paying

Re:unnerving?

[Erwos (553607)]

You can choose the race of your main character, so fears about this becoming a KKK future world simulator are probably unfounded. :)

Re:unnerving?

[Itchyeyes (908311)]

Only the first island is Hispanic. The second island is comprised of eastern Europeans and the third island is made up of English speaking Caucasians and Asians. As the other poster mentioned, you can also choose the race of your character. Current skins include Black, White, Asian, Polynesian, and even Albino characters; the default character is Black. You're really reaching if you're looking for White on Hispanic racial undertones in this game.

Re:

[pla (258480)]

but is anyone else even remotely disturbed at the subtext of this sort of game?

No, not really. Most of us can separate fantasy from reality...


perpetrated by a Caucasian protagonist (the player, natch) against your stereotypical Latino gangbangers.

...And some of us will even still call a spade "a spade", no matter how un-PC.

In a mafia-oriented game, you have Italian characters. In a terrorism-oriented game, you have Attractive and Successful Gentlemen of Middle-Eastern Descent. And in a wannab

Re:unnerving?

[Itchyeyes (908311)]

um... I'm pretty sure the default character is Black. According to the game's creators, the look of the default character, as well as many of the abilities, was inspired by the Blade movies. People who look for racism everywhere will find racism everywhere, even where it doesn't exist.

As far as stereotypes in sandbox games go, Crackdown is incredibly mild. If you're really that set on being offended by a game perhaps you should take a look at GTA: San Andreas or Saints Row.

Re:

[Kelbear (870538)]

The demo faces you against the latino gang because the game gangs scale upwards in difficulty like in almost any game. The latino gang is the starting point, and thus the best place to start the player in the demo since they would get to experience beginner level gameplay so that they can contrast it with end-game gameplay.

If the races disturb you, what about this?:

Why is it alright for a black person to kill a black person, but not for a white person to kill a black person? How about asians killing black p

Re:unnerving?

[Pollardito (781263)]

The demo faces you against the latino gang because the game gangs scale upwards in difficulty like in almost any game. The latino gang is the starting point, and thus the best place to start the player in the demo since they would get to experience beginner level gameplay so that they can contrast it with end-game gameplay.

oh great, now someone's gonna get mad that the game somehow implies that latinos are the "easy mode" gangs and other races are somehow better at it

incorrect

[User 956 (568564)]

The demo floating around on XBL features some good old-fashioned ultraviolence perpetrated by a Caucasian protagonist (the player, natch) against your stereotypical Latino gangbangers.

Have you seen the demo first-hand, or is that just something you heard from a friend of a friend? Every download of the demo I've played (and the retail game) has an african-american as the default character.

Re:incorrect

[Matias D'Ambrosio (609229)]

How do you know he's african-american? Maybe he's african-african? or camouflaged-albino? or dirty-mongoloid?

Re:incorrect

[David_Shultz (750615)]

Every download of the demo I've played (and the retail game) has an african-american as the default character.

Just say black, damnit, not "African American". All black people don't come from Africa. Also, there is nothing offensive about being called black, so I don't understand why you need to use some silly cover term. Trust me on this -no one is going to be offended by your recognition of the fact that their skin has a darker pigment than your own (yes, I can tell that you're not black).

Re:

[saboola (655522)]

When I played the demo the protagonist was an African American. Is the hero random? It might be an option to change the players race but I just kind of quick hit start a bunch till I got into the game.

Re:

[Cheapy (809643)]

On the screen where you choose whether to do it solo or coop (and choose dificulty), there's a bunch of pictures. The picture you choose is the skin of your character. The default one is the black guy.

Re:

[Cheapy (809643)]

The cover of the game has the black character on it, so he's the "main" protagonist. In fact, from the original set of characters you can choose from, there are no "normal" white guys. They are all disfigured in some way. It's only when you get the downloadable characters do you get a normal white guy.

Of course there's a sequel!

[fistfullast33l (819270)]

Can someone tell me whether there will be a sequel or not?

Are you kidding me? The game has been released for about two weeks. Of course there will be a sequel! In fact, it was started soon after the original game was pitched to publishers. It should be coming out in September, as part of Microsoft's one-three punch with Halo 3 and a price drop to annhilate the Wii, PS3, DS, PSP, Dreamcast, Genesis, and all other competition from the historty books and all eternity. Other consoles will only be a comma [washingtonpost.com] taught to game designers everywhere thanks to this game's sequel Crackdown 2: When Crystal Meth Attacks!

Sorry, went a little overboard there.

Re:

[Erwos (553607)]

The game really does deserve a sequel, though. There aren't many problems in the underlying game mechanics - the game itself just needs more content. Similar story to Dead Rising in a lot of ways - not a lot wrong, but quite a bit missing.

I've heard rumor that Crackdown will seeing some (free?) downloadable content via XBLM, so there's that, too.