Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Sony Officially Dropping 20GB PS3 in North America

Posted by Zonk on Wed Apr 11, 2007 05:14 PM
from the get-thee-behind-me dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Sony has just announced they're officially ditching the 20GB model of the PS3. 'Due to the overwhelming demand for the 60GB model from both retailers and consumers, we have ceased offering the 20GB model here in North America. In addition to the larger internal hard drive, the 60GB PlayStation 3 features added storage media slots and built-in Wi-Fi not found in the 20GB system. Based on retailer and consumer feedback, we have decided to focus our current efforts on the more popular 60GB model.'"
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • xbox elite (Score:3, Interesting)

    by k_187 (61692) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @05:16PM (#18695697) Homepage Journal
    Seems MS was right to put the new xbox at $480 then. Keeps the $100 premium for the PS3 intact.
  • Sound familiar? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Mark Gordon (14545) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @05:16PM (#18695699) Homepage
    So much for "20 GB is enough for anyone"
  • Makes sense to me (Score:4, Insightful)

    by alvinrod (889928) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @05:22PM (#18695749)
    I think that most people who would be willing to shell out $500 for a console wouldn't mind having to pony up another $100 for built-in wireless (I think that's usually about $100 to add on, at least that's what it is for the Xbox 360), an extra 40 GB of room on the HD, and some media card slots (not sure how useful these are).

    Makes me wonder when Microsoft is going to axe the $300 version of the Xbox 360, which in a way is kind of crap since it doesn't come with any way to save games on it by default without shelling out at least enough for a memory card or a special HD (since you can't plug your own in as far as I know). With the new Elite version coming out in the future, why bother having this lowend version take up shelf space?
  • But I only want a 20 gig drive, and I liked the $100 cheaper price. Oh well, I guess I'll just have to wait longer before getting a PS3.

    (yes, I actually was planning on getting one at some point. But only the 20 gig model).
    • > But I only want a 20 gig drive

      Ebay is your friend.

    • So go buy one! They're probably going to stop shipping them over here, not just ditch the ones already on the shelves.

      And yeah, like the other guy said, eBay. :P

      Me, I'm holding out til the price drops a bit - so hopefully, if they concentrate their efforts on one model, that model's price will drop simply due to the economic efficiency of dealing with one model over two.
    • But I only want a 20 gig drive, and I liked the $100 cheaper price.

      I bought my PS3 for $480 used off Craigslist. Actually it was new, still in an unopened box. I actually broke the seal on the box and took the wrappers off everything.

      AND it was the 60GB version !!

      If you want to save $100, there were a lot of people who bought PS3's early for "profiteering" reasons who never intended to play them or use them. Those people are selling them because they need money for other reasons and they're prett
  • Here is hoping (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Durrok (912509) <`calltechsucks' `at' `gmail.com'> on Wednesday April 11 2007, @05:41PM (#18695947) Homepage Journal
    Here is hoping that everyone has learned their lesson about releasing multiple versions of consoles. Just do one console at release guys. If you want to release another lower end version a few months later by all means feel free but for the most part anyone who bought the lower end versions of these consoles would have eventually bought the "higher end" version if the lower end version was never available after the first price drop. All you do is sow discontent among the people who were gullible... err.. trying to save some money.
    • While I generally agree with you, at least the low-end Xbox 360 was upgradeable to be identical to a high-end one at a fairly reasonable price. That's not true of the PS3, and I think that's the real problem Sony faces... if their low-end was upgradeable to a high-end, it probably would be much more popular.
      • Re:Here is hoping (Score:4, Interesting)

        by bluk (791364) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @08:19PM (#18697325)
        What feature from the 20GB vs. the 60GB is not upgradable that you would want? The big 3 are bigger hard drive capacity, memory card readers, and wireless. The hard drive is user swappable and standard connections (unlike the extortion-like prices that Microsoft is charging for their hard drive). Memory card readers can be attached via USB. Wireless supposedly could have been expanded too via a USB adapter.

        The Xbox 360 cannot use a HDMI connection without the Elite model. And while the Xbox 360 is upgradable, it is expensive to do so compared to standard PC parts (which the PS3 uses). That's why you can use bluetooth or USB devices on the PS3 to expand but have to pay outrageous prices for the hard drive, keyboard, etc. for the Xbox 360.

        IMO, Microsoft made a bigger mistake by not including the hard drive as a standard. Developers can count on a hard drive in the PS3 which could be used in a few different ways (expansions, caching, MMORPG content, etc.). The missing wireless and memory card readers don't affect game development like a missing hard drive would.
  • by drinkypoo (153816) <martin.espinoza@gmail.com> on Wednesday April 11 2007, @05:42PM (#18695963) Homepage Journal
    Now when we make price comparisons, we don't have to account for the $500 model any more! That makes it even easier to say that you can get an Xbox 360 and a Wii for the price of a functional PS3 system, because you don't have to qualify it. Sony haters rejoice!
    • Ah, but now you can compare it to the XBox Elite (est. $480) and the fact that to get a Wii you have to buy it second hand (starting at $379.95 on Amazon last I checked). For $859.95 you can buy a PS3 plus a game (or a laptop and a desktop machine with Linux ;)).

  • Well color me miffed (Score:3, Informative)

    by jdubois79 (227349) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @07:11PM (#18696849)
    I had a sinking feeling that this was coming...

    When I first heard about the different PS3 models, I was all for the "why would I buy a gimped version of the PS3?!?" argument. Then I started considering the prices.

    The benefits of the 60 gig are:
    +40 GB drive
    memory card slots
    Wifi

    And it costs 100 dollars more.

    I have a wifi router in my house. My entertainment system is close enough to my router (for my Xbox, et al) to connect with a cable. I connect it, BAM I have WiFi access to my PS3.

    A USB Memory card adapter is $10 at the Electronics store.

    So I'm left paying $90 for 40Gigs of storage? I'd rather shell out the extra $30, get a 500Gig drive, and plug it in myself (standard SATAII cables, doesn't void warenty).

    So, the 20 Gig was the only version I was actually looking at to buy.
    That and the fact that upgraded versions of the PS3 have a good chance of being "Software backwards compatible" like in the UK, which is to say "not backwards compatible at all"

    I can only hope that they won't get rid of the 20gig here as well.
  • by Garse Janacek (554329) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @07:25PM (#18696959)

    How am I going to conveniently categorize fanboy comments?! Seriously, did Sony ever think of that?!

    Before, pro-Sony would refer to the PS3 as $500, anti- would use $600 (and sometimes $700). How am I supposed to ignore the people I disagree with?!

    It's the same thing with Nintendo... back before they announced the price, people would say either $300 or $200 (or sometimes even $150!) depending on who they were rooting for... now... well, I guess they're still more than $300 on eBay, so this still works some of the time :-P

    Thank goodness I can still tell how people feel about Microsoft! Especially with the new model coming out...

  • I decided to look for the 20G model since I saw the HD was user replaceable. The WiFi is nice, but I have no need.

    But when I tried to buy one, none were available anywhere. I've never seen one at retail.

    So it's too bad really... I figured on using the additional $100 to upgrade the HD, making the PS3 a good media extender. But it's pretty clear the 20G model was always the model for price comparison, and I believe it became a casualty of sonhy trying to get a bit rational about distributio of the PS3.

    I t
    • I think we'll see a reduced price PS3 by the fall in the United States, but it will not have hardware emulation for PS2.

      I'm surprised. Either I missed some comments or you're the first person to point this out.

      There seems to be a lot of things pointing at a price drop. Like you said, they launched in Europe with the Emotion chip removed. It seems pretty obvious if they engineered a version without this chip and started developing software backward compatability that we're going to see that here in the states. There was also just a story about them starting volume production with a company called Foxconn.

      It is al

  • Not surprising. (Score:4, Interesting)

    by MaWeiTao (908546) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @10:28PM (#18698079)
    I've never seen the 20gb model in any store. I don't think retailers are big on giving consumers choices. Even if they carried both versions store employees would inevitably direct customers to purchase the more expensive version. I wouldn't be surprised is Sony released the lesser version simply an attempt to alleviate the shock of a $600 price tag.

    Clearly, it didn't made a difference considering whenever anyone thinks of the PS3 price tag they only think of $600. The recent announcement of the Xbox360 Elite makes it easier to justify carrying only the expensive version.

    Either way, I expect this to make no difference whatsoever. As I've mentioned, everyone already sees only one price tag for the console. What will make a difference is the library of games available and eventual price drops and those had better come sooner than later.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Although the PS3 sales are hardly strong, I honestly think the 20GB PS3 was more or less vaporware, from a practical stand-point. I swear to the Lord that I have never seen one in any store. Ever.

      I've come across mountains of 60GB PS3's, but never the lesser one. Which makes me curious about this whole "more demand for the better one" thing. How would they even gage something like that, when it's seemingly impossible to find the goddamn things in the first place?

      It's like General Electric making five to
      • I don't think there was even much of an opportunity to evaluate true demand, because there was never really a choice - you took would you could get. I think Sony just didn't want the 20GB model as an anchor weighing them down as they move into media sales...

        However, there is one small bit of anecdotal evidence that backs up what Sony is saying. Amazon had at one point a lottery to get a chance at buying a PS3 from a shipment, you could enter either a lottery for the 20GB or the 60GB model (you didn't pay
        • That (hardly) seems like a reasonable sample; people who are so desperate to buy a system that they're willing to enter a lottery for the opportunity to buy one. It is likely that the 20GB model would be far more attractive to someone who ended up playing Resistance or Motorstorm at their friends house and decided to buy a PS3; certainly (at the price) this is probably a small portion of the population but would grow as the price drops and more games come out to be the majority of the gaming population.
          • Just a point was all, as to why they might have thought that. But as I said I don't think they ever gave the market a real chance, and think they pulled that model for other reasons with that one as cover.

            I think they were not sure they could really sell as many as they wanted at $600 as $500 - once they saw they could outsell the 360 [eproductwars.com] at the $600 price point they decided to stick with that model to make things simpler for retailers and Sony. Sony (and Microsoft) do not really care about the Wii I think, s
      • Re:i wonder if... (Score:5, Interesting)

        by 7Prime (871679) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @06:06PM (#18696217) Homepage Journal
        Yeah, the 20GB model was practically a hoax, Sony released a few of them, here and there, so they could say, openly, that the PS3 started at only $500. It was all just a sales gimmick to get people to come in and buy them, and then when there weren't any 20GB models on the shelves, they'd just go "oh well" and buy the 60GB models. Pretty pathetic, if you ask me. I mean, it's Walmart's tactic (get people to come in for the cheap stuff, but then sell them the expensive stuff), but at least Walmart actually HAS the cheap stuff, Sony didn't really even ever have a 20GB, there's little evidence that very many ever existed.

        This also gives credence to the concept that the PS3 is not going to have a price drop for a VERY LONG TIME.
        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          Exactly. I've seen estimates that extra parts and labor that go into the premium PS3 versus the regular is about $35 and the assembly lines can be diverted late during production to keep a variable ratio of one to the other. It would have been useful if they were having trouble keeping PS3s on the shelves but, evidently not. In practice, the 20GB version has been MIA in retail for a while... it costs $100 more so making all 60GB versions lets Sony takes about $65 less in red ink. It's a good way to mitigate
    • Re:i wonder if... (Score:4, Insightful)

      by HappySqurriel (1010623) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @05:46PM (#18695987)
      I love how they decided to drop the 20GB model because of the "overwhelming demand for the 60GB model from both retailers and consumers" when I can walk into any retailer and buy a 60GB PS3 whereas the 20GB model has never been in any store or online.
      • Different company (Score:5, Insightful)

        by SuperKendall (25149) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @05:38PM (#18695921)
        The company with the rootkits is Sony Music, not Sony Games. If your brother robbed a bank should you go to jail too? Truly large companies are really lots of smaller companies that make their own choices.
        • by calbanese (169547) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @05:55PM (#18696097) Homepage
          There is only one Board of Directors for Sony. There is only one Chariman and CEO of Sony. They are responsible for every last employee from both the Games and Entertainment divisions. The responsibility is with them, whether or not they approved the actions or not.
          • by SuperKendall (25149) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @06:29PM (#18696425)
            Do you think the Board of Directors approved the rootkit? Or even the president? Hell no. That was up to the division. That division made a bad call, and the Board is responsible insofar as they hired the doofus that made that choice for Sony Music. But they are not directly responsible, and Sony Games being yet a step further removed is less responsible.

            Again I ask, if your brother rob a bank should you go to jail? Your father raised both of you, why shouldn't he go to jail? You talked to your brother at some point, surely you are to blame. All of these statements are as silly as what you are trying to say.
            • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

              Again I ask, if your brother rob a bank should you go to jail? Your father raised both of you, why shouldn't he go to jail? You talked to your brother at some point, surely you are to blame. All of these statements are as silly as what you are trying to say.

              There's a fundamental difference you're missing (or rather, ignoring). The Sony board are legally responsible for the actions of their employees. My father is not legally responsible for my actions.
              • Again I ask, if your brother rob a bank should you go to jail? Your father raised both of you, why shouldn't he go to jail? You talked to your brother at some point, surely you are to blame. All of these statements are as silly as what you are trying to say.

                There's a fundamental difference you're missing (or rather, ignoring). The Sony board are legally responsible for the actions of their employees. My father is not legally responsible for my actions.

                So if they pass a law making parents legally responsible for their child's actions, does that make a difference? Whether or not something is morally right or wrong, does not depend on legality. I'm not excusing Sony for the rootkit scandal, I'm just saying that legality shouldn't play a role in a moral judgement.

            • by asdfghjklqwertyuiop (649296) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @08:51PM (#18697537)

              Do you think the Board of Directors approved the rootkit? Or even the president? Hell no. That was up to the division. That division made a bad call, and the Board is responsible insofar as they hired the doofus that made that choice for Sony Music. But they are not directly responsible


              And I wonder, after the rootkit scandal broke, did the board of directors or the president use their vast power to do anything, so as to discourage their other subordinates from making equally bad decisions in the future? Nope:

              The uninstaller for the DRM had security problems of its own.

              Thomas Hesse, president of that division, who said "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?" still has his job today.

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_Sony_BMG_CD_copy _protection_scandal [wikipedia.org]

              It is their responsibility of those people to keep the company in line and fix quickly when it isn't. That's why they have so much power get paid tens of millions of dollars a year (supposedly). By continuing to delegate their power to somone who wonders why people would care that their machine had been rooted, they clearly approve of those actions.

              Again I ask, if your brother rob a bank should you go to jail? Your father raised both of you, why shouldn't he go to jail? You talked to your brother at some point, surely you are to blame.


              And I ask, are you given power to control your brother's actions? Are you his legal guardian? Is he under 18 or mentally retarded? If so, yes, you might in fact go to jail. With power comes responsibility.

            • Once I can buy stock in Sony Games or Sony Entertainment without buying stock in Sony, let me know.

              Every dollar that goes to SONY Entertainment, SONY Electronics, or SONY Games goes to improve SONY's bottom line. All the money that flows into all the subdivivions of Sony gets distributed based on what the Board decides, not necesarily on who sold the original product.

              Arbitrary distinctions which are used solely to divide responsibility for product markets does not mean that Sony Corporate should is n
              • If a son goes to jail, it's the father that pays bail. That does not make the father more culpable. It is just sad for the parent.

                Myself, I think it would be better to reward divisions that do well financially (Sony has made some good choices like Linux support and folding at home clients that I approve of). If that division grows, while we all ignore and punish the "bad" divisions, then it's more likley Sony might get rd of or change Sony Music in ways we approve of. Since killing the whole company is
          • First of all - corporations are not people. Let's dump the analogies. I believe I am intelligent enough to discuss the actual situation rather than a contrived and inappropriate analogy.

            Corperations are run by people, and your poor choice of userID indicates you are an idiot - or a troll, it matters not which one.

            Furthermore, where was your defense of their predatory lawsuits against lik-sang.com, I don't seem to see it in your post.

            That's Sony Games. Not Sony Music. Was I ever defending Sony Games from
            • "Corperations are run by people"

              But the relations between divisions within companies are quite different than the relations between siblings - which is what you were comparing them to. Parents don't often sell off their lesser children. Your analogy was flawed. I did the best I could with it.

              "and your poor choice of userID indicates you are an idiot - or a troll, it matters not which one."

              That's a really good argument. You made a personal attack against me. Nowhere did I do that to you. I attacked your

              • But the relations between divisions within companies are quite different than the relations between siblings

                Man, you REALLY do not know companies and the people that run them do you. Have you ever met a VP? Do you understand the rivaries and turf wars that go on?

                Your analogy was flawed. I did the best I could with it.

                My analogy is perfect. Your inept handling and understanding of same is not my problem.

                That's a really good argument. You made a personal attack against me.

                That is an observation, not an att
          • It may not be a law, but companies certainly do have the right to tell their resellers what they can and don't with their product. If the reseller signs a contract with Sony (or whatever company), the contract may stipulate what can and can't be done, and the reseller is legally obligated to follow that contract.
          • Also, the post you responded to says *I* have the right to say who can and cannot sell my product." - It doesn't say anything about dictating what you can and can't do with a product you've purchased.

            Again, it may not be a law, but a company can sell or refuse to sell their product to anyone they choose. A reseller can't force a company to sell them their product.
    • by SuperKendall (25149) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @05:30PM (#18695853)
      The 20GB model has:

      GigE networking

      A Hard drive that is user servicable and replaceable

      The same AV connections

      Anything else used to actually play games, lacking only a media reader for things like CF cards.

      I was going to buy the 20GB model, and put a larger HD in it. So I personally think it was the superior option as it was more configurable and it did not have wireless if you did not need it. Lots of things are coming with wireless built in now which is nice, but I was going to wire it up anyway so as not to have the possibility of interference.

      I can kind of see why they did it but I'm annoyed they are removing that option.
    • So that makes it a collector's item, right?

      EBAY!

      Finally, PS3 owners will get the $1000+ auctions they were dreaming of!
    • by SuperKendall (25149) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @05:35PM (#18695897)
      if they're dropping it due to poor demand, they should drop the 60GB model too:P

      Wouldn't that mean asking Microsoft to drop the 360 as well? The PS3 has been outselling [eproductwars.com] the 360 every day since Amazon finally had them in stock a few weeks ago (scroll down to "Sales rank of the primary Systems").

      And yes, the Wii is still trouncing them both.
      • Errr... I don't think taking a single store's sales is enough to declare a trend. Heck, the Wii and the 360 are not available right now at a store near where I live and there are PS3's lying around. <sarcasm> Oh my god, Microsoft still can't meet demand...</sarcasm>
      • Wouldn't that mean asking Microsoft to drop the 360 as well? The PS3 has been outselling the 360 every day since Amazon finally had them in stock a few weeks ago (scroll down to "Sales rank of the primary Systems").

        Good lord, you should apply for marketing at Sony or something. On that page, every other statistic shows that either the Wii or the 360 is selling far better than the PS3. And even in your particular example, it's only based off the last 2 weeks of data, and in only one store (Amazon), and the d

        • Look again (Score:4, Informative)

          by SuperKendall (25149) on Wednesday April 11 2007, @09:01PM (#18697597)
          Good lord, you should apply for marketing at Sony or something. On that page, every other statistic shows that either the Wii or the 360 is selling far better than the PS3.

          No, other entries say things like "There are more items for sale for the 360" Well, yes - that's pretty obvious - it's been out longer. And as the 360 has been out longer with more games the games they do have are also outselling most PS3 games. That seems pretty obvious as well. What is not obvious, and what is interesting, is that the PS3 every time it was availaible at Amazon, has outsold the 360. It just happens that that has only held true (Amazon havng stock) for any length of time starting around the end of March.

          And even in your particular example, it's only based off the last 2 weeks of data, and in only one store (Amazon), and the difference between the "sales rank" is small (360 is 20, and the PS3 is 16). It's not that clear what "sales rank" even means.

          You need to understand "the rest of the story". See all those times the graph is low? On every one of those days, the PS3 was not in stock and sales were from third parties charging $100 more for the console. That's every day since the start of the year.

          As for what "sales rank" means, you cannot of course derive absolute numbers from sales rank. But what you can say is hat something with a sales rank of x+1 sold more units than something else with a sales rank of x. It might be only one more unit, or it might be 10k. But it is more. And ever since Amazon has had the PS3 in stock, it has outsold the 360.

          The February NPD numbers show a much different story. Granted, the NPD values aren't complete either, but much more so than merely combing just Amazon. In any case, the March NPD numbers will be along shortly, so we'll see if your theory holds up.

          The Feburary NPD numbers agree with the graph. The March NPD numbers will also agree with the graph, and should show the 360 with a lead (note the rise in the graph only started around the 23rd or so of March). It's the April numbers that will be interesting and will or will not bear out the point I am making.

          Of course when the Elite comes out, that will probably push the 360 in front of the PS3 for a while again I imagine.

          Let me be clear, I am making no judgements against or for any console with these numbers (I own none of them). I am just saying what the charts and obvservation of all three since the start of the year has shown.
          • You need to understand "the rest of the story". See all those times the graph is low? On every one of those days, the PS3 was not in stock and sales were from third parties charging $100 more for the console. That's every day since the start of the year.

            Here's the problem. How do you know that's truly "the rest of the story"? Could there be a similar problem with 360 sales now? Or perhaps the PS3 sales are artificially inflated for some other reason? We don't know because we don't work at Amazon.

            Of course w

            • Here's the problem. How do you know that's truly "the rest of the story"? Could there be a similar problem with 360 sales now? Or perhaps the PS3 sales are artificially inflated for some other reason? We don't know because we don't work at Amazon.

              I know because I have been monitoring this almost daily for months. You can look at the 360 and the PS3 and see if they are in stock, or not. Why? I have no idea, it amuses me to see which way the trends turn.

              Of course we could play the "what if" game all day. T