Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

The $500 Gaming PC Upgrade

Posted by CmdrTaco on Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:39 AM
from the more-fps-equals-more-frags dept.
sand writes "Building a powerful PC for gaming doesn't have to be expensive. In this article, FiringSquad spends $500 on a gaming upgrade, and compares its performance to that of a high-end Core 2 Extreme PC. The Core 2 Extreme rig is faster, but you may be surprised by how well the $500 PC is able to hang with it in Crysis, Call of Duty 4, and Unreal Tournament 3."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Duh (Score:5, Insightful)

    by BrianRoach (614397) on Monday November 05 2007, @10:51AM (#21241755)

    Newsflash: If you buy the last generation of hardware, and not the top-of-the-line video card, you'll save money!

    I've been keeping my PC about one or two cycles behind the bleeding edge for this reason, and it plays games just fine ... you just can't crank ALL the settings in some of the newer games.

    - Roach
    • It's simply about buying mainstream stuff, instead of ultra-high-end stuff. Those high-end buyers PAY for the technology to be developed for all the mainstream users. But, games aren't made for a few people with high-end cards; they're made to play pretty damn well on what most people who bought any decent card/machine recently will have.

      For 99.9% of people, buying very high-end stuff is a lot like buying a ferrari. Sure, it looks nice, but what practical use are you going to find for it?
      • You know, I'd say the mid-to-low-end market is probably where the money is actually at, the high-end is there for advertising and image-building purposes. Well that, and a side-effect of R&D. But I don't buy for a moment the claim that the high-end user is the primary market of PC component manufacturers, and the reason they keep developing new tech.
      • Oh, I completely agree. I was just pointing out the non-newsworthiness of the article.

        I have to say though ... I've owned sportscars, and sportbikes.
        Practical? No, not really.
        Fun, on the other hand? Absolutely.

        A high-end gaming rig falls into that category ... I just don't have the interest anymore. Mid 90s? I HAD to have the latest and greatest.

        - Roach
    • Re:Duh (Score:5, Informative)

      by Corwn of Amber (802933) <corwinofamberNO@SPAMskynet.be> on Monday November 05 2007, @11:13AM (#21242009) Journal
      The best hardware for the price is always, always 'top-of-the-line minus ONE'.

      As in, only desperately lobotomized morons would buy an Intel Extreme for $1000, when there are Intel Quads with as much cache and the same FSB for one fourth that, and frequency means zilch when the price difference allows you to buy liquid cooling. Now how's that 4x 4,8 GHz with 2x 4Mbyte cache sound?

      As for GPUs, well, just buy the last-gen Ultra. An ATI X1950Pro 256M is now $200, anything really more powerful is at least $500. And it will run any recent game at decent speed.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        As for GPUs, well, just buy the last-gen Ultra. An ATI X1950Pro 256M is now $200, anything really more powerful is at least $500.
        Wrong. A GeForce 8800GT completely obliterates anything from ATI or any non-8800-based card from nVidia, and costs $260, not to mention consumes a lot less power. Now, getting a hold of it is another matter since they're selling like hotcakes...
            • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

              what the article was saying is the 8800GT appeared for $240. The cheap end of the X1950Pro is about $160 (I did a lot of price-digging to find that), so there is a $80 difference, but the price on those cards is pretty wild, and most I've seen are right around the $200 range (but one was $330).

              OpenGL features have four phases, but sometimes skip some of them. The first is vendor specific - e.g. NV, ATI, Apple, SGI, etc. These are written specifically for a type of hardware and are not agreed upon by anyo
      • Heck I am running Current -3 and still kicking ass. I have an athlon 2200XP running at 2.6GHz a Gig of Ram, and a NVIDIA 6800 512 that I bought a while ago. I recently retired the PC to a server but up to that point it played every game I owned, eg Wow, BF2042, and a series of other FPS's that I love without a hitch. Not to mention I did video rendering with pinnnacle studio and AutoGK (now that took a while but worked fine).

        I may upgrade in the next couple years, but I am a mobile user now, unfortunat

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        Amen. Can you believe that someone would go to Dell's website and pay an extra $200 for an Intel Core2 Duo Processor E6700 (4MB L2 Cache,2.66GHz,1066 FSB) instead of an E6600 (4MB L2 Cache,2.4GHz,1066 FSB)?

        Friggin' amazing!
    • Hell, my PC is more than one or two cycles behind the "leading edge", I think.... but I haven't been playing anything at less than max settings (with good frame rate).

      Athlon64 3500+, Geforce 7900GT, and 2gb of PC3200 ram. I suppose my processor is creating a bottleneck, but I've not been tempted to upgrade it. Everything runs fine-- Just finished Prey, which was running at a wonderful framerate with all settings maxed out-- did the same thing to C&C3 a month ago, and F.E.A.R. before that. Am I just luc

    • Re:Duh (Score:5, Insightful)

      by sm62704 (957197) on Monday November 05 2007, @11:37AM (#21242397) Journal
      The people designing these games are losing money (maybe in this case "loosing money" would be appropriate) for what? I just don't get it. The elitist attitude is what got me to stop playing PC games in the first place.

      In 1990 when I first started playing games on a PC, a computer like the one in my living room now took a dedicated building and was called a "supercomputer", yet I can't play a new game on it. And the new game cost sixty bucks.

      Now, I used to be into gaming; some of you may remember the old Quake site th Springfield Fragfest. But here's where the absolutel stupidity of the game designers comes in: they design for the next generation of machines. This gains teh hardware manufacturers dosh, at the expense of game designers who can't even sell me a game any more, let alone Joe Normalguy.

      A game called Screamer 2 is an excellent example of why their designing for the next generation is stupid. When it came out (1997 IIRC), there wasn't a single PC in existance that could run it at its highest resolution. Today it would be a piece of cake - except that it is written for DOS and my Audigy isn't supported. No sound.

      I still get Road Rash (1995) out once in a while. A fun game is fun. Developers, by designing for the next generation of equipment, are shutting out this generation of equipment, as well as most of their possible audience. Design for this generation of equipment and sell the games for $15 instead of $60 and you'll sell a hundred times as many.

      -mcgrew [kuro5hin.org]
      • Re:Duh (Score:5, Informative)

        by ameoba (173803) on Monday November 05 2007, @12:27PM (#21243171) Homepage
        Most of time when you see a game that can't be played on maximum settings with current hardware there's a good reason for it.

        In many cases, such as Quake 3 and, more recently, Crysis, it's because the game engine is designed as a licensable asset that will be reused by other game studios for a number of years & they want it to remain relevant. Game engines are expensive to produce so once you've written a good one, there's few reasons not to license it out. If you plan on licensing the system & you want it to be relevant in 2-3 years, you not only need to be able to support todays top-of-the-line hardware but also be able to produce respectable results in two years when derivative titles are being released.

        The other case is when you anticipate games to be played for long periods of time. A great example of this is Everquest 2 - SOE knew that they could expect the game to be actively played for 5 years or more. Given an anticipated lifespan like this you face 2 options - produce an engine with room to grow or plan on rewriting the engine so that 3 years in you can continue to meet player expectations.
  • by Seakip18 (1106315) on Monday November 05 2007, @10:51AM (#21241763) Journal
    I think they wanted to call this a cheap build, but saw that it equated to another normal build. So they removed things like an optical drive, hard drive, case, power supply, speakers, and a monitor to "reduce the price" and make this an "insanely cheap upgrade!"

    Honestly, I'm sure half the nerds on this site could build an entire SYSTEM that'd put this upgrade to shame at that price.
    • Being an upgrade and all, they assumed you already had things like a case, hard drive, monitor, etc...
    • Honestly, I'm sure half the nerds on this site could build an entire SYSTEM that'd put this upgrade to shame at that price.
      Ok, go for it. Spec out an entire gaming system for $485 that will easily beat the benchmarks posted on the last few pages of the article. Seriously, I haven't upgraded my gaming rig in three years and this would prove extremely useful.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Omitting details like drives and case is cheating quite a bit.

      What about the types who are still running a system with IDE drives? Or their old case has dead fans? The cost starts escalating fast. If they built an all-new system for $500 that could play Crysis, maybe then I would be impressed.
      • by Liquidrage (640463) on Monday November 05 2007, @11:17AM (#21242077)
        IDE drives aren't really an issue. For the MB in the article, sure. But that's not the spirit of the article I'd say.

        I recently went through having to upgrade, and I have 4 IDE drives I wanted to keep. I found most new AMD based boards only had one IDE channel. Meaning, I get to keep my DVD drive and one HD.
        Most intel based boards had more. Usually 2 to 3. Not sure if this is because of the reference designs for the chipsets or not. But a lot of searching led to that conclusion.

        The ASUS I just grabbed had 3 IDE channels. And 6 SATA connectors.


        I got a thread on here detailing what I picked up for $450 shipped last week. It's inline with what they're showing in the article. Nice full-size ATX towers can be found for $75 and less, with a power supply. Add a single 500 gig IDE drive, $100. That's how much I paid for one a few months ago at CompUSA even. DVD R/W Drive, $30. 17" flat screen LCD, $100. Find a decent one onsalse at CompUSA or BestBuy. Heck, I walked into a 21" View Sonic on sale a few months back and grabbed it for $250. Mouse and keyboard, wireless optical 2, $40.

        So you're looking around $800 for a comparable system, but including everything built from scratch. Of course, you still need an OS, and since you're talking games, you're going to be paying for that too. So you're looking at a grand total IMO.

        But it would be a rather nice system.
          • Are you always that stupid?

            There are certain pieces you can pick up from large brick and mortal retailers that they have cheap.

            They do heave leaders you know, and if you're not prone to dropping $500 on worthless crap you don't need then there's no reason to be afriad of them.
            Yes, you can usually find stuff online that matches the price of what they are using to get people into the store. But then you need to wait a few days to get it, you're most likely paying shipping, etc.

            For example, the video
      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        Fans aren't very expensive unless you have an oddball case. And even if you aren't upgrading, you'll have to keep up with replacing the fans if you don't want your rig to burn up. The IDE drives can be more of an issue, however most motherboards still support 1 IDE connection (=2 devices). Unless you want more than 1 hard drive and 1 CD/DVD that's enough - and if you do want more, there are still a number of options; a few motherboards still support 2 IDE connectors, and even if the one you choose doesn
      • An upgrade is just that. I don't think it's cheating to keep as many of the existing parts that makes sense to reuse, especially given the budget. Being able to reuse existing parts is supposedly one of the advantages of assembling your own computer. If it's buying all new parts, then it's cheating to call it an "upgrade" because upgrade usually suggests that you replace or add parts to make an existing system better, not pull out the old power cord and put it into a new computer.

        Fans aren't that expensi
    • Not to mention OS...wouldn't windows activation have a fit if you replaced that much of your computer? And yes, if you are gaming Windows is pretty much required(which is why I own a wii that I hook up to my mac :P)
      • That is a no, you wouldn't have a problem. Worst case you have to reactivate. If you've done more than the 10 installs that Microsoft let's you activate over the web then you have to call to activate. In any case, still not a problem as they will still let you activate it.

    • Not quite an entire rig, but I had a power supply fail* last week on my trusty old dual athlon box, so I just ordered parts pretty similar to this scenario (with the primary focus of everything working in Linux)

      NVidia 7600GT with 256MB: $99.99
      Asus M2N-E motherboard (4 PCIE slots, 3 PCI slots for my existing cards): $96.99
      AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane/65 watt version): $84.99
      1 GB Corsair RAM: $44
      Seagate 250GB SATA drive 16MB cache: $69.99
      Lite-On SATA DVD burner: $36.99
      Thermaltake 430 watt PS: $39.99

      Total: $472.94 not counting the $40 in mail-in rebates

      That's basically everything but a case and peripherals... and my focus was getting the best bang for my buck (while being able to retain things like my PCI SCSI controllers), not trying to keep under a certain amount.

      * My computer started randomly rebooting and the other night, I smelled that wonderful joy of electric melting plastic. Turns out all the 5 volt lines connecting the power supply to the motherboard melted their connectors. I cleaned the melted plastic out the matching pins on the motherboard side, connected it to my backup power supply and things have been running fine since... though I wasn't sure if it was going to work at all when I ordered my new parts last week. /eagerly awaiting the last delivery from UPS today so I can put my first new computer together in 5 years.
    • And the 500 $ does not include any microsoft taxes for directx9.0 or 10.0 , also named windows Xp or vista.

      Since even the nerds from firingsquad are able to do their benchmark on the 30 days evaluation version.

  • The summary (and even the article) is a bit confusing. They're spending $500 on 4 components:
    CPU
    GPU
    Motherboard
    RAM

    It is assumed you already have the other components (PSU, case, HDD, etc)

    Dan East
  • Unimpressive (Score:4, Informative)

    by Kenoli (934612) on Monday November 05 2007, @10:56AM (#21241807)
    I recently upgraded my machine for playing games. I spent about $450 and built something *significantly* better than what is shown in this article. How? By buying cheap/discount/used hardware off eBay. It's really just that simple. I could have easily spent several hundred more dollars on the same stuff by buying from an actual store.
    • How? By buying cheap/discount/used hardware off eBay.


      You left out "/stolen" ;)
    • Sure, but that's not news. You can save a lot of money by buying goods with no proven legitimate source of supply, and could have come from anywhere, under any means. Not that I'm condemning you for it, but just food for thought. A *huge* amount of goods on eBay are stolen (or worse, robbed).

      If you're talking about >40% off store prices, your goods are almost certainly stolen, since that is below even wholesale cost.

  • by Cragen (697038) on Monday November 05 2007, @10:57AM (#21241817)
    The recommended GPU is not currently available. I wonder if it will be available in time for XMas for (^h^h^hfrom) St. Nick?

    From TFA:

    "The GPU of choice in our upgrade article is without a doubt the recently announced GeForce 8800 GT from NVIDIA. ... ... ... Most of the online retailers sold out of their inventory of GeForce 8800 GT cards within hours of the GPU's release, but hopefully they'll be restocked shortly. EVGA is a great brand, offering goodies like a lifetime warranty and their Step Up trade-in program. We've reviewed their cards in the past quite extensively and always liked them.

    Keep in mind that NVIDIA is producing all of the early GeForce 8800 GT cards for their board partners like EVGA anyway, so regardless of the brand of card you choose they're all coming off the same production line. This includes the factory overclocked cards.

    Alternatives: Until AMD ships their upcoming RV670 chip, the Radeon HD 3800, there really is no viable alternative to the GeForce 8800 GT that we'd recommend. If you want to save a little money the Radeon X1950 Pro would be an excellent alternative though."

  • I had a fairly high end, new rig (4GB of RAM, Vista Home Premium, Quad Core processor) and I was not satisfied with Crysis at all using a 8800GTS (384MB). At 1600x1050 (default resolution) it was just able to run with Medium - Low settings with some stuttering. I dropped in an 8800GTX Ultra instead (probably the only time in my life I'll ever be able to get away with buying a near top of the line card), and now I can run at High possibly even sneaking some things to Very High.

    Once the article actually loa
  • by Liquidrage (640463) on Monday November 05 2007, @11:08AM (#21241935)
    FTFA: "There's a silly misconception out there that you need to spend $1,500 or more to own a decent gaming rig. This is just nonsense"

    Sure, I know people that always buy top of the line right when it comes out. They actually care if they're able to get 71 fps in a certain game vs 68 fps. Not because they play it, but because it means something to them to have a high number.
    But that's the exception, not the norm. People building their own systems like was done in the article aren't that retarded.

    I was just forced into upgrading due to a motherboard that went bad on an old Athlon XP 2400 system.
    A few hours of looking and a e4600 Core 2 Duo, 2 gigs of DDR2 667, decent Asus MB, and a 512 meg Nvidia 8600GT...
    $450 shipped. That included seating the processor and having them do the bios upgrade before shipping for $9. This from a reputable online service that many people have used for years. Even if I had to add a case, monitor, hardrive, dvd drive, key board and mouse, you're still looking at under $750 without a problem. And that would certainly qualify as decent.

    Now, I got no doubt they spent a ton of time finding just the right stuff to eeck out all that little bit of tweaking.

    But overall, no one thinks when building a system yourself you need to spend anywhere near that for a decent gaming system. For top of the line to have bragging rights over a meaningless fps score, sure. But not for something that'll play everything new just fine and be fine for years.
  • It seems like console games and computer games have little if any distinction besides input method (controller vs keyboard/mouse). With USB coming standard on the next gen systems, why not "upgrade" your console with a keyboard/mouse? It wouldn't take much from game devs to allow this control scheme, especially for games that are going to see a PC port anyway. The whole PC gaming thing never made much sense to me. You can spend $500 on a console that performs as well as a computer at 3 times the cost.
    • It seems like console games and computer games have little if any distinction besides input method (controller vs keyboard/mouse).

      Some PC games just arent available on consoles. In depth simulation or strategy games, more hardcore RPGs such as Witcher or NWN2:MOTB, adventure games such as Sam and Max...

  • by pbhj (607776) on Monday November 05 2007, @11:41AM (#21242479) Homepage Journal
    Well the best price for that card in the UK (could only find one vendor with the EVGA one) is £172. That's about $350.

    Rough figures:

    Athton 64 X2 4000 = £42
    Gigabyte GA-MA69GM-S2H = £45
    2x 1GB PC2-6400 = £80 (kingston, or £60 for cheaper brand)

    GPU + CPU + Mobo + RAM = £339 (about $700)

    --
    http://bridgehosting.net/cheap-gaming-rig [bridgehosting.net] ?
  • GPU bound (Score:3, Informative)

    by Buzz_Litebeer (539463) on Monday November 05 2007, @11:44AM (#21242523) Journal
    These games seem to be heavily GPU bound.

    What about a game like Supreme Commander? Which can bring a quad core processor to its knees.
  • The Significance (Score:3, Interesting)

    by keithjr (1091829) on Monday November 05 2007, @01:36PM (#21244209)
    Most people don't seem to see why this number is so special: it's about the cost of an X-Box 360 with all the bells and whistles. Sure, they left out a case, monitor, speakers, and input. But compound to the cost of an X-Box 360 the fact that you have to buy controllers, an HD-TV, and a Live account. The point that should be taken home is that if you put your brain to work, you can build a system that's cheaper, more powerful, and plays better games than the consoles out there right now. This is the first time this has really happened: consoles from a generation or two ago were always rather cheap.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      When many gamers spend $500 for just a gaming GPU, yes $500 for a full gaming upgrade is cheap - if it lives up to the hype.
      • This basically comes down to a GeForce 8800 GTX vs. GeForce 8800 GT. The problem is the 8800 was a high end part a year ago and the GT just came out.

        So if you want to build/upgrade to a cheep gaming system pick up an 8800GT if not wait till the next high end chip hit's the market or buy 2 8800GT's.
    • Inexpensive is generally a relative term. Of course, if one plays CS only, then he or she could probably find a local college or uni throwing out equipment capable of playing it.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Yes but they go to insane levels.

        Unreal tournament 3 plays just fine at sane levels on a Throwaway P4-3.0ghz with a Geforce 7900GS video card, yes the incredibly slow AGP interface as well. I've been playing it on what amounts to a $250.00 computer all week.)

        now if I turn on all the goodies I can make it slower on some of the more expansive and detailed arenas.. but some of the simpler short distance line of sight it still plays decently until you have 4-5 bots in the room all firing rockets like madmen..
    • by ByOhTek (1181381) on Monday November 05 2007, @10:51AM (#21241759) Journal
      For a good performing gaming PC, as many have stated, that's downright cheap.

      A bigger complaint would be:

      They chose the AMD690 motherboard chipset. The big reason? The one they went on and on about? Dual digital [video] outputs (DVI + HDMI). They also had a discreet video card. Call me nuts, but if you use the DVI/HDMI output on the motherboard, you aren't going to be getting the goodness from that $250 graphics card you just picked up, are you (barring two monitors I guess).

      Seriously, they could have saved some $$, or gotten a board with a better set of features, excluding it's graphical output.
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        First, you really can't buy a board for much less than the $80 and expect it to work well. They all come with tons of features these days - you just have to decide which you want. Going cheaper nowadays doesn't mean same quality with less features - it means similar features with lower quality.

        Second, there's some very good reasons for going with a board that includes onboard video. It gives you the potential to run more than two monitors (which is, I admit, very unlikely) but more important, if/when your m
    • The parent poster has a troll name and a flamebait attitude, but the comment was insightful. Five hundred buicks IS a lot of money! Hell, that's more than my car payment, or any other of my bills except my mortgage, and the mortgage is only another sixty bucks over this needless expenditure.

      I doubt if it would cost five hundred bucks to replace every part in my computer. Now I remember why I quit gaming - DOOM 3.

      Fucking elitists. Mod me down, "-1, he's not a rich boy".

      -mcgrew [kuro5hin.org]
      • Now I remember why I quit gaming - DOOM 3.
        Fucking elitists. Mod me down, "-1, he's not a rich boy".


        Alternatively, you could have tried playing games that concentrate on stuff other rather than the shiniest graphics?
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Some people play games, some people drink and smoke. To each their own fun. If you amortize the cost of the 500 dollars over the life of the usefulness of it, you would probably find that it was about the same amount of money other people spent on their hobbies.
          • See, that's where they're making their mistake. Not gamers, but developers. The developers are only selling to hobbyists, when they could be selling to people just looking for a little recreation.

            I never got into the MMOLPs because I was afreaid of being sucked into the addiction. Instead of selling crack, game developers should be selling twinkies.

            With crack in them. They're shooing away many people they could get hooked.

            -mcgrew