Slashdot Log In
Darling Brothers, UK Indie Game Devs, Upgraded to CBE
Posted by
timothy
on Sun Jun 15, 2008 04:02 AM
from the which-brother-submitted-this dept.
from the which-brother-submitted-this dept.
scriptedfun writes "The BBC reports that David and Richard Darling, the brother tandem who founded Codemasters back in the mid-'80s from their bedroom, were recently made Commanders of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) for their 'services to the computer games industry.' Their story is definitely inspiring for modern-day independent game developers." Naming such honorees annually is one of the perks of being Queen.
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
The Queen and Video Games (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It seems the industry is getting worse in recent years, but its not uniform. There are some companies where the staff seem to be well paid and have fun, bu
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Some of the guys I've known back then (and also some years later) have made a living on games programming; but they founded their own games companies.
Re: (Score:2)
Is that anything like a Level 70 Elite Tauren Chieftain?
Do you get any special powers when you become a Commander of the Order of the British Empire? Like, for example, can you force all the non-CBEs to avert their eyes?
I mean, if no special powers come with being a Commander of the Order of the British Empire, then what good is it? Do you get like a t-shirt with that? A t-shirt would be pretty cool, especially if you could make the commoners avert their ey
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Sadly that does mean instead of Commander of the British Empire, one would be
Facilitator of the move towards general consensus on climate change.
or
Chairperson of goodwill towards all nations.
Codemasters (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Awards for video games? (Score:4, Funny)
(To the first one)
"Please accept this MBE for fragging 50 players in under a minute without taking damage"
"Thank you, Ma'am"
(To the second one)
"Please accept this MBE for pulling off a 53 hit combo in Street Fighter IV"
"Thank you, Ma'am"
(To the third one)
"Please accept this MBE for obtaining 100% completion in GTA V"
"Thank you, Ma'am"
etc.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
elite (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Not the Queen... (Score:5, Informative)
Cell Broadband Engine (Score:2)
Re:D: (Score:5, Informative)
Cheers,
Ian
Parent
OMG someone is wrong on teh internets! (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Mastertronic got there first, Darling! (Score:4, Informative)
According to WP (uncited), Codemasters were formed in 1985, and Mastertronic in 1983; but I certainly know that Mastertronic were releasing games in 1984. (In fact, having scanned the WP article for this comment, I find that apparently (uncited, again) the Darling brothers supplied many of the early Mastertronic games before going on to form Codemasters).
(*) Interestingly, I've seen no evidence that an equivalent segment existed in the US. Although the 8-bit market there was (AFAIK) mainly disc-based by that time, and Mastertronic did release some of their stuff over there on disc, you never hear Americans discussing it, which implies that it didn't really have the same success or cultural importance it did here- I mean, anyone who grew up in the UK during the 1980s had some Mastertronic/Codemasters/Firebird/etc games. Anyway, this might be because this was around the same time that the NES started doing really well in the US (**)- cartridge-based consoles being pretty unsuited to Mastertronic's business model- but I assume that the C64 market was still in reasonably good shape then.
(**) This contrasts with the UK, where (although the NES sold moderately (***)), the games market remained overwhelmingly computer-based until the early 1990s, when the Mega Drive (Genesis) and SNES started doing really well.
(***) Actually, the NES wasn't even dominant in its 8-bit console niche- it was outsold by the Sega Master System here, strange though that might seem (****) to the Americans or Japanese.
(****) How many levels of nested footnotes are too much?
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I admit I've never been huge on names, but I don't remember many of the rest of the folks knowing the names of the developers very well.
The names that got remembered, at least in the C64 scene, were the musicians.
Re:D: (Score:5, Informative)
The Dizzy Series
Colin McRae series
Micro Machines
Operation Flashpoint
Overlord
The TOCA series
It's a good back-catalogue, though I was always more a fan of Bullfrog before EA ate them.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I had no idea there's an alternate universe of games over in the UK.
It's a shame they didn't make it over here, because "Super Skidmarks" sounds like my kind of thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:D: (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Spectrum users probably know more games from them.
whoops! (Score:3, Funny)
I can feel the urge to re-awaken the old 'spectrum vs Commodore 64' argument rising.
Must....resist...
Re:whoops! (Score:5, Interesting)
From where I am C64 did not exist, it was more like MSX vs Spectrum vs Apple II.
The problem with Spectrum-to-MSX ports (and Codemasters are not alone) it's that developers simply added a Spectrum hardware emulator layer (both machines used Z80 processors) and, presto, port done.
Often the game was slower than the original version.
There are games which list 'joystick' as 'kempston' in the MSX version. C'mon!
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
From where I am C64 did not exist, it was more like MSX vs Spectrum vs Apple II.
I assume that you're not from the UK (where Codemasters are from) then; in terms of user base and (consequentially) software that supported the machine, MSX was (at best) a very minor player here. Since Codemasters were originally selling in the UK market, that'd be why they didn't do many MSX games.
Here it was ZX Spectrum (first) vs. C64 (clear second, but still successful) vs. Amstrad CPC (some way behind, but still usually a chosen "third format" for mainstream games).
Owners of other formats, e.g. A
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Speccy was okay once Sugar got his claws into it and marketed the bastard properly though.
Re: (Score:2)
American kids had Sega vs. Nintendo arguments.
Which Darling brothers? (Score:2)
Re:seeking approval (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Apart from whining about it on Slashdot, you mean?
What an, erm, clever humour pattern.
...
[Slashdot poster #1] "What could be possibly be more pathetic than _____?"
[Slashdot poster #2] "Apart from whining about it on Slashdot, you mean?"
Where _____ could be any of:
(i) Apathy to gradual loss of freedom;
(ii) RIAA's abuse of the courts;
(iii) Bribery of political officials;
(iv)
(v) Profit!
Oh look lol a meme lol, it's witty because it lacks originality.
If there's one thing many nerds are sorely lacking, it's.. well.. any sort of ability outside their narrow fie
Re: (Score:2)
Re:seeking approval (Score:5, Interesting)
Partly because it's not worth making a fuss over within the context of modern, laser-guided wrongdoings, but mostly for the improved ability to secure last-minute restaurant reservations.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Are you sure the majority of Britons....
I didn't say a majority of Britons, I said a majority of those getting honoured (perhaps an even more outrageous declaration).
Of course I don't have proof, that would be against the entire spirit of internet-based debate. But I was getting at a wider truth about the UK- There are many reasons to hate every country, the UK included, but one of the things I love is the progressive egalitarianism prevalent in the thinking classes; Announce at any formal social function that you are religious/believe in astro
Re:seeking approval (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Given that shes not even the one who chooses who to give the awards to its not really an issue here. I personally would like to get rid of her, but there is some benefit to separating out your purely political honours to those given by 'the country' and while not perfect (i mean you can buy either apparently), it does In theory stop gordon or tony knighting all his mates.
Still if it were up t
Hate to reply to an AC...but... (Score:2)
Oh, wait. It's not the Queen who picks people for the honours list, it's the honours committee. Truth be told, the Queen will probably have never heard of them, won't know who they are when she confers the honour and won't ever know.
To your more expansive ideas...about why people, through their actions, seek approval from others, and why this is a bad thing: What is
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:One of the perks of being Queen? (Score:5, Funny)
It got modded flamebait because...
We mean it man
We love our queen
And our figurehead
Is not what she seems
Bit early for my Codemasters sessions on the Speccy, but formative nonetheless.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)