Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Next Prince of Persia Game Promises Fresh Start

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Fri May 30, 2008 12:58 PM
from the reinvention-the-key-to-continued-success dept.
Next Gen recently had a chance to sit down with Ubisoft and discuss the next addition to the Prince of Persia franchise. The team is excited that this isn't just another tired rehash of the same characters and setting, however, promising a new prince and open world adventuring on top of the already rich world of the previous games. "'We had a whole story with the previous trilogy, and Prince of Persia is a general universe where several different stories can unfold,' [creative director Jean-Christophe] explains. 'We're starting afresh, in the same universe, and we wanted to bring something new while keeping what worked before. We introduce a new Prince, who won't start as a prince, more a drifter and adventurer, lost in the desert. He'll be confronted by a lot of fantasy settings, as opposed to Assassin's Creed, which was more realistic. Here he will come to a land and be engulfed in the conflict between two ancient gods, in this very specific region of Persia. It's based on an old Persian religion, Zoroastrianism, and the battle between light and darkness.'"
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Kingrames (858416) on Friday May 30 2008, @01:08PM (#23602217)
    If you don't recognize the franchise, it is the franchise formerly known as *insert freakish hand symbol here*.
    • What the fuck, man? You can't just go around stacking as part of some fucking joke. Around here, that gets you killed. The Blues see you, they kill you cause they're rival. The Reds see you, they kill you for claiming. I see you stacking again, I kill you for being a punk-ass, shit-for-brains nerd who don't belong in this 'hood, who don't respect the law of the land, and who doesn't recognize good fucking advice when someone takes the time to explain it to his stupid self.
  • Make the Prince have an uncanny resemblance to Mahmoud Ahmedinejad. Guide him towards making a fresh start as threat levels world over drop to green!

    Cheers!
  • !rpg (Score:5, Informative)

    by snarfies (115214) on Friday May 30 2008, @01:12PM (#23602271) Homepage
    Whoever tagged this as "rpg" doesn't know what an "rpg" is.

    That said, an actual Prince of Persia CRPG might pique my interest. This 19th billion incarnation of the same thing does not.
    • Maybe they meant it to be 'rocket-propelled grenade'?
    • Re:!rpg (Score:4, Funny)

      by merreborn (853723) on Friday May 30 2008, @02:25PM (#23603179) Homepage Journal
      Yeah, the "open world adventuring" bit makes it sound more like GTA: Persia than an RPG.

      Except without the city, hookers, guns, or cars.

      It'll fly right off the shelves, I'm sure.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        They tried to pawn off Assassin's Creed as an "open world" game, which was complete BS. The open world was really just five ridiculously huge maps that they made you run across for every mission. They were all filled with the same repeated garbage, and all-in-all made for one of the most boring games I have ever played. It sounds like this is just going to be a clone of that. Not interested.

        // I actually enjoyed the first PoP remake.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Whoever tagged this as "rpg" doesn't know what an "rpg" is.
        So...it's an arcade game? A board game? A sport? Just because the video game industry churns out RPG after RPG, doesn't mean it's too broad of a category.
        'Gimmicky Brawler/Platformer Hybrid' doesn't have the same ring, I guess.
      • How about just calling them "Third Person Action Games"...which would allow you to fit in DMC and GoW (God, not Gears....I'm actually talking about GOOD games here).
  • 'We're starting afresh, in the same universe, and we wanted to bring something new [...] based on [...] the battle between light and darkness.'

    Yawn.
    • by Kijori (897770) <ward.jakeNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Friday May 30 2008, @02:55PM (#23603615)
      A fresh start to the franchise?

      So that would be the Fresh Prince of Persia, then?
      • by Jesus_666 (702802) on Friday May 30 2008, @04:42PM (#23604911)
        Now this is the story all about how
        My life got flipped, turned upside down
        And I'd like to take a minute, just sit right thar
        I'll tell you how I became the prince of a land called Persia

        In west Philistia born and raised
        On the playground where I spent most of my days
        Chilling out, maxing, relaxing all cool
        And all throwin' some discus outside of the school
        When a couple of guys that were up to no good
        Started making trouble in my neighbourhood
        I got in one little fight and my mom cried war
        And said "You're moving with your auntie and uncle in Persia"

        I begged and pleaded with her the other day
        But she packed my suitcase and sent me on my way
        She gave me a kissin' and she gave me my ticket
        I put my saber on and said "I might as well kick it"

        First class, yo this is bad,
        Drinking red potions out of a champagne glass
        Is this what the people of Persia livin' like,
        Hmm this might be alright

        I whistled for a chariot and when it came near
        The license plate said fresh and it had dice in the mirror
        If anything I'd say that this chariot was rare
        But I thought "Now forget it, yo home to Persi-air"

        I pulled up to a palace 'bout seven or eight
        And I yelled to the cabby "Yo, home smell you later"
        Looked at my kingdom I was finally thar
        To sit on my throne as the prince of Persia
  • by shark72 (702619) on Friday May 30 2008, @01:17PM (#23602337)

    "It's based on an old Persian religion, Zoroastrianism, and the battle between light and darkness."

    Let's hope it leaves out the ritualistic testicle shaving referenced in Austin Powers.

  • Religions only become mythology when their number of adherents drop to 0 and that is not the case with Zoroastrianism in Iran or Parsis (the ones that migrated to India (and again to America; I had a Parsi friend in Miami)), despite its ancient origins surprisingly. It doesn't seem like a very bright idea to use an existing religion - in the middle east no less - and fantasize a conflict with it and another religion.

    Or maybe that's the idea, stir up a slight bit of controversy to attract attention to their product. ;)
    • It doesn't seem like a very bright idea to use an existing religion - in the middle east no less - and fantasize a conflict with it and another religion.

      Wait, you mean so there's no conflict between light and dark within the religion itself, so they're going to have to put it in conflict with a different religion?

      Lame! What is it, like Zen Buddhism or something?

      Cool religions have built in good/evil conflicts. Boring ones tell you that conflict and desire are the source of suffering and only by letting go
        • Sorry to ruin your self-inquisition, but I didn't see the parent attacking religion.

          Myths are stories shared by a group, and are a part of that group's cultural identity, but so are family traditions.
          -from about.com [about.com].

          Really when it comes down to it, the stories and traditions of your religion of choice are no different that the stories and traditions of other religions from antiquity. The faith and whatnot you feel for yours is also no different that the faith that others felt for their own.

          A myth is pretty much a term referring to the NARRATIVE of the religion, as opposed to the worth of the religion. As an atheist, I have read many of the worlds religious texts, not trying to find some "true faith" in them, but for the stories they tell. The Bible is mostly a narrative, and can be seen as such. As well as being the corner stone of meaning for a billion of so people, it also is a book, with all the properties of it.

          Is that offensive? How?
  • by Sabz5150 (1230938) on Friday May 30 2008, @01:21PM (#23602391)
    Oh, you mean a Fresh Prince of Persia. Gotcha.
    • by veganboyjosh (896761) on Friday May 30 2008, @01:40PM (#23602629)
      In west Eslamebad, born and raised...
    • by Trespass (225077) on Friday May 30 2008, @01:41PM (#23602643) Homepage
      Or 'The Artist Formally Known as Prince of Persia'.
    • Oh, you mean a Fresh Prince of Persia. Gotcha.

      Now, this is a story all about how
      My life got flipped-turned upside down
      And I liked to take a minute
      Just sit right there
      I'll tell you how I became the prince of a place called Persia

      In Western Arabia born and raised
      On a sand dune was where I spent most of my days
      Chillin' out maxin' relaxin' all cool
      And all racin some camels outside of the school
      When a couple of Greeks
      Who were up to no good
      Startin making trouble in my neighborhood
      I got in one little fight and my mom got scared
      She said 'You'r

      • Akkad fits the rhyme better than Susa. Okay, so it wasn't the capital of the Persian Empire, but Cyrus controlled it.
  • by ndansmith (582590) on Friday May 30 2008, @01:22PM (#23602401)

    The team is excited that this isn't just another tired rehash of the same characters and setting . . .
    Ambassador of Argentina?
  • Why Not a New One? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Arccot (1115809) on Friday May 30 2008, @01:24PM (#23602423)
    The first of the series (SoT) was excellent and the time mechanic was almost revolutionary. Sure the sequels weren't outstanding, but they still were decent. I don't get the hating going on here, if they're doing something really different with this one.

    I was really impressed with the first, and I'd love to see what they can do if they start fresh again.
    • the first of the series was "Prince of Persia" published in 1989 by Jordan Mechner.

      Sands of Time was a next generation title based on the original game.
      • the first of the series was "Prince of Persia" published in 1989 by Jordan Mechner. Sands of Time was a next generation title based on the original game.
        I'd say inspired by the original PoP rather than a sequel to. I consider them two separate series, but you're right that some people are unaware of the excellence of the first game in the original series.

        For those who have never played the original Prince of Persia, it's a game so good it's still worth playing today.
    • I guess you never played the original DOS game? Actually, I'm not even sure if it was DOS since I was too young at the time to distinguish operating systems.
    • What made the first so great was the voice acting and lighthearted humor. The darker tone of the 2nd and 3rd was not nearly as good. PoP SoT was easily one of the top 15 games I've ever played. The other two were boring, forgettable adventures.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      The first prince of persia was excellent and totally revolutionary. I was really impressed with it, and I'd love to see what they can do if they don't stoop to ripping off other games and bring back Jordan Mechner, the person responsable for making the franchise great.

      Who incidently was quoted as saying ov the new games, "I'm not a fan of the artistic direction, or the violence that earned it an M rating. The story, character, dialog, voice acting, and visual style were not to my taste."
  • "It's based on an old Persian religion, Zoroastrianism, and the battle between light and darkness."

    the battle between light and darkness IS an old persian religion, but zoroastrianism (another old persian religion) is not the religion in question. they mean manichaeism [wikipedia.org]

    the monotheistic religions hold that there is one dominant good power. the manichaeans meanwhile were dualists: they believed the forces of good and evil are evenly matched
    • Zoroastrianism is quite dualistic (though, as I understand it, ultimately the good, uncreated God will win). It also predates Manichaeism by about a millennium.

      Zoroastrian [wikipedia.org]

      • Zoroastrianism (Score:4, Informative)

        by Hoi Polloi (522990) on Friday May 30 2008, @03:08PM (#23603801) Journal
        I agree. I actually did some studying on Zoroastrianism many years ago. The basic duality is the conflict between good (Ahura Mazda) and evil (Angra Mainyu). It is the conflict between creation/destruction, order/chaos. Due to its antiquity and location (Persia) Zoroastrianism has influenced modern Judeo-Christian religions (duality of God/Satan, the halo, etc).
  • I've played a lot of video games, but Prince of Persia is one series that just hasn't crossed my path yet. What are the most notable games in the series? Do the PoP games from the 80s and 90s stand up to the test of time? What's the best port for the original PoP?
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      For classic PoP, I'd recommend Prince of Persia Classic on Xbox Live Arcade. It's an excellent port of the original, with a much more modern look. If you are more of a modern 3D gamer, try Sands of Time or The Two Thrones. You can pick up either for a last-gen system at a very reasonable price.

    • The PS2 version of Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time contains the original game as an unlockable. You can probably find it pretty cheaply these days so if you want to catch up on both the old and new series this would probably be the best place to start.
  • Since ubisoft owns the assassin's creed franchise, I'd love to see the new Prince of Persia games use that engine, world, and dynamic.

    AC is a seriously revolutionary game. It's the first of its kind to use the mechanics of those platform type games in a 3d setting so fluidly that it feels extremely natural.

    Now that I think of it, it's what POP really always should have been. So, I hope they take the franchise there.

    AC is definitely in my top 5 favorite games of all time. POP, while a lot of fun, should a
  • This is lame. They're just putting a plot under an 80s' jumping game.

    They should have done one where you're a Saudi prince. You can just play around as a playboy, drive fast cars, and go to the camel races. Maybe buy your own little island off Dubai. Or you can try to work your way up politically. Run a ministry, make alliances with the other princes, try to keep the mullahs happy, the oil flowing, the reformers and the religious extremists under control. Work your way up and try to become King. Maybe

  • Am I the only one bothered by the phrase "the next addition?"

    I mean, they're aren't even homophones for heaven's sake!
  • I'm just now getting around to playing the trilogy from last gen. I finished Sands of Time last week, and have been working through Warrior Within. Sands of Time was very enjoyable, Warrior Within feels like more of the same while fixing some problems with SoT (like the fixed camera going un-fixed when you move about).

    However, while I don't consider them bad, both games seem "almost great". You may think it's the same thing as "good", but I view it in a different light-- Ubisoft had something wonderful going, but eventually decided that release dates were more important than polish.

    In SoT, the camera would move about on its own disjointly, the controls moving with it, so you'd often turn yourself around in battle. Fixed cameras were far too distant to be of much help, though they gave you a nice view of the area. The camera would also change to be "dramatic", but more often would change so that you were now pointing the stick in the wrong direction and you die. Each "epic fight" concluded with an annoying "put away the swords" flash, and the forced visions at save points pretty much held your hand the entire game.

    So far, in Warrior Within, they've fixed the fixed-camera problem as well as removing the "put away swords" sequence. Instead, they introduced a rather unintuitive combo sequence, where actions take a bit to carry out but your successive button sequences are still counted, making it hard to control the Prince if you decide to change what you're doing mid-fight. A problem that SoT had but is worse in WW is button mapping- buttons tend to be context sensitive (do you have your weapons out? Are you against a wall?) and when you press a button to zag you might zig instead. Furthermore, because it's so GRIMDARK, it's hard to spot any visual cues (where available) to time jumps and other actions. And lip-syncing+voice placement is just horrible.

    I've not played Two Thrones yet, but I hear good things, so hopefully that removes some of these problems.

    I make note of these things because they aren't just about the PoP series-- Ubisoft, in general, seems to be a company that's "almost great". I've played many of their games, such as XIII, Red Steel, and Farcry. Each of these games are fun (well, once you get over the aggravation of Red Steel's controls), but every game feels as if it could have been great. None of them have "polish", which keeps them at a B (or C+) grade instead of an A grade.

    The only Ubisoft game I've played that seemed to have a hefty amount of polish was Rayman Raving Rabbids. Very fun, and I plan to get the sequels, but that's just one great of many sorta-good. If Ubisoft put the same amount of QA and polish into games that Valve seems to do (seriously, if you haven't played their games with commentary on, you're missing a lot of interesting information), they could have games I would call exceptional. Instead, they have the "good enough" mentality and boot it out the door for some extra cash.

    This is why I don't have big aspirations for these new PoP games. Will they be good? Probably. Will they be great? Not unless Ubisoft has made great strides recently.
    • Oh those times... [K]ill them all!
    • Re:prince megahit (Score:5, Informative)

      by sakdoctor (1087155) on Friday May 30 2008, @01:29PM (#23602481)
      For those of you who actually don't know, adding megahit when running the original game from the command line activated the cheats.

      This didn't work with the Amiga version which I played as a kid, plus there was this weird potion room that wasn't on the PC version.
      The game was rock hard without the cheats (or possibly bad skills), mostly because there was a tight time limit of 1 hour in which to beat the game.
      • From playing the PC version, I can tell you that there were two potion rooms. First there was the potion room for the copy protection, where it would ask for a specific section from the manual (which my dad had photocopied from the guy at his work that he got the game from), and then I also saw him get into the cheat room where you drink a potion for the level you want to go to.
    • by UnknowingFool (672806) on Friday May 30 2008, @01:18PM (#23602349)

      At least they haven't made it "Hollywoody":

      Opens to 1st screen in Prince of Persia. You are in a chariot and you racing across the desert to the palace. The 3D graphics are gorgeous. Along the way masked riders appear. They fire at you to stop you. But not with arrows or knives. Being Hollywood, it's got to be plasma blasters. Of course, you don't have any blasters or projectile weapons. You can only ram with your chariot. As you knock them off their horses, of course, the horses tumble and then explode. To regain your health, you have to obviously run over the health packets along the way.

      When you get to the palace a cut scene starts. Your beloved princess is being carried off by a huge ape while a bald man stroking a cat laughs at you. She's yelling: "Prince, save me!" You respond "ADRIAN! ADRIAN!". That is immediately followed by a commercial feature skateboarders urging you to "Do the Dew."

      Well at least I'm hoping. :P

    • by Chyeld (713439) <chyeld&newsguy,com> on Friday May 30 2008, @01:31PM (#23602509)
      I think I have your answer, but hold on, I've got to issue another series of behests to my adventures in Final Fantasy - Crystal Chronicles - My Life as a King.

      I've been playing it inbewteen sessions of Mario Galaxy, where I, as Mario, rescue Princess Peach and the Great Stars from Bowser, King Koopa.
    • by miscz (888242) on Friday May 30 2008, @01:43PM (#23602673)
      It's "only" 7th in the series and probably beginning of a new trilogy. Sands of Time was a well crafted and self-confined story that you could treat as something that can stand on it's own. Prince of Persia is growing to be something like The Legend of Zelda universe with different Links in different times.
      • That's what they state. It's kinda early to believe that it has absolutely nothing to do with it. Depending on how deep people look into the lore, the entire series has involvement with sands of time in a sense. This is like creating a new mario, nobody said it has to be a shitty game, just that they need to start coming up with new title names.
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          Well the first two games didn't have any sands of time in them. It's like Final Fantasy in that they all have the same title but you play different princes and different stories in each. So far they have released 3 different series. The first one is Prince of Persia and Prince of Persia 2: The Shadow and the Flame. The second one is Prince of Persia 3D but I haven't played it so I don't know if it has any relation with the previous ones. The last one is the Sands of Time series which is a trilogy. Now it se