Slashdot Log In
Halo 3 Criticized In Murder Conviction
Posted by
Soulskill
on Wed Jan 14, 2009 05:23 AM
from the master-chief-charged-as-an-accessory dept.
from the master-chief-charged-as-an-accessory dept.
oldwindways writes "An Ohio teen was found guilty of murdering his mother and shooting his father in the head after they took away his copy of Halo 3. One has to wonder if this is going to have any effect on the games industry. Clearly, the AP thought they could stir up something controversial by asking the IP owner for a statement: 'Microsoft, which owns the intellectual property for the game, declined to comment beyond a statement saying: "We are aware of the situation and it is a tragic case."' I suppose the good news is they did not accept his insanity plea, so no one can claim that Halo 3 drove him insane. Even so, I don't think anything good can come out of this for gamers."
Unfortunately, it seems somebody can claim that the game was a contributing factor; the judge who presided over this case said he believes that the 17-year-old defendant "had no idea at the time he hatched this plot that if he killed his parents, they would be dead forever." GamePolitics has further details from the judge's statement. It doesn't help that the boy's lawyers used video game addiction as a defense.
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a game. (Score:5, Insightful)
he believes that the 17-year-old defendant "had no idea at the time he hatched this plot that if he killed his parents, they would be dead forever."
If someone as old as 17 doesn't understand this basic fact of life, then there's obviously something wrong that has nothing to do with the video game.
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:4, Insightful)
Hey, plenty of 17 year olds don't believe death is forever.
They're called "religious".
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Funny)
You know it's flamebaiting to speak about people respawning millenia ago.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Insightful)
"According to prosectors, Petric, 16 at the time of the shooting, was forbidden to buy Halo 3 by his parents, Mark and Susan Petric. The teen snuck out to purchase the game anyway, and was caught by his parents upon his return. The game was locked up in Mark's lockbox, along with a 9mm handgun."
So no, a history of violence wasn't mentioned in the articles I have seen so far. However, it also says he didn't have a copy of the game.
From the same article:
"Lawyers for the accused delivered a brief statement at the opening of the trial, explaining that their client had be under a large amount of stress after being homebound for a year due to a snowboarding accident with nothing to do but watch television and play video games."
So, presumably he hadn't been playing the game elsewhere.
But don't worry...
"Dad, I'm so sorry for what I did to Mom, to you and to the family," Daniel Petric said, according to his father. "I'm so glad you are alive."
"You're my son," Mark Petric responded. "You're my boy."
Dad forgives him...
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Insightful)
From this article [kotaku.com]: "According to prosectors, Petric, 16 at the time of the shooting, was forbidden to buy Halo 3 by his parents, Mark and Susan Petric. The teen snuck out to purchase the game anyway, and was caught by his parents upon his return. The game was locked up in Mark's lockbox, along with a 9mm handgun." So no, a history of violence wasn't mentioned in the articles I have seen so far. However, it also says he didn't have a copy of the game. From the same article: "Lawyers for the accused delivered a brief statement at the opening of the trial, explaining that their client had be under a large amount of stress after being homebound for a year due to a snowboarding accident with nothing to do but watch television and play video games." So, presumably he hadn't been playing the game elsewhere. But don't worry... "Dad, I'm so sorry for what I did to Mom, to you and to the family," Daniel Petric said, according to his father. "I'm so glad you are alive." "You're my son," Mark Petric responded. "You're my boy." Dad forgives him...
This is quite revealing. I think it's safe to say there is at least some degree of a lack of rationality in that family that is not Halo 3 related
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Informative)
I'd warrant, then, that the kid's probably had as much exposure to the Old Testament as he has to Halo 3. Personally, I'm not in favour of banning either, but if anything...
Parent
Re:No on actually reads that thing (Score:5, Insightful)
I hate doing this because I'm not a Christian, but there is a lot of FUD among atheists with regard to the Bible. They use bad translations and don't interpret the text with the proper context, they just pick and choose specific lines and say here, this is proof of contradiction (ironically this is not so dissimilar of the behavior which they accuse Christians of only picking and choosing which parts to follow). You have to remember that the style of writing was vastly different than the style of today, so using modern day context to interpret a nearly 2000 year old text is just plain stupid. Even beyond the context of the chapter/book/testament they ignore the differences between the Old and New Covenants.
So atheists, until you actually go and bother to read the Bible and are willing to understand it within context it is presented, please stop passing this FUD around. On the other hand, criticizing the belief in religion is just fine and dandy. Trying to use evidence from a specific religion when you can't even interpret it in the proper context is just plain stupid.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Insightful)
"Hey, plenty of 17 year olds don't believe death is forever.
They're called "religious". "
Kinda hard to sell suicide bombing and similar sports any other way.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Insightful)
It's called nationalism.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Insightful)
It's called fanaticism. If it wasn't countries or religions it'd just be something else.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Interesting)
No, they're called retarded. There isn't a religon that I'm aware of that doesn't ackowledge that you cease to be a human upon death, and all of them believe its likely to be a one way trip. Some believe in an afterlife, some beleive we go back into a pool of life force, some believe in reincarnation. All of them believe your human life is over.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Insightful)
Damn you guys are worse then the people who knock on my door twice a month.
It is kinda sad for a group of people without a religion or a belief in God(s), that you are are so instantiate to bring up your views on religion even when it isn't part of the topic. Get over it religion will be with us for our lifetimes. I haven't heard anyone give a good enough reason to prove that the Atheist are right, conversely I haven't heard a good reason to prove that religious people are right.
Lets compromise God exists 1/2 of the time. There is a solution that no one likes so therefor it must be a good compromise.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Insightful)
There's a word for that: hypocrisy.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Funny)
he believes that the 17-year-old defendant "had no idea at the time he hatched this plot that if he killed his parents, they would be dead forever."
If someone as old as 17 doesn't understand this basic fact of life, then there's obviously something wrong that has nothing to do with the video game.
Clearly Halo 3 is at fault. If they had some non-respawning game types this would never have happened...
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Insightful)
If someone as old as 17 doesn't understand this basic fact of life, then there's obviously something wrong that has nothing to do with the video game.
Obviously. Nobody is arguing that completely normal people would go postal by playing Halo 3. If I said "All you people on slashdot are a wsate of oxygen and should go kill yourself" there won't be mass suicides, but someone already suicidal really sitting on the fence just might. So here we got a borderline psychotic, serious trouble separating famtasy from reality and he's on the fence. Was Halo 3 the push? How much should you pad the world to make sure he doesn't get a push? Or is it him, if anyone had realized how serious his issues are, that should have been put in a padded room? There's a line somewhere there, but I think what 99%+ of the population handles well should never be outlawed. The rest is just triggering some secret freak-out button that can't really be helped. Or rather, those people should be helped if possible.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Funny)
This shall be the last post you hear from me, you insensitive clod!
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:4, Interesting)
People should stay dead when they're killed (except maybe if they're zombies
You might think this would ruin the game, make it useless - but it wouldn't. It would raise the stakes for the player (don't you find a life lasts much longer in an arcade game, when you have to pay for more) and speed up the turnover of the game, raising the income for the writer. Some things would have to change to make the game saleable, but ultimately it would be more involving.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Interesting)
True, but that would be a fun sort of game. Imagine you can have multiple characters - say, a hundred - and this is your own personal "team". Each one on the team has their own individual skills - some randomly given out at spawning, and some trained. Keep the "max skill" cap low and not all that difficult to obtain.
It could be an FPS played just like a sports sim. Some of your team could be on the injured list (things like missing limbs could be explained away by a futuristic setting), and some might outright die and enter "the graveyard", where they are immortalized with their scores, skills, appearance, etc.
This would make a game where Medics are useful - you don't want to lose that guy you spent 2 hours maxing out his skills (ideally, I think that's as long as it should take, tops). You'd sure as hell appreciate the doc when you get revived on the field instead of dying of heart failure. People would actually use COVER and tactics to protect their investments of time.
Lastly, think of the achievments - longest survivor, etc. I think something like this could be fun if it were designed properly.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:4, Insightful)
Yeah, I know he was living up in Ohio but come one ...
Guns don't kill people! God do!
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:4, Funny)
One has to wonder how it's a difference for you ;D
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:4, Insightful)
Addiction: Not dealt with until far too late.
Child: Not able to tell that 'murder' is a bad idea.
How is it anything other than the parents fault? They're responsible for 17 years of this child's development, and he ended up sufficiently screwed up to murder them as they slept. There's no one else you get to pass that responsibility on to.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Insightful)
He killed his mother and shot his father in the head. the father survived.
Daniel's plan was originally to make it look like a murder-suicide, by leaving the gun in his father's hand. After the shooting, Mark Petric said his son put the gun in his hand while saying, "Hey Dad, here's your gun. Take it."
The outrage is from people who are pissed that a manipulative evil piece of shit is trying to avoid a harsher punishment by blaming a hobby which most people here enjoy.
His first plan to avoid getting punished didn't work out so well but a judge seems to have bought into the "it was the videogames fault!",partly at least.
Parent
Re:Sure, 17 year-olds believe this because of a ga (Score:5, Insightful)
Daniel's plan was originally to make it look like a murder-suicide, by leaving the gun in his father's hand. After the shooting, Mark Petric said his son put the gun in his hand while saying, "Hey Dad, here's your gun. Take it."
Well there go the theories about him not thinking his parents would be permanently dead. I mean what would happen to the murder-suicide plan once the parents respawned?
Parent
Or... (Score:5, Insightful)
"An Ohio teen was found guilty of murdering his mother and shooting his father in the head after they took away his [thing that he really liked]"
If he had a caffeine addiction and his parents took away his Coke would that mean that it was the fault of the Coke that he murdered them?
Re:Or... (Score:4, Interesting)
If he had a caffeine addiction and his parents took away his Coke would that mean that it was the fault of the Coke that he murdered them?
What if he had a cocaine addiction and his parents took away his cocaine?
What if he was an alcoholic and his parents took away his booze?
It's just a matter of defining clearly what constitutes a deranged mind and what is conscious murder intention and/or idiocy. With no regard to the cause of the derangment, nor whether it's chemical or not.
That clear definition is quite harder to produce than it might seem.
Parent
Re:Or... (Score:5, Funny)
I'm so fucking upset about this matter, the situation among youths of today is absurd!
I mean, come one, how the fuck can you fail murdering your own dad?! How hard can it be? Learn to finish something damnit, lazy ass kids of today!
Parent
Re:Or... (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Spawn point (Score:5, Funny)
"I firmly believe that Daniel Petric had no idea at the time he hatched this plot that if he killed his parents, they would be dead forever."
The Spawn Point defence should be filed along with the Chewbacca defence in the big book of crazy law.
Re:Spawn point (Score:5, Funny)
I'd bet my life on it.
Parent
Anime: more educational than games (Score:5, Funny)
I can see why playing Halo (or, indeed, most games, with the notable exception of NetHack) might make you believe that. If only he had watched anime instead, he would have been taught the cruel reality of murder [imageshack.us].
murder weapon? (Score:4, Insightful)
Okay, why hasn't anyone even mentioned the "9mm handgun"? To my simple, unAmerican mind, that seems far more like a murder weapon than the video game.
Talk about elephant in the room.
Anyway, I expect the usual 800-post NRA/2nd Amendment gun nuts vs rational people thread.
Only in America.
Re:murder weapon? (Score:4, Insightful)
Don't forget the people who think that every gun is evil. I don't have any need to own a handgun or rifle, but I support the right of people who do, provided they are responsible (as the father seemed to be, considering that the gun was stored in a lockbox). Yes, the kid used a gun to kill his parents. However, he could also have just used a butcher knife from the kitchen.
Parent
The judge's statement (Score:5, Informative)
FTA:
Another article notes... [chroniclet.com]
So the son was trying to frame the father for murdering the mother. Seems to indicate that he knew death was permanent...
he is a sociopath, or worst (Score:5, Informative)
Miscellaneous quotes : (http://news.aol.com/article/ohio-teen-killed-mom-over-video-game/302589)
Petric may have been addicted, but the evidence also showed he planned the crime for weeks, said Burge, who found the teenager guilty of aggravated murder, attempted aggravated murder and other charges.
Deputy prosecuting attorney Anthony Cillo argued during the trial that the teenager had planned to make it appear to be a murder-suicide by putting the gun in his father's hand.
I can see the warning label (Score:5, Funny)
(It's that good).
Inverted logic ? (Score:5, Interesting)
So yet me see:
- teenager plays Halo 3 for weeks/months/years: does not kill anyone.
- same teenager *stops* playing said game for 1 day: shoots both parents.
So does that mean that playing the game *stopped* him killing real people ?
Déjà Vu (Score:5, Funny)
Microsoft... declined to comment beyond a statement saying: "We are aware of the situation and it is a tragic case."
Wow, déjà vu. That's the same thing they said when Vista was released.
One of these things is not like the others... (Score:5, Insightful)
The father, a minister, had a 9mm handgun that the son, who played video games, used as the tool for his action.
So lets see.
Religion.
Guns.
Video Games.
Which one is not enshrined in U.S. culture and will therefore be blamed.
Re:One of these things is not like the others... (Score:5, Funny)
Oh come on, it was only 9mm. He must be one of the nonviolent priests or he'd have a fully automatic:-)
Parent
Re:guns (Score:5, Insightful)
About a third of murders don't involve firearms. Areas with widespread legal firearms ownership tend to have less crime than areas with severe gun restrictions. Finally, if someone is that nuts, operating an axe, shovel, hatchet or any number of other hand tools is no great obstacle.
Lizzie Borden was just a chick, but did a "hatchet job" quite smartly (and beat the rap too).
Parent
Re:guns (Score:4, Insightful)
If the kid bashed their brains out with a hammer, would you say "Would this murder have happened if it would have been harder for the kid the get hold of a hammer?". After all, one good swing with the claw end of a hammer and you'll be just as dead as if they used a 9mm. If somebody wants to kill, they are going to kill. All you can do is lock them up after the fact. But thinking you can get rid of evil bastards killing folks by getting rid of guns is just nuts IMHO. All you will do is make sure the ordinary folks have no way to defend themselves while the criminals will just buy guns smuggled over the border. They don't obey your laws, that is why they are called criminals.
You want to cut down on crime? Quit throwing potheads and non violent junkies in jail and get rid of the revolving door on violent offenders. This kid may have been a "one off" when it comes to violent crime but if you look at the damage a career violent offender does it is frankly staggering. If we got rid of the stupid pot laws and made all non violent drugs crimes (buying,selling,using) into misdemeanors then you would have the resources and space to get rid of parole for violent offenders and force them to do their entire time. This would cut down on crime IMHO a lot more than trying to get rid of guns, which the criminals by and large don't get legally anyway.
Parent
Re:guns (Score:5, Interesting)
It is still possible but it requires no hesitation, no emotion, and a minimal physical strength.
In case one of these criterion is missing, a gun can help. With a gun you can kill someone out of anger, while filled of contradictory emotions, while crying and without really wanting it. That is how must murders are made. As you pointed out, when carefully planned, a murder do not require a gun. Guns are too noisy and too easy to track down.
Parent
Re:guns (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:So why was the insanity plea denied? (Score:5, Insightful)
Good question.
Probably because the legal definition of insanity in order for it to be a defence isn't "The person did something that nobody in their right mind would consider appropriate, they're therefore insane". It's "The person was not aware that what they were doing was wrong, they're therefore insane".
Were this not the case, most of the world's prisons would be significantly less crowded and most of the world's mental hospitals significantly more crowded.
Whether or not this is right and proper is something I leave to the peanut gallery.
Parent