Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

StarCraft II Beta Signups Open

Posted by Soulskill on Thu May 07, 2009 12:28 PM
from the time-to-zerg-the-servers dept.
motang writes "StarCraftWire reports that Blizzard has started taking beta sign-ups for StarCraft II. Quoting: 'Interested parties must simply visit their Battle.net profile page, choose to opt-in for the beta, and re-submit their current system specs by way of a small downloadable piece of software.' Blizzard's Chris Sigaty said in an interview, 'As with previous betas for our real-time strategy games, the StarCraft II beta test will be multiplayer only, and players will have access to all three races — terrans, protoss, and zerg — and all of their units. We'll include a selection of multiplayer maps, but they won't necessarily include all of the maps that will be in the final version of the game. We're making some great progress on the single-player campaign, but we don't plan to do a public beta since we want to keep the story under wraps until the game's out.'"
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Interviews: Ask Blizzard About Starcraft2, Diablo III, WoW, or Battle.net 520 comments
Well, Blizzcon 2009 is about to get underway (look for the big news from the keynote in a few hours) and given how fast it sold out I'm sure there are still many rabid fans interested in what Blizzard might have to say that don't want to shell out the $40 for Pay-Per-View access. So, to that end we have interviews scheduled tomorrow with the teams from Starcraft2, Diablo III, World of Warcraft, and Battle.net. If there is anything you wish to know about the progress or juicy details from any of these teams please leave it in the comments below. We'll try to parse through for the best questions and get you answers during our interview slots tomorrow. The usual Slashdot interview rules apply.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by orclevegam (940336) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:30PM (#27863039) Journal
    I signed up for this yesterday but so far haven't received any notification. My guess is Blizzard will just select from the pool of everyone that applies, possibly selecting based on hardware specs for a wide variety of system configs.
  • by GPLDAN (732269) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:31PM (#27863051)
    I was beginning to feel old when I used the term "Zerg Rush" to describe anything involving lots of people swarming to get at something. By younger IT colleagues would roll their eyes at the "old man" with his dated terms.

    Now there will be a new generation of geeks who will learn the power of the Zerg...
    • never doubt the power of korean gamer alliterative laughter either

    • Yeah. When I hear someone reference a video game in real life, I think "old."
        • Typically "zerg rush" involved either a 9 pool or 6 pool (amount of pop you had; 9 pools were typically dropped prior to your second overlord)

          This impacted your economy significantly, since you're working from one hatchery instead of 2 in the early game, and didn't go fast gas.

          There were other strats that were valid; 'ling massing vs zealots were pretty effective prior to the first forge upgrade, and were very synergistic with mutalisk follow-ups to finish off the 'toss player.

            • I've found the best use for Zerg is to capture one using a dark archon and then just build lurkers, they're really the most useful unit the Zerg have. If I can last long enough to have my carrier fleet built and a dark archon it's pretty much all over as I'll go capture the other two races and combine the best of all of them. On defense a wall of lurkers, followed by photon cannons, and backed by seige tanks will stop almost anything, particularly with a cloaked carrier fleet hanging above it. On offense th
              • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

                by BlitzTech (1386589)
                Watch some of the pro replays. There are people worlds better than your friend, than you, than me, and than most people you encounter online. Your blanket statement is patently false, as evidenced by these replays. Zerg can survive and win late game.
              • by toad3k (882007) on Thursday May 07 2009, @03:21PM (#27866159)

                Your understanding of the game is poor.

                Zerg do not have to win early. In fact if left alone, a zerg will expand twice as fast as the other races, culminating in wave after wave of hundreds of units. They may have weaker units, but their unit production is so much faster that it greatly affects their resource production. They also have much more nimble units and the ability to cross the map meaning they can hold these expansions with relatively small forces.

                It is obvious you stopped playing 8 years ago, and the game has advanced so far you simply can't even conceive of it. I'm not saying that to insult you, but it is true. Neither you or your newbie friend would be able to win a single game in 20 against even the worst players on iccup.

                    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

                      by toad3k (882007)

                      Carriers are nearly worthless against zerg, they can be plagued and ensnared, they can be scourged, and hydras can be dark swarmed making them invulnerable for a considerable amount of time. They are expensive investments and while you are producing them your ground forces stand a good chance of being overwhelmed.

                      Honestly you sound like I would have a year ago. I suggest you make an account on iccup, patch up your broodwar (or download a non legit copy on iccup), use their anti hack launcher and proceed t

  • Not just Starcraft 2 (Score:5, Informative)

    by FLEABttn (1466747) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:34PM (#27863117)
    It's worth noting that this beta signup also allows you to opt into Diablo and Warcraft universe beta testing as well.
  • by LiquidFire_HK (952632) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:36PM (#27863157)

    It should be noted that in order to sign up for the beta, you apparently need to have at least one Blizzard game CD-key signed up with your battle.net account. Otherwise you get this message:

    You need to have at least one Blizzard Entertainment game attached to your account in order to set up your beta profile.

    • Just merge with your WoW account... are you saying you never played World of Warcraft?!

      • I have, but it says WoW account merging is US only.

        • By "US only" they mean North America (or possibly the Americas) ... which still may or may not help you (I'm Canadian and merged my account just fine).
          • Thanks for the tip. But alas, no; I'm in Europe.

            Coming Soon!
            The World of Warcraft account merge process is not yet available in your region.

            • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

              They've stated that the beta won't start until the EU region can merge their accounts properly. It's in TFA, iirc.

          • You will also have to download and run an application on your computer.

            So no, you can't complete this beta sign up at work like I just tried to do.

            Buggers.

            • It probably looks at your hardware configuration, since they'll want a good varied mixture of testing hardware, so it would not be a good idea to run it on your work machine anyway.

              • by pdbaby (609052)
                I assume the GP is, like me, using Linux at work. I ran into the same thing. Oh well, at least they have a Mac client I can run at home :-)
      • Just merge with your WoW account... are you saying you never played World of Warcraft?!

        What is this...World of Warcraft...of which you speak? Is it popular? I hope it doesn't have gold farming that ruined my Legend of the Red Dragon experience. *hide*

    • by ukyoCE (106879) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:52PM (#27863475) Journal

      On the plus side, that means if you create a separate b.net account for each cd-key (and oh boy do I have a lot of em) you increase your chances of getting into the beta.

      • Any reason you have a lot of em? And can I have some? :)

        • by ukyoCE (106879)

          Heh...I really *should* give em away since I already have a beta SC2 key from Blizzcon last year :)

          Why do I have so many?
          WC2, WC2 battle chest (to get TCPIP multiplayer), WC3, Diablo2, D2 expansion, SC2, SC2 expansion. Most of those games are X2 keys because I got a copy for my wife (girlfriend at the time) to play with me a bit.

          In addition, 6 WOW accounts between us (including ~4 expansion keys). This is due to dual-boxing and Recruit-a-Friend accounts, plus a botched RAF signup that they wouldn't refund

          • Wouldn't it be better to get your wife in on the beta with you? :)

            Or are you just another typical slashdot user who claims to have a girlfriend/wife?

            • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

              by Dyinobal (1427207)
              once the beta starts he'll be getting a divorce.
            • by ukyoCE (106879)

              She went to Blizzcon too, but I can't pretend she's as into the nerdy games as I am. Might sell her SC2 key on ebay to buy clothes/furniture ;)

          • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

            by pdbaby (609052)

            ...SC2, SC2 expansion

            Ah HA! So that's why you have so many CD Keys. You're from the future, no doubt a history student from the year 3045 coming back to play SC2 beta so you can compare and contrast it with the retail version. But I'm on to you!

      • by ukyoCE (106879)

        Addendum: I'd much rather hear that they multiply beta chances by the number of games on your account, as I don't relish the idea of having 12 different battle.net accounts to keep track of.

        Especially if they complete their plans to compete with Steam and offer buddy-list/chat functionality through battle.net accounts.

  • by andytrevino (943397) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:38PM (#27863213) Homepage
    Well, there goes the remainder of my academic career. For Aiur!!
  • Beta Codes (Score:2, Insightful)

    by AAMP31B (1287332)
    If you have the cards from Blizzcon or the World Wide Invitational you can use those for this beta too. Just use mine so once invites start going out should be getting mine.
  • Wow, I think thats the fastest slashdot'ing I have ever seen...

  • No Linux? (Score:4, Funny)

    by SEWilco (27983) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:51PM (#27863437) Homepage Journal
    No Linux, no interest. I won't make my machines susceptible to zerg infection in order to play.
    • Yea, Blizzard is in for a big surprise if they think they'll ever be a successful company without officially supporting linux. /eyeroll

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by AaxelB (1034884)
        Well, some number of us would certainly be happier if they shipped a linux version. They've always been about making the best product they can (and making scads of money in the meanwhile, of course), and it could be worth their while, though it's hard to estimate how many linux users would buy it.

        That said, there's no point complaining, so I'm hoping to get it working in Wine, or else I'll throw a spare hard drive in my desktop and install Windows.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by Yvan256 (722131)

      On the other hand, I've heard they try to make their games run fine under WINE.

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        This is because:
        1. Every geek in the universe plays at least one Blizzard game and Linux geeks are no exception.
        2. Blizzard games take so long to make they're technologically obsolete before they are released.
  • by linzeal (197905) on Thursday May 07 2009, @01:17PM (#27863955) Homepage Journal
    Seriously, I am more scared of South Korea going ballistic over Starcraft 2 than North Korea having the technical aptitude to get an ICBM together.
  • I had to close Firefox to get the systems specifications application to send the info correctly. One Firefox was closed I re-ran the app. and it worked great.
  • by Aggrajag (716041) on Thursday May 07 2009, @01:44PM (#27864419)
    I registered my old Starcraft cd-key from 1998 for the first time and was really surprised when a) it actually worked b) I could download a whole new installer with Brood War included. I had a similar surprise when I registered my old Half-Life cd-key with Steam and got all the HL1 based games for free.
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by ouimetch (1433125)
      I am personally glad that Blizzard decided to put a lot of extra time into this game. The longer the better in my opinion. Too many gaming sequels have been short changed because of a such a rush to get a product out there while the market is still hot(first one that comes to mind is Halo 2).

      Starcraft 2 is going to be an excellent sequel because of the fact that they are not rushing it.
    • by jandrese (485)
      I wanted to like C&C3 and RA3, but both of them used the same network code that doesn't seem to understand how to go through my NAT box, making online play impossible. I still don't understand how a game released in 2008 can be foiled by NAT, I mean it seems like the sort of thing the developers might have considered when making the game... Their online help is a total joke too. The diagnostic tools are from Ultima Online (which uses, as best I can tell, completely different net code) and they don't
      • Re:Late (Score:4, Insightful)

        by khellendros1984 (792761) on Thursday May 07 2009, @12:49PM (#27863401) Journal
        Are you kidding? Starcraft is remembered more for its multiplayer than for its story.
        • Are you kidding? Starcraft is remembered more for its multiplayer than for its story.

          Perhaps by you. I have played multi-player SC, but except for the fact that it was fun I can't remember anything else.
          But I'll remember the story for a long time. Heck, my laptop's name is Tassadar!

          • Re:Late (Score:4, Insightful)

            by VeNoM0619 (1058216) on Thursday May 07 2009, @01:02PM (#27863709) Journal

            The reason Starcraft's multiplayer is so well renoun is because of the near perfect level of balance it had.

            Which kept getting updated and updated and updated... every Blizzard game has "balancing fixes" with each update. Starcraft has had plenty of updates as well. Sure, it's nice they try to keep the game balanced over time, but after a while it's like "how are they changing the gameplay this time? what are they going to nerf?" Too many of one character (or too many victories from one class) to them means it's overpowered and needs adjustment, because it's not a 50/50 split.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Actually, since Blizzard only has 3 IPs, or 2.5, if you wanna consider Starcraft an offshoot of Warcraft, Blizzard should care that I don't care. If there's going to be 10 years between installments, they need to bring something new to the table. The same 3 races with the same basic attributes are not something new. People will just find equivalents to the old units, and the game will feel much like the first, with prettier graphics. You know the first bit of excitement I had over SCII? The April Fool's Day

        • Have you played DIII and SC2? Do you know what the games will be like when they are released? No? Then stop making assumptions and shut up.

          For the record, Blizzard games never brought any thing new to the table. They take established concepts and refine them until the game is fun and balanced. You contradict yourself by saying you were their core audience, and then bash their games which haven't even entered public beta yet.

    • I had that problem the first time I tried it, I just closed it and relaunched it... It then uploaded w/o problem.