Possible PS2 Price Portent Pondered 302
Londovir writes "Could Nintendo soon be sharing shelf space at the $99 rack? According to an article on IGN.com, an internal source at Target claims to have received printed fliers with the Playstation 2 listed at $99. If you remember from an earlier story from September, it was an advance newspaper ad from Target (again), as well as a leaked scan of a Wal-Mart ad, that told the world about the GameCube's price before it happened. Given how the GameCube is outselling the PS2 & XBox - would a price drop so low be so unexpected? One last tidbit to contemplate: Sony is ready to roll the manufacturing plants for their smaller 90 nanometer PS2 CPU. Maybe that price drop isn't so unbelievable after all..."
but... (Score:2, Informative)
2 thoughts (Score:2, Flamebait)
2. Folks who bought a PS2 at $499 must really feel screwed now. And they say Apple has large profit margins !
Re:2 thoughts (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2)
I actually received my delivery yesterday. The sega ages games were the first that interested me enough to buy the system, especially with the price of modding.
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2)
Sure, I still have the receipt, but I'm willing to bet I could hold my breath until I turn blue in the face until I see any sort of refund from EB.
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2, Funny)
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2)
Anybody besides me having Sega Saturn flashbacks?
Re:2 thoughts (Score:3, Interesting)
Each type of system(console/PC) is strong at different types of games. RPGs and FPSs are usually best in the realm of the PC. Sports games on the other hand, I always find to be much more playable on a console. Different strokes for different folks and all
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2)
Console RPGs are linear, constricting, and just plain boring. There's no sense of exploration, so sense of being enveloped in a
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2)
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2)
Rus
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2)
And rightly so, since the price (in US Dollars) at launch was $299.99. Unless they imported their unit prior to launch or we're talking AUS dollars or something, anyone who paid that much needs to put down the pipe.
Absolutely! (Score:2)
1. Graphics are inferior.
2. No mouse control.
3. Inability to mod games.
4. Investment in console is not an investment in PC hardware upgrade or other PC games.
5. Consoles depreciate faster than PCs.
6. Inability to store several games at once?
7. Internet gameplay almost impossible without service, even if free, is monitored.
8. Inability to easily run servers.
9. Requires development license for developers.
10.
Re:Absolutely! (Score:2)
Re:Absolutely! (Score:2)
Games are designed to utilize controllers, not mice.
> 4. Investment in console is not an investment in PC hardware upgrade or other PC games.
And vice versa. Consider the price of the top of the line graphics card - more than the entire console.
> 6. Inability to store several games at once?
Huh? Even a standard PSX memory card has 15 save slots. The Xbox actually lets you have virtually unlimited saves on the hard drive.
> 10. Poor games
You've got to be kidding.
> 11. De
Re:Absolutely! (Score:2)
Only if you consider pixel count to be more important than how it actually looks.
2. No mouse control.
Er, it's a "limitation" that game authors are aware of, hence console games don't need one.
3. Inability to mod games.
Is that something you do often?
4. Investment in console is not an investment in PC hardware upgrade or other PC games.
What you seem to write is that your PC expenses are too high for you to afford a console - which isn't so strange...
5. Consoles depreci
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2)
Consoles have their benefits.
And I paid US$300 to get my PS2 on release day. Are you maybe talking Canadian or Australian dollars? Not sure
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2)
Apple needs large profit margins because they sell few units. For Sony, large profit margins are just icing. I don't know anyone who pai
Re:2 thoughts (Score:3, Interesting)
Somebody invited me to this 8player XBOX Halo party. It was horrible. Besides the fact I had never seen an XBOX before, my assumptions were all proved right. I played for about 30 minutes trying very hard to get used to those silly thumb pad things for rotation, but it just doesn't work. Even though I use a mouse for all PC games, I would even prefer a trackball over these weird thumb pad things on the XBOX. I seriously bet I could learn to use a trackball a lot better then the thing they come with.
That i
Excellent points!! (Score:2)
I remember when I used to play Doom, then Quake with the keyboard. Everyone around me was saying try the mouse, but I didn't think I would like it so I kept on playing with the keyboard as I knew it like the back of my hand. Then, after months and months of just getting blasted by my foes on the game I decided to try it. Man, what a change! Instant 360 degree rotation! I was fragg'n with the best of them. I'll never go back. Sometimes you just gotta' try new things.
+1
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2)
How about this: the best tool for the job. Console games on consoles and computer games on computers?
thirty-two players? (Score:2, Interesting)
64 players is a lot. 24-32 is decent.
How do you expect to fit 32 players into a room in a single-family residence? How do you expect to have players' parents approve of disconnecting their consoles and TVs and LANning up? Oh, you mean Internet play? Many areas are still not wired for residential high-speed Internet access, and satellite still has too much latency for real-time gaming. (Civ and Tetrinet are turn based so they don't count.) Even in areas wired for broadband, most minor children's allowan
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2)
Really? Damn. I guess I must not have been having fun in all those 2, 3, and 4-player Doom deathmatches back in the day. And to think, all these 22 years I've been playing, I didn't even realize that you needed > 8 people to have fun at a video game...
--Jeremy
Re:2 thoughts (Score:2)
Actually, I've tried to do a FPS with a controller, and even a minute is not enough. You just don't develop the thumb-muscles to use it efficently/painlessly if you are used to mouse/keyboard.
Keyboard mouse - use all 8 fingers. One thumb for space-bar
Controller - Both thumbs for multiple sets of controls. 4/2 fingers for the trigger buttons on the end.
Big physical difference.
Why should they lower the price? (Score:2)
Now the XBOX is a different case entirely, it really needs to be cheaper.
I suspect Sony will keep the price where it is in the run up
Re:Why should they lower the price? (Score:2)
Why the hell else would someone buy a game console? Because it matches thier curtains?
END COMMUNICATION
Re:Why should they lower the price? (Score:2)
Buy a GameCube, then buy:
Metroid Prime
Legend of Zelda: Windwaker
Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem
Rogue Squadron III: Rebel Strike
Those four alone should make the Cube wor
Re:Why should they lower the price? (Score:2)
Re:Why should they lower the price? (Score:2)
Re:Why should they lower the price? (Score:2)
Plus I love Metroid and Zelda, so the Cube was a no-brainer.
Cheap Linux Box (Score:2)
Rus
Re:Cheap Linux Box (Score:2)
Re:Cheap Linux Box (Score:2)
Linux on Xbox utilizes all of the processor, at 733 MHz or whatever it is. It can be booted at least from the hard drive and maybe from the CD with the right BIOS. It can read the CDROM drive, which as we all know is just a normal ATAPI DVD-ROM, but which you could prob
Will this kill the XBox? (Score:4, Informative)
It's hard to see how Microsoft can get the XBox to profitability. The original game plan was that decreasing electronics costs would eventually make the XBox profitable at the original price point. But Nintendo and Sony aren't letting Microsoft maintain that price point. They've pushed the price of game consoles down from around $300 to $100. Microsoft was losing money on every unit at $300; it's worse now.
The only way Microsoft can make money with the XBox is if they achieve market dominance and pricing power. That's not happening. They've found themselves in price competition against larger competitors with lower costs, an unusual position for Microsoft.
Microsoft is trying to design a lower-priced XBox 2, which might bail them out of this hole. But that's still some time away.
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2)
Ah, competition... isn't it grand?
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:3, Funny)
S
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2)
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2)
How to earn karma and influence slashdotters (Score:2)
Take every possible chance to slam the Xbox, even if the article isn't specifically Xbox related:
1. tell everybody how it loses money on every unit sold.
2. Evil Empire microsoft bad, evil empire Sony good.
3. fail to realise that they ALL have their good and bad points, and there are still people futzing around with the Atari 2600, dreamcast, et. al. And when (if?) one of the three players fails, hey CHEAP GAMES!
BTW, The judges are docking you points be
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:4, Interesting)
If Sony wants to kill the Xbox they will have to bring out a version of the PS2 which comes with the hard drive and ethernet interface, which can both run linux and play games on the internet, and which costs no more than the Xbox. Obviously their PSX system (It is terribly ignorant of Sony to name their new system the PSX, given that their old system is commonly known as PSX, but that's a subject for another rant I guess) is not going to be any kind of competitor, as it will price itself right out of existence for almost everyone.
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2)
The fact is, people will see the PS2 as 99 dollars and the xbox as 180, regardless of extra costs of necessary components, or older, slower hardware.. that's not what people see when they're looking at the advertisements making up their minds. They see: ps2 99 dollars, vice city 20 dollars, SCORE.
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2)
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2)
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2)
You are wrong. Period. While Games are the primary driving force behind console sales, Linux-running ability does sell consoles. I bought a PS2 for gaming, but I bought the Xbox because it would run linux and work as a media center. I am hardly the only one, so obviously some percentage of sales are due to the ease of hacking. So you might say that Games primarily sell consoles, but you would be (and are) absolutely incorrect to say that hacking ability does not sell them.
Since we were talking about run
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2)
He's not wrong, and you're only barely right.
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2)
Beating someone means removing them from the game. Microsoft continues to be a major player and their momentum is increasing. Xbox live continues to draw many people to their system. It looks like Microsoft will be the next Sega in terms of sports gaming, and they certainly have the most fully-developed online experience in console gaming.
I never said everyone modded their Xbox, nor that I was in the majority. I simply said that hacking ability sells consoles. Look around the internet for hacking sites,
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2, Insightful)
As cool as Linux on the Xbox is it means jack shit in terms of sales. Even if it didn't the money is in the games, MS may not loose cash on an Xbox sale, but they sure as hell aren't making very much.
As far as Ethernet and Hard-drives go once again they don't really make a big difference. Most people don't care about them, and those who do (admittedly a significant percentage of the market) tend to be the sort of people who buy one of each of the systems out anyway.
The console mark
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2)
Today console system developers must walk a fine line between enough hackability, and too much hackability; If the system is too easy to copy games for (Read: Dreamcast) then sales will taper off to nothing. If you don't need to at least open the case and void your warranty (though the warranties are becom
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2)
Unusual in the 20 year sense, but not in the 10 year sense. Microsoft's biggest problem (not unlike any new company) is proving that their initial success with Windows was not just a fluke. They outlasted larger companies by lost-leader techniques
Re:Will this kill the XBox? (Score:2)
Every time this gets discussed, people forget something important: Microsoft has all the money in the world to burn. Going into the console market, Microsoft knew that it would lose money on the first XBox. And the second. Maybe even the third. But Microsoft has way more staying power than Sony or Nintendo, and they can literally run the clock out on their c
avoidable alliteration awkwardly accomplished (Score:2)
Pedantry (Score:2)
Not a pedant (Score:2)
Great news for Xbox (Score:4, Insightful)
To be honest, as a geek, Xbox has become my favorite plaything. The games have started to get very good (I've been playing Panzer Dragoon and Voodoo Vince pretty much non-stop) and, when you're ready to hack the system, all the parts are there. I actually have two: one legitimate one I use on Xbox Live and another I've sacrificed for hacking. Hard drive, Intel processor, networking, nice video: card all for $100? I'll pick up another.
Re:Great news for Xbox (Score:2, Insightful)
Good point, bad logic (Score:2)
But your point is correct - people don't want to buy something that costs $10.00. They want it for $9.99 - maybe because it has less digits.
Good deal (Score:2)
Re:Good deal (Score:2)
Re:Good deal (Score:2)
What would happen? (Score:2)
You know how quickly they could saturate the market? Would the quikness hurt sales? I mean if PS3 came out at that point and Xbox2 was $300+ which one would you get?
This would certainly help to have a huge user base to buy games which iirc are the main source of revenue and profits.
GC have anything like the new PS2 netplay games? (Score:2)
Okay, so this is slightly offtopic but...
Monster Hunter [gamespot.com] for PS2 is like a multiplayer morrowind meets rune game that has USB kb support. Finally networked games worth playing on a console. =)
Re:GC have anything like the new PS2 netplay games (Score:2)
The price drop is unlikely, but is still possible (Score:3, Insightful)
The GCN was designed from the very beginning as a low-price machine. The ATI and IBM chips are very well integrated and have a lot of room for costs reduction. At the time of launch, they were still made using a
Many regarded the GCN's production halt as a sign of weakness, but this has been a normal move since the first NES. I can certainly see a more integrated GCN motherboard (can the thing be even better? It's already incredibly tiny and simple), maybe even putting everything on one die, just what ultimately happened with the SNES. Slashing costs even further is possible because the TSOP technology used is far chesper now than in 2000 when the GCN's spec was frozen.
For Nintendo, this is something they had planned for so long and it's finally paying off. But Sony and Microsoft have much more to lose if their price point got to that low level.
Sony just launched the SCPH-50000 model a few months ago, so I don't think they can roll out a
This Christmas season suddenly seems a lot more interesting and leaves me wondering about the next one... Historically these price drops happen only when the next consoles are around the corner, which is definitely not the case here.
Re:The price drop is unlikely, but is still possib (Score:2)
I'm not surprised.. (Score:3, Insightful)
How in the PS2 now? Almost 3 years old (In the US). Based on previous game consoles, that means the PS2 is nearing the average lifetime of a console (which is about 3~5 years).
Regardless of sales and the numbers game, Sony is under pressure to continue the impression that they're dominating the market. The gaming industry may be big business, but as it is the gaming industry is a harsh, demanding market with little room for failures or mistakes. (Sega being the biggest example) If Sony was to lose footing due to the PS2's weak hardware (expansions don't really count) and fails to bring the PS3 out in time to compete, Sony will be in huge trouble.
Christmas will be here in less than 3 months. What more can I say?
Re:PS2 and the need for one. (Score:2)
Re:Welp (Score:2)
Re:XBOX will be lonley (Score:2)
Aside from M$ hating, I couldn't imagine buying a PS2 instead of an Xbox. The graphics on the Xbox are superior. This would be different if the PS2 has FSAA and a HDD.
I'm not being a zealot here, I own both systems and I only turn my PS2 on to play DBZ: Bodukai anymore. All other titles, I wait for the Xbox release in hopes of graphical enhancements.
With a little customization to your Xbox, you can slap a 120 gig HDD in it and run your
Re:XBOX will be lonley (Score:2)
they're junk... i hate playing fighting games with them and most other games..
I own all 3 consoles... i haven't fired up my xbox in months...
last game i bought was SCII....for PS2.. sure graphics are a little prettier on xbox.. but so what... the controls are better on the pS2.. that means a hundred times more to me and other gamers..
Also lets consider online play... i bought madden.. guess what.. its only on PS2.. and its free and i don't have to pay 60 box to micr
Re:XBOX will be lonley (Score:2)
Re:XBOX will be lonley (Score:2)
Re:XBOX will be lonley (Score:2)
link [lik-sang.com]
Works like a charm, and lets you use Saturn and Dreamcast controllers to boot! I use the Saturn controller for SC2, and I never looked back!
Re:XBOX will be lonley (Score:2)
Yeah, I do like the PS2 controllers better too.
Still, tho, I can't deal with those jaggies on a big screen. If the PS2 had FSAA and component video output (at least 720p resolution, native), then things would be different.
Re:XBOX will be lonley (Score:2)
My tv doesn't.. so ps2 is fine for me till next gen consoles... plus the games are better
Re:XBOX will be lonley (Score:2)
Re:XBOX will be lonley (Score:2)
Re:Um... (Score:2)
Do you have a link which shows detail on Sonys cost of goods sold? By this point I bet that Sonys cost to make a single PS2 is much lower than people think.
Re:Um... (Score:2)
Didn't Nintendo come out not to long ago and say that they have never taken a loss on what they sold the consoles for? I'm sure they make a majority of the money on licensing et al. The Xbox is a diffent beast though, since MS has been selling it at a loss when Nvidia wouldn't help cover some of the costs.
Re:Um... (Score:2)
Within the first few days of the announcement, some retailers were selling as many as 70 GameCubes a day (although sales appear to be declining). Last week's sales data shows that the GameCube outsold the Playstatio
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2)
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2)
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2)
The cube has the best selection of 'party' (4 player) games available. I guess you can't enjoy these titles though since they're on a kiddie system.
Also, not everyone has $200+ to throw around for a system, memory card and game. $100 is still a lot of money to a lot of people these days.
So people do buy PS2's or Gamecubes because of price.
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2, Insightful)
I know the gamecube has a reputation for being a kiddie system, but it simply is not the case. I can remember clearly at launch and for the several months afterward that there were no 'kiddie' games. In fact, a quick look at the PS2 lineup will find hundreds of kiddie games, many of them worthless.
If you still think its kiddie, go pick up Resident Evil 4 for GameCube (the ne
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2)
a quick google search reveals that adults make up a full 40% [216.239.57.104] of gamecube buyers compared to 60% [216.239.57.104] for the console industry as a whole. that means that all 3 console manufacturers are targeting pretty much the same demographic; the current surge in sales of the gamecube will impact the sales of both the ps2 and the xbox.
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2)
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2)
If a PS2 was also $99 I bet they'd sell like gangbusters.
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2)
If everybody bought everything because of price, Wal-Mart would be the only store left in the country. As is, I have a thriving high-end retail store as PROOF that not everything revolves around price. Some of us still care about quality...
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2)
The hard part is convincing a lot of people that paying twice as much gets twice as much quality, and really, rarely does one get doubling of quality on doubling of price.
As it is, the market for better products is much smaller than the stuff that is literally a commodity.
Resident Evil?!? (Score:2)
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2)
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2)
<WONKA>
Strike that. Reverse it.
</WONKA>
Re:Not gonna help... (Score:2)
I only wish I did...
Re:Who cares if games are still overpriced? (Score:2)
Games are where the money's at. (Score:2)
Re:I don't get this story (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Huh? (Score:2)
Re:Own all the consoles (Score:2)