Slashdot Log In
Moody Non-Photo-Realistic Driving
Posted by
timothy
on Wed Aug 10, 2005 05:39 AM
from the this-looks-fun dept.
from the this-looks-fun dept.
An anonymous reader points out a project called Drivey, which he describes as "a dark and fascinating example of 2.xD [not quite 3d] graphical rendering. This tiny, free [as in beer] demo gives you an amazingly compelling driving experience. To quote the author, 'It was conceived as a driving simulator for old farts like myself, who are kind of nostalgic for the "old days" [ca. 1985] but are not so thick as to believe that the games from the 80s were actually in any way superior to the games we play today.' Even works fine under WINE!"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Moody Non-Photo-Realistic Driving
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 479 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
I cannae see shit, cap'n! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I cannae see shit, cap'n! (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Tuesday July 08 2003, @09:31AM)
Congratulations, you've just invented the new "imagine a beowulf cluster of
Re:Burnout ruled (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.mattowen.com/)
Not all games/demos have to be at the burning edge of graphics.
15 years on, and loads of people still play lemmings. The emulator scene for old 16 bit machines, and even old arcade machines is bigger than ever. All these people can't be wrong.
All modern games have, is their graphics. Most of them don't even have enjoyable game-play. Graphics are not everything, calling a game with low-spec graphics, rubbish, is like saying Impressionists couldn't paint.
-Jar.
Trojan? (Score:3, Funny)
(http://www.primary0.com/)
Well, gee whiz (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/)
why ? it works on Wine... (Score:4, Informative)
(http://t3.dotgnu.info/ | Last Journal: Monday September 26 2005, @06:32AM)
You'll realize that all the "standard" offsets most viruses use for exploiting buffer overflows are almost always not valid in Wine.
Also this has been featured on tucows.com
Re:Uh, what? (Score:4, Funny)
Seeing as how he's spent time in federal prison, I'm just gonna hafta take his word for it... : p
Re:Well, gee whiz (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www./..com/)
MTV (Score:5, Interesting)
Style (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Monday February 09 2004, @07:21AM)
Simple cell-shading done with style. This is what's missing from most games. Real style.
If I wanted photo-realism, I'd get up from my PC and head out the front door. Games such as WoW, Rez, Killer 7 and Ico have shown that a little creativity in the design can go a long way. It can also be easy on the gpu.
Re:Style (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.jwnyc.com/)
Its one of the very few genres were maximum realism really is wanted, because everybody known how it look to drive and have expectations how it should look like when driving, well, faster...
You've obviously never played games like Burnout, Outrun, Daytona USA, Ridge Racer, Wipeout, F-Zero, or any of the other myriad of racing games where realism is most definitely not the goal...
And to the "style" of this "demo". Well, i cant call it style, and i cant call it a demo. Its more like a short looping flash movie, and the "style" is using only one colour and making everything so dark you cant see there isnt anything too see.
And from this, I can tell you've obviously never played any of the prior art listed on this page, such as Night Driver or Speed Freak.
Racing games are not a genre that requires any more realism than any other genre. The point of a racing game is to have fun. There is no need for them to be realistic - there is only a need to make you feel like you are driving something.
This guy does call this a "driving simulation", which implies realism, but even that's a misnomer. There's nothing about the word "simulation" that implies realistic visuals - the dictionary definition that applies in this case is "Representation of the operation or features of one process or system through the use of another: computer simulation of an in-flight emergency."
And to further that example, modern commercial flight sims (you know, the ones that cost $2 million each) have less realistic graphics than commercially-available flight simulators available at your local GameStop. Because simulating the inner workings of something is not really about texture-mapping every single crack on the asphalt.
Re:Style (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.urbandetail.ca/)
Please.
It's just a fun little project. You're going to give yourself a heart attack trying to find fault.
Drivey Crashes (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.e3.com.au/)
Problem is I get crashes before it even starts.
It appears Drivey does not like my Dual Screens.
It flashes some kind of grahics test across both monitors and then exits.
Durn.
Pretty good (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.hipersonik.com/)
Nice project, now lets back to Gran Turismo and see what still needs to be done (-:
Howto Make it a Screensaver in Windows (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Howto Make it a Screensaver in Windows (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Monday February 04 2002, @03:31PM)
Re:Howto Make it a Screensaver in Windows (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.lemming.be/)
You now have a screensaver which doesn't exit on mouse movements or key presses
Also, a standard
Renaming
Re:Howto Make it a Screensaver in Windows (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.reamined.on.ca/doconnor)
Not only is it a cool screen saver, it's secure too.
tried it (Score:5, Interesting)
Most games overdo stuff with graphics when they could focus on content.
Now all we need is some cows, logs, perhaps some water, dual player, 2x tac2 and rear view of a mockup car with lotus logo.
2.5D graphics rendering (Score:5, Interesting)
Interesting thing here is the big black blob in the top left, which is the bottom end of a light pole. Why is it floating in the air? Because extruded objects can't currently be drawn correctly unless one end is visible to the observer. The reason for this is remarkably interesting, specific to the weird 2-and-a-half-D rendering system, and pretty much impossible to explain to anyone without a strong background in both 2D and 3D graphics. *sigh* oh well, I find it interesting anyway.
It sounds interesting to me... but I don't have a background in both 2D and 3D graphics. Would someone care to explain it?
Re:2.5D graphics rendering (Score:5, Informative)
The problem is that it's trying to show 3 dimensions with only 2 dimensional objects. Here's another problem with a similar issue. Imagine a very flat wall. Take a large light source like the sun and bring it to a position above and behind the wall, now the wall face is dark and a long shadow is cast. Now move the light source to the front of the wall. The wall is lit up and no shadow is cast by the wall. Now slowly move the light source up directly over the edge of the wall. Get to the point just before a shadow would appear. Should the wall be lit? Should it be dark? Should half of it be lit?
Re:2.5D graphics rendering (Score:5, Funny)
Ensuring that it's at least 25% flatter than your everyday, ordinary flat wall...
it's only a demo but... (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.iainalexander.com/)
I found a rather obvious bug... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:it makes sense really (Score:5, Interesting)
This page [pandora.be] gives an interesting description on driving traditions.
Basically, driving on the left comes from the need to protect yourself with your sword arm from oncoming attackers, and driving on the right comes from needing to whip a train of horses with your right hand while riding on the left-rear horse (this was before seats, and if you're on the left hand horse, it's easier to pass people on the right). So both systems are rooted in the notion that most people are right handed, it's just that the use of the right hand for either reigns or swords determined the protocol chosen.
Re:I found a rather obvious bug... (Score:5, Funny)
Bonus Code Fu Courtesy of Bill Gates (Score:5, Funny)
Even though probably no one much ever played this primitive bit of DOS/BASIC demo software [purportedly the last piece of professional software ever written by Bill Gates!]
Good to see he ended on such a high note.
Correction and Note (Score:4, Informative)
(http://magnolia.fadeover.org/)
Fatal error: (Score:5, Funny)
(http://expatexp.blogspot.com/)
Frivolties aside, if realism isn't the goal, why stick to our boring terran transportation? I think the game would be really cool if some ideas were stolen^W^W^W inspiration was taken from Wipeout, letting some big air jumps enter the game. Why not take a little from Tribes aswell and add the jet boost-thing?
Mix well and the result is a toe curling orgasm^W^W^W hit for sure.
Waiting... (Score:4, Funny)
And dont forget to.. (Score:4, Informative)
http://intepid.com/2005-05-08/13.49/ [intepid.com]
It is really good!
Way, way too unrealistic... (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.davidmcmanus.com/)
Bunch of different keyboard commands, too (Score:3, Informative)
Body roll physics (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://juddy.org/)
Know what?
I prefer the BMW! #1 reason: Predictable body roll physics. I turn the wheel left, and the car follows. Not so in Drivey, where I turn the car right, and the horizon tips over to the opposite side. Does Drivey think it's a boat?
Drivey has fine acceleration however, and I dig the everlasting twilight/dawn.
It reminds me a lot of the Ford Simulator [dosgamesarchive.com] that existed in the oldenne days (1987). Not as much instrumentation, but who really needs a tach or speedo anyway?
Easter Eggs! (Score:3, Informative)
(http://zachnichols.com/jason)
- Left, Right, Up, Down: Steer & Accelerate/Brake
- A, D, W, S: Same as above, respectively
- T: Toggle Info
- G: Grey Scale
- H: display random palette
- K: palette cycle (Pretty cool)
- C: adds Other Cars (8 at a time)
- N/M: Zoom in/out
- F1: Shows all key functions on Screen
- F2: Toggle WireFrame
- F3: Toggle Dashboard
- F4: Show Rear View
- F5: Toggle Manual Control
- F6: Toggle Sound
- F7: Change Sky Gradient
- F11: Toggle Full Screen
Play around with it!Note: you can seriously slow down the game by hitting C a whole bunch of times.
Re:Anyone tried it yet? (Score:5, Informative)
Arrow/WASD keys control steering and accel/brake, but the car drives itself to stay on the road so you really can't steer. 1-4 selects a road/scene, C adds 8 cars, K toggles palette rotation.
With palette rotation this would almost make a good screensaver...
=Smidge=
Re:Anyone tried it yet? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/karekol/)