Peter Jackson to Executive Produce Halo Movie 277
e03179 writes "According to Reuters, 'the Oscar-winning creative team behind the The Lord of the Rings films, including director Peter Jackson, has been named to run the production of the upcoming film based on Microsoft Corp.'s blockbuster Halo video game, the company said on Tuesday.' The film will be shot in New Zealand and Jackson's production and post-production studios will be used. World-wide release is set for mid-2007 by Fox and Universal. The then rumor was started by Gamespot two weeks ago and was previously covered by Slashdot." Okay, *now* I'm interested. More details available on the Bungie site.
I've got a good title... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I've got a good title... (Score:2)
Re:I've got a good title... (Score:5, Informative)
Red vs Blue is a machinima [wikipedia.org] series done by some fans of Halo. Been going on for several years, won some awards, and become the defacto standard to compare new machinima series to.
It's actually got some very funny parts, especially if you're familiar with Halo.
whoosh! (Score:4, Funny)
hear that?
Thats the joke going over your head.
CJC
Re:I've got a good title... (Score:2)
3 Hours? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:3 Hours? (Score:2)
Not without an ending.
(I kid, I kid.)
Re:3 Hours? (Score:3, Funny)
Yes, and it will start out with a view of Halo, and a deep dark voice saying:
"One ring to rule them all....."
It depends where it takes its plotline from... (Score:2)
But to be serious (as serious as one should be with, yaknow, entertainment), it probably won't follow the games too rabidly. And this will probably be a good thing. See, for example, the Resident
You knew it was going to happen... (Score:2)
Re:You knew it was going to happen... (Score:2)
But should be made? That is the question
I think it will be a boring film. Frankly i dont movies made based on videogames. I'd rather just have really good videogames with cinematic quality story telling.
Re:You knew it was going to happen... (Score:2)
Now, that said, they probably won't touch on any of that. But it could happen.
Re:You knew it was going to happen... (Score:2)
Though, I suppose maybe this time they may actually stick closer to the plot from the novel.
Yaup (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Yaup (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Yaup (Score:5, Interesting)
Or, like Disney with a Pixar film. Or American Airlines with a Boeing aircraft. People who put a product out in front of that product's consumers/users generally have their name associated with it. But I suppose you're the sort that never reads the credits, and assumes that no one else does, either. Do you really think that MS's cash, audience, game platform, etc., has nothing to do with the success of the game? I think Pixar's work is fantastic... but I know that the success of say, the Toy Story franchise, is at least partly owed to Disney's professional marketing teams - even though they didn't color a single pixel. Don't pretend that marketing isn't important. Great games with no marketing frequently fail. Mediocre games with lots of marketing often get results. But great games with great marketing really attract an audience, and that's why it's done. Disney coughed up a lot of money into marketing and distribution in its partnership with Pixar, just like MS does with the games they front. Of course, things with Pixar/Disney have gotten a little rough lately. That will definitely be too bad for Disney, since only Pixar can do what Pixar does.
Come on, admit it. You're worried that Jackson will make a very cool (or at least, successful) movie, and that MS will get a little street cred buff as a result of having been involved with the product's successfully large audience.
Re:Yaup (Score:2)
Re:Yaup (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Yaup (Score:2)
Um, considering that a game console title typically retails for 3-5 times the cost of a movie ticket, and that day-of-release performance has a lot more limitations on the movie side of things (finite number of seats and showings, etc.), I would have to say MAYBE.
That works out well (Score:5, Funny)
Re: Hell Froze Over (Score:2, Interesting)
Actually, accoding the the Inquirer and Amazon.com its actually going to come out in December. I suck at HTML Link [theinquirer.net]
Thats the game, not the movie. Surprised Slashdot didn't link this, but its understandable since it's vaporware.
Don't You Mean.... (Score:3, Funny)
That scream you just heard... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:That scream you just heard... (Score:2)
So? (Score:5, Informative)
An executive producer of a motion picture is typically a producer who is not necessarily involved in any creative or technical aspects of production. They generally handle business issues, and may be a financier of a movie. Some executive producers act as representatives of the studio or production company that is releasing or producing a film, occasionally being credited as Executive in charge of production.
So, um, why does it matter that he's doing this?
Re:So? (Score:5, Insightful)
And Peter Jackson wouldn't want to ruin his name.. (Score:2)
Re:And Peter Jackson wouldn't want to ruin his nam (Score:4, Interesting)
I wouldn't quite call it selling out yet, but it's how the Hollywood game is played.
Re:So? (Score:2)
then I got a little sad,
then I thought about it and realized that marketing should serve a purpose, it should tell you whats really worth buying, and lesser products should get less marketing. Too bad the process has been bastardized since at least the '80s and good marketing no longer means good product.
then I thought a little harder and wondered if that was niave thinking that marketing used to serve a purpose other than hyping product good or bad. Cigarettes
Re:So? (Score:2)
Re:So? (Score:5, Informative)
Film producers did once have more creative control, but that was because of the studio system, where there were no independent films on the radar and the people working under the producers had to grit their teeth and bear it. Now-a-days "the man with the money" really doesn't mean much to the movie itself; the executive producer basically exerts his creative control by trying to keep the movie on budget and giving it the final OK. Now making a movie financially successful, on the other hand...
Rob
Re: (Score:2)
Re:So? (Score:5, Informative)
This gets particularly hairy when you hear titles like "Executive Producer" or "Co-Producer". These can be almost honorary titles. However, in a movie, when you have a creative type who's listed as "executive producer", there's a good chance he's running the show, but has chosen not to direct the thing himself (i.e. Lucas and Star Wars).
Due to his success with the LoTR movies, I'm guessing he's not hurting for work/money, and therefore, if he's getting involved with Halo, it's probably because he's interested in it. Meaning he probably won't be creatively detached. Meaning, if you're a Peter Jackson fan, it's good news for Halo.
Re:So? (Score:2)
And Spielburg to Direct... (Score:5, Funny)
The touching movie about two lines and the square ball they share.
Has Hollywood run out of ideas?
willie
Re:And Spielburg to Direct... (Score:3, Funny)
Spielberg already directed a World Famous Movie of Pong! [tlf.cx]
Re:And Spielburg to Direct... (Score:2)
Never mind...
"Breathe deep the gathering gloom,
Watch lights fade from every room.
Bedsitter people look back and lament
Another day's useless energy is spent.
Impassioned lovers wrestle as one;
Lonely man cries for love and has none;
New mother picks up and suckles her son;
Senior citizens wish they were young.
Cold-hearted orb that rules the night
Removes the colours from our sight,
Red is grey is yellow white
But we decide which is right
And which i
Re:And Spielburg to Direct... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:And Spielburg to Direct... (Score:2)
I'm still waiting for Tetris: The Movie (Score:5, Funny)
Seems only appropriate to mention Doom (Score:5, Funny)
Went to see Serenity this weekend and they showed Doom trailer that
featured nice shots of something being poked at with a chainsaw
The story line seemed to be unintrusively good too - "Mars. Horrible
disaster. If it breathes, shoot it."
Opens in late October 2005.
Re:Seems only appropriate to mention Doom (Score:2)
I wish Jackson luck but there has never been a good movie based on a game (and vice versa.)Maybe he can break the curse.
Re:Seems only appropriate to mention Doom (Score:2)
example 1: Goldeneye 007 on N64
example 2: I heard riddick was good, havent played it yet
alright, forget the second example, bond was good enough to break the mold. It can be done, but only by a good team that does something amazing.
Re:Seems only appropriate to mention Doom (Score:2)
or does that count? I dont know
Re:Seems only appropriate to mention Doom (Score:2, Insightful)
I will submit that there has been one good Video Game movie. And that movie is:
(deep breath)
Mortal Kombat.
Think about it, every charater is introduced in like the first 15 min's with a nice clipped explination of who they are and why they're there. The story fills you in on everything you need to know as to what is actually going on. And it's fun.
The figh
Re:Seems only appropriate to mention Doom (Score:3, Funny)
Wrong, there have been PLENTY of good movies made from video games:
Money? (Score:2)
So if the movie makes $50 mil domestically, All Microsoft gets is $5 mil. They were negotiating for more I guess MS was shown the middle finger.
Re:Money? (Score:2)
Microsoft also gets a ton of hype and free promotion for their Halo sequels. You could think of the movie as a commercial for the Halo video games, a commercial that not only does Microsoft not have to pay for, they actually GET paid $5 million for it. Then somebody else spends a fortune marketing the movie, which spreads the Halo name far and wide without Microsoft spending a dime. It's free marketing! Microsoft should be paying
The Hobbit? (Score:2)
Re:The Hobbit? (Score:2)
Re:The Hobbit? (Score:2)
A lot of work to do... (Score:2)
Typical Microsoft Film . . . (Score:2, Funny)
Are they going to provide the raw editable video source for free download? Heck, if I don't like something in the storyline I want to be able to edit it and recomplie my own version. Or if there's a glitch in the playback I can debug it myself.
It's a movie about Microsoft software!!! I'm going to boycott this evil movie.
What about HALO 2 for the PC? (Score:2)
Re:What about HALO 2 for the PC? (Score:2)
Re:What about HALO 2 for the PC? (Score:2, Informative)
Halo only made it to the PC because it had a legacy (first Mac, then PC, then Xbox) of promises and Bungie felt they should follow through on at least one of them (sorry, no Mac version). Halo 2 from the very start was designed as Xbox-exclusive. Neither Microsoft nor Bungie have ever even hinted at a PC release, and in fact have denied it on several
Why movies are going down the tubes... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why movies are going down the tubes... (Score:2, Funny)
Doomed? We'll see. (Score:2)
We'll see how doomed they are when the game's fans all over the country pay money to see it. It's not just that the industry is uncreative. There's a definite market for garbage.
Re:Why movies are going down the tubes... (Score:2)
Good Precendent (Score:4, Insightful)
reality check (Score:5, Insightful)
jackson: "yeah, sure, why not, there's some free time on the servers between king kong wrapping up and us putting 'the hobbit' into preproduction"
studio exec: "ok thanks"
newslines scream: peter jackson, EXECUTIVE PRODUCER OF HALO THE MOVIE
but the above exchange is about the sum total of his involvement in the movie folks, sorry
the title "executive producer" is like getting the key to the city from the mayor: that key opens about as many real doors as the executive producer is involved in any real movie making work
Re:reality check (Score:2)
For example, do you think John Lasseter had little involvement on all the Pixar movies he was "executive producer" for?
And who's the director? (Score:2)
It hasn't even been 10 years... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It hasn't even been 10 years... (Score:2)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0367093/ [imdb.com]
Great Gmes = Great Movies! (Score:2)
Yes, but... (Score:2)
What's going on here?! (Score:2)
Re:What's going on here?! (Score:2)
The people that are in the positions to make the movies they always wanted to make were into comics at the end of the Silver Age, and the bankrollers know that the next generation of people bought even more comics than them.
It may get harder for studios to pull that off over time as interests become increasingly diverse thanks to being able to join any little community of people on the net.
Re:What's going on here?! (Score:2)
Re:What's going on here?! (Score:2)
Comic movies have been made for ages but the tech was never able to compete with the expectations of the fans, no matter how much money there was.
Now you can just render a skin tight body suit and it looks good. That's one major hurdle to suspension of disbelief there.
The viewers were already out there, there just wasn't anything worth watching until CGI reached the right level of cost and quality.
Come on, noone cares about Peter Jackson (Score:2, Funny)
Come on, if he'll do Snakes On A Plane, he'll do this...
Too bad it's hype (Score:2)
This is unfortunate, because before he made good movies, Peter Jackson made awful movies which were FUN TO WATCH. The B movie tradition is strong even in his recent blockbusters.
Now, obviously, the Halo movie is going to be completely dreadful. If you were exp
How about Half-Life, the movie? (Score:2)
Re:How about Half-Life, the movie? (Score:2)
Compare HLs story line to the story line of most any action film in the last 5 years and I think you'll find that HLs story line kicks the shit out of most modern action films.
And the story isn't over yet...
What? NO! (Score:2)
Doesn't he realize that's one of the signs of the apocolypse?
Maybe I'm overreacting. It's possible that even Jackson's emmense skill can't overcome the abomination that is the video-game-to-movie genra.
Re:What? NO! (Score:2)
I suggest you go back and look at some of his earlier works.
He's had his share of really good and really bad.
Executive Producer doesn't matter; Director does. (Score:2, Informative)
Executive Producer George Lucas George Lucas Studio Suits
Director George Lucas Steven Spielberg Peter Jackson
The Director is far more important than the Executive Producer. Anybody with money can execu
One simple request (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:One simple request (Score:3, Funny)
*ducks*
~X~
Peter Jackson WILL be involved (Score:2, Informative)
I don't think he'll just be writing checks.
Why Make A Movie? (Score:2)
It's worth noting that every project like this runs the risk of becoming another Super Mario Brothers fiasco.
If he bases it on my usual game of Halo (Score:3, Funny)
Maybe the music will be better.
Kevin Bacon (Score:5, Funny)
Re:At least it won't matter if he changes the plot (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:At least it won't matter if he changes the plot (Score:2)
Re:At least it won't matter if he changes the plot (Score:5, Funny)
Re:At least it won't matter if he changes the plot (Score:2)
Re:bad experince (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Finally. (Score:2)
Re:Finally. (Score:2)
There has never been a good movie made based on a video game.
Never.
I'm going to wait until they actually make a film worth watching, just once, before I ever give a damn about pre-release hype involving a video game movie.
Besides, I'm too busy watching "Serenity" over and over right now.
Re:Finally. (Score:2)
One (Score:2)
Re:Who will Play the Aliens? (Score:2)
My only major gripe with the game was that you had to leave the extremely useful pistol behind. It was awesome for taking down Elites (and Hunters when they showed up) but you couldn't justify using a weapon slot for it when you have a shotgun and an Elite's plasma rifle (or the sniper rifle).
Re:The cast? (Score:2)
Re:Wow (Score:2)
The problem with drawing non-fans to video game films is that it's attached to a video game. It doesn't mean the film is going to be bad but a good section of the population will dismiss a film based on it's source; "Oh, a film about a comic book/video game/cartoon. great...uh yeah... great..."
So this really is an uphill battle. Jackson was fortunate to get LotRs. It's doing well was almost a given considering it's true core audie
Re:I wonder what it costs to buy off Peter Jackson (Score:2)
This is a case of Jackson buying someone else off. Jackson will put his own money down in the hopes that this film will do well. the real question with this announcement is if Jackson is putting his cash down on the right horse of if he's been drinking too many mint julips in the hot summer sun and is just taking a wild guess.
And let's face facts here, just because Jackson thinks this film will profit doesn't mean he thinks it will be a good film.
Re:Yet Another Video Game Movie That Will Suck (Score:3, Insightful)
A new take, new technology, good writing can make a good movie.
by good, I mean enjoyable.
How does that change you (Score:3, Insightful)
All I ask from Hollywood is movies worth paying for and lately, in general, they are failing. I don't give a shit what equipment or software they use whether its OSS or Microsoft products. I just want to get out from the movie theatre and say to myself "Now that was a good movie!". I haven't had one of those in a long time.