Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Banned From WoW For WINE & Programmable Keyboard

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wed Mar 15, 2006 09:30 AM
from the they-hates-them-the-emulation dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Player gets banned for playing World of Warcraft under WINE and using a Logitech Gaming keyboard. "I am an experienced network engineer for an ISP and I am often running World of Warcraft on Linux through the use of WINE..."" Although the e-mails exchanged are unclear my guess is that the programmable keyboard was more the problem then WINE. Not that you'd ever know that given that Blizzard communicates with their users seemingly almost exclusively with form letters.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • Anonymous? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by LiquidCoooled (634315) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:33AM (#14923631)
    Slashdot profile [slashdot.org]

    The keyboard he is using sounds quite cool though :)
    I shall have to look into getting one.
    • Re:Anonymous? by Lester67 (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:46AM
      • Re:Anonymous? by Jaysyn (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:18AM
        • Re:Anonymous? by MSisNOT4Sale (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:08AM
          • Re:Anonymous? by orangesquid (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:25PM
            • Re:Anonymous? by Zerathdune (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @06:14PM
            • Re:Anonymous? by theshowmecanuck (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:29PM
              • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
            • Re:Anonymous? by Whorehopper (Score:1) Thursday March 16 2006, @12:53AM
          • Re:Anonymous? by Sporkinum (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:13PM
            • w3rd by Skye16 (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @04:32PM
            • Choose? by hackwrench (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @04:52PM
            • Re:Anonymous? by Le Marteau (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @05:13PM
            • Re:Anonymous? by JhohannaVH (Score:1) Thursday March 16 2006, @11:00AM
            • Re:Anonymous? by Jaysyn (Score:1) Sunday March 19 2006, @01:30AM
    • Re:Anonymous? (Score:4, Interesting)

      by n00tz (926304) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:01AM (#14923902)
      (http://www.daltongamers.net/)
      Around Christmas I bought me and my brother both a Logitech G15. They are really nice keyboards, with a lot of versitility. G15forums.com [g15forums.com] has a lot of different ways to use the display it comes with.

      Unfortunetely, for the keyboard to be effective in WoW, Blizzard is going to have to support it and program some hooks into the game for it to be supported. Even if there was a 3rd party program (or even a UI mod) that would take care of the hooks for WoW it would be against the ToS, and my account would be banned for it.

      As much as I like the game, I have found blizzard themselves to be fairly nazi about what can do what and who can do it. CmdrTaco had an instance with Blizzard Nazism not too long ago. [slashdot.org]
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Anonymous? by Hoi Polloi (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:07AM
      • Re:Anonymous? by n00tz (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:29AM
    • Re:Anonymous? (Score:5, Funny)

      by Juliusz (905365) <jwalczyn@sourcio.com> on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:28AM (#14924203)
      (http://www.sourcio.com/)
      Yeah, cool, but it got him banned. He should have used one of those little, swinging, water-drinking, wooden birds with the funny hats, they're harder to detect.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Anonymous? by stor (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @06:29PM
        • Re:Anonymous? by Billy Donahue (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:39PM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Anonymous? (Score:5, Informative)

      by infernix (300990) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:44AM (#14924360)
      (http://infernix.net/)
      I did not submit this anonymously myself; I submitted under my own account a week or two ago. I guess someone else resubmitted it.

      And just a minor remark here to people who claim I was botting. Please, go look up some botting software.

      1) They virtually all need MS .Net framework - in other words, botting software doesnt work on WINE.
      2) Botting software runs around, taps mobs, kills them, loots them and repeats this process. I didnt. I did not loot, move, nor change target. Anyone with a WoW account can run to Thousand Needles, find a Windchaser creature, get a lowest level weapon and hit it indefinately, provided that you are a healing class.

      Anyway, I mentioned this, but I can understand why people who quickly read would miss it.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Anonymous? (Score:5, Interesting)

        by thelost (808451) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:21AM (#14924769)
        (Last Journal: Saturday January 20 2007, @07:25PM)
        I sympathize with you man. This kind of treatment is why I gave up WoW. I haven't had to go through that terrible process myself, I just sick of the way people were being treated and cancelled my account, but to see you being blind-sided like that with no warning really makes my blood boil.

        One of the most obvious problems with WoW these days is that there is this massive wall of low level employees (GMs, Billing & accounts etc) who don't have either the authority or time to really look after customers properly. Add to this Blizzards obvious contempt for it's playerbase as easymeat who are pretty much addicts so can be treated like trash and you have a situation where people will frequently get reamed like this with no way to prevent it.

        You will of course get accused of botting by lots of players, but lots of players also happen to be 14 year old children who love to point fingers (not to say every 14 year old is like this, but the culture of WoW has shown to me that while there are exceptions if a player sounds like a 14 year, acts like a 14 year old and talks AOL trash talk then he's caek).

        In the end Blizz and it's employees can pretty much act as they want and this is the most problematic part of it for me. There is no accountability, GMs have been to behave extremely innapropriately in the past, it's impossible to defend yourself from accusations of cheating because Blizz wants to be seen to having a strong anti-cheater policy so if false positives come up then it doesn't really matter. Amoung the thousands of cheaters those innocent will go unheard.

        I suggest that you give up on WoW, and find a MMO that treats it's customers with at least a little common decency. Hmph that might be tricky though.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Anonymous? by 3dr (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:30AM
        • Re:Anonymous? by 3dr (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @04:52PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Anonymous? (Score:4, Insightful)

        by dnoyeb (547705) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:32AM (#14924869)
        (http://www.rigidsoftware.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday September 24 2005, @11:58PM)
        I think your only legitimate statement is that Logitech claims the keyboard is useable for WoW. Other than that, using macros is a definite nono.

        Botting is not defined by "botting software." Its defined by Blizzard. In Eve-online, they don't have a 'bot' ban. They ban you if you are using macros. Maybe Blizzard should upgrade their terminology to make it clearer. If you were a younger person I might accept that you had no idea you would get banned. If you never gamed before I might expect you may think a legalistic position would work. But as a network engineer, and someone that has probably gamed before you should know better. You know there is neither judge nor jury. You know legitimate users get banned all the time. Knowing that you should have known the keyboard would be an issue.

        I hope they let you back in. You seem like an honest person based on how much info you told them. My mom also taught me to tell the truth. The world really doesen't care...
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Anonymous? (Score:5, Informative)

          by merreborn (853723) * on Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:41AM (#14924977)
          "I think your only legitimate statement is that Logitech claims the keyboard is useable for WoW. Other than that, using macros is a definite nono."

          If you RTFA, he provides a (now defunct) link to a post in the EU forums, with a quote, in which blizzard had stated that using keyboard macro functions is okay.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Anonymous? by Rakarra (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @07:27PM
          • Re:Anonymous? by Vivieus (Score:1) Thursday March 16 2006, @02:36AM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Anonymous? by Hillie (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:51AM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Anonymous? by ocbwilg (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:52AM
        • How is Using Macro's Not Allowed? (Score:4, Insightful)

          by Evil W1zard (832703) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:17PM (#14925329)
          (Last Journal: Thursday October 13 2005, @10:30AM)
          The game itself allows you to create macros in game through the /m command and then in game you can assign a key to the macro button you just created. Maybe I'm being overly simple here, but to me that would mean that Blizzard does in fact not only allow macros but also assists the player in setting them up?
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:How is Using Macro's Not Allowed? (Score:4, Insightful)

            by kscguru (551278) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:37PM (#14925503)
            In other words ... Blizzard allows macros that don't fundamentally alter the game experience. This user used outside equipment (keyboard) to set up macros that do fundamentally alter the gaming experience - allow him to run automated attacks, from what I can read here - and Blizzard banned him for it.

            I don't see this as any more novel than someone getting banned for inserting a graphics driver wallhack. He's violating the spirit of the game (no automated character improvements; you must invest your own time) while trying to weasel around the letter of the rules. Blizzard is vague precisely so that they can ban smartasses like this guy!

            (All that said, I think Blizzard would be better served inventing some other "punishment" for this. Like, if your character spends 20 minutes attacking a critter it shouldn't be able to kill and it looks like you are a bot, some big SLOW nasty spawns and kills you. If you weren't a bot, you could outrun the nasty... but dumbass bot users die. And maybe take an experience penalty too.)

            [ Parent ]
          • Re:How is Using Macro's Not Allowed? by NetFu (Score:2) Friday March 24 2006, @03:40PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Anonymous? by quarmar (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:28PM
          • Re:Anonymous? by The Snowman (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @06:24PM
            • Re:Anonymous? by quarmar (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @06:39PM
            • Re:Anonymous? by TeraCo (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @06:43PM
              • Re:Anonymous? by The Snowman (Score:2) Thursday March 16 2006, @03:39PM
      • Re:Anonymous? by GuyverDH (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:50AM
        • Re:Anonymous? by epee1221 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:04PM
          • Re:Anonymous? by Hal_Porter (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:53PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Keyboards (Score:4, Insightful)

        by _KiTA_ (241027) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:52AM (#14925091)
        (http://www.nwinfo.net/~mcantrell/)
        I have one of those Logitec G15 keyboards, as well as a Belkin Nostromo N52 (Which I no longer use). I am very concerned that Blizzard considers them a bannable offense. Only, they apparently don't. But they do. But...

        Blizzard is infamous for refusing to give details about exactly WHAT you did wrong when they ban you. As you can see in the emails. "We looked, you're guilty." "of what?" "Being banned." "For?" "Being guilty". "Of?" "Being Banned." "Well, can you review it?" "Ok. You're still guilty." "Of what??" "Of Being Banned." "For..."

        They're unfortunately just asking for a lawsuit in this matter, but... I guess 6 million customers paying $15 a month makes one feel they can get away with anything.

        I suggest you call their headquarters directly. They will tell you to email them instead. Refuse. Be a huge pain in the ass, and don't accept being told to go away. They *are* accountable for disabling your account. Fortunately you are in Europe where their EULA holds MUCH less weight than in the US -- they can't write away your consumer rights, so fight for them!
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Keyboards by thatguywhoiam (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:24PM
          • Re:Keyboards by _KiTA_ (Score:2) Saturday March 25 2006, @11:05AM
        • Re:Keyboards by TobyWong (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:33PM
        • Re:Keyboards by karnal (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:44PM
          • Re:Keyboards by Khaotix (Score:1) Thursday March 16 2006, @05:35PM
      • You were still botting (Score:5, Interesting)

        It just is a matter of degree. In your view you were not botting as you define it to a scope which your event does not qualify.

        Look, if your not paying attention to the game go do something else. If it is that boring to do what you were doing then why bother? If it is for improvment within the game should you not focus your attention on it.

        Unattended play, botting, macroing. Call it whatever you will.

        If you want a game which will allow you to bot, supposedly only attended, then go play Asheron's Call. Turbine themselves approved of combat automation to the horror of the entire industry.

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Anonymous? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:57AM
      • Re:Anonymous? by Hillie (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:02PM
        • Re:Anonymous? by snuf23 (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:10PM
          • Re:Anonymous? by Hillie (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:17PM
            • Re:Anonymous? by snuf23 (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @07:14PM
      • Re:Anonymous? by Intangion (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:02PM
      • hmm... how about mono for .NET by Creepy (Score:3) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:32PM
      • Re:Anonymous? by Unnamed Chickenheart (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:20PM
      • Re:Anonymous? by Ra Zen (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:28PM
      • Credit Card == Bludgeon. by Viv (Score:3) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:40PM
      • Re:Anonymous? by Glock27 (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:42PM
      • Re:Anonymous? by IamTheRealMike (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:16PM
      • This is why I never tried WoW by TheSpoom (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:19PM
      • Re:Anonymous? by svip (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:24PM
      • Re:Anonymous? by StillAnonymous (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @06:52PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Anonymous? by Tamerlan (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @08:01PM
      • External Software by fm6 (Score:2) Thursday March 16 2006, @04:13PM
      • Re:OK, but what about your apology? by NicklessXed (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:38PM
      • 7 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Anonymous? by e03179 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:04PM
      • Re:Anonymous? by e03179 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:09PM
        • Re:Anonymous? by Zone5 (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:31PM
          • Re:Anonymous? by GrungyLotG (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @08:04PM
  • Simple by nexcomlink (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:34AM
  • Favor (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:34AM (#14923639)
    He should consider it a favor. Now he can go back to living his life.
    • Re:Favor by cablepokerface (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:03AM
      • Re:Favor by gardyloo (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:41AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Favor by imdx80 (Score:3) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:33AM
      • Re:Favor by Jace of Fuse! (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:52PM
    • What is it with Taco and WoW? by Overly Critical Guy (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:30AM
    • Re:Favor by dubl-u (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:31PM
    • Re:Favor by Danny Rathjens (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:55PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by BadAnalogyGuy (945258) <BadAnalogyGuy@gmail.com> on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:35AM (#14923641)
    I just got out of a pink page of death ban myself here at Slashdot. Somehow they mistook my frequent reloading of pages and multiple-thread bouncing as some sort of bot or malicious bandwidth-stealing script. It was neither.

    So I sit out a couple days trying to get the techs behind banned@slashdot.org to notice my emails. Finally, after a long negotiation with these guys and promising that I will turn off all my Firefox extensions when accessing the site, I get let back on.

    And this is what I come back to. A story about someone getting banned.
  • He's better off. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by GundamFan (848341) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:36AM (#14923651)
    It stings to get banned... but realy any MMO is a waste of time, WoW being one of the worst in my opinion.

    if this is Blizzards new attitiude towards it's customers, maybe I can get all of my friends to stop playing WoW and spend some time in the real world interacting with people in person.

    Mod me a troll if you want it won't change the fact that I am siclk of Fantasy MMOs.
  • Not a Suprise (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Herkum01 (592704) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:36AM (#14923657)

    In any situation which one party has vastly superior authority and little chance of penalized. Don't expect them to act in a reasonable manner.

    • Re:Not a Suprise (Score:4, Interesting)

      In any situation which one party has vastly superior authority and little chance of penalized. Don't expect them to act in a reasonable manner.

      I guess it depends upon your definition of reasonable.

      In this case they actively pissed off a customer, terminating the account of a paying subscriber, because they felt that his actions were detrimental to the rest of the community. His actions had nothing to do with Linux, but rather were the result of what appeared to be automated activity (which could have been that a user saw him there stat padding for hours, complained, and then an admin trying conversing with him to find the character just mechanically repeating the same steps). Reading his account, it sounds like he configured a variety of complex activities as macros on his keyboard, and just sat there repeating them ad nauseam for hours while he did other things (fun!), doing this largely automated activity for his own gain. Given that MMMORPGs are somewhat of a zero sum affair, this means that it's at the cost of other players.

      I'm actually amazed that the company acted so responsibly. It would have been easy to just backtrack and forgive and forget, but they forged ahead, making an enemy and losing a customer, to try to maintain the "rules of the land". Good for them.

      I should also say that the individual in question might want to learn why "the right to silence" can be an important trait. He completely indicted himself in his emails ("so I was sitting her occasionally triggering macros while I watched TV...").
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Not a Suprise (Score:5, Insightful)

        I'm actually amazed that the company acted so responsibly. It would have been easy to just backtrack and forgive and forget, but they forged ahead, making an enemy and losing a customer, to try to maintain the "rules of the land". Good for them.

        You have a funny definition of "responsible". If you read TFA, he went through great lengths to attempt to resolve the issue with Blizzard, keeping his emails polite at all times. He pointed out that both Logitech and Blizzard had advertised the keyboard as being good for WoW, and even offered to accept a temporary ban to make up for any accidental infractions.

        Blizzard ignored all his correspondance, and went for a permanent ban, apparently in direct violation of their own terms of service. [blizzard.com]

        Blizzard was WRONG, and paid no attention to a reasonable customer. I find it perfectly acceptable if he was currently considering either legal or grass roots responses to their gross negligence in the matter. If that is the best they can do for loyal customers who attempted civil resolutions, then they deserve to end up in a media circus of bad press and class action suits.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Not a Suprise by ergo98 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:22AM
          • Re:Not a Suprise (Score:5, Interesting)

            So you're convinced that every person who accidentally triggers a TOS violation should be permanently banned from a service like WoW, even when:

            1. The service claims in forum posts that what he's doing is okay.
            2. The user offers to correct the problem, and even accept a punishment.
            3. The service has a policy that is supposed to require multiple violations to obtain a ban.
            4. The user has no prior history of TOS violations.
            5. The user has spent considerable money on the product.

            If you think that all that combines to make a "responsible decision" on the part of Blizzard, then allow me to be the first to point out that you're a heartless tyrant, and I really do hope this happens to you. Perhaps you'll see things different from the other side.

            I for one, hopes he gets a good lawyer. Given that this is far from the first time I've heard these complaints, a class action suit against Blizzard may just be what's needed to shake things up.
            [ Parent ]
            • Re:Not a Suprise by ergo98 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:45AM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by sirket (Score:3) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:24AM
              • Re:Not a Suprise (Score:5, Insightful)

                Maybe it's a fun game, but it's just a game, a service provided by Blizzard for a fee.

                (Emphasis mine.)

                There's the part you seem to be missing. He has paid money to be provided with a service. As of right now, he's been singled out for violations to the agreement that he didn't commit, and has been unfairly kicked out of the service he paid for. (Presumably without a refund.) Because of this, he has suffered the loss of virtual property (his characters/accounts) that he has a paid significant amount of time and money to obtain. This just isn't okay, neither in a moral sense, nor in a legal sense.

                You have got to be kidding. "This company refuses to take my money anymore! I'm suing.!" I marvel at the mindset that spurred you to even imagine writing that paragraph.

                I'm dead serious. The legal system is there as a recourse for resolving disputes between parties. He has pursued every avenue available to him in resolving this issue. He has been ignored and treated poorly by the other party at every step of the way. As a result, he has an honest grevience to bring against Blizzard.

                While I'm not one to suggest that he sue for $10,000,000 for "emotional damages" (that's just not right), suing for restoration of his account(s), legal fees to be paid by Blizzard, and a full refund of the amount he has paid to date (to cover the harrassment he has received) is a perfectly acceptable solution. Of course, it's a lot easier to get a lawyer to handle a class action suit for him, so in that case Blizzard would be facing the equivalent of hundreds of these suits at once.

                Even if he didn't take the class-action path, a judge may note several reasonable complaints occurring around the same period and decide to combine them into a single suit himself.

                Firstly, we're of course hearing one side of the story.

                That's about the only insightful thing you've said. Unfortunately, Blizzard refuses to talk about the issue. If they won't even talk to the customer they have a disagreement with, then that customer may have to force them to tell their side in court. Alternatively, he could start a grass-roots mailing campaign or boycott against Blizzard. These are the options he has available.

                Secondly, how about some perspective: This is a game.

                My perspective is just fine. A game or not, Blizzard is offering a service in exchange for money. If Blizzard then decides to turn around and unjustly harrass its customers in violation of the contract entered into, it can expect that its customers will seek to reverse the business transaction and/or force Blizzard to uphold its contractual obligations. Not only does this resolve the matter, but it sends a message to the business that the customers do not appreciate being stepped on. Otherwise, what is to prevent the company from further abusing its other customers?
                [ Parent ]
              • Re:Not a Suprise by MECC (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:43AM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by crabpeople (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:45AM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by bobalien (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:52AM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by ultranova (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @04:25PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by ergo98 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:49AM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by AKAImBatman (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:28PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by MarkByers (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:09PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by gnud (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:11PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by AK Marc (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:15PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by AKAImBatman (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:37PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by cballowe (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:41PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by bigpat (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:53PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by ergo98 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:10PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by ergo98 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:46PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by AKAImBatman (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:48PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by lebski (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:29PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by Alcilbiades (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:32PM
              • Refund by Gorimek (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:36PM
              • Re:Refund by AKAImBatman (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:46PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by ergo98 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @04:47PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by truesaer (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @05:21PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by AK Marc (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @05:47PM
              • Re:Not a Suprise by MECC (Score:2) Thursday March 16 2006, @09:36AM
              • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
            • Re:Not a Suprise by bwalling (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:41AM
            • Re:Not a Suprise by dlc3007 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:51AM
            • Why Sue? by matt_tucents (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:54PM
              • Re:Why Sue? by AKAImBatman (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:16PM
        • This is commonplace for Blizzard by Mayhem178 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:24AM
        • All too common by metamatic (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:04AM
        • Re:Not a Suprise (Score:4, Insightful)

          by hey! (33014) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:29AM (#14924842)
          (http://kamthaka.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday March 30 2005, @03:18PM)
          Blizzard ignored all his correspondance, and went for a permanent ban, apparently in direct violation of their own terms of service.

          I wonder what it's like to make so much money you can give a dedicated customer a high handed heave-ho.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Not a Suprise (Score:4, Insightful)

            by mikaelhg (47691) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:44AM (#14925002)
            I wonder what it's like to make so much money you can give a dedicated customer a high handed heave-ho.

            You should ask Sony Online Entertainment, they're currently living with the results.
            [ Parent ]
          • Re:Not a Suprise by dubl-u (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:35PM
          • Re:Not a Suprise by StikyPad (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:10PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Boo! by umbrellasd (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:50PM
        • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Not a Suprise by phulshof (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:23AM
      • Re:Not a Suprise by Cat_Byte (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:29AM
      • Re:Not a Suprise by Shanep (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:47AM
      • Re:Not a Suprise by demongp (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:04AM
      • Zero Sum? by Millard Fillmore (Score:3) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:21AM
        • Re:Zero Sum? by ergo98 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:27AM
      • Re:Not a Suprise by geekoid (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:23PM
    • Re:Not a Suprise by ktappe (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:50AM
    • Re:Not a Suprise by Mahy (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:58AM
  • It's the keyboard, stupid. (Score:5, Informative)

    by JasonUCF (601670) <jason-slashdawt@jnlpro. c o m> on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:36AM (#14923659)
    (http://jnlpro.com/)
    They have stated repeatedly that programmable keyboards like the Logitech one violate the EULA for WoW. While the current iteration of hacks -- sending the keyboard the mana/HP, are benign, the possibilty exists for there to be future mods that become harmful to the game or allow for some form of hacking.

    Source:
    http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=w ow-interface-customization&t=330798&tmp=1#post3307 98 [worldofwarcraft.com]

  • CmdrTaco and his Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:37AM
  • Not that I am suggesting *anything* by grasshoppa (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:39AM
  • Uhm, no. (Score:5, Insightful)

    Banned for violating the rules with his programmable keyboard. They outright told him that; he was interacting with his environment in an unattended manner. That's a violation of the TOS for every MMORPG I've ever read the TOS for, which admittedly isn't many.

    However, it is telling that he knows that bot programs won't work on Wine under Linux; I'm not buying the story that he tested them all subsequently.

    Summation: Cheated. Got caught. Got banned. Whined and told his buddies an "edited" version of the story, so they all rallied behind him. Tough noogies.
    • Re:Uhm, no. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by EddieBurkett (614927) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:47AM (#14923751)
      Banned for violating the rules with his programmable keyboard. They outright told him that; he was interacting with his environment in an unattended manner. That's a violation of the TOS for every MMORPG I've ever read the TOS for, which admittedly isn't many.
      The best part is that the guy wraps himself in the I'm-being-persecuted-for-running-Linux flag, which he knows will raise the ire of many the WoW player. If he was playing the game unattended and got caught, he deserves to be banned, and if he finds fighting low level mobs to raise his skills so boring, maybe he should find another way to spend his time.

      Its been a while since I've played WoW. Can Trolls be Priests?
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Uhm, no. by b1t r0t (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:08AM
      • Re:Uhm, no. by theparag0n (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:12AM
      • Re:Uhm, no. by merreborn (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:36AM
      • Re:Uhm, no. by MysteriousPreacher (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:42PM
      • Re:Uhm, no. by tabby (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:44PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Uhm, no. by amrust (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:48AM
    • Re:Uhm, no. by WebScud (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:49AM
      • Re:Uhm, no. by egburr (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:28AM
      • Re:Uhm, no. by geminidomino (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:30AM
        • Re:Uhm, no. by WebScud (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:39AM
          • Re:Uhm, no. by geminidomino (Score:3) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:10PM
          • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Uhm, no. by ivoras (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:52AM
      • Re:Uhm, no. by TrappedByMyself (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:02AM
      • Re:Uhm, no. by Shanep (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:19PM
    • Re:Uhm, no. by oisteink (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:30AM
      • Re:Uhm, no. by Syberghost (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:44PM
    • Re:Uhm, no. by Ayaress (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:35AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Rights and software? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by globalar (669767) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:39AM (#14923680)
    (http://slashdot.com/)
    I don't think you have any rights related to software you can't completely control yourself. Please, someone correct me if I'm wrong here. That said, my experience with most RPG's is that they involve a lot of repetition (which is why the guy programmed some macros). Apparently this is part of the official, mandatory WoW experience. That would explain why goldfarming (or whatever it's called in the game) is so popular. Someone at Blizzard must have taken econ101 somewhere along the line?

    The fact that Blizzard needs to know if you're sitting at your computer or not is a bit disturbing, however. Like a parent.
  • by Neologic (48268) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:41AM (#14923690)
    Incidents like this remind me that when you play WoW or other mmorpg's, you don't own your character, despite the often thousand of man-hours people put into them. It seems to me that if there was a similar real-world analogue, the account holder would be able to get some sort of redress to his losses in a court of law, or at least reinstatement. In these virtual worlds, the game company is able to rule by diktat and is able to twist the TOS to suit their needs. Indeed, they can change the TOS at will and if you don't agree to the new terms, then you forfeit your right to your account. Eventually, the legalities of virtual worlds will need to be addressed.
  • good by cyclomedia (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:42AM
    • Re:good by Hubbell (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:51AM
    • Re:good by Lord Bitman (Score:3) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:01AM
      • Re:good by rasjani (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:23AM
  • Definitely the keyboard (Score:5, Informative)

    by Kadin2048 (468275) <slashdot@kadin.xoxy@net> on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:42AM (#14923699)
    (http://kadin.sdf-us.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 16, @01:46PM)
    It seems like it was definitely the programmable keyboard and not WINE that set off their bot detectors.

    Apparently the macros on the keyboard were making him do repeated actions, and somehow this was interpreted by Blizzard as "unattended" operation. (Why they think it was unattended I don't know, TFA doesn't say exactly ... why didn't they just message him when they saw the odd behavior? Or do something else to verify it's a human on the other end?)

    Anyway, a quote from TFA:
    "So it seems that if I use a programmable keyboard I am botting. However I suspect their 3rd party detection software saw a very strange enviroinment in which WoW was running; that combined with the repetitive task of healing myself, switching weapons, and casting Hex of Weakness programmed in my keyboard, I am viewed as a bot."

    So it seems other people using WoW under WINE are safe, you'd just better not get too trigger-happy with the keyboard macros.

    What's really the problem here is that there seems to be a huge disconnect between official Blizzard policy (programmable keyboards are okay, this has been explicitly said by one of their reps in the forums, according to the article) and what the GMs did. And after the guy got banned, they seem to just be just stonewalling him and hoping he'll go away, giving him a lot of "the matter is closed" crap. I have to salute his perserverence, though, in spite of this.

    Rather a disappointing showing from Blizzard.
    • Re:Definitely the keyboard by Kaychsea (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:51AM
    • Re:Definitely the keyboard by Professor_UNIX (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:02AM
    • Re:Definitely the keyboard (Score:4, Informative)

      by Jugalator (259273) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:34AM (#14924263)
      (Last Journal: Monday February 13 2006, @07:11PM)
      Why they think it was unattended I don't know, TFA doesn't say exactly ...

      Yes, TFA says the guy had been watching movies during this because his character was owning the enemies anyway. That counts as unattended gaming and is strictly prohibited in WoW due to unfair advantages it grants the botter.

      Now, how Blizzard pictured this may be up for debate, but Blizzard has in the past been monitored suspicious accounts if the strange behavior goes on over long periods of time and aren't just flukes. That's probably how they can say this, and if pressured could maybe even say for how long he did it.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Definitely the keyboard by H01ym0ses (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:27PM
    • not so odd by kcurtis (Score:3) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:28AM
      • Re:not so odd by Kadin2048 (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:01PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • If it walks like a duck... (Score:4, Informative)

    by Tominva1045 (587712) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:43AM (#14923706)
    (http://www.digidroid.com/)


    On this point (botting) the EULA has been clear since the release of the game. If one knows something he is doing could be percieved as botting (at the discretion of the owner of the content) then why tempt fate by using it and then admit to using it?

    They made a judegement call with their corporate reputation as the foundation upon which they stood to defend this principle. That didn't leave them any backing-down room. When you admitted to the programmable keyboard that gave them what they needed to completely defend their position.

    Step 1: ditch programmable keyboard.
    Step 2: obtain new credit card.
    Step 3: Hellooooo Level 1.

    good luck - EULAs can be tough.
  • geez that guy's a trooper (Score:5, Funny)

    by WormholeFiend (674934) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:43AM (#14923711)
    The way Blizzard replies to the guy's emails, if I had been him, I would have emailed them a large high rez uncompressed photo of my middle finger with the caption "this is the finger I used to press my final macro key in WoW".
  • experienced network engineer fired for playing WoW by Johnny Mozzarella (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:44AM
  • BFD by squidguy (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:46AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • anyone spot his first mistake? by know1 (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:46AM
  • Sad by Silicon Mike (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:47AM
  • He Had It Coming (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Kylow (581998) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:48AM (#14923761)
    Any dunderhead should realize that automating levelling of skills is and SHOULD BE against the rules of an MMORPG. He got what he deserved. He was also deceptive early in the correspondence, trying to convince them he was only using his macro keyboard to change armor sets. Whether weapon skills are important to a priest or not, he gained levels in those skills with this macroing. This also has very little, if anything, to do with WINE. I think that played no part in the expulsion.
  • Why I don't play Blizzard games anymore... by Codename46 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:49AM
  • let me get this straight (Score:5, Insightful)

    by gEvil (beta) (945888) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:51AM (#14923794)
    (http://evil.google.com/)
    First off, I've never played WoW (nor any other MMORPG). Now, let me get this straight. The entire WINE aspect seems incidental, so we'll ignore that. Otherwise, he set up some macros on his Logitech keyboard to perform some repetitive tasks. He set those in motion, put up a 'Do Not Disturb' message, and then proceeded to go off and do something else (which admittedly was watching the movie on the other monitor). While this is not a bot program, per se, how is this not running a bot? It's unattended automated actions performed repeatedly. To the best of my knowledge, that's what a bot is. In which case, a banning is what you get.
  • It was most likely Wine (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Opportunist (166417) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:53AM (#14923822)
    Search google for "wow warden client" and read a few things. In a nutshell: Blizzard most likely checked if their watchdog program was running (which should make sure that you only run "good" programs and makes sure that you're a "good" player) and didn't find it in the process list.

    Result: You must've been hacking your way to 60.

    Dunno, as much as I hate cheaters, but some companies go a tad bit far for my taste.
  • please by k-sound (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:58AM
  • If you read the article... by Jaeph (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:59AM
  • Why was it WINE or keyboard? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by fleck_99_99 (223900) <belaNO@SPAMmaine.rr.com> on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:02AM (#14923915)
    (http://www.worldiv.com/)
    From reading the linked explanation, it sounds to me like the playing really WAS essentially unattended. If a GM sent a tell while this guy was watching TV, and he didn't answer, but his character kept performing actions -- well, if it looks like a bot and quacks like a bot...
  • He was cheating.. by saboola (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:02AM
  • Why start every letter with by u16084 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:03AM
  • Uh oh by hkb (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:03AM
  • He _could_ sue Logitech by geddes (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:06AM
  • If the author wants to know... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by mmalove (919245) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:08AM (#14923976)
    This is why you got banned:

    "At the time of the ban I had configured my keyboard to switch weapons, cast hex of weakness and renew myself, all with the press of a button."

    There exists a global cooldown of one second between most gameplay affecting actions in WoW, most certainly for casting these two spells hex of weakness and renew.

    Therefore the only way you could have cast both with one button, is if the keyboard is interjecting a wait period, and issueing a keystroke to the game that you are not pressing after this wait period. Now in this case, that keystroke may only be a second after you pushed the button. But the issue is that you have, at this point, just barely crossed the line into botting. It has to be drawn somewhere, and to me this is where it makes the most sense: If you allow the keyboard to issue commands while you are not interacting with the hardware in anyway, you are botting.

    Not saying this to be an ass, just to let you know what most likely Blizzard took issue with.
  • Ridiculous. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by xutopia (469129) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:12AM (#14924019)
    (http://www.xutopia.com/)
    This has nothing to do with Wine or Linux. If he had been using the keyboard and macros but been able to respond when asked a question it wouldn't have been a problem. The problem is this guy was not at his computer for all intent and purpose and leveling his character's skill through automation. He was close to his computer but not on it while leveling his skills. Bannable.
  • Tedium by kidcharles (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:15AM
  • CmdrTaco Vs. Blizzard (Score:3, Insightful)

    by binkzz (779594) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:15AM (#14924049)
    (http://www.xieke.com/ | Last Journal: Monday October 16 2006, @02:59AM)
    To me, it seems Mr Taco is still peeved that Blizzard made him change his invalid nickname, and is using this story and abusing slashdot to try and shed some more negative light on WoW.

    Unfortunately, none of the major MMORPGS offer any form of reasonable communication to their users, and if you decide to disregard the ToS (by installing macros and playing the game unattended or using bad nicknames), you're likely to get stung sooner or later.

    Which is why I don't play MMORPGS anymore, because they can undo all your hundreds of man hours without warning or compensation for reasons that are just or not and there'll be nothing you can do about it, until someone starts an MMORPG player's union.
  • Very Mature (Score:3, Funny)

    by Kristopher Johnson (129906) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:19AM (#14924091)

    At the bottom of the article:

    P.S.: I'm no kid. I'm 24.

    Priceless.

  • just started playing EQ by Hohlraum (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:21AM
  • Need more information by Krystlih (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:22AM
  • the real message here by stinky wizzleteats (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:22AM
  • You guys need to learn how to read by Hubbell (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:23AM
  • Second chance by iamblinkin (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:24AM
  • It's a matter of (in)consequence. by Rivenwind (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:24AM
  • Player TOS (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Bonewalker (631203) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:25AM (#14924155)
    You know, the real irony here is that while Blizzard won't allow players to 'bot' their way through the game, the only responses you get from them are bots. Standard form letters that are automatically activated when you contact them.

    There should be a Player TOS that the company agrees to before selling their games. It would read like so:

    17. In the event you, the player, are ever in need of technical assistance, customer support, account maintenance, or in the event you are banned from the game and your account closed, you have the right to expect that a human Blizzard employee will examine your situation and respond without the use of bots, form letters, or automated responses to make certain that your situation is fully resolved. Furthermore, while the resolution may not always be to your liking, the details will be explained in full using simple, standard language showing the logic we used to make our decisions. Once we have made every effort to explain our decisions, if you still feel that Blizzard has errored in some way, you will have one appeal effort to escalate your situation. This will mean that a team of three Blizzard employees will examine your case in full, reaching a decision. You will only be notified that either Blizzard's previous decision has been upheld, or that there is sufficient evidence to reverse the previous Blizzard decision.

    • Re:Player TOS by MagnaDoodle666 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:42PM
    • Re:Player TOS by asuffield (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:21PM
    • Re:Player TOS by cmburns69 (Score:3) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:57PM
  • What's this botter's problem?? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Jugalator (259273) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:26AM (#14924174)
    (Last Journal: Monday February 13 2006, @07:11PM)
    ... "while I was training my different weapon skills by pressing the macro keys and healing myself every now and then, I watched some movies on my TV, because fighting a level 25 healing mob doesn't require much attention if you're a level 60 priest. "

    That is the key problem in what he did. If he used macros while watching TV, I can only guess at how long these repeated actions went on.

    This isn't about Linux, not about WINE, not even about programmable Logitech keyboards! This is about: watching TV while letting your computer play the game. And... "playing" the game unattended is most certainly against most MMO agreements, and usually equalled with botting, much like Blizzard indeed told him.

    I can only guess at why the Blizzard Boards once told him that it was OK to use keyboards with basic programmability, but a guess was that Blizzard didn't mean it was OK to fucking abuse them to play WoW while watching TV. Yeah, maybe that's why.

    If it in his eyes "doesn't require much attention" or not is completely irrelevant, and an "excuse" stupid enough to just worsen his case. It's the very same excuse used by "true" botters. Blizzard has most likely monitored his account over some period of time and seen, "hey, this guy is doing identical actions all over". The follow up reply from Blizzard shows they were listening to his complaints and clarified the problem once again.

    He then went on saying:

    "I have also apoligised in advance if using a programmable keyboard violates the TOS - but your TOS does not say anything about using such keyboards."

    No, but a TOS doesn't detail every individual piece of hardware or software disallowed either. That would be impossible. Instead, they try to explain what's allowed or not. Not that Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboards are disallowed when used to exploit game mechanics. Whether Logitech says they're OK or not is also irrelevant as they don't have a say in the WOW ToS anyway.

    And I'm sure they are right too that using their keyboard is allowed, but do Logitech say "using our keyboards to 'play' WoW with during TV watching is in agreement with Blizzard ToS"?

    So that's flaw number two in his argument, after trying to excuse himself with "but *I* thought it was OK to play the game in an unattended way, because ... my level 60 char is so powerful anyway!"

    Come on, just because he's using WINE and this stupid keyboard doesn't excuse his actions.

    "However I suspect their 3rd party detection software saw a very strange enviroinment in which WoW was running"

    Nah, that's just him trying to find ways of blaming his behavior on Linux and WINE.

    "that combined with the repetitive task of healing myself, switching weapons, and casting Hex of Weakness programmed in my keyboard"

    Yes! That's why though! You know, stuff botters write Windows software to do Does it really matter that much how you do it? This guy need to understand what botting implies (= tools to enable game play automation) and that botting isn't allowed.

    "Now to the advantage gained. What exactly did I gain? All I did is train my weapon skills. I did not gain any gold, did not gain any experience at level 60, no honor, not even any loot whatsoever."

    This argument is beyond comprehension for me. He gained trained skills! That's what he gained. Gee.
  • "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters" by Tycho_Atreides (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:29AM
  • WINE is not an unbottable environment (Score:3, Interesting)

    by egarland (120202) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:31AM (#14924232)
    A macro keyboard is a descent defense but realistically I doubt it would be hard to programmatically inject keystrokes to a program running under WINE and there would be no way for that program to detect that they weren't coming from hardware. Sending the right keystrokes in the right order can do some basically useful stuff and Blizzard would consider this botting. A clever way to get around the warden and bot but not undetectable.

    The problem with Blizzard's stance on this issue is that they have created a game with some mindless repetitive tasks that beg to be automated. Realistically, they beg to be eliminated entirely since a computer program assigning you fake, easily automated, mundane repetitive tasks isn't good for anyone. Most of WoW is not this way, however. Most of it's parts are interesting and immersive and those are the parts people find fun. Nobody is going to bot their way through an 5+ person instance run (well, almost nobody.)

    Blizzard has drawn a hard line on botting but the problem with any line is there are gray areas and the mundane easily automated tasks (like grinding up a weapon skill at L60) that are so wildly easy to automate as to be trivial. Sitting in one place pushing button 1.. 2.. 3.. 1.. 2.. 3.. 1.. 2.. 3.. gets old after about 1000 repetitions. It would even be easy to create a macro keyboard that would fully automate this activity beginning to end. It wouldn't in any realistic way be "botting" but Blizzard would probably ban you.

    Blizzard needs to fix WoW. Pull the mundane easily automated crap out. I'm level 60 and never used a crossbow, don't make shoot 100,000 arrows at rats in the tram to level the damn skill.. it's mundane, repetitive, and I don't want to do it. Ramp that skill up much much faster to the point where it's maybe a little weak but I can use it in regular combat and you eliminate the mundane easily automated task issue. They should also allow you to assign one of your characters to a task and log out and have the game essentially fake the thing for a while (fishing, farming mobs, etc). That short circuits a lot of the desire for botting and allows them to control the negative aspects of it (the characters "botting" could appear differently or not at all in-game.)

    As a society we should consider making it illegal to ban the automation of easily automated mundane tasks. Do we really want humans to be forced to sit at a keyboard hitting the same 3 keys in the same order for hours and hours? Blizzards stance on this simply shouldn't be allowed. If Blizzard notices a player standing in the same place doing the same thing for hours the thought on their side shouldn't be "Ban this guy!" it should be "How do we eliminate the desire for automating this task?"
  • He should have his credit card decline payment. by Beached (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:36AM
  • Typical SlashDot Mob Blames the Victim by SirChive (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:37AM
  • They did him a favor by bwd234 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:38AM
  • Too Linear by AzsxQuii (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:38AM
  • Blizzard sucks ass by sasdrtx (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:39AM
  • WardenClient and you! by KCDale99 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:42AM
  • P.S. He does sound like a kid. by cnelzie (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:42AM
  • Bastards... by EddyPearson (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:46AM
  • What I get out of this story (Score:4, Insightful)

    by NotQuiteReal (608241) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:47AM (#14924407)
    (Last Journal: Saturday December 09 2006, @10:46PM)
    I am not a WoW player.

    My take-away from this is that some people are simply addicted. If the game can be so boring, that, at times, a player watches movies while playing, what kind of entertainment is that? Sounds like classic addiction - small rewards at random times("wins" of enjoyment, I presume)keep you coming back despite the overall "loss" tedium, time-wasted, monthly fee.

  • Something fishy by Qumahlin (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:59AM
  • While I see Blizzard's point... by slasher999 (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:03AM
  • W(h)INE by GothChip (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:04AM
  • Broken Gameplay by blueZhift (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:08AM
  • Unattended Play by setrops (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:11AM
  • ... then Wine WHAT? by Mr.Surly (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:14AM
  • "I am an experienced network engineer for an ISP" by REBloomfield (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:15AM
  • Why is this a WINE or keyboard issue? by keylight (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:18AM
  • Not for WINE, for macroing by gallwapa (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:29AM
  • Different Motive for the Ban? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Millard Fillmore (197731) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:30AM (#14924850)
    (http://www.periphrastic.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday April 21 2002, @11:17AM)
    Is it possible that Blizzard banned him not because his activities were violating the Terms of Service per se, but rather because he had the audacity to engage in another form of entertainment whilst he was playing the game? Blizzard was losing critical mindshare to some movie studio or television producer. Their customer might even have seen an advertisement for a rival video-game company - while he was ostensibly using their service. The horror!
  • Screw the bastards. by Spy der Mann (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:31AM
  • Why do they hate poor gold farmers? by WillAffleckUW (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:40AM
  • Where is the line drawn? by happyfrogcow (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:40AM
  • Getting kicked off of Wow for using a bot keyboard $15

    Complaining about it uselessly $0

    Posting it to Slashdot so everyone can see how high your 14M3 factor is ... PRICELESS!
  • In a related story, I was banned from smoking! by Tiger Smile (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:49AM
  • Petition WoW for Linux by fithmo (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:51AM
  • Why do you people bother with WoW? by xski (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:54AM
  • Lose a Lawsuit by Nom du Keyboard (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:57AM
  • How was he cheating? by hrrY (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:03PM
  • This is hilarious by bravo369 (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:10PM
  • how could he cheat by pepsi_max2k (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:14PM
  • Against the EULA (Score:5, Interesting)

    by kindbud (90044) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:28PM (#14925427)
    (http://www.thekindbud.com/)
    EULA is now an enforcerable contract with a fanatical following on Slashdot. Who'd a thunk it?

    I wonder if that will carry over to the next thread about the next change in Microsoft's license terms.

    Has anyone ever established that an EULA is a valid contract in any state?

  • We need smarter bots by Animats (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:39PM
  • Whats the difference by GmAz (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @12:47PM
  • by Noishe (829350) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:02PM (#14925722)
    "I had put myself on /DND with the note that I was watching movies and was not paying much attention to the game, which i muted because of the movies I was watching"
    Now afaik, the Blizzard GM's will whisper you if they think you are a bot. And what does dnd do? blocks all whispers and instead sends an automated reply telling them that he is watching movies.

    So someone reports him as botting, gm checks it out, gm get's automated reply saying he's not at the computer while the character continues to attack a mob, he get's banned, end of story.

    Regardless of what he was actually doing, he told a blizzard gm through his dnd message, that he was away from is machine, aka that he was botting.

    Never mind the fact that whether or not he is violating a specific rule of the tos or not, he is clearly violating the spirit in which that rule was made.
  • Send Concerns by havoc (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:03PM
  • Side-Article by Puk (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:10PM
  • Why you were banned, really. by DeusExMachinaX (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:19PM
  • you want a reason for being banned? by boojumbadger (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:23PM
  • "Let slip the dogs of law" by KeeghanMacAllan (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:29PM
  • Says a lot about WoW... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by mattgreen (701203) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:33PM (#14926011)
    If players feel compelled to bot their way through tedium, then it says a lot more about the gameplay (or lack thereof) within WoW than it does about the players. Although, admittedly, they should be a lot more picky about what they choose to waste their time with. (I'm become bored quickly, so MMOs are about as fun as watching paint dry on the wall.) Anyway I don't see anything wrong with hitting macro keys every now and then. At least he's doing *something*, and not just having it run full auto without having to watch.
  • The Bottom Line by ScrapsNY (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:47PM
  • It was a combination of factors. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by NoMercy (105420) on Wednesday March 15 2006, @01:57PM (#14926252)
    After reading his lists, it seems it's most likley a combination of things, the repeated equal-spaced timed events from the keyboard, in combination with the lack of responsiveness while he was watching movies and yet continuing to preform actions, and the suspicious program list, probably all contributed to them writing him off as a bot.

    Personally I think it's also a fault with the way WoW works, if you can can gain skills by doing trivial tasks repeatidly, the system is broken.. You learn a damn sight more about anything by pushing at the limits of what you can do, the game should reflect that.

    Gold farming's harder to overcome, but coding the game to encourage skill farming?!?!
  • I play unattended all the time. by akisugawara (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:01PM
  • Kid? by jimpop (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:02PM
  • "I'm no kid!" by Brew Bird (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:06PM
  • Macros Allowed by kilox (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:31PM
  • Hate to defend Blizz, but... by NitzJaaron (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @02:41PM
  • Welcome him to Lineage II then. by sethstorm (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @03:53PM
  • Blizzard Rhyme by ecorona (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @04:02PM
  • All he got was banned? by Hillgiant (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @04:31PM
  • Bah! by DaveJay (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @05:31PM
  • Paid-for service? by Schraegstrichpunkt (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @05:47PM
  • D&DMMO by morolen (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @05:47PM
  • Standard Blizzard Behavior by Victor Tramp (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @06:29PM
  • "customer care" by Jerry Smith (Score:1) Thursday March 16 2006, @04:47AM
  • Update. by infernix (Score:1) Saturday March 18 2006, @09:09AM
  • Re:Could it be... by ZombieWomble (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:42AM
  • Re:Could it be... by Kadin2048 (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @09:51AM
  • Re:Could it be... by filesiteguy (Score:2) Wednesday March 15 2006, @10:10AM
  • Re:"Grammer" lesson by fufubag (Score:1) Wednesday March 15 2006, @11:08AM
  • 41 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2