Slashdot Log In
Live 12-Hour Oblivion Marathon
Posted by
Zonk
on Mon Mar 20, '06 04:19 PM
from the nothing-to-do-tonight dept.
from the nothing-to-do-tonight dept.
HarvardFrankenstein writes "Gamespot's Greg Kasavin will be playing The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion for 12 straight hours tonight (Monday, March 20th) and the entire marathon session will be broadcast live. Kasavin will be 'offering commentary about the experience as it transpires. Subscribers will see a picture-in-picture view of Kasavin as he spends an increasing number of successive hours playing the game, and they will be able to chat with each other over the course of the event.'" The event starts tonight at 6pm PST, if they get started on time.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
What has the world come to?
(Score:3, Insightful)(Last Journal: Monday February 06, @08:17PM)
Really?
(Score:3, Insightful)But seriously, making this sound like an achievement is an achievement...
erm..
(Score:1)(Last Journal: Sunday September 19, @10:03PM)
Re:erm..
(Score:5, Insightful)(http://doghole.blogspot.com/)
I don't think the point is that playing for 12 hours is an achievement of note. I think the interest comes from the fact that a game reviewer is playing a game and, essentially, demoing it for folks for 12 hours live on the Internet. I can see where people might find that interesting, especially if they're one of the people - the many people if online talk means anything - who are considering buying an Xbox 360 or new PC components specifically for this game. For those people, the cost of a month's subscription to the site in order to watch the proceedings (perhaps not all 12 hours) might be well worth the money. It could also provide some insight into the thinking of a professional game reviewer while he's actually playing a game.
Again, playing for 12 hours is no achievement at all. Like many, I've done 24+ hours stopping only to let caffeinated liquid out of my body. But that doesn't mean that this event isn't worthwhile or interesting.
The Koreans do it better
(Score:5, Funny)(http://www.milksucks.com/ | Last Journal: Monday September 15, @12:30PM)
50 hours
http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2005Aug/bga2005
Second gamer dies after massive binge
http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2120472/second-
etc.etc.
In related news...
(Score:5, Funny)"Mmm, this is delicious! Falling off the bone! Too bad your God won't let you eat this, mine doesn't give a crap!"
Seriously. I want to PLAY THE GAME, not watch some media guy play the game (and almost certainly ruin the plot for me in the process). What kind of masochist would watch this?
Hmm...
(Score:3, Insightful)Today it might seem strange. Watching someone play a game, I mean duuuuh? Can't do it yourself?
This might change. Let's go into the realm of sports, let's go to American Football. Sure, you can play it yourself. But will you ever catch a 80 yards pass? Will you ever kick a 50 yards field goal? Or baseball, will you ever throw a ball in curves like the pros? Or hit for a killer homerun?
Today's computer games don't really lend themselves well for "pro-gaming". They're too easy. Everyone can play them at a decent level. After all, that's what they're made for: For the general audience. They have to be playable for everyone, at a more or less decent level.
This might change, we might see the advent of "pro games". Games with a difficulty that scales up with the skill of the player, where the game doesn't "level off" at a certain point where more skill does not automatically mean better playing.
And a more interesting game. Watching a game can be more interesting when you actually get to see something you won't see at home, because the pro player can do stunts you won't ever be able to copy. Current games don't offer this kind of experience.
Wrong job
(Score:2)(http://web.lemuria.org/)
Seriously, I guess it stops being fun when you have to do it, and can't go "'nough for tonight, I need some sleep" when you feel like it.
errrr... not that 12 hours is that long. I think I've had longer sessions myself...
I won't be tuning in...
(Score:2, Funny)(http://www.moviesoundclips.net/ | Last Journal: Friday September 15, @10:42AM)
This can only end in tears.
(Score:5, Funny)(http://kwrussell.vox.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday October 22, @11:33PM)
Bethesda Nightmare Scenario #1:
T + 1:00:00: Oblivion.exe has experienced a problem and needs to close.
T + 2:20:54: Oblivion.exe has experienced a problem and needs to close.
T + 3:54:29: Oblivion.exe has experienced a problem and needs to close.
T + 7:32:47: KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED
Bethesda Nightmare Scenario #2:
T + 9:29:30: "Done!"
Don't laugh
(Score:4, Informative)T + 9:29:30: "Done!"
Morrowind 5 segment Speedrun in 00:07:30 [speeddemosarchive.com], and that for a game which you can play for days and weeks without ever touching a story quest.
Not impressed...
(Score:3, Funny)(http://my.opera.com/duddev/ | Last Journal: Monday June 12, @05:04PM)
My grandmother could play 12 hours straight... Get back to me when you've played Elite for 2 days straight you damn toddler!
feed link?
(Score:2)(Last Journal: Friday January 30, @06:40PM)
Anyone got a direct link or could point me in the direction of the video feed page?
Stupid idea
(Score:4, Insightful)Umm what?
(Score:5, Funny)(http://xenu.net/ | Last Journal: Saturday April 01, @10:33PM)
As opposed to what, a decreasing number of successive hours?
Oblivion?
(Score:2)Umm, yeah...
(Score:2)(http://hillpeople.us/ | Last Journal: Thursday October 13, @01:16AM)
Just a big advert for a pay site!
(Score:2)(http://slashdot.org/~TibbonZero/journal/ | Last Journal: Wednesday November 16, @03:41PM)
First, I haven't played a game for 12 hours in years, and I'm certainly not going to watch him play for 12 hours, just to get my appetite up to buy a 360 and a $70 game.
12 Hour Marathon
(Score:1)Everything went fine
(Score:1)I have to say, I was not impressed with the game until I watched this marathon. Now I'm seriously considering buying it for PC.
I could almost see watching this
(Score:1)On to Fallout
(Score:2)HINT: To please fans, all they have to do is add an OPTION for top down view of turn-based action. Yeah, sure, make it a tactical, story-rich FPS in the Fallout universe. That's fine, BUT include the OPTION for old school play.
Re:Well, remember, this *is* Greg Kasavin.
(Score:1)(Last Journal: Thursday April 29, @10:08PM)
Visually speaking though the 360 version of the game will allow both HDR lighting and anti-aliasing. The PC version makes you pick one or the other. I'm sure none of us will be able to tell either way considering the quality of your average webcast.
Re:Well, remember, this *is* Greg Kasavin.
(Score:4, Interesting)The consensus seems to be that the maximum view distance is farther on a high end PC though.
Re:Well, remember, this *is* Greg Kasavin.
(Score:2, Insightful)Re:Well, remember, this *is* Greg Kasavin.
(Score:4, Funny)Hi, I'm Nobody. Pleased to meet you.
Re:Well, remember, this *is* Greg Kasavin.
(Score:2)Re:Well, remember, this *is* Greg Kasavin.
(Score:2)(http://www.crfh.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday November 14, @02:47PM)
I can't say I'm surprised. The big advantage a console has over a regular PC is that the hardware is more predictable, so there are fewer bugs.
Re:Twelve hours is nothing
(Score:1)Re:Well, remember, this *is* Greg Kasavin.
(Score:2)Hi comic book guy.
You're saying that of using a controller designed to fit well in your hands, designed solely for games, you should use a keyboard designed for typing, not playing games? Whereby using it for games requires awkward unnatural positioning of your fingers and wrists? Or a mouse which puts undue stress on your wrists?
Instead of sitting on a sofa, you should sit at a computer chair?
Instead of sitting 10-feet from a large TV, you should be hunched up in front of a 17" monitor?