Slashdot Log In
The Time for Women in Games
Posted by
Zonk
on Tue Apr 25, 2006 03:58 PM
from the xx-making-games dept.
from the xx-making-games dept.
VeeCee writes "Next Generation has an interesting article on why few women are game developers, why it should change, and how." From the article: "Fulton then cited workforce statistics, showing that in 1950, 30 percent of women worked, compared with 70 percent six years ago. 'We're rapidly becoming equal players in the larger workforce. More women are playing games.' Citing a study that showed women outnumbered men as players in the 24 to 35 year-old demographic, Fulton granted that casual games were a factor. 'However I think there's an appetite there. As we get online, as the games start getting more interactive, more social, women are getting more and more interested in what it means to play games.'"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading ... Please wait.

Wonder why? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Wonder why? (Score:2)
What's your point? (Score:2)
Re:What's your point? (Score:3, Interesting)
1. it's automatially a bad thing
2. it's automatically a bad thing for girls
Not true. Nobody seems to be concerned th
Re:What's your point? (Score:2)
Re:What's your point? (Score:2)
-stormin
Re:Wonder why? (Score:2)
Programmer A: "Good lord, what is wrong with Laura's breasts!? That's
Perception (Score:3, Insightful)
In less developed countries, game-playing women are perceived as lazy, hence reducing their chances of finding mates.
Honestly, I'm surprised Ms Fulton titled her keynote "The Best Defense... Why Gender Doesn't Matter (As Much As You Might Think)". If gender really doesn't matter, then why would the general public care of 10% or 99% of the game developers are female?
Re:Perception (Score:2)
Re:Perception (Score:2)
Re:Perception (Score:2)
Reduce their chances? What do you think the chances of a gamer girl being picked at E3? In fact, their game playing would add to
Re:Perception (Score:2)
I think in more developed countries, game-playing women are perceived as nerds, hence reducing their chances of finding mates.
Reducing? I'm pretty sure there are plenty of single male nerds looking for a woman. Or hoping for a woman, at least. Perhaps
Re:Perception (Score:2)
Re:Perception (Score:2)
Because there are three types of discrimination/racism/sexism -- positive, negative, and nonexistant. Negative discrimination occurs
Re:Perception (Score:2)
Re:Perception (Score:2)
Re:Perception (Score:2)
Re:Perception (Score:2)
Social != Gamer (Score:2)
Sadly, long-term gamers are the exact opposite of 'social', so still no sex for them.
Girls aren't interested in programming (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Girls aren't interested in programming (Score:2)
Re:Girls aren't interested in programming (Score:2)
Re:Girls aren't interested in programming (Score:3, Interesting)
The little light-bulb went on for a friend of mine when his sister with a Ph.D in computational physics was hired by a high-end as "a fukin' booth-babe! A Demo Dame! What kinda sh** is that?!" as he'd say with considerable outrage in his voice. And q
Re:Girls aren't interested in programming (Score:2)
Rage th
Re:Girls aren't interested in programming (Score:5, Insightful)
I obviously can't speak for other girls, but I'm in this field because I like it. I get to dress casually (long skirts, tall socks, and comfy shoes!), play with code, and game or read Slashdot during breaks. I won't claim to be a particularly good coder -- hey, I'm still a student here -- but I've never found myself thinking that having a little something extra between my legs would make my job faster or easier.
It does, however, irk me when people (not you specifically, but far too many others) repeatedly bemoan or otherwise find occasion to rant about how few women there are in IT. If more women want to get into the field, they're welcome, but going on and on about how terrible it is for us poor little girls who actually have to *gasp* work with or even *double gasp* talk to male colleagues is just going to scare people of both genders away. Why not just shut up about it? Why not just let people choose what they want to do and leave them to it? A few more pairs of breasts around the office may be a welcome sight to the average guy, but if the girls don't want to be there, maybe they shouldn't be.
Re:Girls aren't interested in programming (Score:2)
Because they can make a living by saying that.
Re:Girls aren't interested in programming (Score:2)
Only one of the programmers is female. But quite a few artists, sound engineers, and producers are. Some of them come from traditionally female-strong
Re:Girls aren't interested in programming (Score:2)
MOD PARENT UP (Score:2)
Re: The pastor (Score:2)
Re:Girls aren't interested in programming (Score:2, Funny)
Brenda Laurel, bring back Purple Moon! (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Brenda Laurel, bring back Purple Moon! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Brenda Laurel, bring back Purple Moon! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Brenda Laurel, bring back Purple Moon! (Score:2)
Re:Brenda Laurel, bring back Purple Moon! (Score:2)
Re:Brenda Laurel, bring back Purple Moon! (Score:2)
Yeah, and Blue Moon promptly went under. Maybe she should have taken her cues from Roberta instead.
-Eric
Casual means casual (Score:4, Insightful)
Being casual does not make you that bothered. I ride bicycles, but I don't want to be a bicycle engineer. I would even say I love cars, but I don't care about their engines past how loud they are and how fast they can go. That's a casual relationship too.
Why would girls who play Sudoku care in any way shape or form about programming Sudoku games?
We can run around these circles all day about why girls play games or why they don't, why they program or why they don't, but the end result is the same. Unless someone can fundamentally change the nature of programming, or indeed, development, they aren't going to do it.
I have stopped caring about how many girls play games or how many girls develop games. It's not a big deal.
Re:Casual means casual (Score:2)
You obviously don't know the women I know.
True equality requires complete equality (Score:3, Interesting)
From the UK [statistics.gov.uk]: "Men outnumber women in all major crime categories. Between 85 and 95 per cent of offenders found guilty of burglary, robbery, drug offences, criminal damage or violence against the person are male. Although the number of offenders are relatively small, 98 per cent of people found guilty of, or cautioned for, sexual offences are male"
Or how about garbagemen (garbagepeople) or coal miners? Why are people never concerned about women not making headways there?
Riddle me that, Batman.
Re:True equality requires complete equality (Score:2, Interesting)
"It is self-evident that the low number of men in nursin
Re:You are forgetting one important thing (Score:2)
Few women in engineering = systematic discrimination against women.
Few men in nursing = systematic discrimination against women.
Huh?
Re:You are forgetting one important thing (Score:2)
Re:You are forgetting one important thing (Score:2)
First, even though another reply to your post says
Business Situation (Score:4, Insightful)
Back in college (6 years ago), we had similar ratios in all the CS classes, and even in the upper division physics classes. However, my upper division social classes were DOMINATED by women.
I don't want to sound sexist or mysognistic, but I don't think we need more women in engineering any more than we need more male social workers. I think we need more people doing exactly what they want to do; if that fits a pattern, so be it; just as long as we don't restrict people from being in any profession.
McD
Did anyone else read it as... (Score:2, Funny)
"Lara, you're going to have to swim through this shark infested water to get to the next ruin."
"I certainly hope not. Blood attracts sharks quicker than anything else."
"My god, you're injure
I know a lot of female gamers... (Score:3, Interesting)
Regarding women as programmers, I think that there are two things to consider:
a) programmers are geeky and particularly at the moment, teenagers frown on people being smart, as the opposite of cool. Women tend to be more socially aware (or socially malleable) than their male counterparts in high school, so while they may quietly get good grades, they probably won't choose a geeky path like CS in college.
b) there are still, believe it or not, teachers who discourage women from fields related to math or science. I was lucky enough not to have that problem in high school (now a fading ten years in the past), but I have heard plenty of first hand stories on the subject.
The problem lies elsewhere (Score:2, Insightful)
So girls aren't keen to join? That's probably because they have too much SENSE to join the world of perpetual crunch time and all the other misery we always hear about.
Why does it need to change? (Score:2)
Why promote a sex into a certain field. Women have obviously chosen that IT is not a field for them. In a
Re:Just have female characters (Score:2)
Also, in single-player games, the protagonist is often meant to be one specific person rathe