Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

ESRB Changes Oblivion's Rating to 'Mature'

Posted by Zonk on Wed May 03, 2006 03:48 PM
from the country-governed-by-infants dept.
kukyfrope writes "Perhaps reacting based on the debacle that was the 'Hot Coffee' scandal, the ESRB today changed the rating on The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion from Teen to Mature. From the article: 'The content causing the ESRB to change the rating involves more detailed depictions of blood and gore than were considered in the original rating, as well as the presence of a locked-out art file or 'skin' that, if accessed through a third party modification to the PC version of the game, allows the user to play with topless versions of female characters,' said the ESRB in a release."

Related Stories

[+] ESRB Ratings Unfairly Targeted? 53 comments
John Callaham writes "The US video game ratings system created by the industry and the ESRB has come under attack in recent months, but is it really all that bad? FiringSquad decided to take an informal retail survey and compare how the ESRB rates games to how the movie and TV industry rates DVD releases." From the article: "One person who has been highly critical of the ESRB system is Leland Yee, the California Assemblyman who authored the bill that was signed into law last fall in that state that would ban the sales of certain games with violent content to minors (the law is currently not being enforced pending the conclusion of a court case started by the video/PC game industry). When the study of content descriptions in M-rated games was issued by Harvard earlier this month, Yee was quick to send out a press release ..."
[+] Bethesda Responds To Oblivion Re-Rating 341 comments
Gamespot has details on Bethesda's response to the ESRB for their (some would argue) knee-jerk reaction to fan-added elements of Oblivion. From the article: "There is no nudity in Oblivion without a third party modification. In the PC version of the game only - this doesn't apply to the Xbox 360 version - some modders have used a third party tool to hack into and modify an art archive file to make it possible to create a mesh for a partially nude (topless) female that they add into the game. Bethesda didn't create a game with nudity and does not intend that nudity appear in Oblivion." They go on to state they submitted a 60-page document detailing the violence in the game. If anyone is at fault here, I think it's the ESRB.
[+] Jack Thompson Weighs in on Oblivion 505 comments
Robotron23 writes "Jack Thompson has commenced his attack on The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion by seeking appearances on several talk shows. A press release announcing his availability speaks of Take Two not having 'learned its lesson' over the Hot Coffee scandal, before continuing to detail the issues surrounding Oblivion's re-rating, in particular regarding nudity - concluding that the game content will spawn 'an even worse disaster' than occurred during Hot Coffee."
[+] Living In Oblivion 296 comments
The Elder Scrolls series is well known among PC gamers as the high water mark for an open-ended RPG experience. The series, set in the world of Tamriel, has a staggering breadth and depth thanks to the exacting standards of the team at Bethesda Softworks. The newest title in the line brings Tamriel to life in a manner that is renewing the faith of even the most jaded CRPG player. Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion may not be the perfect game for everyone. For those willing to give it a shot, Oblivion treats gamers with a level of respect that is unique, uplifting, and (hopefully) inspirational for game developers in all genres. Read on for my impressions of a truly unique game.
[+] Gaming's 10 Biggest Scandals 96 comments
GamePolitics has a list of ten of the most well known gaming scandals to hit the games industry. Starting back in 1993 with the senate hearings on Night Trap (a game that arguably led to today's ESRB), the list catalogs some things that the companies responsible would probably just as soon forget. "Hot Coffee (2005) - needs no introduction. Cheeky Rockstar programmers left hidden sex animations (accidentally or otherwise) buried in the PS2 code of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. Modders made sure they didn't stay buried for long. Rockstar's denials only made things worse. And then Hillary got involved ..." At the post's close they call for additional nominations, as it's definitely not an exhaustive list. They left off the ESRB's decision to re-rate Oblivion , for example. What 'scandalous' gaming events can you see rating with this topics?
[+] Hackers Uncensor Manhunt 2 125 comments
Less than 24 hours after the release of Manhunt 2, you can already play the full and uncensored version thanks to some enterprising hackers. The news for Rockstar is just ... bad: "The game has been censored in the US in order for it to receive an M rating - and therefore a release - rather than the original AO rating it was given by the ESRB. The illegal exploit of the original PSP code indicates that the scenes that were cut in order to secure an M rating were not removed from the full game, rather disabled, much like the Hot Coffee mini-games in Rockstar's Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas." This is also exactly what prompted the re-rating of Oblivion and Halo 2 for the PC. We should expect to see an ESRB response to this very soon, then.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

ESRB Changes Oblivion's Rating to 'Mature' 50 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • So this out yet? (Score:5, Funny)

    by ZiakII (829432) * on Wednesday May 03 2006, @03:50PM (#15257099)
    if accessed through a third party modification to the PC version of the game, allows the user to play with topless versions of female characters,' said the ESRB in a release.

    So is this out yet?.....
    • Re:So this out yet? (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 03 2006, @03:53PM (#15257130)
      allows the user to play with topless versions of female characters

      The change in rating is to prevent younger players getting scared by all those women with their heads missing.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:So this out yet? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Kjella (173770) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:54PM (#15257732) Homepage
      Yeah, I tried it a while back... so there's some pixelated tits, but they do absolutely nothing. There's no way to use them in any erotic context. It was about as arousing as an article about breast cancer with illustrations. With the game mostly in 1st person or from behind in 3rd person, you barely see them. If this is "Mature", then the nude skins + kissing in the Sims should make it rated XXX.
      [ Parent ]
        • Re:So this out yet? (Score:4, Funny)

          by beoswulf (940729) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @07:32PM (#15258832)
          "Half the population has..."? It seems American education is sorely lacking to the point you are unaware that we men have nipples too! And with half of males overweight the boobed population of adults increases to at least 70% after taking into account flat chested women.
          [ Parent ]
    • Re:So this out yet? (Score:3, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward
      In other news, the Disney Magazine is no longer to be sold to minors in stores, due to new information showing that it's possible to buy a copy of Hustler, cut out all the tits, and glue them on to Mickey's face.
      • Please, Your Majesty, I know that I, like many other Americans, have behaved like a total buffoon. But we Americans are England's children. I know we don't call as often as we should and we aren't as well- behaved as our goody two-shoes brother, Canada --
        • Re:Europeans watch with mouths agape (Score:4, Insightful)

          by arkanes (521690) <arkanes@NosPaM.gmail.com> on Thursday May 04 2006, @08:05AM (#15261482) Homepage
          No, the U.S. does not have a problem with nudity, though I think we would be better off if more of our population did. (I assume you mean public or publicized nudity, since I've never heard of anyone who had a problem with nudity in and of itself.)

          This must be willfull ignorance. Despite the fact that "public nudity" and scanty clothing is becoming more accepted, American culture is stull much less comfortable with it than they are with good old fashioned violence. Witness the fact that all forms of entertainment recieve higher ratings for sexual content and nudity than they do for violence, such as the game mentioned in this article.

          If you really examine your history, you will observe that cultures become more barbaric as they do away with their inhibitions.

          The word you're looking for is decadent, not barbaric.

          Inhibitions keep us from doing things that would otherwise get us killed, like jumping off of a building without a parachute just because the ride down will be fun.

          No, that is self preservation. Inhibitions are what keep you from doing it *with* a parachute.

          Besides the health risk of constantly exposing your privates to the elements, vulnerability to disease, etc.

          There's nothing risky about not wearing pants that isn't risky about not wearing clothes in general. There aren't floating 'disease germs' that will attack your wee-wee if you don't wear underwear. This sort of made up bullshit "medical" advice is exactly why some people *do* have a problem with "nudity in general".

          If the media be representative of the entire population, then any attempt at regulating morals is a complete hypocritical joke.

          Any attempt at regulating morals *is* a complete hypocritical joke. It's also sadly common amongst a certain breed of insecure, repressed, power hungry person who is so uncomfortable with himself and his humanity that he needs to control everyone, not just himself (or herself. English needs better non-gendered nouns). It's right there in the Genesis as you mention above, although apparently you don't grasp the implications. Adam and Eve felt *shame* for their nudity.

          Nonetheless, there are some of us who don't want to pass on to future generations that sex should be casual or that self-control is a weakness.

          Self control isn't a weakness. But repression is. Look at the history of our culture and your religion.

          For those of us who claim to follow the God of the bible (and the even fewer who act like it), this is a minority stance (especially on any internet forum). I don't expect everyone to adopt it.

          You don't expect everyone to adopt it, but you're perfectly happy with attempting to legally mandate it?

          Still, it is unfair to completely reject an idea just because someone with religious values agrees with it.

          I do no such thing. However, I do reject an idea when its only supporting foundation is those same religions values. Your only non-religious mention here are ambiguous medical dangers if you walk around naked, a total falsehood. Do you have any non-religious support for the dangers of informed, mature, casual sex? Are you aware that the rate of sexual predation is higher among members of your religion than among others? That as our acceptance of nudity, pornography, and sexual freedom has raised so too has sexual equality?

          [ Parent ]
  • mmmm (Score:4, Funny)

    by GmAz (916505) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @03:52PM (#15257121) Journal
    MMMMMMM...polygon'd boobies!!!
  • When I was your age (Score:5, Funny)

    by Burlap (615181) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @03:56PM (#15257160)
    virtual boobs only had 5 polygons and we had to walk to school up hill, both ways!
  • Any game? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Eudial (590661) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @03:56PM (#15257165)
    Uh, you could technically mod any PC game into toplessness. Therefore all PC games should be Mature? Do I smell a console conspiracy?
    • Re:Any game? (Score:5, Funny)

      by voice_of_all_reason (926702) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @03:59PM (#15257205)
      Let's crack Microsoft Word to make Clippy flash us on command. We can finally bring those fuckers down!
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Any game? (Score:3, Informative)

      You could technically mod nudity into any PC game, yes, but, in this case, the original topless female mesh was already present in the game as distributed, it was simply not usable until a mod enabled it (by pulling the resource out of an archive and placi
        • Re:Any game? (Score:4, Interesting)

          by Babbster (107076) <aaronbabb@@@dsl-only...net> on Wednesday May 03 2006, @05:37PM (#15258059) Homepage
          The source of the data is the critical point. While the ESRB can't base their ratings on third-party content, they have every right to rate the content that actually ships on the disc. So, for a slightly more off-the-wall example, if a T-rated game shipped with a password-protected archive of Playboy photo shoots on the disc - completely unaccessible from, and unrelated to, the game itself - the ESRB would still jack the rating up because the material is being shipped.

          I personally don't think bare breasts are that big of a deal (though they can be a lot of fun in RL), but the ESRB isn't there to either protect me (age 34) or to represent me (childless). They exist to keep f***ing legislatures out of the gaming business, and they've succeeded to a large extent. Since they know that politicians and many parents would care a lot about bare breasts, they've got to rate games accordingly.

          In other words, I think some people here need to learn to love the ESRB...and the bomb...
          [ Parent ]
  • so all mod content... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by gerbalblaste (882682) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @03:56PM (#15257169) Journal
    If i make a mod for Oblivion allowing the player to engage in sexual intercourse would that mean the ESRB would have to rank Oblivion AO?

    Basing the rating of a game upon the available third party content seems very stupid to me. I'm sure i'm in the majority of slashdotter who think that changing the rating of a game because of mods is stupid.

    this does not bode well for the future of video game ratings.
    • Re:so all mod content... (Score:5, Informative)

      by TubeSteak (669689) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:13PM (#15257356) Journal
      Did you even read the entire summary?

      The "art file or 'skin'" was already present in the game, locked out or otherwise.

      The third party tool gave you access to what was already there... exactly like GTA & their hot coffee disaster.

      What the ESRB is trying to tell game makers is that they need to stop including postentially sexual content on the game discs, even if it's "locked out".
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:so all mod content... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:34PM (#15257538)
        What if I make a third party mod that "unlocks" the "hidden" nudity that comes when you layer thousands of images on top of each other, and for each pixel position selects 1 of the thousands of images to show though. It'd be simple to take pre-existing algorithms and get xxx pictures outta that.

        Now, my mod is simply taking stuff that's already on the disc and displaying it. It's just doing so in a way that the developers didn't intend. 18+ rating for everything!

        There's got to be a line drawn, and it should be drawn by saying that if you can access the content without the use of third party tools/mods/whatever, then it should count for the rating. If you have to hack the system in order to modify the game in order to gain access to content, then it shouldn't count against the rating. Once you allow content unlocked by a third-party modification to the game to count for ratings purposes, you've started down a slippery slope.
        [ Parent ]
      • It's still a mod (Score:3, Informative)

        Regardless of how those textures got there, the semantics of it are sorta like this:

        1. There's the game as you bought it, and it doesn't show any nipples.

        2. You download a mod which, regardless of HOW, replaces the bra texture with a skin and nipple textur
        • Woohoo! (Score:3, Funny)

          That said, some times we are so fucking uptight that if you shoved a lump a coal up the average American's ass, in two weeks you would have a diamond.
          I'm rich!!!
  • Nudity is fine (Score:4, Funny)

    by foundme (897346) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @03:59PM (#15257197) Homepage
    It's the marriage with an Orc [slashdot.org] that summons a Mature rating.
  • Finally. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Cheapy (809643) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:01PM (#15257222)
    I love the game, but there is no way it should ever have been Teen. The necromancer and vampire lairs can be very graphic (If you've seen Memorial Cave, you know what I'm talking about.), way too graphic for a little kid. Decomposing bodies with a noose around their neck hanging from the ceiling? And a 'kicked out' chair underneath them? More decomposed bodies stuck to the wall with spears (Incidently, the only spears in the game, other than the skulls.)

    Way too graphic.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I'll go buy one of the last 'T'-labeled games, and sell it for a profit later on.
    • Re:Finally. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Tom (822) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:07PM (#15257300) Homepage Journal
      way too graphic for a little kid. Decomposing bodies with a noose around their neck hanging from the ceiling?

      Oh, there's nothing wrong with decomposing bodies, according to the ESRB. But look, one of them has the tits hanging out. And you can almost see the nipple! OMG! Think of the chiiildren!
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Finally. (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Azarael (896715) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:29PM (#15257493) Homepage
      There are certainly some aspects of the game that aren't suitable for younger audiences, which is the case with a lot of games. What really bothers me is that it wasn't any of the violence that prompted the rating, but something stupid like this. No wonder people don't have much faith in the ratings system.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Finally. (Score:3, Informative)

        FTFS: The content causing the ESRB to change the rating involves more detailed depictions of blood and gore than were considered in the original rating[...]

        You think that was just a cover-up (no pun intended)?

    • Re:Finally. (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Cutriss (262920) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:32PM (#15257510) Homepage
      Please resolve these conflicting statements:

      I love the game, but there is no way it should ever have been Teen.

      The necromancer and vampire lairs can be very graphic (If you've seen Memorial Cave, you know what I'm talking about.), way too graphic for a little kid.
      [ Parent ]
  • Unfair distinctions (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Vallimar (323618) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:01PM (#15257229) Homepage
    Why is the ESRB now adjusting a games rating based on post-release modifications? Have you seen what topless Oblivion is like? You have to be pretty desperate to get off on those lumpy misshapen breasts.

    And, since they have started this crusade, why hasn't the Sims 2 been pulled and modded Adults Only yet? That has far more explicit mods and in-your-face sexuality. Hell, the only way to get ahead in that game is to have sex, and that only gets a Teen rating still?

    If the ESRB is going to keep pulling this, all game makers should just slap Adults Only labels on their games and let the parents figure out which ones are safe for their kids, like they are supposed to be doing in the first place.
    • Re:Unfair distinctions (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Overly Critical Guy (663429) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @07:38PM (#15258867)
      Yes, it's interesting isn't it? More interesting is that The Sims 2 has nude bodies in it, they're just pixellated, and you can turn it off with a third-party mod...which is the exact same reason Oblivion is now being marked "M."

      The ESRB is officially punishing game companies for what users do to the game. "Hot Coffee" was never normally accessible in GTA; therefore, they can't be rated for it because a user has to specifically unlock it themselves. The same with this, and it's even more silly because the only reason the nude textures are included is because Bethesda needs a nude body texture to display clothes on top of. It was just for their clothing system, for crying out loud, not some malicious erotic intent. I guess if there weren't any nipples, the ESRB wouldn't care?

      Fucking idiots.
      [ Parent ]
  • Breasts! OMG! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Tom (822) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:02PM (#15257237) Homepage Journal
    Because, you know, you can't possibly confront young people with images of something they've sucked on 10 years ago.
  • Check out the nude patch in action! (Score:4, Informative)

    by Durrill (908003) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:04PM (#15257259)
    I saw a video of this nude patch a few months ago, check it out here [gametrailers.com].
  • 3rd party modification? (Score:5, Funny)

    by hunterx11 (778171) <hunterx11&gmail,com> on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:06PM (#15257281) Homepage Journal
    I have been told by reliable sources that the ESRB rating board in fact contains nudity, and that it can be unlocked simply by undressing the board members. I must therefore recommend that this story be rated M, and that /. prevent minors from reading it.
  • False claims (Score:5, Funny)

    by Ralph Yarro (704772) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:06PM (#15257283) Homepage
    the PC version will carry an additional content descriptor for Nudity

    If the nudity isn't available in the basic game but needs a third party hack, isn't it false advertising to claim "nudity" on the box? I'd expect a refund if I bought this and found no nudity included.
    • Re:False claims (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Wylfing (144940) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:56PM (#15257749) Homepage Journal
      If the nudity isn't available in the basic game but needs a third party hack, isn't it false advertising to claim "nudity" on the box? I'd expect a refund if I bought this and found no nudity included.

      You just don't understand the new thinking, is all. See, we need to be "protected" not simply against what things are but also against what things can be made to do. And, frankly, it is the fault of godless monsters like Bethesda for putting tools into people's hands that are capable of creating nude images, and they should be labeled as the pornmongers they are.

      Seriously, it won't be long until game makers lock down code so that modding is impossible. There will never be another Counter-Strike for fear that someone will make a whorehouse map.

      [ Parent ]
  • Great idea... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Thad Boyd (880932) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:19PM (#15257415) Homepage
    Because the best way to demonstrate the strength of your ratings system is to REPEATEDLY CHANGE RATINGS AFTER ASSIGNING THEM.
  • Hot Mead? (Score:5, Funny)

    by shoptroll (544006) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:27PM (#15257472)
    Anyone up for labeling this scandal "Hot Mead"?
    • Re:Hot Mead? (Score:3, Funny)

      Anyone up for labeling this scandal "Hot Mead"?

      Hot skooma! Just to confuse those who haven't played the game.
  • This sick filth must stop! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Channard (693317) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:45PM (#15257643)
    Why, only yesterday I was sickened to find that by cutting out and supergluing the centrefolds from 'Playboy' onto my television, I was able to turn the supposedly child-friendly film 'Bambi' into a cornucopia of filth. I have written to the head of Disney to complain and will be protesting outside my local Best Buy to demand this sick spectacle be taken off store shelves.
  • The Lusty Argonian Maid (Score:4, Informative)

    by Vo0k (760020) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:50PM (#15257689) Journal
    A book, present both in Oblivion and in Morrowind. Contents follow:

    The Lusty Argonian Maid

    by Crassius Curio

    Act IV, Scene III, continued

    Lifts-Her-Tail: Certainly not, kind sir! I am here but to clean your chambers.

    Crantius Colto: Is that all you have come here for, little one? My chambers?

    Lifts-Her-Tail: I have no idea what it is you imply, master. I am but a poor Argonian maid.

    Crantius Colto: So you are, my dumpling. And a good one at that. Such strong legs and shapely tail.

    Lifts-Her-Tail: You embarrass me, sir!

    Crantius Colto: Fear not. You are safe here with me.

    Lifts-Her-Tail: I must finish my cleaning, sir. The mistress will have my head if I do not!

    Crantius Colto: Cleaning, eh? I have something for you. Here, polish my spear.

    Lifts-Her-Tail: But it is huge! It could take me all night!

    Crantius Colto: Plenty of time, my sweet. Plenty of time.

    END OF ACT IV, SCENE III

    ---
    (and make friends to the alchemist in Skingrad, she'll ask you an interesting question...)
  • Accountability in Gamin (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Goblez (928516) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @07:15PM (#15258736)

    So I'm addicted to Oblivion, at least an hour a day of late. It's a great game, and one of the aspects that builds on this is that there is a sense of Accountability in the game. If you outright kill someone, things change. If you steal, people get pissed at you. If you punch someone, they go rounds with you. Isn't it more important when rating a game that it enforces proper consequences upon the player?

    This is in addition to how ridiciulous it is that you can Mod it, therefore it's MA. Guess what, I can render porn in another well known program, called Windows, so I want it rated MA too (MA for what I say when it crashes).

    --
    Goblez

  • Ooh yeah (Score:3, Funny)

    by Spacejock (727523) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @09:09PM (#15259349) Homepage
    allows the user to play with topless versions of female characters

    Now there's a candidate for rephrasing if ever I heard one.
  • Barbie Dolls are now Adult Only!! (Score:4, Insightful)

    by DeadboltX (751907) on Thursday May 04 2006, @02:27AM (#15260491)
    Barbie dolls are now Adult Only toys, to be sold only in adult sex shops due to the fact that they have built-in nudity, and by modifying the doll (taking the clothes off) you can reveal said nudity which is not only unrealistic but exagerated for the purpose of sexual attraction (bigger tits)
  • Dear ERSB... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Bahumat (213955) on Thursday May 04 2006, @09:22AM (#15262132) Homepage Journal
    Dear ERSB: A modder adding nudity to the game? This is the software equivalent of a kid picking up a pen and comic book and drawing breasts and a mustache on Wonder Woman.

    The Teen rating was appropriate. The Mature rating based off of third party modifications is not.
    • by edwdig (47888) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @04:26PM (#15257470) Homepage
      That's not quite how it works. I haven't played the game, but this is what I've gathered from reading the author of the mod's comments.

      Most games handle clothing by making it directly part of the character model. Oblivion models character bodies and clothing seperately. Although this approach increases the complexity of the graphics, it allows more reuse of art assests. With this approach, you can mix and match body types and clothing without having to redo the artwork for the different combos. This patch simply removes the clothing layer.

      Also, according to the mod author's comments, the topless women don't quite look right. The models were designed to look right wearing clothing, not bare.
      [ Parent ]
      • My understanding of it was that they accomplished it by replacing the default female torso texture with some other undressed torso texture that was supposedly hidden. Seeing as how they admit that the nipples don't look quite right, is there any chance th
        • Re:Adult Quests (Score:3, Insightful)

          Just to make it clear again, I like Oblivion, Hardcore, and eMule. I don't like rape and the encouragement or incitement to do so, and hope Oblivion is not associated with Hot Coffee and other last-minute changes.

          Care to actually be informed and know what
    • Re:Oblivion nudity (Score:4, Informative)

      by Covin (234817) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @06:51PM (#15258592) Journal
      The parent is correct, the underlying skin of 'female upper body, nude' was only included to allow additional clothing to look correct when it exposed portions of what the bra was covering.

      The nude female skin included in the file isn't even female. The proportions are quite distinctly male as evidenced by the placement of the nipples being way too far appart and thus rendering them on the side of the breasts rather than the front when it is placed over the female upper body mesh in the mod. The mesh file of the supposed nude still distincly shows the folds of the bra (rendered normally as a folded up, dirty off-white cloth going around the upper body) giving the topless characters lumpy shadows where the bra was.

      In other words, this was not a 'hidden' nudity thing. The males can be rendered without shirts and clothing made with exposure of various parts of the upper body. The female was made the same way, and since the nipples would never be shown, it didn't matter that they used the male skin 'skin' for it as well.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Oh man! Are you kidding me? (Score:5, Informative)

        by DoctorPhanan (972649) on Wednesday May 03 2006, @07:07PM (#15258685)
        Just to reiterate, the nude texture was included into the game because Oblivion's clothing and armor textures/meshes would not always look correct with a bra texture going straight through it. The bra mesh would also cause clipping and it would be rather clunky to retexture it with every armor. Rather than make some convoluted script that checks skin tone and modifies the existing texture, Bethsoft used a much simpler solution.

        I think that the presence of nipples are the foremost concern for those who object to the "nudity" nipples are apparently the most offensive part of the mammary and must therefore never be shown to children of any age. But if we consider the role a nipple might play in the modelling of armor and clothing (although I will admit that I have no experience in this matter and will defer to the knowledge of anyone who does), such as providing a boundary for how far the neck of a peice of attire can go. The nipple play a part in determining where a seam might be placed on a blouse or an indentation on a tight fitting dress.

        Unlike the Hot coffee mod, which was an intentional inclusion of graphic content, Oblivion's mesh and texture were created to make the game run more smoothly and quite possibly as a modder's resource. The "nipple" on the topless mesh is barely distinguishable from the rest of the breast, and Bethsoft goes to great lengths to make it's content appropriate for younger audiences. For example, in Daggerfall (and Arena?) the book series known as "The Real Barenziah" had very graphic sexual content, Which they removed from Morrowind (and Oblivion) and replaced with the phrase "this passage has been removed by order of the church" They also removed all nude daedra or provided more consevative versions of them for Morrowind. I don't think Bethsoft ever intended for the mesh and texture to be used for this purpose, and while Bethesda certainly expected nude content to become available, they should not be obliged to provide such content for ESRB screening purposes.
        [ Parent ]