Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Details on the PS3 Online Service

Posted by Zonk on Sat Oct 14, 2006 10:40 AM
from the going-online-take-me-away-we'll-go-online dept.
Eurogamer has details of Sony's online strategy for the PlayStation 3. Finally. The long article goes into the process by which you log into the service, some of the things you can expect to find online, the different aspects of user accounts, and finally some details about the PlayStation Store. From the article: "As to the content that will be available, Sony is still playing its cards close to its chest to some extent - but one thing the giant firm is clear on is that the PlayStation Store will grow to encompass more than just new game content and demos. Alongside the free and paid-for game content, the store will also play host to a wide range of new titles developed specifically for download (the first of which, fl0w, was shown off at TGS - dozens more PlayStation Store exclusive titles are being worked on around the world thanks to an initiative which Sony launched at GDC last year) - and as Ken Kutaragi revealed at TGS last month, it'll also be possible to buy PSone and PS2 classics you missed out on, as well as a selection of PSP games, from the PlayStation Store, and download them directly to your PS3." After all this time, it's nice just to know there is an online strategy.

Related Stories

[+] Grad-School Thesis Becomes PS3 Game 167 comments
Carl Bialik from WSJ writes, "USC student Jenova Chen's Flash game, 'flOw,' attracted interest from Sony, which commissioned an enhanced version that will be sold through its PlayStation Network, WSJ.com reports. From the article: 'Gameplay is incredibly smooth, particularly for a Flash game. But it's the design touches that set flOw apart. Players will notice faint outlines of the creatures lurking at lower depths, a foreboding sign that vicious manta- and squid-like enemies await. The water darkens as the creature advances to deeper levels. The game's ambient sound is somewhat hypnotic. The intuitive controls and design simplicity are among Mr. Chen's mandate: build immersive games for people who don't consider themselves gamers. 'My parents and grandparents don't play games. My girlfriend, she doesn't play either,' he says. 'I want to make games that those people can appreciate.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • shortsighted. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by CDPatten (907182) on Saturday October 14 2006, @10:54AM (#16436615)
    (http://www.pattensoap.com/)
    anyone else read that and feel like the author just has an axe to grind against online gaming.

    I think he is kind of shortsighted by saying (strongly implying at least) that full games will never be web based.

    I certainly can see (as broadband speeds increase) purchasing a game like halo, and you download the 30 mg level in a 30 seconds. Video clips are streamed in real-time instead of being played off the DVD.

    Am I just off here, or was that author lacking vision.
  • The Details For The Lazy (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 14 2006, @11:08AM (#16436733)
    "the system does show you friend sign-ins and new messages received in overlays on top of the game you're currently playing"

    "Oh - and it's all free, too. The only place you'll be asked to fork over a penny is when you purchase something in the PlayStation Store - all of the online services, from sign-up right through to voice and video chat, are free, as is normal multiplayer gaming"

    "the only things you'll pay money for are paid-for downloadable content, or subscriptions to premium services like massively multiplayer games."

    "Unlike Nintendo and Microsoft's offerings, Sony doesn't hide the price of items behind an arbitrary "points" scheme"

    "it'll also be possible to buy PSone and PS2 classics you missed out on, as well as a selection of PSP games, from the PlayStation Store, and download them directly to your PS3."

    "what we've seen is very promising. Account creation and management, buddy lists and various types of chat appear to be working just fine, the interface is simple and elegant, and the PlayStation Store"

    Zonk: "After all this time, it's nice just to know there is an online strategy. "

    Pathetic. Just pathetic.

    The Wii and PS3 are only a month away and the Slashdot community is missing out on many major console gaming news due to the 'fucked in the head over Sony/PS3' Zonk. It's time for a change. It's not funny. It's not inflammatory. It's just fucking sad.

    Zonk, go away. Deal with whatever the fuck issues you have with Sony on your own time. Slashdot is long overdue for a sane games editor.

    • Re:The Details For The Lazy (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Tim Browse (9263) on Saturday October 14 2006, @11:56AM (#16437133)

      Zonk: "After all this time, it's nice just to know there is an online strategy. "

      Pathetic. Just pathetic.

      Actually, it's a pretty reasonable comment - and a sentiment that many PS3 developers share, which you'll have seen evidence of, if you've been following the PS3 news in the past couple of months.

      Sony have shown time and time again that the one thing they are hopeless at is software, and an online service is all about the software, not forgetting of course the hardware/server farms, which I think Microsoft just might have more experience with.

      Knowing Sony's MO, the fact that this service is free basically telegraphs to me that Sony don't think this service will be as good as Xbox Live. In other words, they can't compete on quality or value with the online system, so they've decided to compete on price.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:The Details For The Lazy by Fozzyuw (Score:1) Monday October 16 2006, @09:44AM
    • Re:The Details For The Lazy by SScorpio (Score:2) Saturday October 14 2006, @11:52AM
    • Re:The Details For The Lazy by Cid Highwind (Score:1) Saturday October 14 2006, @12:10PM
    • Re:The Details For The Lazy by NotWorkSafe (Score:1) Monday October 16 2006, @10:18AM
    • Re:The Details For The Lazy by brkello (Score:2) Monday October 16 2006, @11:37AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by goldaryn (834427) on Saturday October 14 2006, @11:11AM (#16436759)
    From wikipedia [wikipedia.org] page on the PS2.. comedy gold!:

    Sony rolled a PS2 online adapter in late 2002 to compete with Microsoft, with several online first party titles released alongside it, such as SOCOM US Navy SEALS to show its active support for Internet play. Sony also advertised heavily, and its online model had the advantage of being supported by Electronic Arts.

    Uhm...
  • How much will it cost? (Score:2, Insightful)

    Xbox live 360 from Microsoft costs 40 bucks [amazon.com] a year. Has there been any indication this is going to be free or something?
    • Re:How much will it cost? by Nick05 (Score:1) Saturday October 14 2006, @11:25AM
    • Re:How much will it cost? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by libkarl2 (1010619) on Saturday October 14 2006, @11:49AM (#16437053)
      Has there been any indication this is going to be free or something?

      From the article:

      Oh - and it's all free, too. The only place you'll be asked to fork over a penny is when you purchase something in the PlayStation Store - all of the online services, from sign-up right through to voice and video chat, are free, as is normal multiplayer gaming. There's no equivalent of the Xbox Live Gold account, where you're expected to pay extra for a further tier of services - the only things you'll pay money for are paid-for downloadable content, or subscriptions to premium services like massively multiplayer games.

      [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • If Only.... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by SCDavis (974281) on Saturday October 14 2006, @11:28AM (#16436875)
    If only microsoft, Sony and Nintendo could get together and have a "global" network with all three systems and even PC maybe (gamespy? or one of those guys?) and let people that have say Ghost Recon for the 360 play against people with the PS3... or even a global store where you could buy the things once... When i get the Wii and IF i get the PS3, i really dont want to pay for all 3... with Live costing 40/year or whatever it would be good to get a deal on all 3...

    360+wii = 60
    360+wii+ps3 = 90

    where all seperate could cost people 120+ a year!

    but we'll see... Nintendo seems to have things going the right way with rumors of being able to download old nintendo games (whether it be for free or not we'll see).

    Also Microsoft seems to already be rolling with their network set up while the PS3 will have to work out all of their bugs that Microsoft worked out with the first XBOX... Nintendo also might have the same problems that Sony will have, but who knows...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 14 2006, @11:32AM (#16436893)
    For 500 dollars you get from Sony:

    This amazing and free online network
    1080p games - already at least seven 1080p games - and 1080p looks like it will be the standard rez for most PS3 games
    Full backwards compatibility with the entire Playstation and PS2 library of games
    1080p BluRay movies
    HDMI
    20 gig harddrive that can be upgraded to any size from any computer store
    The ability to buy old PS1 and PS2 games from the online network
    The tilt controller
    A full Linux distro right on the harddrive of every PS3 system
    A full set of dev tools right on the harddrive of every PS3 system
    DLNA compliance
    And I believe you can just plug any standard USB WiFi device into the system

    The Xbox 360 for 400:

    Needs to have 50 dollars every year to play online - add 200-250 dollars to the system over four to five years
    Needs to have 200 dollars and a clunky addon to play HD-DVD movies - but no HDMI connection and no 1080p or high quality audio output
    Plus Microsoft charges you to be allowed to do homebrew - 50? 100?
    Can't upgrade the harddrive
    The now admitted massive hardware defects - 50 dollars just for an extended warranty
    And let's not even go into the ridiculously marked-up 360 peripherals...

  • Pretty obvious really (Score:4, Insightful)

    by DrXym (126579) on Saturday October 14 2006, @11:43AM (#16436983)
    People keep thinking that the PS3 has to recoup its money through games, and how can they possibly do that blah, blah, but look at the revenues open to Sony from this device:
    • Games (obviously)
    • Peripherals (like bluetooth TV remotes, headsets, controllers, keyboards / mice (?) etc.
    • Monthly subs from "premium" online services, whatever they happen to be
    • Online games, movies & music promote to buy, rent & (sell?)
    • Lots of licence fees if Blu-Ray wins the HD TV format war
    • Blu-Ray movies.
    • Increased sales of HD televisions.
    • Increase sales of LocationFree wireless room-to-room / internet streaming devices.

    How well it does these things remain to be seen, but Sony has far more ways of making money than either MS or Nintendo do with their systems. The other consoles have their online systems, but all their other revenues must come from games. Perhaps that is why the PS3 sometimes appears to be a "kitchen-sink" system to catch all those revenues.

    • Re:Pretty obvious really by The_DoubleU (Score:1) Saturday October 14 2006, @12:40PM
    • Re:Pretty obvious really by Lord_Dweomer (Score:2) Saturday October 14 2006, @02:07PM
    • Re:Pretty obvious really by HaMMeReD3 (Score:1) Saturday October 14 2006, @02:48PM
    • Lots of assumptions there (Score:4, Insightful)

      by MMaestro (585010) on Saturday October 14 2006, @07:22PM (#16440091)
      Games (obviously)
      With few exceptions, Sony's lineup has nothing on Nintendo's all-star launch and Microsoft "our system is already out so show up or shut up."

      Peripherals (like bluetooth TV remotes, headsets, controllers, keyboards / mice (?) etc.
      Which are directly tied into the system's success. Peripherals don't sell systems, systems sell peripherals.

      Monthly subs from "premium" online services, whatever they happen to be
      They just promised not to have monthly subs. And "premium" services are likely to be one-time purchases, not exactly a cash cow system.

      Online games, movies & music promote to buy, rent & (sell?)
      Unless Sony has some kind of PS3 Online Arcade system in the works, I'm not seeing this happen anytime soon.

      Lots of licence fees if Blu-Ray wins the HD TV format war
      General concensus is: Don't hold your breath.

      Blu-Ray movies.
      Thats assuming Blu-Ray takes off in the first place.

      Increased sales of HD televisions.
      Sony is not a major seller of HD-TVs these days. They don't own the patents either. Sharp is destroying Sony (and the rest of the market) in marketshare as well.

      Increase sales of LocationFree wireless room-to-room / internet streaming devices.
      The only people who would probably benefit from this would be companies like Netgear. People don't exactly think Sony when they buy a wireless router.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Pretty obvious really by DrXym (Score:2) Sunday October 15 2006, @01:44PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Zonk's philosophy (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Pluvius (734915) <ploov@suddenl i n k . n et> on Saturday October 14 2006, @11:55AM (#16437117)
    (Last Journal: Saturday November 18 2006, @07:24PM)
    When Nintendo is secretive about its product: "It makes perfect sense for Nintendo not to give everything about the Wii away all at once. Secrecy keeps the rumor mill churning, thus making sure that the Wii doesn't lose its presence in the news media. And every time Nintendo releases new information, it causes a feeding frenzy among the fans. Secrecy also keeps Nintendo's competitors guessing and sometimes catches them off-guard."

    When Sony is secretive about its product: "Christ, what the hell is taking them so long to give us information about the PS3? Obviously the only reason they aren't talking is because they have no clue what they're doing."

    I'd like to remind Zonk and the other anti-Sony fanboys that most of the important details for the Wii's Virtual Console were only revealed a month ago.

    Rob
  • RTFA (Score:2, Informative)

    by Scipher (35125) <lachlanpearceNO@SPAMgraffiti.net> on Saturday October 14 2006, @01:37PM (#16437915)
    Could everyone please read the article? The number of replies being posted is stupendous..so many.



    "Oh - and it's all free, too. The only place you'll be asked to fork over a penny is when you purchase something in the PlayStation Store."



    "So, once you add friends, what can you do with them? Obviously enough, you can check their status and see if they're online; you can see if you have any new messages from them, and send them messages. Sending emails through the system uses the same peculiar text messaging style keypad that users of the PSP will be familiar with, which seems a bit painful at first but rapidly becomes a much faster way of entering text than the on-screen keyboards used by other system"

    Please take of the fucking blinkers! slashdot?! you ate my balls with the xbox360 fellatio!

  • by kinglink (195330) on Saturday October 14 2006, @02:01PM (#16438049)
    These guys have seen the final system? Sure they have.

    Remember that this is the same company who releases patches for the PSP over and over, yet does it actually improve the PSP? not exactly. They are just tempting people away from home brew and hacks and keep getting broken.

    I'm all for a robust online experience, but from the sounds of it this is going to be the SAME online that Xbox has. Though with one difference. Xbox Live is a pay service which pays for the servers. the PS3, will not be paying for the servers which means the cost falls on the manufacturing price for the games, not the Xbox Live cost. I have a feeling that you'll see weaker online games where as the 360 has a huge push for "every game has online"... which has the best stategy? Don't know. don't care.
  • by dlim (928138) on Saturday October 14 2006, @02:29PM (#16438289)
    (Last Journal: Thursday October 11, @12:00PM)
    Does this mean we can't call it a "rootkit" anymore?
  • PSP emulation? (Score:2)

    by Kuukai (865890) on Saturday October 14 2006, @04:45PM (#16439213)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday April 12 2006, @12:43AM)
    it'll also be possible to buy PSone and PS2 classics you missed out on, as well as a selection of PSP games, from the PlayStation Store, and download them directly to your PS3.
    Does that imply that the PS3 will have PSP emulation? That's would be very interesting, since there are a couple of PSP games I want to play, but I don't want to buy one, and none of them are really "handheld" material, they would all be better on a console in my opinion. Or is this a PS3-based PSP game store? (I didn't know you could legally download games onto the thing)
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by HappySqurriel (1010623) on Saturday October 14 2006, @11:02AM (#16436683)
    I hope so... Not all the content has to be free.. but I'd like to play online without a monthly subscription. Finally some competition.

    I personally don't think XBox Live is the type of service Microsoft is trying to compete on price with; they seem to be more focused on quality of service and increased functionality. By having a charge, Microsoft will be able to provide services that would not be cost effective on a free service; much of this functionality may be of questionable value (gamer-scores and what not) but it is what the service is based on. I would expect that XBox Live would (probably) increase the ammount of services it provides rather than reduce the price.
    [ Parent ]
  • While the web browsing and friends lists looks nice, people seem to be missing one key point...the sony online services doesnt tie into games. You can chat all you want or buy things at the sony store but they service still isnt going to link you up to play some madden head to head. Gaming on the PS3 may be free (or may not in a few cases depending on the publisher) but its also piecemeal. Peer to peer or publisher control online play is still the only way to do it with Sony, there is no centralized matching service or more importantly infrastucture maintenance for gaming.

    Thats the big advantage of XBox lives subscription services...if all you want is profiles and shopping, MS already has that for free its called Xbox Live Silver.
    [ Parent ]
    • This is an excellent point. PS3 developers/publishers are either rolling their own or using services like XFire or Gamespy to get their games online. That could (based on the history of the PS2) mean multiple logins to access multiple games. I just can't imagine developers being happy with that compared to the ease of use cited with Xbox Live from just about its beginning on the first Xbox.

      Past the initial setup, Xbox Live access has been completely transparent with my 360. I start the console, I'm immediately logged in, any game I insert checks for updates and has multiplayer ready to go when I select the appropriate mentu options. The most I ever have to think about is how many XBL points I have when I'm looking at perhaps downloading something.

      Maybe Sony will have similar functionality that allows the third-party online services to utilize Sony's login, but we haven't seen any evidence of that, yet. The bottom line is that if Sony's online complexity varies on a game-by-game basis, then it will continue to suffer in comparison to Xbox Live.

      PS- I should note that XBL multiplayer is by no means perfect across all games. Lag is reported as an issue in some games while being a virtual non-factor (except on a connection-by-connection basis) in others, so obviously there is still code that depends on the developer. MS and developers still have some work to do in this area, but as far as convenience and ease of use they seem to have things down pat.
      [ Parent ]
      • Mod parent :) (Score:4, Insightful)

        by stunt_penguin (906223) on Saturday October 14 2006, @04:47PM (#16439223)
        This is an excellent point.

        It's not only an excellent point, it's the point. I can't see Sony getting their online service right for another year- they need a unifying framework that all of their game developers can use to provide one login, one matchmaking service and one game update platform.

        Microsoft had it 80% sussed with the Xbox (there was no tangible dashboard, but the basic core was there) and are doing extremely well with the 360's service; sony have, it seems, only reached the 30% mark :|
        [ Parent ]
      • RTFA, it's single sign-on. by News for nerds (Score:2) Saturday October 14 2006, @11:56PM
    • Also, what about entitlements? by jchenx (Score:2) Saturday October 14 2006, @12:44PM
  • by kabdib (81955) on Saturday October 14 2006, @12:26PM (#16437357)
    (http://www.dadhacker.com/)

    Troll.

    <sarcasm> Heck, games are just pushing pixels onto a screen and handling user input, what's so hard about that? For online games you just sprinkle some packet handling in there. Should take you like half an hour to do all that.

    I mean, operating systems just use standard hardware (e.g., paging and protection) and some standard protocols (e.g., SATA, USB), and what's so hard about them? Compilers? I wrote three last week, and didn't even stoop to use a parser generator. This afternoon I think I'll do a browser, and maybe an MPEG-4 decoder after supper. It's just mundane, standard stuff, innit? </sarcasm>

    It's really easy to dismiss this stuff as easy. Sir (or Madam), you have no idea what you're talking about.

    ... obSnideAside: Or if think you do, maybe you work for Sony :-)

    [ Parent ]
  • by Merovign (557032) on Saturday October 14 2006, @01:25PM (#16437839)
    Heh. Not everyone feels the same way about Steam.

    I've had to reinstall it about 5 times. I've fought with it to get it to recognize games I have installed. For someone without limitless free time, auto updating (especially without knowing how long it's going to take) just cuts into what little gaming time I have. I hate having to shut down my net connection just to run Steam if I want to enjoy my 30 minute gaming window instead of spending 10 minutes updating.

    It's stopped working, lost games, and yes, it has switched me to Steam-related messages while I'm playing.

    I just happen to think it's a bad model. At the very least I should be able to tell it "pretend this is standalone" when installing, but I can't. I understand why they did it, but it doesn't make me any happier with the product.

    I'm glad it works well for you, though!
    [ Parent ]
  • 11 replies beneath your current threshold.