Slashdot Log In
The Tax Man Comes To Virtual Australia
Posted by
Zonk
on Tue Oct 31, 2006 01:21 PM
from the need-to-hire-virtual-accountants dept.
from the need-to-hire-virtual-accountants dept.
shadrach_au writes to mention that what was being considered in the states is now apparently policy down under: your virtual assets can be taxed. The Australian Tax Office (ATO) is warning citizens to consider whether their gaming 'is a hobby or a business' and act accordingly. From the article: "If a virtual transaction has real world implications — if it can be attributed a monetary value — it attracts the attention of the Tax Office. Sites such as slexchange.com set rates for swapping Second Life's Linden dollars for 'real' money. 'The real world value of a transaction may form part of your taxable income, even if it is in Linden dollars,' the ATO spokeswoman says. 'In addition, there may be GST (goods and services tax) to consider.' In other words, if you are turning over the equivalent of more than $50,000 selling virtual jewelery to Second Life avatars, you must get an ABN (Australian Business Number) and register for GST."
Related Stories
[+]
Virtual Economies Attract Real-World Tax Attention 247 comments
doug141 writes to point out a Reuters story on the attention tax authorities are beginning to focus on virtual economies. From the article: "Users of online worlds such as Second Life and World of Warcraft transact millions of dollars worth of virtual goods and services every day... People who cash out of virtual economies by converting their assets into real-world currencies are required to report their incomes to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or the tax authority where they live in the real world... 'Right now we're at the preliminary stages of looking at the issue and what kind of public policy questions virtual economies raise — taxes, barter exchanges, property and wealth,' said Dan Miller, senior economist for the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress."
[+]
Lawmakers Trying to Head Off Massive Taxation 108 comments
An anonymous reader writes to mention a Reuters article about a lawmaker's attempt to stop the Government's interest in taxing Massively Multiplayer Game content. R-New Jersey Jim Saxton is cautioning against exploring the taxable status of in-game items. From the article: "'The goal of the forthcoming Joint Economic Committee study is to help lawmakers understand the issues involved and head off any premature attempt to impose a tax on virtual economies,' he said. Under current law, Saxton said if a transaction takes place solely within a virtual world there is no 'taxable event.' Dan Miller, chief economist for the Joint Economic Committee, said earlier this week that the committee's study would start with a blank slate and be completed by the end of the year."
[+]
eBay Delisting All Auctions for Virtual Property 324 comments
The growing popularity of Massively Multiplayer games has brought the issue of ownership rights in virtual worlds, and the appropriateness of what is called 'real money transfer' (RMT) into an increasingly public light. The success of the company IGE, as well as the launch of Sony Online Entertainment's 'Station Exchange' service would seem to indicate that RMT is now an acceptable part of Massive gaming. The well-known auction site eBay has recently made a policy decision that may throw these assumptions into a different light. Following up on a rumour that's been going around I spoke today with a media representative for the company, who confirmed that eBay is now delisting all auctions for 'virtual artifacts' from the site. This includes currency, items, and accounts/characters; not even the 'neopoints' used in the popular Neopets service is exempt from this decision. Read on below for the company's rationale for this decision, and a few words on the impact this could have on future RMT sales.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading ... Please wait.

I support this (Score:2)
Regardless of what service you provide, you should also pay taxes. Give to Ceaser what is Ceasers.
Re: (Score:2)
Other than that "Give to Ceaser what is Ceasers", I have one of his Denariuses - but he's been dead for 1800
Re: (Score:2)
It's Holloween. Be careful what you wish for.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Better yet, what about commodities and futures! There you're not buying anything at all...
Re: (Score:2)
The issue I have with taxing purely
It doesn't really ma\tter (Score:2)
Why should online money (Linden dollar
No, you don't (Re:I support this) (Score:2)
You'd support the government getting their cut when the "virtual" money is exchanged for real money. That's sensible. This issue is about treating in-game points (virtual money) WITHIN THE GAME, just because the
Yes, I do. (Score:2)
If you bought a home in the 1920's in a rural area with 0 property tax, and now a city has grown around you, you are now expected to pay property tax. NOT at the cost that you bought it for, but at it'
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think that ultimately, I agree that if you make a living off of a game, you should pay taxes. Anything that EVENLY distributes the tax base is a good idea.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I do not think this means what you think it means. [praxeology.net] There might be his head and name on the coin, it does not make it his. All tax is theft, and is a sin.
Re: (Score:2)
*We know Caesar died on 44 BCE. We don't know when Jesus was born although most modern estimates are around 5-6 BCE.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, that seems reasonable... (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
like currency (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Timing of taxes (Score:2)
Whenever you convert currency to calculate your gain/income, also convert enough of the asset to cover your tax liability.
You need to handle your L$ assets like any other foreign c
Re: (Score:2)
It's still a real world transaction (Score:2, Insightful)
If you design graphic artwork for a website, you get taxed when you get paid for the work, even though it's not something designed to be used outside of the computer.
No, it's a virtual transaction with RL value! (Score:2)
If you sell a virtual necklace for 1000 virtual dollars, and those 1000 virtual dollars are worth $50 on the open real world market, then could you be taxed on that $50 regardless on whether you converted those 1000 vi
Re: (Score:2)
That's how taxation and earnings in foreign currencies work.
I'm in New Zealand. I do work for some clients in Australian Dollars. When the end of the year rolls around any Australian Dollars I retain (I have not exchanged) need to be declared in an e
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
obligatory (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
*Releax it is a joke!*
Ronnie said it best... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
having done a little bit of maths... (Score:2)
California Taxen uber alles? (Score:2)
This has interesting impl
Wow, real life income is taxed!! (Score:2)
Life is hard, in Australia we must pay tax on all income derived in Australia and abroad. This includes the net.
If I trade virtual services for virtual money, all good; If I convert those virtual services or monies into ACTUAL money or
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting implications wrt minors (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
>>
No. The complaint about "taxation without representation" means something different entirely. The complaint was not that Britain didn't provide infrastructure in the colonies. They
Re: (Score:2)
I would disagree with this move if the transfe
Re: (Score:2)
They are taxing the income of residents of Australia. Something that is perfectly within their sovereign power and perfectly logical.
It is perfectly standard for countries to tax the worldwide income of their residents. On the other hand, the US goes
Re: (Score:2)
You have to pay the Goods & Services Tax on satellite TV in Australia.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)