S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Team Not Art Thieves

Via Kotaku an Inquirer article reports that, despite earlier claims to the contrary, it looks like the folks behind the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. title are not guilty of art theft. It seems both Half-Life 2 and S.T.A.L.K.E.R. use textures from a pack produced by Marlin Studios. The similarities are there because both teams used pre-canned materials for their titles, not because of any tom-foolery on the part of GSC GameWorld.

Good thing

[fishybell (516991)]

Good thing we all jumped to conclusions.

Re:Good thing

[Hsensei (1055922)]

Goes with our guilty until proven innocent society, and even then your ruined for life becuase no believes your innocent.

Re:Good thing

[CogDissident (951207)]

Excuse me for a moment if I quote a person of great wisdom, myself, from when this story came around the first time.

Remember this is a Zonk story.
It is a allegation that stalker may possibly use the same assets as are used in HL2 or D3, and an assumption that they did not pay for the rights to use these (through purchasing the same developer tools, or simply paying eachother off).

Good ol Zonk, posting a story that is not just an assumption, but an assumption of an assumption.

Re:Good thing

[Dr. Eggman (932300)]

Indeed! I always find it interesting to hear about the little things that go on behind the scenes of game development. Had no one jumped to these conclusions, I never would have known about this interesting Marlin Studios.

Re:

[RedElf (249078)]

I know, we could make a jump to conclusions matt...

On a related note to the article, this is good news.

Re:

[HTH NE1 (675604)]

Not me. I stayed out of that story. From what I saw on the Firehose before, I suspected the elements to be public domain or algorithmically generated by another program, such as Difference Clouds in Photoshop, that used the same seed value. A common asset producer makes even more sense.

Re:

[Synic (14430)]

Slashdot - Torch bearer of investigative journalism! They check facts almost as much as Wikipedia!

Damnit.

[by Anonymous Coward]

I bought all 38 copies of S.T.A.L.K.E.R. from the local Best Buy thinking it'd be a good investement.

Fantastic News!

[Murrdox (601048)]

I'm a big fan of S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

The game is very original, and I see a lot of promise in this game in the way of mods, expansions, and sequels. This game is so good it made me feel like I was playing a first-person-shooter version of Fallout. In fact, I recently reinstalled Fallout, and am beating it again. If S.T.A.L.K.E.R. is good enough to remind me of such a golden age game, they must have touched on the right nerves.

Hopefully any previously mentioned projects will take less time to develop than the game itself did! :)

I sort of doubted the original allegations were true, and figured that some kind of licensed or public domain material must have been involved in this. Glad to hear that is in fact true.

This developer shows promise, and it would be unfortunate if its reputation were inappropriately tarnished.

Re:

[Osmosis_Garett (712648)]

I'm a big fan of Sci-Fi. I had some hopes that STALKER would indeed be a FPS version of Fallout, and indeed it does give me that sensation as I play it from time to time. Unfortunately, this game fails because of some seriously surprising oversights. I am constantly finding the AI doing incredibly stupid things; I took out a small army of military from the third floor of a building with my handgun, for example. I've tricked squads of soldiers by hiding in a bush in front of them and shooting as they sne

Re:

[robson (60067)]

The game IS buggy. And it does have its flaws. And the plot isn't as coherent as I would like. However, it is the FEEL of the game that keeps me playing it. That, and it is also refreshingly challenging. I'm hoping the developer keeps improving. Hopefully they've learned from making S.T.A.L.K.E.R., and we'll get a well-polished, bug free, and more coherent sequel.

Agreed on all counts. They successfully capture the atmosphere of a damaged world full of damaged people and animals, both via aesthetics as well as through gameplay.

I didn't care for the actual storyline, but I really liked the implied storyline (basically, what you think is going on for most of the game). And the intended storyline didn't get in the way.

Frankly, I haven't been this engaged by a game in a long, long time.

Re:

[robson (60067)]

How can any game be called original, and then labeled as a "first-person-shooter"? If it was original, then it wouldn't be the 4000th first-person-shooter.

It's not hard for a label to be an oversimplification, as is the case with STALKER. It does use an FPS mechanic, but it has some significant differences and can't really be played like a normal FPS.

The perfect poster for STALKER?

[myspys (204685)]

Or maybe anti-Stalker

http://www.starfild.pri.ee/pildid/ajaviide/imagepa ges/image270.html [starfild.pri.ee]

Tarkovsky

[pluke (801200)]

Anyone who has seen the original 1979 movie that i imagine is heavily influencial to this, may well disagree. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079944/ [imdb.com] But then again, will have to play the game first.

I like this

[obeythefist (719316)]

So, game developers are not constantly re-inventing the wheel... this is great. How many times in an FPS have you burst into an office, seen a desk, a chair, etc, then wondered how long it took developers to model it, texture it etc? Probably not many. But I have! Really, a few good chair models is all we need. This will hopefully free up development time for more important things like design, AI, plot and innovation.

Even better, these kinds of resources need to be made available to small time and independant developers. Writing a 3D game would be a lot easier if a huge number of the objects were already done.

Pff, so the STALKER dev team's innocent...

[CaseM (746707)]

But someone ought to take a good look at Marlin Studios. Apparently some of their textures were lifted straight from HL2!

Re:

[CogDissident (951207)]

Do you have any idea the hundreds of thousands of hours that would be wasted if every game made all of their own unique textures. How different do you want that crate to look from game to game? What about that door? Or how about on a smaller scale, what about the trash texture used to cover the top of a garbage dumpster, do you want to recreate that for every game just to give it another point of difference that nobody will notice?

Re:

[Volante3192 (953645)]

Exactly. Time spent creating Unique_Wall_Texture_37 takes time from creating Unique_Mob_Texture.

I mean, I know every time I go through Half-Life 2, I spent hours looking at wall textures wondering how each would look as wallpaper for my room. I could care less about the striders, the bugs, Dog or Alyx.

Re:

[Clever7Devil (985356)]

When it's so noticeable that the creators get accused of stealing artwork? Yeah.

I understand the concept of using tools (Engines, Texture Sets, etc.) to create games. I also understand that it is unfeasible for studios to reinvent the wheel every time they make a title. But when a game is accused of stealing artwork because its graphics are so rehashed, I think it is indicative of a problem. Like I said, these things won't likely affect sales.

Re:

[CogDissident (951207)]

By "so noticeable" you mean that nobody noticed until someone HACKED the game files and found the water texture raw files?

Re:

[Synic (14430)]

A game without crates would be dreamy! Time to crate for STALKER? 2 minutes. Pretty good!

Re:

[grub (11606)]

just as unoriginal aesthetically as the other major players.

Nah, S.T.A.L.K.E.R.'s dark brown halls look much nicer than DOOM 3's dark brown halls.

Re:In the minds of the consumer

[Jugalator (259273)]

So... they're not thieves, just as unoriginal aesthetically as the other major players.

Yes, because games sharing the textures for some of their lamps are then all junk. :-s

Give me aesthetically innovative lamp textures, goddammit!

Re:How do they explain the Doom3 specific filename

[dartboard (23261)]

Do they even need to?

Re:How do they explain the Doom3 specific filename

[ZipR (584654)]

From the last sentence of the article: "the IMP_Light texture that it was thought could have been pilfered from Doom 3 was, in fact, just a standard Impact Light texture, rather than referring to the Doom 3 monster."