Slashdot Log In
Games Had Nothing To Do With V. Tech Shooting
Posted by
Zonk
on Fri Aug 31, 2007 09:50 AM
from the don't-you-love-that-they-have-to-specify dept.
from the don't-you-love-that-they-have-to-specify dept.
GamesIndustry.biz is reporting that an inquiry into the Virginia Tech shooting in April of this year has revealed no connection whatsoever to videogames. The shooter's lack of interest in violent gaming was widely reported among game news sites at that time in the year, despite the exploration of the idea on cable television news. The official report, filed with the governor of the state, lays that 'motive' to rest. From the article: "The report, which includes a mental health history of the shooter, Seung Hui Cho, notes that during his childhood he had 'played videogames like Sonic the Hedgehog,' yet 'none of the videogames were war games or had violent themes.' This flies in the face of statements made on Fox TV news by Jack Thompson in the immediate aftermath of the tragedy, which laid the blame for the incident firmly at the door of videogames."
Related Stories
[+]
Many Dead In Virginia Tech Shooting 2661 comments
nexuspal writes "Over 20 confirmed dead at Virginia Tech. Shooter killed some at residence hall then two hours later killed others in classrooms. Worst school shooting in US history. "
[+]
Your Rights Online: Virginia Tech Report Cites Privacy Law Problems 381 comments
RickRussellTX writes "A panel of Bush administration officials, including several bureau chiefs, concludes that confusing privacy laws contributed to the Virgina Tech shootings. The report claims that confusion over student privacy and medical privacy laws "has limited the ability of these officials to prevent the kind of violence that occurred at Virginia Tech.""
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
*surprise* (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:*surprise* (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:*surprise* (Score:5, Informative)
"Did he ever play any games?"
"No"
"Did he ever play any violent games?"
"Um, no"
"Are you sure?"
"Um, pretty sure. He mostly surfed the web"
"So, no games?"
Then they interviewed another and asked the same questions. Sorry, media, you'll have to stick with the real news.
Oz
Parent
Can we afford such blindness?!? (Score:4, Insightful)
Jesus, he was abnormal. Why didn't anyone notice this obvious deviation from normality in time to stop his brutal rampage?
Seriously. I play violent games so I don't kill people. As games have gotten more violent, violent crime has gone down in the big gamer demographics...Correlation may not equal causation, but it is nicely suggestive.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
the same is true for porn. (Score:3, Funny)
Watch sex abuse statistics go down.
Perverts are too busy having a wank to actually go out and assault someone.
just as with games, violent people are too busy venting their frustration in the virtual world to take it out on the rest of us.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Multiple people noticed. They intervened, he was investigated by the police and committed for mental examination. The people at his school, faculty, staff, and students, knew he was likely to do something violent. They took every legal step they could.
I know it terrifies people, but in the end there weren't any reasonable steps left to stop this guy. This kind of thing has happ
Video games DID cause a senseless shooting... (Score:4, Funny)
Video games WERE responsible for Jack Thompson senselessly shooting his mouth off.
-Don
Re:Video games DID cause a senseless shooting... (Score:5, Funny)
C'mon, do you have to get our hopes up?
Parent
Oh, THAT V. Tech (Score:4, Funny)
Pity he didn't (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
From tfa:
Obviously, to prevent further school violence we must encourage the youth of today to play violent games, not repeditive puzzle games with bad disco music.
I suggest we start a fund to provide low-cost or free copies of Manhunt to inner city youth. Think of the c
Even worse!! (Score:5, Funny)
wtf people. (Score:5, Insightful)
Look. This is past. Cho is dead, the unfortunate people who were in the right place at the wrong time are dead, let their families and friends mourn in peace.
Re:wtf people. (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm not justifying what he did, and of course I empathize much more with the victims and their families, but Cho's story is sad, not infuriating. No human being is "just" anything. If everyone shared that willful ignorance mankind would have no will to learn about its own nature.
Parent
If they spent this long investigating the link (Score:2)
Fox News B.S. (Score:4, Interesting)
Jack Thompson is just another idiot on Murdock's payroll who talks out of the part of his body that most people poop from. If he wants to start blaming video games, then he needs to be blaming the media (i.e. himself) as well.
While I do think that violent games desensitize us to some extent, I don't think they are at all the cause of the problem. Seung Hui Cho was just another angry kid, as were Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold. They felt cast aside, rejected, and victimized because they didn't fit in with their peers. So took their anger out on the world around them...
Honestly, I'd think being involved in an online gaming community, no matter how violent the game, would've probably helped. Many people (likely the Jim Thompson type) percieve those addicted online games as being anti-social. Yet from what I've seen, most gamers seem have an elaborate network of online friends. This could've given Cho, Harris, and others a sense of community and a place to "fit in" or at the very least, escape from the world around them.
What I do think is a very real and disturbing issue is that they decided to carry out their anger with automatic weapons and how easily they could obtain them. The reasons behind this have very little to do with video games...
I blame selective journalism (Score:3, Interesting)
What does the average audience get? That every time there is a report about shootings, games are involved. And the immediate connection is that whenever there's a shooting, games are involved (because you only hear of those where some kind of connection can be made). Result? Consult your imagination.
It's not that the news lie to us. Well, not always. But they do something that's about as bad, they select and skew stories. Everything that fits their agenda gets reported. Everything that goes against it is squelched. And of course, if you only hear that A is bad or B is good, you start to believe that this isn't a selected few cases, but that it's the way it is.
Be careful when you hear a few stories about something. It could be that you get to hear the occasional stray exceptions instead of the rule, because that's what furthers someone's agenda.
And yes, that should be common sense, and probably is on this board. But where else if not in a thread like this would a "no shit, Sherlock" information fit in?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It has nothing to do with agendas. The exception is news, the rule is not ("man bites dog is news, dog bites man isn't"). No, what you should be suspect of is self-appointed experts like our friend Jack Thompson here, who use speculation as if it were well established fact in order to further their own personal crusad
Perhaps he played too few games (Score:4, Interesting)
Aside, these documents are a fascinating read. If you're interested in psychology, security, forensics, or criminology you will find much interesting material here.
pointing the finger in the wrong direction (Score:4, Insightful)