Slashdot Log In
Halo Movie Is Still Dead
Posted by
Zonk
on Tuesday October 30, @11:52AM
from the doesn't-want-to-go-on-the-cart dept.
from the doesn't-want-to-go-on-the-cart dept.
1up is reporting that despite numerous reports of its death, the Halo movie isn't quite completely cancelled ... yet. As far as Fran Walsh, Peter Jackson, and the WETA folks are concerned, things are still just in a holding pattern. "Kamins also shot down both the rumors of a swelling budget and dissatisfaction with Blomkamp. 'The only budget the filmmakers every spoke about was $145 million less the 12.5% rebate that you get from shooting in New Zealand, which would put it at about $128 million,' said [Jackson representative Ken Kamins]. And of the director, Kamins said, 'Everybody is supremely confident in Neall. Part of what excited Peter and Fran was Neill's vision. We're very confident this film will move forward with the creative partners intact, who will take the film to production.'" Update: 10/30 18:58 GMT by Z : It looks like that post was made from outdated sources.
Related Stories
[+]
Fox And Universal Say Goodbye To Halo Movie 310 comments
Master_of_Tumbleweeds writes "20th Century and Universal Pictures, the two studios that agreed to co-finance the film adaptation of Microsoft's Halo video game, have abruptly pulled out of the project. This leaves executive producers Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh without financing or distribution. A ballooning budget (rumored to have been closing in on the $200 Mil mark) and apparent lack of confidence in rookie feature film director Neill Blomkamp are being named the major culprits for Fox and Universal's decision."
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Scheduled release... (Score:2, Funny)
Walk (Score:2)
(http://www.cad.cx/ | Last Journal: Saturday October 27, @10:56AM)
Halo was quoted as saying - (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Halo was quoted as saying - (Score:4, Funny)
Uwe Boll will save it! (Score:1, Funny)
Hope it is Cancelled! (Score:1)
Re:Hope it is Cancelled! (Score:5, Insightful)
Landfall (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Wednesday January 17 2007, @05:13PM)
BTW, since when could an ODST drive like that? If I was in the back of that warthog in game, we would have hit every one of those walls. Or simply stopped in front of each one for 15 seconds figuring out how to get around it.
a cost saving suggestion (Score:5, Funny)
$145 million for Halo? Boll could trash it for $35 million.
Whereas Peter Jackson would want CG space ship scenes with the giant ring rendered in glorious detail Boll would settle for spray painting a hula hoop and super gluing Legos to it.
Damn, who knew game movies were vampires (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Friday August 17, @06:34AM)
Just as you think you killed them off for good, someone drops a little blood and Guess Who Is BACK!
Most video games, and I think Halo certainly qualifies, use story telling because being told to kill X of Y because, is a little bit boring after a while. Oh sure sure, Halo got a rich universe, intresting characters, yada yada. Sorry. NO.
It really doesn't. It is enough to motivate you to play the game BUT it is the game that is the main attraction. NOT the story. To give you a counter example, The Longest Journey you play for the story NOT the puzzles.
In a movie you can do two things, tell a story or WOW the audience. There may be a certain amusement seeing the characters come to life, problam is that in modern video games they are already "alive".
Then there is telling a story. If you retell the same story as in the game, why bother. It is not like games today can't do that themselves.
What is left is to tell an intresting story and so far games to movies haven't done that. Even the passable Dungeon & Dragon 2 didn't exactly tell a tale that amazed.
Frankly, it is almost doomed (get it doom?) from the start. Doom3 made a better movie then doom the movie. Halo as far as it can be movie, already IS a movie, just with lots of interactive bits.
What could you do to Halo that would A not mess up the original material B present a fresh new intresting story.
You can't. Mario Brothers only hinted at the game and basically invented lots of stuff never in the game. Doom tried to make it an aliens wannabe. I can understand the attraction, but lets not forget that Lord of The Rings is NOT a good example. That movie was nice because it allowed us to see what we previously had to imagine. It wasn't a retelling of the stories, more and illustrated edition of the story that skipped and simplified a great deal but that didn't matter because it had huge battles.
Why doesn't Microsoft Fund this themselves? (Score:2)
(http://www.bookmarkbliss.com/)
Heres the problem with fans and game based movies! (Score:2, Insightful)
OMFGWTFBBQ!! (Score:2)
Oh no. Oh dear god, no! Kill it! Kill it now!!!
Honestly, I couldn't possibly think of a worse movie. With the possible exception of Doom. Doom should have been a huge bright red blinking neon sign warning them away from this path.
Leave it alone... (Score:1)
Why does it have to be live action? (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Wednesday August 15, @03:45PM)
Great potential if it's not Jackson (Score:1)
Problem is Peter Jackson. He is an atrocious director who works with supremely bad editors. A lot of y'all are saying Uwe Boll should just drive the franchise into the ground and be done with it. Peter Jackson is just as capable of doing that. Really I wouldn't trust anyone but maybe Bryan Singer or Wolfgang Petersen with a project like Halo.
just finished Halo 3 and ... (Score:1)
(http://thirdprize.blogspot.com/index.html)
What was it with MasterChef and the hologram? Did someone kidnap her or something? What was the Flood again?
Halo Movie Name Leaked (Score:1)
Yes, actually. The cat does "got my tongue." (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Friday January 05 2007, @01:57PM)
Ummm, yay?
N/A (Score:1)
(http://www.eagar.net/)
Good. (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Friday June 15, @12:03AM)