Slashdot Log In
Blizzard to Boll - DENIED!
Posted by
timothy
on Tuesday April 22, @09:34AM
from the no-cheese-for-you dept.
from the no-cheese-for-you dept.
Drathos writes "From MTV Movies Blog by way of WoW Insider: Everyone's least favorite director, Uwe Boll approached Blizzard about making a World of Warcraft movie. Their response? "We will not sell the movie rights, not to you ... especially not to you.""
Related Stories
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

WoW Movie (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Re:WoW Movie (Score:5, Interesting)
I'd honestly rather see Blizzards people do the majority of the work as I honestly think they could do an as good if not better than job than Hollywood could. If it was animated I doubt they'd need much outside help, if not then primarily they'd just need actors and costumes people - certainly I don't believe they'd need any effects people or writers.
There are differences between film and game storyline creation certainly, but I think they could probably do it, certainly as you say with the help of a "game-friendly" director such as Jackson rather than someone whose about as good with the difference between films and games as Boll.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:WoW Movie (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:WoW Movie (Score:5, Funny)
> but my overall level of excitement from the movie is pretty low. There was a lot
> of parts that just really dragged on.
So it was a very faithful reproduction of the books, then!
Reply to This
Parent
Re:WoW Movie (Score:5, Insightful)
Quit being an old man and address the point rather than attacking the perceived person. LOTR, IMO is dull, both in book and film form. Crap all happens very slowly, the storyline is contrived and very simple, and the vast majority of characters are simplistic in the extreme. If you like it, so be it. Don't start hurling insults when someone criticizes it, especially not ones that have nothing to do with the criticism. This is coming from someone who has read probably a couple of thousand books, and no I don't want your pacifying drugs.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:WoW Movie (Score:5, Insightful)
However, I think he did a great job. Look at any book-to-movie adaption, aside from movies based off books that read like a movie, the movies always fail to capture everything from the book. Given the herculean task of moving the trilogy to less than 10 hours of film, I don't think anyone could have done a better job. Yes, there were some important parts missing but unless you enjoy sitting down for 5 hours straight (I don't), something had to be cut.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:WoW Movie (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
a shame (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Re:a shame (Score:5, Insightful)
Fade in to a low fly-by of a dwarf on griffin-back swooping over the trees of Winterspring. Cut to three adventurers (a human warrior with impossibly enormous shoulder guards, a female night elf with thigh-high boots and no pants encircled by a shimmering bubble, and a goatee-sporting gnome shifting back and forth with two giant-sized red-hot-glowing maces in his hands) on the ground looking up at the passing griffin rider. The camera swings to track the speeding flyer. Cut to an absurdly massive axe, crackling with electrical energy, cleaving the head of a white furbolg.
HUMAN - Pile those corpses high, Ihealuloolzzz. Lilkneestaßßer needs that agility enchantment, and those greedy beasts in Timbermaw Hold won't give it to us unless we kill enough of their enemies!
IHEALULOOLZZZ - By the light of Elune, Tànkérlordd, it shall be done!
LILKNEESTAßßER - Off and away!
Cut to 9-minute montage of our heroic trio slaying thousands upon thousands of furbolgs. Intersperse clips of them ripping beaded necklaces from their slain foes, and other clips showing them spilling gold-bound chests full of these necklaces onto the floor in front of the Timbermaw denizens. Over the course of the montage, we repeatedly see the face of an important-looking Timbermaw shaman. At first the face is frowny and angry, but over time it appears friendlier and friendlier.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:a shame (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
May I proudly proclaim... (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Re:May I proudly proclaim... (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
I dunno... (Score:5, Funny)
Pr0n chicks in green and blue body-paint with fake elf-ears and horns.
Not nearly as hot as you would think it is.
Reply to This
Re:I dunno... (Score:5, Funny)
Not nearly as hot as you would think it is.
Reply to This
Parent
Come on, let's deal with this once and for all (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Fool! It's a trap! (Score:5, Insightful)
Seriously, the best thing you could have done was start a petition and have like 3 people sign it. I would show the people in charge that no one cares about him.
Reply to This
Parent
In a purely hypothetical case... (Score:5, Funny)
Not that I'm suggesting anyone should. Just y'know, it'd be a lot more expedient than a petition.
Reply to This
Parent
you know nothing of trolls and pr (Score:5, Insightful)
thus ensuring you will hear about uwe boll again and again forever
the only way you will ensure you will never hear of use boll again is to not mention him. btw, a front page slashdot story, unfortuantely, extends uwe boll's shelflife
love is basically the same as hate when it comes to garnishering attention. just ask any troll. the only way to defeat a real life troll like boll, just like online, is to IGNORE them. if you give them attention, they win
so any stupid petition ensures boll lives on and on. is that what you want?
Reply to This
Parent
Twisted logic gem (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
I almost wish they would... (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
For the Horde (Score:5, Funny)
Come on. Everyone knows the Alliance is for pussies. And so are Blood Elves.
Reply to This
Nice headline (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Re:I love Uwe (Score:5, Insightful)
Uwe Boll has a Slashdot account?
Now, here is the serious response. You credit Boll with openly criticizing... wait, you said insult, not critique. Insults other directors, resorts to basic animal reactions in response to critique, and takes pride that he is viewed as the worst possible thing that can happen to a story you enjoy.
The man isn't a director, he reminds me of an online griefer. If Uwe Boll was his nom-de-plume then I'd think he fell victim to the formula, Anonymity + Audience = Total Ass (to paraphrase for work audiences).
The man is a walking tax writeoff for movie studios.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:I love Uwe (Score:5, Insightful)
Note: Just because we don't agree, or disagree in the strongest terms possible, hardly means someone deserves to be punished for posting an honest, non-inflammatory, contradicting opinion.
If you disagree, go ahead and do so in a constructive way - by posting an intelligent rebuttal. But if punishing someone for taste were allowed on
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Trey Parker & Matt Stone (Score:5, Funny)
"Now we go to fight the ultimate evil!"
"Wait, we don't have the key to his front door."
"Who cares? Can't we break in?"
"No! The door is too powerful! We have to spend days of our lives getting the parts of the key and forging them together!"
"The door is too powerful? Fine. You guys go get the key..."
"Sorry, sir, we ALL need a key. So we each have to go on the key quest separately, though of course we can help each other."
"WHAT? That doesn't make any sense!"
"The door works in mysterious ways, sir."
Reply to This
Parent