Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Games Entertainment

Falcon's Eye: a Make-over for Nethack 197

Posted by michael from the rogue-still-the-best dept.
chromatic writes "Howard Wen has written two pieces on Falcon's Eye (an alternate interface for Nethack). The first is a description of Falcon's Eye and its features. The second is an interview with Jaakko Peltonen, the project's creator."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Falcon's Eye: a Make-over for Nethack More

Falcon's Eye: a Make-over for Nethack

Comments Filter:

  • Falcon's Eye (Score:5, Interesting)

    by pope nihil ( 85414 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:04PM (#5105098) Journal
    How about asking "When will Falcon's Eye actually be updated to work with Nethack 3.4.0?"

  • Super Old (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward
    I know slashdot is a little slow with the news, but holy crap. Falcon's Eye comes with Mandrake. And I'm almost 100% sure it's been there since version 7 or 8 at least. This is YEARS old. Falcon's eye is pretty cool, but any nethack purist will dismiss it as total crap.

    • Re:Super Old (Score:5, Interesting)

      by wass ( 72082 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:20PM (#5105196)
      This is YEARS old.

      Well, actually, the interview with Jaacko Peltonen is from yesterday, and the article by Howard Wen is from two weeks ago, so while Falcon's Eye may have been around for several years, this posting from slashdot is actually quite recent.

      Regarding your second point about nethack purists, any nethack player can choose whatever display they want. But if someone wants to look at a pic of a wizard instead of @ then they have that CHOICE.

      • Of course they have that choice, however they need to realize that Nethack was /created/ with the intent to use those characters instead of tiles or other pictures. The difference comes in many times (spoilers for people who choose to play without outside knowledge of the game). Plus, anyone who's played long enough to know it's a good game will likely prefer the standard interface. You just get used to it, and it's also quite efficient, which is a far cry from the tiled interfaces I've seen.
        • The difference comes in many times (spoilers for people who choose to play without outside knowledge of the game).

          What do you mean, if anything, the graphical versions tend to show less of the board than the ascii art version, and glhack has an option to switch back to the old view so you can use it much like a map since the graphic tile view only shows a small area.
          • One specific example is blessed scrolls of genocide. More recent versions of Nethack have allowed for a word description of the monster CLASS you want to genocide, however it's still easier to type the letter corresponding to the types of monsters you want to wipe out.

  • OH LORD! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Neck_of_the_Woods ( 305788 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:05PM (#5105106) Journal

    Put down your crack pipes, your fat sappy, your smack, even your nose candy...there is a new drug in town...err old drug...err new and improved drug.

    When you find my body dead over the keyboard with nothing but coke cans and pizza boxes just tell my parents I love them.

  • Hardware accelerated text game (Score:4, Funny)

    by thinkliberty ( 593776 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:05PM (#5105107)
    I think that this has got to be the only text base video game that works better with a video card that supports hardware acceleration.

    Now even people with dyslexia can play nethack!
    • Comment removed based on user account deletion

      • Re:Hardware accelerated text game (Score:5, Informative)

        by fader ( 107759 ) <fader@[ ]pop.com ['hot' in gap]> on Friday January 17, 2003 @08:31PM (#5105560) Homepage
        What about blind people?? Is there a speech synthesized version?

        From the Nethack Guidebook (ships with at least the official sources from nethack.org):
        NetHack can be set up to use only standard ASCII characters for making maps of the dungeons. This makes the MS-DOS versions of NetHack completely accessible to the blind who use speech and/or Braille access technologies.
        • Great, now even blind people can spend way too many hours getting killed in various stupid ways after levelling up.

          I loved Falconseye-Nethack before, but sometimes it just forces you to give up. After 3 hours of wandering through dungeons and getting bum rushed by 30 creatures in a single room and killed instantly, it kinda pisses you off. In old-school nintendo-speak, I'd call it a true controller thrower.
      • No, but you can interface speech synthesis software with the nethack text. Actually, I first was introduced to Nethack by my older brother, who was introduced to it by a blind man who played it with a speech synthesiser and minimal (something like 20%) vision. He could handle SpaceWar because of the high contrast and using the lasers and missiles for figureing facing - but would often get confused about which object on the screen he was - the ships and missiles all looked the same to him.
  • He may be a great writer but I am having the hardest time in the world trying to read anything on his page - The whit on black text is alright, but all the links are dark blue and unreadable on my mac here.
  • notice the most recent update to the site is almost
    a year
    stale

    and despite how nice the screenshots look, there's no animation. chess boards are more exciting

    wouldn't it be nice if when the message "The gnome drinks a bubbly potion" appears, you actually saw him do it?

    but nethack code isn't designed for that as it stands.
    even the sounds effects are a kludge
    (it just watches the text output for "You hear a X")

    and as far as I know, no one's working on this,
    at all.
    • and despite how nice the screenshots look, there's no animation. chess boards are more exciting

      I downloaded Falcon's Eye just yesterday, coincidentally enough, after seeing it on the GNU Win II site from yesterday's story here on Slashdot.

      Even without animation, I find I enjoy the graphical interface much more than a text-based interface, or even the "official" tile-based interface to Nethack. I was never really able to get into the game up until now .... and now I can't put it down.

      Someone should really take Nethack and make it truly 3d.

  • Behold... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by archnerd ( 450052 ) <nonce+slashdot...org@@@dfranke...us> on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:10PM (#5105131) Homepage
    No Points Name Hp [max]
    1 5516572 daniel-Mon-Hum-Mal-Neu ascended to demigod-hood. 322 [342]
    2 5472484 daniel-Cav-Hum-Mal-Neu ascended to demigod-hood. 188 [193]
    3 3672208 daniel-Wiz-Gno-Mal-Neu ascended to demigod-hood. 157 [160]
    4 3236010 daniel-Val-Hum-Fem-Neu ascended to demigoddess-hood. 128 [133]

    The caveman was polyless, genoless, and killed all eight demons princes, and the monk was weaponless and polyless. And somehow I managed this with good old ASCII graphics.
    • [playful troll]
      That's great, check out my stats:

      No Name Girlfriend Social Life
      1 IIRCAFAIKAIANAL Yes Yes

      [/playful troll]

      In all seriousness, that's pretty cool. I could never get into Nethack. I like my rpgs with plenty of story.

      I wish someone would approach the complexity/freedom of Nethack and combine it with a strong story. Of course, freedom and story are often at odds in games (Torment has an awesome story but it's quite linear, Nethack is the complete opposite)

      Can anyone recommend some games that combine these two ingredients nicely?
      • Ah nutza, I screwed up the formatting. Considering all the troll mods I get you'd think i'd be a little more professional, eh?

      • Re:Behold... (Score:3, Informative)

        by brandorf ( 586083 )
        I'd have to reccomend Fallout 1 and 2, sure you do have a goal you need to complete, but the way you do it and the methods you employ can be radically different. Still are my favorite PC Rpg games. You can get both games in a valupak for pretty cheap now.
  • Published on The O'Reilly Network (http://www.oreillynet.com/)
    http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/onlamp/2003/01/02/ falconseye.html
    See this if you're having trouble printing code examples

    Falcon's Eye: The Making-Over of Nethack

    by Howard Wen

    01/02/2003

    Nethack is one of the oldest and most acclaimed games in the history of open source software. It's also, quite frankly, dull looking. This single-player, Dungeons & Dragons-inspired game presents immersive dungeons, though it represents walls, monsters, items, and everything else with simple ASCII characters. Your player character, for example, is @.

    Enthusiasts of NetHack with programming skills have devised various graphical overlays to enhance the game's look. These "windowing interfaces" essentially replace each ASCII characters with a bitmapped image. Your @ becomes a graphic of a warrior or wizard, and the various keyboard symbols that comprise a map are replaced with colorful tiles to form what actually looks like a dungeon layout. Most of these interfaces perform a make-over of NetHack with flat, 2D graphics, but some also present a pseudo-3d look.

    Falcon's Eye aims for a much more sophisticated transformation, visually and otherwise. It overlays the ASCII characters with detailed graphics presented in an isometric 3D perspective -- accompanied with animation, sound effects, and music -- for the dungeons, player characters, creatures, and items. This particular windowing interface also adds mouse support, tooltip information for creatures and items, shortcuts for several keyboard commands, and many customization options. Falcon's Eye coats NetHack with so much eye candy that it makes the visually minimalist game look, sound, and play almost like a commercially produced role-playing title.

    NetHack's steep learning curve and crude non-graphics turn away many users. That motivated Jaakko Peltonen, the 25-year-old from Finland who created Falcon's Eye. He works as a researcher of neural networks at Helsinki University of Technology. "Text-based games may not seem so appealing to computer gamers nowadays. On the other hand, I knew that NetHack's game content was varied and interesting," says Peltonen. "It seemed natural to upgrade the graphics, in order to better appreciate the game play."

    Working with NetHack's Friendliness Toward User Interfaces

    Peltonen originally developed a self-standing engine for displaying isometric graphics, then grafted it onto NetHack so he could incorporate his other creative skills -- drawing and sound composing. Falcon's Eye has, thus far, been solely his work in terms of its design, artwork, and programming. However, many people have sent him suggestions, bug reports and fixes. Others submit art and sound effects, which are usually added to the latest releases.

    While there are several patches available which alter NetHack's game play, Falcon's Eye itself doesn't provide such changes. It does add some helpful features, like a path-finding "autopilot" algorithm to help the player character navigate long distances, but the windowing interface remains strictly compatible with the official releases of NetHack. "If Falcon's Eye were to have changes [to NetHack], they might be redundant or contradict other modifications. NetHack has been developed over many years, so many people prefer the game play in its current form," says Peltonen.

    He was pleasantly surprised to discover how well NetHack's code had been arranged to accommodate different user interfaces. NetHack assumes very little about the user interface: the game tells which dungeon maps and messages to display and what to ask from the player, but leaves the implementation details to the interface. "This versatility helped a lot to create Falcon's Eye," says Peltonen. "If NetHack had been tied to a character-based interface, I might have needed to work around it a lot. Thankfully, this was not the case."

    Like NetHack itself, Falcon's Eye is programmed in C, except for a few system-dependent functions that require C++. It uses various graphics, sound and input libraries: SDL for the Linux and BeOS versions and DirectX for Windows. Aside from linking with these libraries, the code of Falcon's Eye is original.

    One challenge in designing Falcon's Eye was making its code "system-independent" as much as possible, so it could be used under different operating systems. "[Achieving] this is often difficult with game programs, since they use graphics and sound extensively," says Peltonen. "As a result, Falcon's Eye has 'wrapper functions' for all the graphics, sound, input tasks it needs. These then call DirectX, SDL or whatever is needed."

    Peltonen managed to narrow down such system-dependent code to a few files. To port his NetHack GUI to another operating system, you only need to create new versions of these files, instead of having to rewrite everything.

    Implementing the mouse interface was another programming challenge. The NetHack game control scheme is oriented toward the keyboard, so Falcon's Eye's code has to incorporate work-arounds to make mouse inputting work. "If you right-click an in-game creature or item, Falcon's Eye opens a context menu with possible actions, such as 'Open' or 'Kick'. NetHack doesn't have built-in support for such menus, so Falcon's Eye creates them on its own, and translates your choices to keyboard commands," explains Peltonen.

    It's Another Way to Look at NetHack

    In future versions, Peltonen plans to add more options for user-customization of Falcon's Eye. The current release allows you to configure the keyboard commands and add sound effects without the need of programming skills. But he wants to make it so players can also create their own graphics for the game.

    Some have reported difficulty compiling and installing Falcon's Eye, which its creator admits should be a simpler process. This is because NetHack has several options available for its installation, which, combined with Falcon's Eye's own, can make getting the game up and running more complicated than it ought to be. "The default settings are often enough, but I still hope to make the installation and customization easier in the future," says Peltonen.

    As dazzling as his Falcon's Eye is, he doesn't mean for it to replace the other, more established NetHack windowing interfaces. Instead, he sees it as another novel method for players to see and interact with NetHack. Though he's not working on such a thing, Peltonen envisions that an application or patch for NetHack which would enable the NetHacker to switch from Falcon's Eye to another NetHack GUI would be beneficial to the NetHack community.

    "Ideally, one could switch between these various interfaces at will during the game, much like some computer programs have changeable 'skins,'" says Peltonen. "That way, players who are accustomed to one interface could still view how a particular game situation would look in the other interfaces. Currently, this isn't possible, but hopefully it will be in the future."

    Getting Away from the Heart of NetHack?

    Falcon's Eye doesn't just show a different "view" of NetHack. Though the game play itself is technically the same, you have to keep reminding yourself of this as you play because it simply "feels" different from NetHack. This raises the question of how much the candy-coating alters a player's perception of the game. NetHack's ardent fans love it for focusing squarely on game play. In a way, it's a reduction of computer gaming to its basic elements, right down to the ASCII symbols. With GUIs like Falcon's Eye, how much becomes too much, detracting from the heart of NetHack?

    "One could in theory create a full 3D interface with a rotating/zooming view and so on," says Peltonen. "Would such additions improve or harm game play? The overall experience is what matters. I believe the graphical overlays are a useful middle ground, each with different amounts of changes. All [of them] leave room for the player's imagination as well."

    Howard Wen is a freelance writer who has contributed frequently to O'Reilly Network and written for Salon.com, Playboy.com, and Wired, among others.
    • you could try:
      http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/opsys/linux/sourcefor ge-sor ted/fF/falconseye/nethack_331_jtp_193_directx.zip

      or

      http://www.fileplanet.com/files/60000/62299.shtm l

  • It's an EMACS plot, I tell ya! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Tackhead ( 54550 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:11PM (#5105140)
    What?!

    NetHack with a mouse?!

    How the hell are we supposed to get n00bz to use h, j, k, and l to move the cursor, the way God intended?

    This is all the work of some EMACS d00dz, I tell ya.

    Next thing you know, they'll release Omega 1.00 with a graphical interface and call it Duke Nukem Forever.

  • although it was cool back in the day - i'm really surprised that with all their support and user base they have yet to make a full 3d version like EQ or UO, etc....

    Although it's nice that I can play this on my Zaurus (as well as Wyvern which is much better IMO) it's exactly like using your P4 with a 1.5mb DSL connection to play a MUD.....ummmK
    • Nethack is text-based not because of technological constraints (as Falcon's Eye shows) but because the players and developers prefer the feel of the text-based Nethack.
      Just because a game is visually simple, it doesn't mean it's computationally simple or has a simpler play. Nethack is one of the most complex games I have ever played, and never ceases to entertain me after years of playing.
      It's also much more computationally intensive than you might think -- the full version requires a pretty decent computer. I can run it full-featured (without X running) on my PowerBook 3400, but it sometimes goes into swap. (32MB RAM, though)

  • Relation to Rogue? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by NineNine ( 235196 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:17PM (#5105170)
    Anybody know what NetHack's relation to Rogue is? The games are incredibly similar.

    • Re:Relation to Rogue? (Score:2, Informative)

      by saddino ( 183491 )
      This [www.hut.fi] should explain it (if it isn't /.'d first).
    • Rogue is an ancestor of sorts to Net Hack, hence the term "rogue-like games"

      More information, including a timeline, can be found here [kyoto-u.ac.jp].

    • Re:Relation to Rogue? (Score:2, Insightful)

      by 2logic ( 640060 )
      Nethack is what we call a "Roguelike" game. Go here [win.tue.nl] for some interesting links and descriptions of the Rogue-like world.

      There is also a newsgroup for Rogue addicts (which is mentioned on the Falcon's Eye site): rec.games.roguelike.nethack.

    • Re:Relation to Rogue? (Score:5, Informative)

      by EllF ( 205050 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:31PM (#5105251) Homepage

      Nethack is a game very much in the tradition of Rogue, so much so that it (and its bretheren like Crawl, Angband, and Omega, to name a few) are called "roguelikes".

      A roguelike generally has the following features:

      • Randomly generated dungeon levels.
      • Monsters with substantial abilities, often the same sort as the player might get.
      • An "identification" item system, where the more you play, the more your character knows. (For example: a "purple potion" at the game's beginning, after you learn what it does, might become a "Purple potion of Invisibility."
      • Multipurpose items: throw that purple potion at an Orc, and it vanishes. Poof.
      • Substantial character death. No saving, except to stop playing for the night and to come back in the morning. When you die, you _die_.
      • HARD. You'll die. A lot. ("YASD" == Yet Another Stupid Death.) And you know? You'll keep coming back.

      • Re:Relation to Rogue? (Score:2, Informative)

        by lucasw ( 303536 )
        Substantial character death. No saving, except to stop playing for the night and to come back in the morning. When you die, you _die_.

        Or, when you die, you reload the other save file you had to manually duplicate the last time you were out of the game.

        Maybe I wasn't very hard-core to be 'cheating' in this fashion, but that's how I killed the Balrog and beat Moria (the superior colored-font version on the Amiga) a decade ago.

        • Savefile scumming is pretty much frowned upon by the hard-core players. But then, hard-core players of a console-based roleplaying game frown quite a bit.

    • Re: Relation to Rogue? (Score:4, Informative)

      by Black Parrot ( 19622 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:31PM (#5105254)


      > Anybody know what NetHack's relation to Rogue is? The games are incredibly similar.

      Basic answer here [win.tue.nl] and here [www.hut.fi]. You should be able to find more by googling for roguelike.

    • The graphics in NetHack (not Falcon's Eye) are VERY similar to an email I once wrote. Especially the @.

    • Re:Relation to Rogue? (Score:3, Informative)

      by wass ( 72082 )
      Just found this tree diagram [nethack.de] which describes the state of evolution from Rogue to Nethack.
  • and i'm downloading it now. Is that enough for ya?

  • Legs on a snake (Score:3, Interesting)

    by kahei ( 466208 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:21PM (#5105202) Homepage
    In Korea (and actually Japan) there's an expression 'legs on a snake', meaning a completely useless and pointless addition.

    Now, maybe I'll go play a little Angband, or Crawl, perhaps Omega. To us old-timers, 'D' means a terrifying ancient dragon, whereas a 32x32 bitmap of a dragon means 'silly' :)

  • glHack (Score:4, Informative)

    by the_real_tigga ( 568488 ) <(ten.egrofecruos.sresu) (ta) (sorhpen)> on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:23PM (#5105212) Journal
    Falcon's Eye does have a brother in glHack [sourceforge.net].

    Although top-down instead of isometric view, I find it much nicer.

  • 6 degress... (Score:5, Funny)

    by airrage ( 514164 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:25PM (#5105220) Homepage Journal
    The nethack.org site has a willwheaton link. It always seems every slashdot story has 6 degrees separation between the article and willwheaton.com. ;)
  • That's like an illustrated "War and Peace". Who needs pictures, it's the text, man, the text.
    • i agree..

      i've tried several of the 'user friendly' interfaces to nethack.. and none come close to the text-interface as what comes into moves-per-minute, which gets VERY important when addicted to this..

      though.. doing nurse dancing with valkyrie with pretty gfx.. mmmmm..... that would be nice. :)

    • Re:graphics (Score:3, Insightful)

      by DarkZero ( 516460 )
      I really don't understand this complaint. The symbols all over nethack aren't words, they're symbols, just like graphics are. As long as the text is still there, as it is in Falcon's Eye, what's the problem? Regardless of whether a dragon is represented by the letter D or a picture of a dragon, it's still a dragon. The only difference is that people can see it and immediately know that it's a dragon just by looking at it, instead of figuring out what the letter means.

  • Wow!! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:39PM (#5105290)
    He took a 1970's era game and made it look like a 1980's era game, in 2001!! Now that's what I call progress!

  • That's nothing (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:42PM (#5105308)
    I've written a 3D wrapper around the original pong code, and it looks like real tennis players, motion captured and all.

    They look kind of awkward running back and forth at the service line though.

    • Re:That's nothing (Score:2, Informative)

      by pullmoll ( 449700 )
      There is no such thing as 'original pong code', as the original pong was discrete TTL chips. DUH!
      • There is no such thing as 'original pong code', as the original pong was discrete TTL chips. DUH!

        He probably meant the original meta-code - you know:

        take two paddles
        put on opposite ends of screen
        put a ball in the middle
        bounce!
  • If it's called nethack, why is it single player?

    Where's the "net"?

  • Falcon's Eye is a BBS door game... (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:51PM (#5105339)
    Falcon's Eye was one of those nifty BBS door games [johndaileysoftware.com] like Usurper, Legend of the Red Dragon, Tradewars, et al. It came from the same author as the great BRE (Barren Realms Elite). Next time I name something I'm checking Google first....

    • Re:Falcon's Eye is a BBS door game... (Score:4, Funny)

      by nbvb ( 32836 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @09:14PM (#5105790) Journal
      Falcon's Eye rocked.

      John Dailey's bought out some of the best BBS doors --- BRE, FE, global wars, global backgammon, all the cool stuff!

      And don't tell me LORD was good -- it was a piece of trash only 12 year olds could like ... :)

      BRE... now _THAT_ was a great game! I had a lawyer who used to dial up my board every day at 9:30am when he got to the office to play BRE for an hour before actually doing any work ....

      MMmm.... makes me miss the BBS days. Except that now I make a lot more money and have an awesome girlfriend. :)

      --NBVB
    • ... and I'm surprised that this is the first I've heard of this thing. ACK! Confusion amongst FE fans - crap!
  • damnit

  • Fav roguelike... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by rsborg ( 111459 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @07:53PM (#5105350) Homepage
    without graphics card requirement is... ADOM [www.adom.de]. Nice interface, with inventory, and esp. missle combat. Also has a nice, busy newsgroup of devoted followers @ rec.games.roguelike.adom

  • Scary Music (Score:3, Interesting)

    by dcuny ( 613699 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @08:14PM (#5105460)
    This is one of the games that came on the Knoppix [knopper.net] live Linux CD. My young boys loved the thing, but refuse to play it with the music playing - it's too scary that way. I foolishly installed it on my Linux box, and they kept kicking me off to play their games.

    I was pleasantly suprised to find there was a Windows port, so I could finally wrestle my Linux box back from them, although they keep insisting on playing Frozen Bubble [frozenbubble.org], but mostly Rocks and Diamonds [artsoft.org].

    One of the great things about Rogue [www.hut.fi] (read: NetHack) was that it gave *nix a unified way of talking with various and diverse terminals.

    It's not much, but it's a sig.

  • Talking about the power of addiction... IMNSHO, Mandrake's recent announcement [slashdot.org] is not unrelated to their failure to carry Nethack and FalconEye in 9.0 distro. Oh, well, that will tech them allright!



    ;-D

  • Derivative (Score:3, Funny)

    by Forgotten ( 225254 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @08:48PM (#5105658)

    Isometric 3D display? Mouse-driven?

    Obviously these rogues have just ripped off Diablo.

  • This is good for winusers and children. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Jacek Poplawski ( 223457 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @09:04PM (#5105744)
    IMHO NetHack is one of the best, or just best game in the world. One good feature is that you don't see anything, so you must use your imagination. And everyone has different imagination. The same happen when you read book. Movies are always worse than books, because they kill imagination of reader/viewer.

    But from the other point of view - there are people who don't know NetHack. They play games like Diablo or NWN and think they are "unique", "innovative", better than anything else. Maybe thanks to this port then will download and play - enter amazing world of NetHack, and - BTW - enter world of Open Source.

    And maybe even one day they will move from gfx port to hard core text version, and they will feel what we feel playing NH.
    • Movies are always worse than books, because they kill imagination of reader/viewer.
      That's a pretty simplistic way of looking at things. Is Casablanca worse than "Lethal Seduction" by Jackie Collins? How about comparing The Godfather to, say, "Catch-22"? Movies provide things that books do not (sense of visual scale, social appreciation environment), just as books provide things movies do not (more room for the imagination, lack of budgetary constraints). Saying that one is "always worse" is a pretty useless way to look at the world.

  • Text vs Graphics (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Shade, The ( 252176 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @09:17PM (#5105806) Homepage
    I got into Nethack via Falcon's Eye, and had many hours fun hacking through dungeon aplenty. Then I tried the QT interface, which is hardly as pretty but certainly a step up from ANSI graphics. And yet, it was better that way; you could see the whole dungeon at once, you could see which monster was which more easily, and keyboard commands were faster and more exact than any mouse-driven interface.

    So then I upgraded and the QT libraries broke for Nethack, so I was temporarily forced to use the text-based interface to the game instead. I've never gone back to graphical Nethack since. Because it uses standard ANSI characters, it's far more easy to see what the dungeon represents. Instead of interpreting some small icons or raytraced models, you can instantly see what's about. A little picture of a kobold is hard to recognise, but a 'k' is easy to see. Once you've connected monsters with letters, then there's really only one way to play.
    • I'm all for choice and openness, and if these front-ends bring more people to the wonderful world of nethack then all the better.

      But if you have not weened yourself from the graphics to give the ASCII text mode a serious try then you are really depriving yourself of a lot of fun. And yes, after just a little period of adjustment the text only mode is actually a lot easier. After all there are over 320 different creature types in just the standard Nethack; using just letters and a few symbols you can readily recognize 58 categories, and then throw in color text and other symbols for objects and it's much better. Pretty graphics are going to almost always be ambiguous and similar looking and disappointing (the sense of scale is always an issue, you have everything from a spider to a dragon). Text is wonderfully expressive...that's why modern languages use small letter-like alphabets rather than artistic pictographs. And it's also why nethack is best played like you're reading a book rather than watching a movie. 3D graphics can never live up to what your imagination dreams up. I don't want to see a picture of a disenchanter thank you, that R will do just fine and lets my imagination do the rest. And yes my heart rate usually jumps when I see an L approaching me! Seriously, if you've been playing the graphical front ends and are starting to get bored, try the text version and use your imagination!

      I've been playing nethack for about 15 years and still love it. And yes I am listed in the guidebook, but to be fair I only helped a little bit with the Amiga port a long time ago. I owe the real devteam members [sourceforge.net] a lot of gratitude for all these wonderful years of play.

  • What about a true-3D Nethack? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Ch_Omega ( 532549 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @09:51PM (#5105923) Journal
    How about making a 3D FPS-version of nethack?
    Ofcourse, you wouldn't have the same overview as the real thing, but I know *I* would have loved to explore endless of dungeons in full 3D anyway. :)The nethack "world" is based on squares, and so are some of the older "2.5D" FPS's like f.eks. Wolf3D. I'm not a very experienced (or even slightly good) programmer, but I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to make a simple raycasting engine [blueyonder.co.uk] for nethack. :)
    Anyone up for it? ;)
  • Hasn't falcon's eye been out for a couple of years now? Are they making any improvements to it, or does it still look like a really lame version of diablo?

  • Falcon's Eye is horrible.. (Score:3, Informative)

    by Doomrat ( 615771 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @10:23PM (#5106028) Homepage
    I'm an avid Nethack player, and I tried Falcon's Eye for the first time recently.

    I could barely work out how to move. The isometric layout is HORRIBLE. I couldn't even get through doors.

    When somebody decides that they need not-particularly-pretty raytraced graphics to make up for what their imagination can't deal with, it's time that they tried reading a book. One without pictures.

  • Nethack & Falcon's Eye are up for awards (Score:3, Informative)

    by bobz ( 1527 ) <bobzimbinski.me@com> on Friday January 17, 2003 @10:24PM (#5106030)
    Nethack and Falcon's Eye are both currently competing for Best Free Role Playing Game [happypenguin.org] and Best Free Linux Game [happypenguin.org] in the Happypenguin Awards [happypenguin.org]. Nethack was also nominated for Most Unique or Original Game [happypenguin.org], which seems a bit of a stretch to me. 10 or 15 years ago maybe it was original, but today?

  • nethack in 3d (Score:5, Funny)

    by The_Rook ( 136658 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @10:26PM (#5106040)
    i'm sorry, but falcon's eye still doesn't look right. everyone knows that if they ever made a true 3d version of nethack is would have ascii text characters fully rendered in 3d. i'm still waiting for a 3d hethack where i'm a 3d ampersand running away from a fully rendered 'B'.

    • Re:nethack in 3d (Score:2, Funny)

      by tuffy ( 10202 )
      A little like this [ataritimes.com] perhaps?
    • You're getting modded as Funny, but it's no joke! I've been playing this damn game for over 15 years, and I'm so used to the keyboard commands and textmode graphics, I can't play with any of the fancy rendering and menus and whatnot. I *have* thought of doing 3D text characters, and saving the pretty graphics for the environment, where it doesn't matter for gameplay.

  • Um, this already exists: egoboo.sourceforge.net (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 17, 2003 @10:45PM (#5106096)
    How is this better than Egoboo [sourceforge.net]?

  • Code request (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Jeremi ( 14640 ) on Friday January 17, 2003 @11:36PM (#5106264) Homepage
    Someone please integrate the NetHack game engine with the Quake rendering engine. Then the "full 3d zoomable interface" mentioned at the end of the first article will be realized! :^)
  • Does anyone know what it would take to get the DOS Style extended characters (the nice straight lines for walls instead of - and | rendering in Linux? I prefer the slightly smoother look of the DOS graphics (but not too smooth)

    also (heathen!) is there a way to turn on (gasp!) arrow keys?

Slashdot Top Deals

The rule on staying alive as a program manager is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once.

Close