Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
PC Games (Games) Role Playing (Games) Entertainment Games

Female MMORPG Developers On Influences 30

Thanks to Warcry for their discussion with a number of female MMOG developers, asking whether "the reason so many MMOGs follow the same paths... is that they were designed, built, and maintained by men." Of the respondents, Judith at Turbine Entertainment points out that "an audience that skews towards immature males will very likely have exaggeratedly female avatars for them to play with", and Srand at Turbine doesn't see any particular male-patterned design trap, suggesting: "the reason so many MMOGs follow the same paths... is that they were designed, built, and maintained by people. And people, as the mantra goes, are stupid."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Female MMORPG Developers On Influences

Comments Filter:
  • by Shihar ( 153932 ) on Friday October 24, 2003 @04:17AM (#7298279)
    Personally, I think the biggest issue is that most MMORPGs cater to a certain type of obsessive behavior. For whatever reasons, women seem to be much more immune to this obsession. Guys on the other hand eat it up. Diablo is a perfect example of a game that made itself a hit not off an interesting story, neat quests, or anything of that lack. Diablo was a hit because you spent hours mindlessly killing stuff. It wasn't even that you were killing things. It was that you were just clicking a button for a prize. I don't think it is even the killing that terms women off. I think it is just how tedious these games are and how you need to be obsessive to enjoy it. Throw the average woman in front of GTA3 and she will find it amusing. Throw her in front of Diablo and she will fall asleep after a few minutes. The difference between the two isn't the killing, it is the obsessive and tedious nature of the games.

    The thing is, that while women might be more immune to this then men, I think most men are immune to it too. I think that there is a vast audience out there for MMORPGs. The problem is that they all cater to obsession (granted, there are some exceptions these days, but they are woefully under advertised). Once these games evolve beyond needing someone to be addicted to hitting the button for a prize I think the market will start to really expand. If you could enjoy the game for the games sake, I think that things would drastically improve. How to do this? Build worlds. Build worlds where you don't need to kill to be happy. Even if you do kill on occasion, don't make it so that the only way to kill is to be obsessive about it. I think A Tale in the Desert is about as close as one can get to that these days.

    Personally, I'll stick to RPI MUDs until MMORPGs are more then multiplayer Diablo. My MUD, http://www.armageddon.org/ provides a cohesive world based around role playing, permanent death, and it doesn't require you to be obsessive about killing in order to play. You can still kill stuff, you just are not going to gain anything by mindlessly killing hordes NPCs. Once a MMORPG can copy what that MUD has, I'll shell out my 15 a week.
    • "The difference between the two isn't the killing, it is the obsessive and tedious nature of the games."

      But this does'nt work for certain games, for example most men I know would put "the sims" into the "obsessive and tedious nature" category yet nearly every women I know plays it, so obviously women don't mind tedious they just want different forms of tedious.

  • Go ask Hollywood, and the music industry too.

    Sequels, rehashes, cover versions etc.
  • by JavaLord ( 680960 ) on Friday October 24, 2003 @10:17AM (#7299867) Journal
    "the reason so many MMOGs follow the same paths... is that they were designed, built, and maintained by men." Of the respondents, Judith at Turbine Entertainment points out that "an audience that skews towards immature males will very likely have exaggeratedly female avatars for them to play with"

    MMOG's seem to have more women players than any other online genre. They also seem feminized. I'm sure some people won't like that statement, but seriously, what other online games put such restrictions on killing/harming other players? What other online games make such a big deal over what your avatar looks like?

    Take star wars galaxies for example, it's almost a barbie game online...You can be a dancer! Customize your clothes! Become a tailor or a chef! Only 1 in 500,000 of you will be Jedi though. YEY FUN! Is this what a typical teenage male wants to do? Give me a break.

    As for the women characters being "exaggerated" aren't the men too? Maybe it's just that men don't (typically) have the same poor self-esteem when it comes to their body that many women do. I'd bet that 99/100ths of the men play avatars that have bodies they could never have, even if they tried.

    I hope game developers don't take this seriously. I don't want to log on to matrix online and have to chose between my avatar looking like Rosie O'Donald, Opera, or Ms. Cleo.

    • by Pfhor ( 40220 ) on Friday October 24, 2003 @11:19AM (#7300552) Homepage
      Actually, most studies show that while men do not have as low self esteem as women (especially during the first stages of puberty) men do suffer from poor self image and are felt forced to act masculine or macho, etc. at the expense of being called gay, queer, fag, or worse, a woman. The fact that most male avatars tend to be exagerated also could be linked to the designers trying to compensate for their own insecurities, or the users trying to compensate also, or both. There is a great documentary about male / masculine image in the media called "Tought Guise" which I suggest everyone takes a look at.
      • The fact that most male avatars tend to be exagerated also could be linked to the designers trying to compensate for their own insecurities, or the users trying to compensate also, or both.

        Or maybe they just want to look better? Does someone really have to be insecure to want to look better than they do in real life? Do people really think of their avatar as "them"? I don't, but I can't speak for everyone. What you see in video games isn't much different from television, magazines, music videos, etc
      • Is "Tough Guise" that popular a documentary? I just watched it for a class on gender.
  • It's simple. Just like with other entertainment forms, often the makers are backed by large companies who have a vested interest in the success of the game. It's even magnified in the case of these games since they're paying to set up servers, hire support staff, (etc) in addition to the development of the game. They're not going to try anything risky, but rather take the existing model and change a few elements as systematically as possible.

    That's how Hollywood's operated since... always.

    The sad thing is
    • This is my take on this as well.

      The only true innovation in the industry these days is left to the independent developer. Either that or one with a very loose leash (if they exist anymore) from the publisher.

      I think as more female developers push into the industry I think they will be able to flex more proverbial muscle so to speak but like you said, the economics of computer games, especially in the MMORPG market are irrefutable. Guys spend a lot of money on these - far more than women. Period. Of those
    • Actually, there are some independent online RPGs out there. We just don't get the press coverage of the larger games. We also don't have as high of production values (I.E., our art isn't as pretty as the big-name games).

      My own game, Meridian 59 [meridian59.com] is a typical fantasy RPG, with a heavier focus on player vs. player combat and socialization. It has a much more interesting character advancement system which is much faster than most other games.

      If you like crafting or an Egyptian setting, you might try A Tal [atitd.com]

God doesn't play dice. -- Albert Einstein

Working...