Steam Update Shows FPS Gamer Stats 101
majestik writes "Valve Software today sent out a Half-Life 2 hardware survey via their Steam content delivery app to over 270,000 gamers (and counting!), collecting various hardware and software information about their PC systems to see how they'll measure up to the forthcoming FPS. Lotsa interesting data to check out, if you ever wanted to know what kind of systems today's FPS gamers use. And yes, if you're wondering, right now Intel takes 50.02% of the CPU market, leaving AMD with 49.98%." The stats are updated in real-time, and it seems this update has again stressed the Steam servers, with a message noting "the Steam network has been overloaded, causing many Steam users to be unable to login", though the effect is reportedly diminishing.
AMD vs Intel (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:AMD vs Intel (Score:3, Informative)
Re:AMD vs Intel (Score:2)
Re:AMD vs Intel (Score:2)
among harder core games maybe AMD stats would be better, but a lot of the people playing steam games are teens who know little about computers and are using their family (or personal, but provided by family) computers that were most definately retail purchased. Although for the %'s to end up this way, I would have to assume that a good amount of those retail boxes were AMD (not a huge amount, but enough to impact the stats).
What diss
Re:AMD vs Intel (Score:2)
Re:AMD the winner (Score:3, Interesting)
Is this a user feedback form - or does it gather the data directly from the system ?
Re:AMD the winner (Score:2)
Re:AMD the winner (Score:1)
Re:AMD the winner (Score:4, Informative)
Re:AMD the winner (Score:2)
This violates my 2nd amendment rights! (Score:5, Funny)
They can have my unlimited gaussgun and Mp5 grenade launcher when they pry the joystick from my cold dead fingers.
Heh, interesting (Score:5, Funny)
Also, some fool is trying to run half life at 96 pixels?
And finally, nice to see all those Microsoft employees beta-testing XP SP2 are hard at work...
Re:Heh, interesting (Score:1)
Below 200 Mhz 9
I think my parent's wordprocessor could run HL2 better than a 200 mhz.
Re:Heh, interesting (Score:1)
I'd guess a few people have installed Steam on such old beasts, but I doubty they'll be buying Half Life 2 for them.
Re:Heh, interesting (Score:1)
here too: who would have guessed they exist?!
or is this just proof of how meaningless the survey is?
Re:Heh, interesting (Score:2)
Counterstrike and Halflife are old enough to be playable like that...
Re:Heh, interesting (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Heh, interesting (Score:1)
Re:Heh, interesting (Score:3, Informative)
I'm sure this is just a driver quirk or something else rather silly, but seeing
Re:Heh, interesting (Score:1)
Re:Heh, interesting (Score:2)
That said, I'm no big FPS gamer, and I don't play on Steam, so I'm not a part of that number.
Re:Heh, interesting (Score:2)
-prator
Re:Heh, interesting (Score:4, Informative)
Not so smart: Where do people with 256 MB RAM fit in, "128 Mb to 256 Mb" or "256 Mb to 512 Mb"...? The numbers make me guess it's the former. Same goes for CPU speed.
Hold on a sec (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hold on a sec (Score:2)
Er... (Score:5, Funny)
RDTSC 283,171 100.02%
I wonder how they got that
Re:Er... (Score:1)
Please mod parent Under-rated, or can meta-moderation revoke that?
Re:Er... (Score:2)
Re:Er... (Score:2, Interesting)
And the other winner: Nvidia (Score:4, Interesting)
41.17% Unknown,
10.30% total Radeons,
1.18% Intel.
It's possible (though unlikely) that all the unknowns were ATI cards, but I think this is a clear win for NVidia.
OTOH, the most popular card is a GF4MX, which is actually a less capable card than my poor dead GF2TI, which didn't even make it on the list
Re:And the other winner: Nvidia (Score:2, Funny)
"but it's a geforece 4!!! what you mean it sucks??"
Re:And the other winner: Nvidia (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:And the other winner: Nvidia (Score:2)
Look at the driver DLL name.
nVidia with close to 60% (!)
ATI at around 30% or less
Then you can see the others; i810, s3, etc.
nVidia definitely takes the cake though. Good cards, especially under Linux.
Other Settings: (Score:1)
And I like this stat (Score:3, Troll)
Perhaps there's some nasty problems related to high-poly and BSOD!
Re:And I like this stat (Score:1)
I found Half-Life crashed horribley (as in BSOD[1]) when I tried to run it under Direct3D on my Windows 2000 box.) That's why I use OpenGL. Plus I think Half-Life is supposed to be better performing under OpenGL anyway, although that's probably a moot point on 2GHz machines with a game with a Pentium (no bloody 2, 3 or 4) as it's minimum requirements.
[1] The only BSOD Windows 2000 has even given me on that box. But I only use it for games and stuff, I use an iBook for most browsing.
Re:And I like this stat (Score:1)
Re:And I like this stat (Score:1)
Intel and AMD? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Intel and AMD? (Score:2)
Re:Intel and AMD? (Score:2)
The only complaints I have is more specificly in the cheap machines built with them. The powersupplies are total crap.
Re:Intel and AMD? (Score:1)
They're good for a low-heat, low-noise setup, and perform decently considering their intended use.
I've never seen them as part of a retail machine, though. Maybe as part of a barebones kit, but I'm not sure. How did you purchase yours?
In any case, I built my C3 system from scratch, and haven't had any hardware problems (except for a finicky optical drive).
~~LF
useless (Score:1)
256 Mb to 512 Mb - 53.66 %
Re:useless (Score:1)
Re:useless (Score:1)
Re:useless (Score:2)
Oddly enough, my system with a single 512Mb stick of ram reports to windows that it has 511Mb - so my 512Mb system would still be stuck in the 256 to almost 512 bracket :(
Stop beating the mule, ITS DEAD! (Score:1)
Re:Stop beating the mule, ITS DEAD! (Score:4, Insightful)
1. Basic Retail Pack. Only Single Player with an option to upgrade to Multiplayer for a price over the internet.
2. Full Retail Pack. Single Player and Multiplayer in one pack.
3. Gold Retail Pack. Single Player, Multiplayer and all types of extra junk all crammed into it.
4. Steam. Which will be Multiplayer, Singleplayer and maybe include a few mods that teams are working on right now(valvE are supporting HL1 mod teams in this).
Valve want people to buy it over Steam for one good reason: Cash.
They get 100% of all revenue from Steam based purchases, effectivly cutting retailers, middlemen and their publisher(Vivendi Universal Games) out of the loop.
Which means that they get an arseload of money.
Re:Stop beating the mule, ITS DEAD! (Score:1)
The other Option, is if you subscribe for 10$ per month to Steam, you'll get access to all Valve games you have not purchased, so you could play Half-Life 2, Team Fortress 2, Counter Strike: Condition Zero, and anything else they released, so long as you subscribed. Of course if you bought any game before or during you'd still keep it after your subscr
Lol AMD in the lead now (Score:1)
AuthenticAMD 50.02 %
GenuineIntel 49.97 %
WineX (Score:3, Funny)
Re:WineX (Score:1)
Steam Stress (Score:4, Interesting)
But from what I've been seeing about Steam, I have the feeling that most of the delays have been figuring out how to make that system work right the first time so they don't have a "first day Ultima Online/Everquest/any other massive online game issue" out there.
A good thing, and it's interesting to watch the baby steps they take to break it (like with this survey) then probably analyze what worked and what didn't.
Re:Steam Stress (Score:2)
Well, that and the fact that game isn't close to being content-complete.
Opt-out or opt-in? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Opt-out or opt-in? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Opt-out or opt-in? (Score:5, Funny)
For what it's worth, participation is voluntary. So you were right to ask, wrong to be sure, right to be doubtful, and ultimately a waste of my time.
Re:Opt-out or opt-in? (Score:2)
I think your summary of my post is overly superficial. I was asking a question to which I wanted to know the answer, and I had no way of knowing it other than asking. To summarize that as "But I'm
Re:Opt-out or opt-in? (Score:2)
The Steam license is fairly short and succinct- I suggest you look at it if you are curious about their intentions.
Re:Opt-out or opt-in? (Score:2)
hardware survey (Score:2)
What about ATI and Nvidia (Score:3, Insightful)
I am curious to see who really has the bigger market share between ATI and Nvidia. They have way more influence on game libraries and graphics call than both processor company IMHO.
Re:What about ATI and Nvidia (Score:2)
Look at the part which shows the graphics driver DLL name.
Also note that the GeForce4 MX is the most popular card, followed closely by the FX5200. This is probably because many OEMs use NVIDIA's low-end cards in their mid-range systems. Most gamers probably are smart enough to avoid onboard graphics.
Win 95 (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Win 95 (Score:1)
Win 95 220
can they watch the survery results page with that?
FPS Gamer Stats? (Score:2)
Steam Hammered (Score:3, Insightful)
The survey is quite interesting, as are the stats as to how many servers and players are online etc. Average player minutes last month: 1.160 billion! I'm guessing that's a US billion, which is 1000 x 1million; a UK and German billion (probably other places too) is 1million x 1million. Anyway, I was surprised at the AMD/Intel CPU distribution (about half each).
However, for all their ease of updates and cutting out middlemen for software retail etc, it sucks. As soon as an update like this comes out, everybody's steam client wants to update, the servers get overloaded and become effectively unavailable - I can't play online without updating, and I can't even play any of the steam games offline (offline play is part of this update). Must be hell for those with slower links.
If it worth joining a system, where you can't use it for 3 days when a large update comes out? I think the basic idea is good, but the implementation sucks raw eggs! They don't even use the browser settings and go through a proxy - that would save a lot of bandwidth, and reduce their system load. You could go further with something like BitTorrent, even.
-- Steve
Re:Steam Hammered (Score:2)
Also, it just came out yesterday morning (about 36 hours after I posted this), so "3 days" is a bit of a stretch to say that's how long it was offline.
Valve and BitTorrent... (Score:2)
Re:Steam Hammered (Score:1)
Sure, there were problems like this when steam first came out. That's because of one thing.
ntel (Score:2, Funny)
GenuineIntel - 155,138 - 50.12 %
ntel - 1 - 0.00 %
"ntel"
Intel bugs again...
or someone running lin---s
Hyperthreading (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Definitly accurate! (Score:1)
Connect To Steam, Send Valve Data (Score:1)
This chart also seems to keep track of clients, not servers either. Only 123 computers running OS systems other than Windows? I think we all know Linux
Re:Connect To Steam, Send Valve Data (Score:2)
Huh?` (Score:1)
Re:Huh?` (Score:1)
Maybe someone ported wmquake [bensinclair.com] for Windows and HL... or maybe it gave them... er, ideas.
Re:Huh? (Score:1)
Steam DDoS (Score:1)
steam powered (Score:1)
Not indicative of the entire market. (Score:2)
I play a lot of BF1942, and I can assure you that the computers running this game are far superior to the average shown here.
Among my clan, ATi cards dominate the market, so does more than 512 MB ram, and so on.... I think AMD and Intel are still quite even, though.
I'm confused (Score:2)
Just pointing out the hypocrisy of it all.
Is this usefull? (Score:1)