Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
HP Entertainment Games

HP to Offer Custom Compaq Gaming PCs 253

PunkerTFC writes "Announced in the run-up to E3, Hewlett-Packard will offer custom built-to-order gaming machines under the Compaq brand, according to Reuters. The machines will be avalible in June or July and 'offer a range of options with standard, off-the-shelf components.' HP has been selling a Compaq gaming machine on a limited basis through a few select retailers already - apparently, 'Those pilot sales... convinced the company that it could compete in a market where well-known specialty manufacturers like Alienware, Voodoo and Falcon Northwest face increasing competition from mainstream players like Dell Inc'. The X Gaming machines will feature 'a standard chassis from CoolerMaster, known for its work in keeping system noise down while also decreasing heat, and red glowing lights in front and back what will make it stand out in the dark.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

HP to Offer Custom Compaq Gaming PCs

Comments Filter:
  • by Schlemphfer ( 556732 ) on Monday May 10, 2004 @02:42PM (#9109127) Homepage
    Way back when HP and Compaq merged, the decision was made that HP's would be the higher end product, and Compaqs would be marketed toward the low-end.

    So it's odd to see them choose their cheaper brand to be their game box, since game boxes are by definition amped up versions of regular machines.

    Maybe they just think Compaq sounds a lot cooler than Hewlett-Packard.

  • by ItMustBeEsoteric ( 732632 ) <ryangilbert AT gmail DOT com> on Monday May 10, 2004 @02:45PM (#9109163)
    The Best Buy semi-local to me has them (in Toledo, OH). While I admit the case is cool (shiny polished aluminum), and definitely looks better than the Dell XPS or the hideous Alienwares, it was overpriced as is to be expected. It was almost as much as the Alienware they had (this was a few months ago).

    Now, gamers who buy these gaming systems rather than building their own rigs go a lot for cool factor, name-brand recognition, and bragging rights. I think the fact that it's a Compaq may hurt this.

    "Yeah, I have an Alienware Area-51"
    "Sweet, I just got a Dell XPS laptop."
    "Yeah, well, I got a Compaq gaming tower!"

    See what I mean?
  • Hopeless. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Trespass ( 225077 ) on Monday May 10, 2004 @02:47PM (#9109181) Homepage
    HP has worked tirelessly for the last five years to ensure that their consumer PCs are some of the most unreliable, poorly-supported pieces of Wal-Mart level junk on the market. I should know, I used to sell the damn things. Emachines were actual more reliable for most of the 3-year stint I worked at Orifice Depot. HP has done everything possible to drain any remaining residues of consumer goodwill left. Between not having mobo drivers for many of their PCs available at all, not even shipping a restore CD with their retail machines, and... oh hell I could go on.

    Enthusiasts won't pay these prices for a machine from HP. They should at least do like Sony, and pretend to be a different company for their better products.
  • Definately, the mystique of a case mod is made completely lame by factory installation.

    After-all, mod = modify. If it was just the windows, lights and custom fans that made case mods cool, then we'd call them case accessories, or some-other innane term.

    However, there are plenty of die-hard gamers who have no clue as to what to do inside their computers. These folks buy 'gaming PCs'. Of course, the popular ones don't include pre-fab 'case mods', just seats for where case-mods could go.

  • Markworth is wrong. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by abb3w ( 696381 ) on Monday May 10, 2004 @02:56PM (#9109282) Journal
    "Credibility is something you only earn over time"

    Nope. You also can lose it over time, which HP and Compaq are notorious for. At this point, I trust the HP mid-to-high-end laser printers... and nothing else they make. I used to swear by HP scanners and calculators, but almost everything they make is going downhill in ergonomics and durability, even when the performance isn't crap to begin with.
  • Got one (Score:2, Interesting)

    by simontek2 ( 523795 ) <{moc.liamg} {ta} {keTnomiS}> on Monday May 10, 2004 @03:08PM (#9109408) Homepage Journal
    Actually, We have one. Its the Compaq X07 Its a nice machine, specs Intel P4 3.0Ghz 800MHZ Nvidia 5950 256mb 120Gig seagate SATA 512mb DDR 400 Dual Channel Coolermaster Wave case all in one reader. 4X DVD+R Creative Labs Audigy2 Platium The case is alumium, and slide out mobo. Makes it almost a dream to work on. The only thing Compaq is the Keyboard, mouse and badge on the computer. Which was replaced immediatly. We like running it in Linux, and occasionally use the winxp pro it came with.
  • by ManoMarks ( 574691 ) on Monday May 10, 2004 @03:11PM (#9109440) Journal
    Absolutely. I've had to deal with Compaqs at work and friends who have them, they've been nothing but trouble. They seem to have inherited the old Packard-Bell method of construction. I hear they made good servers, though. Before they were bought out. I haven't heard anything about the brand since.
  • Re:Hopeless. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by JediTrainer ( 314273 ) on Monday May 10, 2004 @03:21PM (#9109524)
    FYI their servers don't impress me either.

    At work my whole team's been given Compaq desktops, and we're now upgraded to these 'low-profile' machines that are making the rounds.

    Both models have had serious issues. Out of four, we've had one die with a motherboard failure and a second with a dead hard drive. The graphics chip (Intel) in it is crap (or perhaps the drivers are), for it hard locks the machine sometimes while the screensaver is on.

    As for the servers (Compaq DL360) and the racks they sit in, again, all crap.

    The servers are 1U machines that can't support their own weight in the rack. Yes, they actually SAG in the middle. The CPU inside has three 1" fans next to it. If one of them dies, do you get a warning? No - the entire box will simply decide to shut down and refuse to boot again until you replace it. It can't run off the other two. Nevermind that I've had dead RAID controllers, dead hard drives and dead memory galore, and I only have 3 of those particular servers. All this in the last year.

    Next the racks. The shelves in them can't support squat. Try to put a desktop machine on one, and it sags like it's going to break.

    Fancy pull-out LCD monitor and pull-out keyboard for the rack? They get STUCK sometimes and you can't put them back in. You have to actually go in behind and adjust the rails so they don't catch on each other. It doesn't look like an installation problem, because it catches on itself, not on anything else.

    It's stuff like this that made me insist that our next round of servers and racks were IBM. And when we got them they made me very happy, for they exhibit none of the abovementioned problems. I'm not trolling here, I'm just relaying my (very) frustrating experiences.
  • Re:Heh. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by dhanes ( 735504 ) on Monday May 10, 2004 @03:31PM (#9109646)
    Holy Shit, Marathon!!

    Marathon was the 1st LAN FPS I'd ever played. I worked for Val-Pak DMS (was brought on-board to help with their migration from Mac's to Pc's for business) and we all had Mac's. Someone loaded up Marathon for us and we'd usually stick around after our shift to play for an hour or more (of course, we'd play any chance we'd get during the shift as well :) )

    I can only remember one particular map in detail, it had a central circular platform with multi-level open tunnels running around it and overhanging it.

    What a blast that game was.

  • by Malor ( 3658 ) * on Monday May 10, 2004 @03:57PM (#9109936) Journal
    I haven't shopped for desktop PCs in quite awhile, but the last time I was looking, Compaqs were 'build to the numbers' machines.... ie, they chose the absolute cheapest possible components to let them say '128-bit graphic accelerator!', even if other chips were faster and cheaper. They chose a marketing spec, and built the machine to meet the spec as cheaply as possible. Actual performance was the very, very last thing on their mind; they were preying on ignorance, not providing good value for dollars spent.

    I don't think it's a coincidence that they were a dying company before HP (incredibly foolishly) spent a bucket of money to buy them out, apparently in the theory that lashing two sinking ships together will make both float.

    The Compaq brand is a terrible choice here. Even if they actually DO manage to shake off their slimy marketing habits, how many gamers are going to be convinced? They should have come up with a new label. A brand is supposed to help, or at least do no harm, but "Compaq" is an active hurdle to acceptance by the target market.
  • Going to the local computer shops all I see these days are windowed cases, blue led's, transparent fans with blue leds, lighting kits, etc... Stores are filling up their stock with this crap rather than any real hardware. Most of the customers are gamers besides for their business customers. Most home users are gamers, or don't upgrade/buy new comptuers or they have a dell/compaq/hp/etc...

    All they are going todo is take business away from the small shops.

    Your right its all wannabes! There are atleast 10 wannabes for every geek!

It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.

Working...