DOOM 3 Final Video Trailer Released 340
Ant writes "A new Doom 3 Final Video Preview/Trailer is now out. It is about 42.5 MB big, 2.5 minutes long, and in Quicktime format. Download it from here (direct link and BitTorrent link), FilePlanet (an account required), or FileShack (an account required)."
FileShack account (Score:2, Informative)
Password: passbyabm
It may be unethical, but so is spam.
BitTorrent link (Score:5, Informative)
.torrent mirror. (Score:5, Informative)
Shouldn't be necessary, but here's a mirror of the torrent [gazonk.org] just in case.
Re:Non QT format? (Score:5, Informative)
A safe, easy, spyware free quicktime (Score:5, Informative)
Get the 'mega codec pack' here:
http://g5.edskes.com/klmcodec103.exe [edskes.com]
For linux users, of course head here and snag:
http://www1.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/releases/codecs/
Which is the mplayer release of an essential codec pack containing divx, quicktime, realplayer, etc. Those should be extracted (without the sub director in the tar) to
alternate mirrors at 3dgamers (Score:2, Informative)
Re:In-game screenshots from a lucky SOB (Score:2, Informative)
Aside from the pictures of the box and so on, those are the exact same screenshots that have been going around the net for a week.
It might have a box, but I don't think he took those screenies.
MOD PARENT UP (Score:0, Informative)
Mirror of the torrent (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.toad.net/~cshafer/d3pcdownloadfinal.
Re:FileShack account (Score:5, Informative)
And you cannot download more than one file simultanously when logged into a free account at fileshack. So sharing an account like that is pretty dumb.
Re:Torrents, the answer to the 404 Not Found dilem (Score:3, Informative)
http and ftp mirror (Score:5, Informative)
via ftp [s6n.com]
the server should be fast enough
Re:the Doom3 hardware requirements... (Score:1, Informative)
What are you talking about? The .torrent is readily available, and the tracker isn't dead:
download rate: 32.1 kB/s
upload rate: 19.3 kB/s
share rating: 0.669 (22.8 MB up / 34.2 MB down)
seed status: 21 seen now, plus 0.966 distributed copies
peer status: 5 seen now, 43.2% done at 341.4 kB/s
Re:You know it's time to get a new computer... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:A safe, easy, spyware free quicktime (Score:1, Informative)
Are the EULAs unenforcable? Of course. However, that doesn't matter. It's copyright law that prevents you from distributing, not the EULA.
Re:rumour : step through the frames (Score:5, Informative)
Re:In-game screenshots from a lucky SOB (Score:3, Informative)
- Oisin
Same here (Score:4, Informative)
The graphics don't look as great as those screenshots we saw a year ago. The game play hasn't changed that much. So I can shoot through that shelf. Can I push it over to help stall the bad guys while I run backwards? Can I spill the contents of those exploding barrels so that the bad guys might slip and fall? Doesn't seem that way from the video. The characters' lips still aren't in sync with the words they're speaking.
I'm not spending several hundred bucks to upgrade my computer so I can play this game. I'll wait until something more immersive comes down the pipe.
Re:Maybe not so impressive, after all (Score:3, Informative)
Re:In-game screenshots from a lucky SOB (Score:1, Informative)
Doom 3 minimum hardware requirements: (Score:5, Informative)
384 megabytes of memory.
Two gigabytes of hard drive space.
An nVidia GeForce 3 graphics card or better; or an ATI Technologies 8500 or better.
Just thought I'd clear that up for anyone not in-the-know.
Demo? (Score:2, Informative)
I don't want to buy the damned game until I know if my machine is good enough to run it acceptably or not.
Re:Another console user... (Score:1, Informative)
In a sense it really isn't id's fault. The problem is that the game development ran long and is overdue. This game "should" have come out over a year and a half ago. The 3D engine technology is now out-of-date, being based on cards 2 years or older. I found the same thing happened when I bought "Halo" for the PC. I "expected" the game to be "better", more detailed, and with higher res graphics. What I found was a game that was only a little better in graphic capability than "Tribes 2", which is now well over 3.5 years old. A 2004 game should have 2004 graphic capabilities, not 2001.
Public service message (Score:5, Informative)
(If someone here is actually using your outgoing bandwidth for other things, consider yourself mentioned, and spare the Slashdot reply.
Re:Well, duh. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Archvile is back! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Another console user... (Score:1, Informative)
Damn, I wish I was that lucky. Most people I knew struggled (but managed) to run it on their 386 boxes with 4 meg of RAM.