Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
PC Games (Games)

State of PC Gaming in 2004 Probed 35

NetDanzr writes "Netjak.com has published another of its annual articles probing the state of PC gaming last year. The author complains about the demise of strategy and role-playing gaming, at the expense of action titles. Even though he praises Valve's Half-Life 2, he is skeptical about the Steam copy restrictions, and predicts that Valve would face legal challenges because of it in 2005. Slashdot reported on the previous article in the series last year."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

State of PC Gaming in 2004 Probed

Comments Filter:
  • Re:XBoX (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Beatbyte ( 163694 ) on Wednesday January 19, 2005 @02:56PM (#11410903) Homepage
    tell that to nVidia and ATI.. they seem to keep making these massively fast video cards that sell like hotcakes. i

    but i'm sure it's just because they do great 2d rendering.
  • by AtariAmarok ( 451306 ) on Wednesday January 19, 2005 @03:01PM (#11410973)
    "It was the dumbest thing Microsoft ever did"

    How is this dumb? Let's see:

    Without Xbox, they sell someone one single OS for a computer that plays games and does Office/etc

    With Xbox, they still sell the OS installation for Office. However, they are now selling another OS...hell, they are even selling the other BOX too just for the games.

  • by M.C. Hampster ( 541262 ) <M...C...TheHampster@@@gmail...com> on Wednesday January 19, 2005 @03:27PM (#11411308) Journal

    You're forgetting the license fee they get for each game sold for the XBox also.

    Ultimately, XBox gaming (if they make a profitable console next time around) will be much better for Microsoft than PC Gaming ever was.

  • Re:XBoX (Score:3, Insightful)

    by zoobaby ( 583075 ) on Wednesday January 19, 2005 @03:37PM (#11411444)
    XBox did not kill PC Gaming and it will not. It has cut into with people 'switching.' However, there will also be those people that want the most powerful machines for their games. A PC is ideal for this.
  • by Apreche ( 239272 ) on Wednesday January 19, 2005 @03:41PM (#11411500) Homepage Journal
    Because they are selling the XboX at a loss first of all. Second of all, without the games there is now very little keeping people on Windows. In fact, Steam is the only reason I still have a windows partition at all. How many nerds do you know who wont switch to Linux because of games? IF the Xbox kills PC gaming entirely all of them will fold.

    Create an unprofitable product that reduces market share of profitable product making it less profitable. So not only do they lose money on Xbox, but they make less money with windows than they used to.
  • by Attitude Adjuster ( 683211 ) on Wednesday January 19, 2005 @03:52PM (#11411652)
    Role-playing games hit rock bottom. Blades of Avernum was just a marginal improvement for Spiderweb Software, and Beyond Divinity was an inferior sequel to Divine Divinity. The only mildly pleasantly surprising release was Kult: Heretic Kingdoms...

    While on the whole I agree with his review I'm surprised there is no mention of Vampire the Masquerade: Bloodlines as a decent RPG. Sure, it suffered from those nasty Source-based texture and sound cache thrashing problems that Half-Life 2 also exhibited, but it was fun, well balanced, decent in terms of length and plot, and has more replay capability than most games thanks to the multiple distinct clans.

    IMHO its the best RPG since the original KotoR, and it certainly (a) sold well, and (b) it got quite a few highly favorable reviews (along with some negative ones like Gamespot's one). That should at least have earned it a mention in the article, I think...

  • by fondue ( 244902 ) on Wednesday January 19, 2005 @04:08PM (#11411860)
    In 2004 we 'only' had Rome: Total War, W40K: Dawn of War and LOTR: BFME. Worst year for RTS games ever!
  • Re:XBoX (Score:3, Insightful)

    by snuf23 ( 182335 ) on Wednesday January 19, 2005 @05:04PM (#11412451)
    I have an Xbox. I have a PC. Let's look at the games I've played over 2004:

    Rise of Nations
    City of Heroes
    Rome: Total War
    Half Life 2
    Doom 3
    Pirates!
    Battlefield Vietnam
    Battle for Middle Earth

    Hmmm. These seem to be PC games. And what have I been playing on the Xox?

    Robotron. Original. Emulated. Can't beat having two joysticks to play it the way it was meant to play!
  • Re:XBoX (Score:3, Insightful)

    by fistfullast33l ( 819270 ) on Wednesday January 19, 2005 @05:34PM (#11412822) Homepage Journal
    The XBox did not necessarily kill PC Gaming. Instead, the Xbox pulled together two markets. First, it grabbed all of the normal console people who can't even spell PC let alone try and run a game on one. Second, it grabbed all those PC fanboys who thought it was cool that the XBox was basically a PC with a special BIOS/OS.

    What I see Microsoft doing instead is combining the two platforms. I remember reading in PC Gamer not too long ago that Microsoft was attempting to develop a platform on the PC that operated just like consoles - instead of installing a game, it could just run off of the discs. This is a brilliant idea when you think about it. If they can write a wrapper and sell it (or even just let it be free), then people can buy Xbox games that run on PC and the Xbox. This way, if you don't have $2000 for a decent PC, you can still buy an XBox. On the other hand, you can use the PC's advanced Graphics chips and easily upgradeable hardware (how many people have installed an ATI X800 in their Xbox lately?) to play the newest games as they were meant to be. The term "console port" would quickly become obsolete.

    Of course, if Microsoft were smart, they'd develop features that could only work on the Xbox so that people don't just buy a new PC and play all the XBox games on that alone.

    Don't rule it out...Microsoft has already said they're attempting to allow PC gamers to play on XBox live.

Genetics explains why you look like your father, and if you don't, why you should.

Working...