Thompson Goes After Sims 2 Nudity 243
magicbond_007 writes "Miami lawyer Jack Thompson is at it again, this time with something above and beyond absurd. Gamestop is reporting that Thompson has accused The Sims 2 of contain obscene material. From the article: 'In the statement, Thompson says, "Sims 2, the latest version of the Sims video game franchise ... contains, according to video game news sites, full frontal nudity, including nipples, penises, labia, and pubic hair."' At this rate kids won't be able to play Mario because Princess Peach is dressed too slutty."
In the wake of Hot Coffee (Score:4, Insightful)
Hmmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh I can solve the problem....
TURN THE FUCKING TV OFF!
Re:Hmmm (Score:5, Insightful)
... But Graphic Violence is just fine. (Score:5, Insightful)
But God help us if little Bobbie might have seen a blur on some "sim" in the tub. We already know if s/he wants to see anything of the sort, their hitting all the free super link porno sites anyway.
What is behind this outcry is the fact that most kids have these games and parents are finding that "Gee, I must be a lousy parent because I didn't know that my kids could do this and frankly didn't care because the distraction kept my kids quiet. I'll pretend to be horrified at this so that other people don't think I'm a bad parent, while I really couldn't care less."
Let's put it this way. My son saw more graphic sex in the gorilla house on a recent visit to the zoo than is possible in these games. Quick, let's make the zoo "AO" and fine the zookeepers for not having warnings that the critters might get jiggy.
Can't wait for the next "important social issue" to come up. It's going to be the horrors of chunky peanut butter or some such tripe.
*sigh*
OMG BAN MODS!!!! (Score:3, Insightful)
(you can wax philosphy all day long about if it was meant to be found yadda yadda)
and then you have the SIMS2 which has various acts of living in your house flirting baby making and alien abductions.. which resourceful people can create various household items such and decorations outfits and skins for which may or may not have giant throbbin cocks or whatever on them.
One had the content and skins already in
The other has the skins and content created by the player..
We know the differences between the two, but who wants to guess which way the media, politicians and other twats like Thompson are going to go.
Ban Ken and Barbie (Score:3, Insightful)
And what about dolls of Barbie's little sister? Also a dirty tool for the pedophile that probably lives next door!
Thompson is a Grade A Moron.
So you want to protect the children, huh? (Score:5, Insightful)
So you want to protect the children, is that what you're saying? Are you saying that children are protected by being taught that sex and sexual organs are morally wrong?
This kind of skewed view of life just kills me. Ultimately, this will just do more damage to children. They'll feel guilty about their bodies! That is just plain twisted.
Fuck these politicians. Revolt.
Jeez, I'm not sure what you mean... (Score:2, Insightful)
What does this mean? He thought the killer was a victim because he played GTA and then killed officers? Or were the officers sued postehumously?
"much to the delight, one can be sure, of pedophiles around the globe who can rehearse, in virtual reality, for their abuse."WTF? You don't seem to be fighting this. [yale.edu] You are an ambulance chasing asshat.
I'm rooting Thompson (Score:4, Insightful)
I can hope, can't I?
Anm
I think I speak for everyone... (Score:5, Insightful)
FOR FUCK'S SAKE, WHAT'S YOUR DAMN PROBLEM?!
Yes i'm yelling. What's wrong with people?! How the fuck will banning the sims "protect the children"?!
In Europe nudity is not considered "bad", in Japan it's not considered "bad".
Hell, I saw some European commercials showing full nudity, in not too late hours.
In Japan the whole genre of adult games is a huge business and they sell for PC and consoles.
Only in the US and Muslim countries nudity is considered a really bad thing.
And what do we get? The population explodes, full of STDs, unwanted pregnancy and so on.
So. GET A FUCKING GRIP ON YOURSELF! SEX IS NOT BAD. NUDITY IS NOT BAD. IT'S ONLY THE NATURAL THING.
Google Images + Radio Button = Nudity | THE KIDS!! (Score:3, Insightful)
You put those blocks in to keep the content from being seen, if someone created a modification that allowed your TV to remove those blocks and blurs and fill in what was really there, would it be the fault of companies like Ventura for having that content in originally?
Instead of attacking the programmers or producers for, rightfully, removing or blurring the explicit content, why aren't Rockstar and Electronic Arts suing the people that made the patches? Why aren't people like Jack Thompson filing suit against them? After all, the material wasn't meant to be seen by the consumer.
Neither Rockstar nor EA deserve to get sued for filtering the content in question and not sufficiently protecting against malicious (not to mention perverted) modders from exposing the code for what it was . As far as I'm concerned, both the Sims and GTA were hacked, slandering the name of legitimate, trustworthy companies. GTA wasn't trying to sneak anything past ESRB against 'moms' will. EA wasn't trying to expose children to explicit nudity...as far as the allegations go: the labia was not visible.
Re:Wait a sec.. (Score:5, Insightful)
This isn't a secret cheat or anything that was left in the code like San Andreas.
Re:Attack on barbies? (Score:3, Insightful)
It can't be the game maker's fault if people hack their software to make it do things they didn't intend.
Now to attack the Sims 2. This guy is sad. Does he not have a girlfriend? What other possible reason could he have for going looking in videogames for nude people?
And for the comment about paedofiles being able to "rehearse in virtual reality". Bah... that is a throwaway line put in there to prove that he diesn't have a clue and he only wants to invoke the fear response to make people do what he wants them to.
You can make anyone do anything these days by mentinoning the kiddy fiddlers or the terrorists.
What's next? Pick on some of the war games becasue you can join the "enemy" and play against the US players? Does that encourage terrorism? It must. We should ban all those games too because they teach tactical bombing skills that can be used against the US.
The world is really a sad place. Where's my BFG and a nice solid wall... it's time to respawn!
Re:Wait a sec.. (Score:1, Insightful)
Groundless Bullshit (Score:5, Insightful)
Please, The Sims is a tame as milk. I can almost agree with him on the GTA thing (although I enjoy the series), simply because it's obviously designed and left in the game, even though I find it hypocritical that he wouldn't seek a lawsuit before the mini-game was common knowledge (as if the violence and the hooker-in-a-car from the original weren't enough). But The Sims / The Sims 2 (the "blur" occurs on both version, if you remember)? Has this man ever seen a Barbie or Ken doll naked? That's about the extent of it. I especially love this line:
No, no it doesn't, and "video game news sites" are not a source to base a lawsuit on, especially if you can't name the site or sites in question. The only thing that might make for evidence in anything whatsoever is the following site I ran into on the way to look for "proper" screenshots:
Now, this is not what he is accusing EA of - this is a skin patch, which should tell you right there what the deal is - if you want to see nude Sims with details, you're going to need a patch, because they're little more than mannequins under the blur. This would not exist if they had full-frontal nudity, penii, etc.
Groundless lawsuit by an ignorant man. Sick of this shit.
This could be a good thing (Score:3, Insightful)
Yup, and this garbage lawsuit is going to helpfully undo some of the harm to the game industry and expose these idiots as just that.
Here is what will happen: Hype - a week from now there will be a story about this on every blog, paper, tv station, and radio station.
Eventually this thing will either make it to court or not even go that far before it is thrown out. It will clearly highlight how ridiculous these zealots are.
Then next time someone starts crying wolf media outlets will hopefully take things with a grain of salt after being made to look so foolish. (I'm not sure if that will get me +1 insightful, or +1 funny)
Re:This just in (Score:5, Insightful)
Go back to the GTA:SA thing. The problem was they found out that between psycopathically antisocial mass murdering rampages you can have consensual sex. SEX....the reason we are all here on this earth! It will corrupt the kids....the sex that is, not the senseless violence and mass murder of police and bystander alike.
It's all so freaking absurd.
Re:Wait a sec.. (Score:3, Insightful)
I mean, there was a mod in the original Sims too that does this exact same thing.
Should we also put warning labels on Poser too? I mean, those are totally NAKED people with genitals and everything on that! And you can...gasp...use them to draw dirty pictures and paintings!
Faints...
Re:In the wake of Hot Coffee (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Wait a sec.. (Score:3, Insightful)
If one follows this "but it was already there" logic to conclusion, why not automatically rate a pg13 film with brief nudity XXX once it hits DVD. I mean, a kid could always pause a nudie scene so it lasts longer then what's acceptable for an R movie.
Absurd? Totally, but no more so than worrying that kids might see some pixel bewbs in a game where you can shoot cops in the face after banging a hooker. Anyhoo, I belive the term I'm looking for is "slippery slope".
Re:Hmmm (Score:3, Insightful)
It's called the Bible. Take a look at it. I can't believe they leave this stuff lying around where anyone can get a hold of it. The first time I read it, I couldn't believe that people would actually want their children exposed to this. Subsequent readings have not changed my opinion. By comparison, GTA is light sentimental fluff.
One of these days this censorious bullshit is going to come home to roost.
Each new medium stirs up a hornet's nest of doom criers who denounce it as the corrupter of youth, and this has gone on for over 2500 years. Plato called for the pan-pipes to be banned because they aroused unwholesome excitement, and it's been going on ever since. Epic poems, romances, the printing press, Beethoven, prose fiction, radio, television, rock and roll, Dungeons and Dragons, the internet, and now video games have each been attacked in turn. They arouse the wrong emotions, or people cannot tell fiction from reality, it seems.
But the political speeches of a demagogue can arouse emotions worse than any form of entertainment, and for those who can't tell fact from fiction, entertainment is the least of our worries. The world is now troubled--yet again--by the fantasies of religious fanatics, who have the courage to die simply because they lack the courage to live. Fantasy isn't the problem, nor religion. It's the dim-witted confusion of those who are so inexpert in navigating the worlds of imagination that they get lost. Magic is all around us, in brilliant stories that distill the wisdom of generations, in the work of scientists who distill a simple law from a mountain of data, or in that piece of code that tells a computer how to do what only a human mind could do before. This is the imagination honed to a laser's intensity. Against this stand the real muggles, who would end the magic, and end the world.
If there is a God, may he protect us from muggles.