MS & Game Rentals 155
pin_gween writes "Technology News says Microsoft has entered an agreement with Exent to provide On-Demand Video Games. So far, only 6 Microsoft games are licensed to the on-demand service (which costs from US$4.95 to $14.95 a month for access to anywhere from 50 to 300 titles). MS titles are "Age of Empire," "Age of Mythology," "Dungeon Siege," "Mechwarrior," "Rise of Nations" and "Zoo Tycoon." Exent lured MS with the "the shelf life can be prolonged and create additional revenue for the publisher not generated by the retail channel"."
Yes... Just what the doctor ordered... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Valve (Score:2, Insightful)
The Borg Jokes Are Dead (Score:3, Insightful)
How much farther can geeks beat a joke into the ground? The Microsoft Borg joke wasn't funny to begin with, yet slashdot keeps flogging it to death for some reason. Our of all the topic icons on slashdot, only Microsoft gets the crappy, derogatory icon. Why is that? There's no good reason you guys can't use the MS logo just like for all the others. It's also funny how many Microsoft ads there are on slashdot. You guys hate them so much, yet have no problem taking their advertising dollars. Nice hypocrisy there.
Only Hardcore Gamers Need Apply (Score:4, Insightful)
XBox 2 (Score:3, Insightful)
--
Dreamhost [dreamhost.com] superb hosting.
Kunowalls!!! [kunowalls.host.sk] Random sexy wallpapers.
Good idea (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:The Borg Jokes Are Dead (Score:2, Insightful)
According to you.
"yet slashdot keeps flogging it to death for some reason."
Slashdot flogs many jokes to death. Why make an exception?
"only Microsoft gets the crappy, derogatory icon. Why is that?"
Because their business practices are crappy at best and they have been found guilty of abusing their monopoly on varying occasions. If they had turned over a new leaf and stopped being so crappy to other businesses and people then perhaps you'd have a point.
"There's no good reason you guys can't use the MS logo just like for all the others."
Got me there....oh hang on, perhaps the editors are worried about microsoft coming around with another of their BS lawsuits because the owners don't have permission to use their logo. Then again, perhaps the ed's still think it's funny...
"It's also funny how many Microsoft ads there are on slashdot. You guys hate them so much, yet have no problem taking their advertising dollars. Nice hypocrisy there."
Slashdot is owned by OSDN. They don't control the ads. Perhaps a little more homework was needed before you wrote that?
Oh, and no, I don't hate Windows. I just don't like random rants at the people running a site you don't have to visit.
How about newer games? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Valve (Score:1, Insightful)
Why isn't this more popular already? (Score:3, Insightful)
Why are there only old games? What about even selling games digitally (yeah, I'd accept some DRM crap for the convience)?
So what's the holdup?
Re:Yes... Just what the doctor ordered... (Score:4, Insightful)
If the game selection's interesting, I'd much prefer this service. Mainly because I don't like rummaging through bargain bins nor do I typically find them as cheap as $5.
Then again, anything can be made to sound stupid if you leave out the right details.
Renting software in the 90's (Score:3, Insightful)
I remember the '90's. I remember that it was actually legal for people and businesses to lend or rent, or even re-sell the software they'd purchased to other people. The only condition was that it wasn't allowed to be run in more than one place at a time. Locally, we even had rent-by-mail companies that would take out full page advertisements in magazines, and post you software to use for a limited amount of time before you were (legally) required to uninstall it and return it.
Software companies -- not even Microsoft, but especially Microsoft -- went to great lengths to inform their customers that they were allowed to install Microsoft Word from their work onto their home PC, as long as it was only being used on one PC at a time. After all, it was clear that the software was licenced for use to the person who'd paid for it, so they were allowed to use it wherever it was most convenient for them without having to pay multiple times.
Some software had basic copy protection (eg. flight simulator games that asked you to quote a random word from page 215 of the manual), but there was rarely serious DRM. Software companies were quite clearly concerned about software piracy, but they weren't trying to wipe out customer's existing rights to solve that problem. On the contrary, most software companies and consumers actually acted as if they "trusted" each other, compared with today.
Somehow, this whole attitude has been lost in recent years, at least in commercial software. A major part of it seems to have been about when the media barons leapt to digital and brought all their annoying views on draconian copy protection with them. There's no way in hell you'd be allowed to casually install a work copy of MS Word on a home PC today, unless your company had a special agreement that they'd paid extra for. Even with this, there would still be DRM loopholes to jump through. You'd probably end up in jail for 15 years as an example to other "criminals" if the Microsoft-sponsored BSA lawyers had their way.
Times change, I guess.
Re:How long until this is cracked? (Score:3, Insightful)