Best of What's New 2005 132
mmoyer writes "Begin the onslaught of year-end roundups. Popular Science takes the early lead with their Best of What's New awards, a roundup of what they consider the top 100 products and technologies of the year. In addition to the obvious awardees like the PSP and perpendicular magnetic recording, there's interesting asides like the world's first programmable wave pool and colored toy bubbles made from disappearing dye."
Some just don't compare... (Score:5, Insightful)
haha!
Excuse me for being a cynic, but the PSP/Jeep portion of the 'grand awards' just feels like advertising...
Hmmm (Score:2, Insightful)
Xbox 360 according to PS (Score:2, Insightful)
What's wrong with this description?
Ahhhh yes... The annual Popular Science (Score:3, Insightful)
Honestly now, how many Best of What's New features have YOU seen in real life? Bet you can count them on one hand.....
Photography section is bogus (Score:5, Insightful)
Irrelevant (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Greatest device (Score:5, Insightful)
Which isn't to say that the multicore SIMD design of this chip won't be impressive. It will be. But three desktop computers? I don't think so. Even the 1 teraflop claim is suspect. Just like how graphics card manufacturers can pump 3 trillion triangles a second, right? (*cough*underlabratoryconditionsmaybe*cough*)
Too Early? (Score:2, Insightful)
If it turns out that it has any "minor" defect, like an exploding power supply that causes thousands of homes to burn down, then it will likely need to be dropped from this list.
I wonder if such an occurance is covered by their EULA? (873. Explosions and/or fires, including those involving lethal casualties, caused by this device, or any other devices supplied by MicroSoft, are the responsibility of said purchaser. Said purchaser hereby absolves MicroSoft, and its affiliates, from any legal action.)
I don't like how everything is oversimplified. (Score:2, Insightful)
From the article on the "Emissions Neutral Vehicle..."
"It breaks down hydrogen into electrons, which power the electric motor, and protons, which interact with oxygen taken in through the ENV's nosecone and are released as Earthfriendly water vapor and heat."
They make it sound like fuel cells actually rip the proton from neutron, or like the electrons get "used up," or that the electrons are actually flowing through the motor like water flows through a straw. Something about the way these articles are written makes me feel uncomfortable. It's like they are saying "well, you and I will never completely understand, but at least someone out there does..."
The worst thing is that explanations of more complex ideas might be botched even greater and I would never know if I trusted this magazine. I think this kind of writing promotes dogmatic science. Potential is hyped but details are not; existence of great ideas is mentioned but the ideas themselves are completely ignored.
Re:How about the worst of what's new? (Score:2, Insightful)
you sir are an asshole!
you did not even try to think about it before brawling out such obwiously wrong statements.
if you think that the EU wants to *take over* the internet, then you MUST think that the USA wants to take over the whole world and even acts like being offended when someone tells them that they don't have the right to!
face it: ALL nations except the USA that nowadays also use the us-controlled internet could easily set up their own root servers, cut access for the usa and then the usa would be very very alone in their own mud of a net while the rest of the world would simply continue to call the new net structure "internet" while the old net would be called usanet. Over shot time usanet would fall down, because it does not have any use for everyone who wants to be international and free!
Just like "chinanet"...
I thought slashdotters where poeple who surely understand why freedom is good... bu i guess there's still a moron here and there that got a