Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Games Entertainment

Philips Unveils Entertaible 32

Posted by Zonk
from the ds-writ-large dept.
Gamasutra reports on Philips' newest gaming gadget, the Entertaible. A touch-sensitive surface allows for unique gaming ideas to be implemented. From the article: "Currently a working concept, Entertaible comprises a 30-inch horizontal LCD, sophisticated touch screen-based multi-object position detection, and all supporting control electronics, and, according to the firm, '...allows the players to engage in a new class of electronic game which combines the features of computer gaming, such as dynamic playing fields and gaming levels, with the social interaction and tangible playing pieces, such as pawns and dies, of traditional board games.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Philips Unveils Entertaible

Comments Filter:
  • Was this article stuck in a submittime queue time-warp since the 70s? We've already tried this -- see crappy dogfighting game in the bar scene from Star Trek 3

    Gamers want immersion in their multiplayer worlds. Anything that makes the interaction more physical is a step backward.
  • I must say I don't understand at all what this is about. The article shows a strange picture surrounded by some fuzzy marketeer speach. Can anybody explain why this is the next best thing?
  • The thought of multiple people touching my monitor just grates. Even if it is horizontal, and even if that is the idea. Purell, anyone?
  • ...why play Monopoly on a square of cardboard for $30, when you can play it on a touch-sensitive flatscreen with surround sound for the low low price of $3000?
    • by fatmonkeyboy (257833) on Thursday January 05, 2006 @01:56PM (#14401840) Homepage
      Well, for $3000 this will never fly.

      But suppose you could get one of these for $300? You could sit around and play Monopoly without having someone be the banker.

      Admittedly, I don't think Monopoly is where this would shine. More complicated games (e.g., Risk) would be good.

      I could see lite D&D-type games implemented for this being a lot of fun. Anyone remember Hero Quest? You could play it on this without a DM.

      Any traditional board game *can* be implemented on this and maintain the "tabletop" feel, which is important. Additionally, there might be some really cool things you could do with this that wouldn't be possible with traditional board games.

      Anyway...my wife and I thought about something like this over a year ago and were really excited about the idea, but didn't know where to start and didn't follow through with it. I'm glad someone else did :)
      • Anyway...my wife and I thought about something like this over a year ago and were really excited about the idea, but didn't know where to start and didn't follow through with it. I'm glad someone else did :)

        You're GLAD someone else did? I would have kicked myself for not getting a patent!
        • Well, we did pretty much abandon the idea after a few days of thinking about it. I'm not sure a patent would have been appropriate or defendable anyway.

          Besides...I still want to have one to play cool board games on, so if I'm not going to make it, someone else needs to right?
      • How about one board for each player, and using it for RTS games and such? Wanna move your troops? Easy.
    • If they ever release this I predict it will flop because it's tiresome to sit at the angle neccesary to look into the table.

      I'll save my cash for my lust object of the month: a 24 inch eizo lcd [beareyes.com.cn]
    • Would you rather have 1 of these or 20+ individual boardgames in your closet?
  • Sounds oddly like a DS to me..
  • ....for the next Lesuire Suit Larry!
  • For the time being, this looks like a solution in search of a problem, as far as the home market goes. The traditional 'cardboard and plastic' approach does the job well enough and cheaply enough that this sort of gizmo would have to offer significant gameplay advances (and I can't think of any "killer apps" for a game like this) in order to appeal to home audiences.

    In addition, it seems to sit at or above the price point of a desktop PC, versus the (relative) inexpense of a console system. If we consider
  • Real Time Stratagy games have cried to me for a touch screen like setting. Starcraft would rock on this IMO. Small ports of old RTS games would really make this worth my $$.

    Also, online abilities would make an online game of chess more like sitting at a table and playing, only not seeing your opponet. Maybe a headset or a built-in mic would serve well here. Reminds me of the Ed's Chess set in a perticular Cowboy Bebop Episode.

    If marketed and supported right, I see a future for this!
  • When will people realize if your not one of the big three, your not going to succeed in the gaming industry. Especially if you design highly gimmicky devices that don't support on the of the big three companies games.

    A 30inch LCD? I haven't found one yet that costs under $1200 CDN, so I can't imaging how a gaming device that adds touch sensitivity to an expensive LCD TV is going to be a success.

    It would be different if this was an accessory to an Microsoft, Nintendo, or Sony game console, but even then, w
  • This product looks destined to go straight to Brookstone or The Sharper Image... next to the $6,000 toy hoverboat or $15,000 authnetic scaled-down Lamborghini.

    In order to do that justice, the screen needs to be bigger. Unless neat zooming features are included on every 'game' they have for this device, being able to command a game from the top down looks small with 8 people and a 30" by 30" screen.

  • I don't see this being a very functional home entertainment device. There's no easy way to keep track of individual players (anyone can touch the table) so cheating, especially amongst younger players, would be a frustratingly frequent behavior.

    That being said, I could see a significant potential for usage as a bar surface. An entire bar surface created with these things (assuming waterproof models exist) could create some interesting dynamics. It could easily fill the role of almost any of the exisit
  • It's about time Ouiji Boards caught up with the 21st century.
  • No more having to draw maps on the fly and using beer caps for the the orcs.

    Hrm... But then again... Having cheetos/dorritos encrusted fingers on this table may be problematic.

    How much is this thing going to cost?
  • by grnbrg (140964)
    "I suggest a new strategy, R2. Let the wookie win." :)

    grnbrg.
  • This gadget looks just as useful as the CD-I, and will probably be as popular.

    I still have nightmares of playing "games" on the CD-I. "Shoot the guardian's lights out!" Aaahhh! You shouldn't be asked to play a light gun game with a remote control.

    But I did have some fun with the Art of the Czar's disc. Pretty stuff. The Smithsonian Museum collection was neat too. Mostly because they were my first encounters with CD-ROM content.
  • It's short-sighted to think of this solely as a gaming device. If it's hooked up to a computer, then it can be a user interface device for use with any piece of software. To me, a large touchscreen which can distinguish amongst multiple simultaneous touches is begging to be used for controlling software synthesizers. That's the market on which the very similar Lemur [jazzmutant.com] product focusses.
  • The TouchTable [touchtable.com] is being built for Northrop Grumman, who is attempting to market it to the Army for mapping applications. Its neat, but only as neat as its software, which has to be more or less custom developed.

You can measure a programmer's perspective by noting his attitude on the continuing viability of FORTRAN. -- Alan Perlis

Working...