U.S. FFXI 360 Beta Begins 25
Gamespot is reporting that the U.S. Final Fantasy XI Xbox 360 Beta has begun. You're going to have to get ahold of a Beta disc from the Official Xbox magazine's February issue, and then sign up at the PlayOnline site. From the article: "When the game goes live in May, Xbox 360 players will be able to rub elbows and swap healing potions with their PlayStation 2 and PC counterparts. But for the duration of the beta test, Xbox 360 users will be kept on their own servers. They will be able to interact with beta testers from Europe and Japan, however. While Square Enix has issued a list of known issues with the beta game, support for USB keyboards and mice has been included."
First (Score:2, Interesting)
Second, hasn't the fire under FFXI kind of fizzled out? Is there still much demand for this online RPG or are the only people playing it diehards that can't let go? From what I could tell, FFXI kind of failed for the PS2, considering how many returned openned HDD and FFXI game bundles you could pick up at a discounted price for mon
Re:First (Score:1, Interesting)
So close...
Will the graphics be improved, or similar from the PC or PS2 versions?
They'll be PC "high-quality", which I count as "no".
Second, hasn't the fire under FFXI kind of fizzled out?
In the US and Europe? Yes, World of WarCraft killed it. In Japan? Apparently it's still popular.
Otherwise, this is a flat-out port of, basically, the PC version.
The real headline should be: XBox360 Port of Four-Year Old Game With No Upgrades Enters Beta, Slashdot Thinks This is News - but that doesn't fit.
Re:First (Score:1)
Re:First (Score:2)
Re:First (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:First (Score:5, Informative)
But being a failure on the PS2? I'd have to disagree. The only issue is that the PC version was so much better as the PS2 chugged along at times. It's true that people looking for the next Final Fantasy game and spending 300 hours leveling your party and completing every side quest were disappointed, but as an MMORPG it was a good game. Well besides that part that simulated the wait in line game, but at least you were logged into the server unlike WoW during that simulation.
Re:First (Score:4, Interesting)
This is definitely true; although the PS2 version could be easily updated... and it's silly that they don't. Compare the graphics on FFXII (which undoubtedly uses a modified version of the same engine) to FFXI.
Another complaint I have heard is that the PS2 version is holding the graphics of other versions behind (since they don't display cloaks and some other things). This is BS, from a developer's perspective: the other versions already look better, and there's no reason you couldn't add the additional things on systems that handled it.
Definitely... FFXI is the kind of game that requires a long-term commitment; those players that have committed are likely to stay so, especially with the constant updates and story extensions that Square adds.
This isn't the only problem... gilfarmers and botfishers are also to blame. However, I'm on a server with much higher inflation now than the first server I played on, and it's actually made it easier for me to earn a lot of money. There was still really expensive stuff on the old server, but getting the cash was harder. So it balances out to an extent.
I disagree. WoW may be more popular, but it has no real storyline, not to mention the huge story arcs that FFXI has. Additionally, while it's OK for casual playing, the rewards feel too easy. Earning ranks or rare items in FFXI feels like much more of an accomplishment; I'm not the only person I know who has returned from WoW to FFXI because of this.
Really? I've heard the opposite... the PC version tends to stutter when you're in a busy area (try lower Jeuno or around a moogle during an event), whereas the PS2 runs smoothly regardless. I do have a problem with USB keyboard input, but it may be my keyboard.
Perhaps. Unfortunately most of the "good stuff" happens later, and you need to find a good group of people to play with, even a static party. That totally changes the game. There is definite Final Fantasy material there, though; you just won't see it until you've made progress deeper into the game's storyline.
Which was this...? You mean the recent NPC quest?
Re:First (Score:2)
PS2 (Score:3, Insightful)
Actually, there's another big issue: I can't play it on my PS2, even if I wanted to. It requires the old PS2 hardware. I'm not sure why they haven't made a version that'll run with the current slimline PS2.
(And it's not unthinkable that I'd want to, since I'm currently badly addicted to FF:X.)
Re:First (Score:2)
As far as the PS2 version goes, the US and EU launches were poor, but that was due to a lack of support of the needed hardware from Sony, and not due to the game. Quite a few players in Japan are on the PS2 version, and I know several in the US who are as well.
Re:First (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Xbox Live (Score:2)
Re:Xbox Live (Score:2)
Regardless of this - I highly doubt MS is gonna give MMOG players a free or reduced cost Live. They are two completly different systems - and MS is going to be making their money off of Live.
Re:Xbox Live (Score:1)
Re:WOOT keyboard and mouse (Score:2, Interesting)
Future of FFXI (Score:1)
Square would not be releasing a new expansion for a dying game. Certainly, it is more successful in Japan than in America, but just because an over-rated MMO came along and snatched up a large number of MMORPG players doesn't mean that the game has died. There is a good storyline and an immersive world, and a lot of room for ex