Blizzard Responds To Gay Guild Debate 444
Edge Online reports that Blizzard has responded to the issues raised by a gay guild trying to recruit in public chat. From the article: "We encourage community building among our players with others of similar interests, and we understand that guilds are one of the primary ways to forge these communities. However, topics related to sensitive real-world subjects -- such as religious, sexual, or political preference, for example -- have had a tendency to result in communication between players that often breaks down into harassment." We discussed this story when it first came up last week.
Bullcrap. (Score:5, Informative)
I see tons of pro-Christian conversations and Guild named all night long when I play. Blizzard never shuts them the hell up or takes action to remove these offensive-to-me names.
Blizazard's perception is that of homophobes. I can't see them any other way with this type of behavior.
- Posting anonymously so their GMs don't *find* some reason to kick me out of the game.
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Bullcrap. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Look at it the other way (Score:2, Informative)
Missing a part... (Score:5, Informative)
What is missing is the second half of the post. They are not banning these guilds, they are just against advertising them in open chat in the game. They have said that the best avenue of recruitment is through their own Guild Recruitment Forums [worldofwarcraft.com]. What they are trying to stop is Orgrimmar and Ironforge (Main capital cities for non-Azerothians) turning into huge (gay/republican/black/white/purple/democrat/strai
In game bashing should properly be restricted to the opposing faction, n00bs, gold farmers, overpowered classes, and the hardcore guys who have no life and stand around showing all the 1337lewts you'll never get but still want.
Re:Look at it the other way (Score:3, Informative)
Re:A small difference (Score:3, Informative)
By the way, one of the studies also mentions they're able to breed gay animals by manipulating the prenatal hormonal environment. Gays ARE born tht way. Your famous "Mostly it is determined by a relationship to the subjects father, meaning that is it not genetic but conditioned." is a red herring - prenatal hormones aren't genetic - they're environmental. However, how the individual responds in such an environment IS genetic. The gays who claim to be "cured" have responeded to conditioning in the environment to accept that being gay is wrong - and most of THAT pressure is from religios proselytes who can't accept that the Bible is wrong in this matter, as it is in a few other things.
Here are links to previous debates - if you look thorugh them, you'll find the research, and more:
http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson/journal/79630 [slashdot.org]
http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson/journal/79828 [slashdot.org]
http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson/journal/80081 [slashdot.org]
http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson/journal/80351 [slashdot.org]
You might also want to review my series on gender: it starts here http://slashdot.org/~tomhudson/journal/123094 [slashdot.org]
Your sexual preference, just like your gender identification, is determined before birth. Get over it, and get over yourself. The stuff you've posted further on in this thread ... well, lors ipso loquitur - it speaks for itself.
Or you can do a little googling for 2D:4D finger ratio and how it shows what actually happened in the womb.
http://www.yawningbread.org/arch_2000/yax-209.htm [yawningbread.org]