Steam Should Be a Seperate Company? 73
simoniker writes "As part of a larger in-depth interview over at Gamasutra, 3D Realms' Scott Miller has called for Valve's Steam digital distribution service to spin off as a separate company, suggesting: 'I would rather there emerge a leader in the market that isn't associated with a game company.' He further adds: 'I'm not a big fan of using Steam, because I'm not a fan of a strong competitor of ours having access to our download stats and revenue totals. I'd rather keep that private. Not only that, but we're lining their pockets as well.'"
Re:Then he should fund a startup (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Then he should fund a startup (Score:3, Interesting)
I agree that lining the pockets of your competitor isn't the smartest thing to do, but nor is -not- being able to properly distribute your content online.
There are a lot of independent developers that don't give a rat's ass at this stage as Steam offers them an excellent platform, and why wouldn't you want to reward the company who is doing it succesfully ?
And if Steam actually becomes 'another' company: Why wouldn't its success -not- be beneficial for Valve too? It's not as if it isn't allowed to throw money in between companies.
Steam should be.. (Score:1, Interesting)
2. Not spam you with adverts for games
3. Consume less disk space
4. Allow you to trade games / sell your account
5. not be a prequisite to playing a game
6. not hog memory
7. be less ugly -eg blend in to native widgets
8. be ported to *nix
9. not use internet explorer
10. not download so much shit