Wiimote Straps Result in Class Action Suit 812
Kotaku reports the news that problems with breaking Wiimote straps has resulted in a class action lawsuit against Nintendo. From the press release about the suit: "Green Welling LLP filed a nationwide class action lawsuit on behalf of the owners of the Nintendo Wii against Nintendo of America, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The class action lawsuit arose as result of the defective nature of the Nintendo Wii. In particular, the Nintendo Wii game console includes a remote and a wrist strap for the remote. Owners of the Nintendo Wii reported that when they used the Nintendo remote and wrist strap, as instructed by the material that accompanied the Wii console, the wrist strap broke and caused the remote to leave the user's hand. Nintendo's failure to include a remote that is free from defects is in breach of Nintendo's own product warranty."
Wait... (Score:5, Interesting)
Web Site of Lawyers (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:A defect? (Score:3, Interesting)
Disgusting (Score:4, Interesting)
Nintendo adds a wrist strap as a safety feature, so stupid people who have 'grip' problems (small peens perhaps?) don't throw the Wiimote around. A group of morons (ok ok, maybe they were drunk and
Yea, great. Im sure this is REALLY going to make Nintendo warm to us Americans. You wonder why they don't port a lot of games over to the US, and you wonder why in some games prior to the port they 'dumb it down' thinking its 'too hard for westerners.' (I wish I could find the article that I got this information from.. I thought it was BS at the time, but now Im thinking it might have been credible.)
Nintendo comes out of left field with a great console, thats tons of fun for all ages... And some douchebags who are looking to make a quick buck want to file a lawsuit against them for breaking a WRIST STRAP which didnt' even need to be added in the first place?
wiihaveaproblem.com - 29 broken straps out of... 1million+ consoles (probably near double that in controllers)
wiidamage.com - 3 broken straps reported
I love the US, but sometimes I just have a hard time being 'proud to be an American.'
(I reserve the right to not check my spelling or grammar. Deal with it!)
Re:Not quite right (Score:3, Interesting)
We're not talking about an individual slipping on the ice at Walmart here. This is a large class action lawsuit. And the class size isn't the number of people who actually express interest in the suit, it's the number of people affected according to record. Let's see, 1 million Wii consoles times, say, $30 per controller plus "damages" and interest. Let me see. Carry the two, add 3... Divide by 10. Well, it comes out to "big settlement".
also, greedy lawyer is hardly right, the lawyer really gets a SMALL fraction of the settlement.
In class action suits of this size, 25% is the typical cut. I'd hardly call that "SMALL". The class members will get a coupon for a new controller plus a game maybe. Once you divide out billable hours, the lawyers often end up with thousands of dollars per hour.
I know a few lawyers. The one who works class action cases lives in a Beverly Hills mansion.
Re:Ummm...No (Score:3, Interesting)
A better, much more accurate comparison would be a ping pong (table tennis) paddle. It's very similar to a Wiimote in size/weight, how you hold it, how you flail it around as part of normal usage, that it's used in your home, and in the amount of damage that it can cause. Of course, many of those have grip tape wrapped around the handle, but certainly not all of them. And almost none of them that I've seen have any sort of wrist strap.
So, I wonder if a manufacturer has ever been sued over one of those? Wait....oh crap. I probably just gave a lawyer somewhere an idea.
Re:Web Site of Lawyers (Score:2, Interesting)
Please provide us with the name of company that you are complaining about:
Green Welling LLP
Please describe your situation or problem:
I have an issue with the current legal environment, the one that allows you to file frivolous lawsuits on the behalf of moronic "clients" who are unable to read the instruction manual correctly and cause damage to themselves or their property.
Nintendo has already announced a free replacement for anyone who currently owns a Wii that does not have the upgraded wrist strap. Instead of allowing them to correct an issue, one brought on by people wildly flinging their Wiimotes in a manner they were never designed to withstand, you feel the need to exploit Nintendo for your own personal gain.
Legal groups like yours are a cancer in the heart and mind of America. You exploit the technological naivete of judges and juries around this country to exploit profitable companies to line your own pockets.
Remember this, aside from those few who have profited from your shameless exploitation, you and your ilk are despised by a large majority of this country.
Never will it be said that this country was built on the sacrifices of it's lawyers. Instead it will be said that while it was built by the sacrifices of the brave and proud who truly love this country, it was brought to it's knees by the exploitations of the few who place personal gain over the good of the people.
Please provide us with the search terms you used to find our Web site:
Scumbag, explotive lawers.
Where does it end, you ask? (Score:5, Interesting)
I have owned a Wii since the UK Launch (Score:2, Interesting)
I have however fell on my arse while playing Baseball because I was stupid enough to stand on our wooden floor in just socks, but you don't see me suing my wooden floor company, or the blokes who make my socks.
Jonathan
Re:If only stupidity were illegal (Score:3, Interesting)
I assume you're referring to the classic McDonald's coffee case, Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants [wikipedia.org], where a woman had a cup of McDonald's coffee in her lap and got scalded by it when it spilled.
1. The car was sitting still.
2. The cup spilled when she tried to pry off the top while the car was sitting still.
3. She was in the passenger seat; she was not the driver.
Whether or not the case had any merit one way or the other, I really wish people would stop repeating incorrect facts about that case. I'm no fan of frivolous lawsuits either, but can we at least use examples of actually frivolous lawsuits?
Re:If only stupidity were illegal (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Wait... (Score:2, Interesting)
True, you aren't expecting boiling hot coffee. However, even if your coffee is 30-40 degrees cooler that the lowest ideal brewing temperature, you will still get a severe burn from less than 2 seconds of skin exposier to the liquid. It is a hot beverage. You can't reasonably expect to not get a burn if it is fresh and you dump it on yourself.
Re:absolutely retarded (Score:5, Interesting)
I sent the following:
The lawsuit that you are trying to bring against Nintendo for people that can't figure how to hold onto a remote controller is appalling. You are a perfect example of why people dislike lawyers. Nintendo has created a device that when used properly is no harm to anyone at all and won't break. The moment people opt to use it incorrectly things might go wrong. If I throw my DVD remote at you and it injures you should we be suing Sanyo? Beyond the fact that Nintendo has created a perfectly safe device, they are even going out of their way to make people happy by offering a completely free and timely replacement program to have stronger straps for people that don't understand you don't throw a remote at your dog/TV/grandma.
Again, you decision to try and pursue this just shows why people enjoy lawyer jokes so much, it is because in cases like this, they are simply true.
-Nathan
Re:If only stupidity were illegal (Score:5, Interesting)
In this case, I have to admit, I'm skeptical as to whether the straps were defectively designed. If only some were made weaker relative to others, then those might be defectively manufactured, but I think that abnormal, excessive use might be a more proximate cause than any alleged defects in design. However, Nintendo may have screwed themselves by performing the strap exchange program. I'm not sure (because I'm not a lawyer, only a student). However, it'll be interesting to see how this pans out. I'll keep it on my radar.
Message sent to Green Welling LLP (Score:2, Interesting)
Disregarding the very clear warnings instructing users to _not_ let go of the controller, Nintendo makes no assertions about the ability of the wrist strap to prevent powerful forces from breaking them. The wrist strap is intended for no other _explicit_ purpose than as a handy way to have the controller hang from your wrist during periods of inactivity.
To further ignore that Nintendo has already improved the wrist straps (and created a replacement program) in lieu of these zealous users when they have no obligation to due so demonstrates how petty and ignoble Green Welling LLP is. I will take whatever opportunities I may have to express my extreme displeasure in your company.
Thank you for your great effort in reading this,
RandUser
Re:Knock it off. (Score:4, Interesting)
McDonalds does infact keep their coffee hotter than Starbucks. People drink Starbucks because they use quality beans, don't abuse those beans too badly and then don't drastically overuse them. Starbucks also offers plenty of additives to the point where you need not even know you're drinking coffee.
People fork over London-esque prices over to Starbucks not because "it's hot" but because they actually like to TASTE the things that they eat and drink.
Being able to do permanent skin damage to yourself doesn't even enter into it.
McCoffee would be a shining example of how the standard American brew bears little resemblance to what the rest of the planet thinks is coffee.
Place it in the same category as Budweiser and Velveeta.
Re:If only stupidity were illegal (Score:5, Interesting)
Any manufacturer mostly release their products in normal countries first to give them a chance to make the product USA Idiot proof. Once they have done that and stockpiled enough money to handle the lawyers fees they will incur in the USA they might think about releasing there.
I design a range of products for clients and I always suggest to steer clear of the USA because there is always a dick that is going to sue you and you better have a fat wallet ready.
Total douchebags. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Knock it off. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:If only stupidity were illegal (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Knock it off. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Knock it off. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:If only stupidity were illegal (Score:3, Interesting)
Same shit. The american legal system is a goddam joke.
A response from lawyers behind this class action (Score:1, Interesting)
Here is what I emailed to gw@classcounsel.com: Here is the response: