Demo PS3 Units freeze on Purpose 363
Posted
by
CmdrTaco
from the stay-off-my-kiosks-kid dept.
from the stay-off-my-kiosks-kid dept.
AbsoluteZero writes "A Sony rep has claimed to Destructoid that demo PS3 units in kiosks across the country were built to freeze up on purpose. From the article: "We do that so that people won't play it all day long," he explained. "Specifically during Motorstorm, we made it freeze up a lot.""
credibility (Score:1, Informative)
Fixed link (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.destructoid.com/playstation-3-kiosks-f
Re:right... I'll buy that bridge... (Score:4, Informative)
There were other game systems to play and my wife was tugging at my arm telling me to get going
thats not what best buy told me... (Score:4, Informative)
Zap! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:This isn't some high up exec... (Score:4, Informative)
Seriously, it was a random rep, in a random EB games. Reps lie, that is all they do. Anythign a rep says is a lie. Remember this and you will be much better off. (I will admit, this is all simply personal experiance in working in retail, and I am including sales staff ofr retail stores as reps. They all lie also.)
Re:This isn't some high up exec... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Maybe someone can tell me.... (Score:4, Informative)
It's not a bash on Sony or their hardware. The crux of the story is: PS3 retail kiosks lock/freeze/whatever up, a Sony rep played it off as something that happens on purpose, it's been confirmed by a few people that they were told the same thing. That is fact. Question my credibility if you'd like, but I think you'll find Destructoid (as a whole) to be both informative and reliable -- I wouldn't intentionally write and post a tall tale for the sake of hits (or anything else for that matter).
Re:I call BS. (Score:1, Informative)
Shopkeeper's Privlege (Score:5, Informative)
As a law student, I'll certify to the limits of my knowledge of the issues that wikipedia is a good source for getting "a sense" of the law. Here's a good example. The shopkeeper's privlege is NOT statutory, it is part of the common-law tradition which is used in almost the entire United States (I believe Louisiana is on purely statutory system, but I'm not stopping to check, so don't quote me on that).
From the Article:
Since the guard would have the legal right to retain your presence under reasonable circumstances (can't gang tackle you on your way out) if you respond by threatening violence, you are subject to a suit for: (dun dun duh dun!) Common Assault.
A quick guide to tortious assualt can be found - Here [wikipedia.org]
As a note to the officer above, these are both tortious acts, not criminal - hence no requirement for a statute. They can be governed by common law which is more permissive and allows (broad brush stroke here) only cash damages.
-GiH
The previous statements are nuance deprived - see your lawyer for details.
Re:right... I'll buy that bridge... (Score:3, Informative)