Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in
  • Preferences

Comments: 97 +-   How Sega Can Save Sonic on Tuesday February 13 2007, @12:23PM

Posted by Zonk on Tuesday February 13 2007, @12:23PM
from the life-support-for-hedgehogs dept.
games
entertainment
You may recall the conversation we had at the end of last year, riffing off of a Retrogaming article on how Sega ruined Sonic. 1up has returned with a response, positing how the company can save their mascot from the death of ignominy. Their advice is simple: Go Fast, ditch Shadow, make fewer games. "Remember Blast Processing? It was a sham, sure, but the idea behind it was a perfect summation of what Sonic was about: A game so fast that the Genesis had to be specially programmed to keep up with it. Slowing down to drink in the ambiance or whatever is pretty much the exact opposite of Blast Processing. Being forced to, say, go fishing in a Sonic game is like buying a Ferrari so you can take naps in the backseat."
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

How Sega Can Save Sonic 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.

  • Save Sonic? (Score:3, Informative)

    by MidVicious (1045984) on Tuesday February 13 2007, @12:29PM (#17999368)

    Here's an idea...

    No more God damn Furry scenes [youtube.com].

    • Re:Save Sonic? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by bersl2 (689221) on Tuesday February 13 2007, @02:31PM (#18001404) Journal
      I was going to mod you down, but I think I'll speak some instead.

      The moment that Sega decided to give Sonic, et al. an actual identity, as opposed to the bland and generic Mario and crew (and let's not kid ourselves here, character details matter very little in his sphere---Nintendo focuses much more on gameplay, and justifiably so), Sega opened an inverse Pandora's box: there is all this room for derivative works outside of video games (which has been done, both commercially and fan-based), but this has alienated non-fans (the association with the furry fandom could be incidental and not causal). And, of course, the games have continued to decline in quality, which is fatal no matter what.

      Sega has no clear objective for Sonic. He maintains his original product differentiation from Mario as described above, but otherwise, he's still a me-too, devoid of boldness and originality in both gameplay and storyline.

      To actually address what I think you're referring to: yeah, I hate the humans too. If they're going to keep inventing characters to the point where they actually make Sonic non-asexual, nobody wanted to see him kiss some dainty-ass innocent human girl.

      Crap, I need to cut off my rant now. I'll be resuming it later. ;)
  • Making the games "not shit".

    Or at least fixing the SAME dodgy camera system that's afflicted every game since Sonic Adv 1.
  • More Sonic, less everyone else and better camera controls are what I would suggest ...

  • The backseats of Ferraris... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Mondoz (672060) on Tuesday February 13 2007, @12:41PM (#17999566)
    "Being forced to, say, go fishing in a Sonic game is like buying a Ferrari so you can take naps in the backseat."

    I submit that there are some activities which would be that much better because they were performed in the backseat of a Ferrari...

  • Clarifying a few points (Score:5, Insightful)

    by AKAImBatman (238306) * <akaimbatman.gmail@com> on Tuesday February 13 2007, @12:42PM (#17999568) Homepage Journal

    Sonic Adventure ushered in re-branded "Dr. Eggman" [...] once Sonic went into 3D, Sega felt that Sonic was better suited on Earth

    Just to clarify, the move toward Dr. Eggman vs. Robotnik and Earth vs. Mobius was a move toward how the Sonic story was told in its original Japanese. The elements we Americans are used to were localization and translation issues. That being said, I think we Americans liked the way Sonic was localized. Trying to cram a version better suited to Japanese culture down our throats is silly, especially since the early Sonic games supposedly sold better in the U.S. than they did in Japan.

    IMHO, the Sonic Team should have used the SatAM show [wikipedia.org] as its source material rather than coming up with the screwy Sonic X series. The result would have been far more appealing to the majority of American fans.

    Last but not least, Sega should really consider reworking the Sonic XTreme concept. There's a lot of demand for that game out there. Enough to suggest that the direction it was going is actually where fans want to go. Yes, it was basically a straight-up translation of 2D Sonic into 3D Sonic. But what's wrong with that?

    In case anyone is wondering why the article calls "Blast Processing" a sham, it's because more processing power is not necessary for Sonic's "speed". Speed is an illusion. As long as the frame rate is high enough to prevent choppiness (consoles are limited to the TV's 60 FPS anyway), you can move the playfield and characters as much or as little as you want per frame. This gives the illusion of speed. In cases where the actual speed exceeds the sampling rate of the television, motion blur tricks can be used to fool the eye further. For example, Sonic's legs weren't really a blur. The sprite was already blurred, then played back at a far lower framerate.

    • Re:Clarifying a few points (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Cowclops (630818) on Tuesday February 13 2007, @01:12PM (#18000112)
      I don't even recall where I read it, but I read a fairly technical explanation as to what "blast processing" boiled down to. It was actually the ability to load background images into memory quickly enough that you can run across many background screens worth of data without it having to wait up for the next screen to load. Moving an individual sprite around a static screen means moving him a larger distance in 1/60th of a second, and both SNES and Genesis can do this with no problem. The issue is, the SNES takes a longer time to load a whole background's worth of data, which is required for the illusion of a character running quickly. After all, in the sonic games when you are moving quickly, the sprite is actually not moving at all relative to the screen but the backgrounds are flying by rapidly, which is the hard part. While I wouldn't go as far as to say SNES couldn't run a Sonic game, I think certain effects would have been impossible. Remember when you were invincible AND had the speed shoes AND were running through tunnels at the same time, how fast the screen could move? I don't think SNES could have done that at full speed, even if the rest of the game was quite possible. Uniracers on SNES moves "quickly" but also has repetetive backgrounds and just a single track in the foreground. Maybe, on Genesis, uniracers could have supported more detailed backgrounds. In short, blast processing wasn't a sham and there IS a limit to how quickly you can load up concurrent background images, but SNES could still deal with "fast" games. The extent to which its limited, I do not know, but the fact remains that there was a limit to how fast SNES could display concurrent background images.
      • Thank you for reminding me of a game I loved for some odd reason. Uniracers. Now I gotta dig out my SNES. (Mebbe it'll end up on Virtual Console?)
      • Blast processing was just marketting. The double frame buffering technique is news to me. I think this might be retro active rationalization. Since this double buffering would not "speed" up anythign and woudl lead to a bit of a control lag. I am aware that the CPU could nto access the frame buffer directlly and has to use the VDP. But this dbl frame buffer situation would not lead to improved speeds of bg scroll.

        The key differences between the SNES and Genesis was that the SNES has custom graphics chip wh
    • I agree with you there. The US/UK got all this amazing content (SatAM, the comics, even the _advertising_ was something special). Stuff like that was why they more or less owned the UK market until they panicked themselves to death over the PS1. Did the Japanese version even _have_ a backstory?

  • 2D (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Conception (212279) on Tuesday February 13 2007, @12:42PM (#17999580)
    Nintendo did it. Konomi did it. Just make a really great platformer. Make it for the DS. Make it for 360 Live. The wii, whatever. Just make it fun.

  • Background Music (Score:3, Interesting)

    by y5 (993724) * on Tuesday February 13 2007, @12:44PM (#17999622) Homepage

    The final straw for me was when they introduced the god-awful fake pop music, complete with vocals and lyrics about Sonic. Something about it just really makes me cringe.

    • Actually, I liked the character songs from Sonic Adventure. But then again I seem to have hated that game far less than everyone else.

  • 3D just never quite worked (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Tarlus (1000874) on Tuesday February 13 2007, @12:46PM (#17999648)
    They need to spend more time developing each 3D game. The first Sonic Adventure game for Dreamcast was decent, but everything since has been just 'meh'. Because there are always tight deadlines for each game, Sega ends up producing a mediocre game with bugs, sloppy controls, unimaginative level design, and God-awful voice acting. They shouldn't have ever given them voices.

    But, because Sega continues to pump out one game after another, and because they try to meet deadlines, we end up with crap like this [youtube.com].

    A name as big as Sonic can afford to suffer one or two release setbacks for the sake of having more time to test and refine a game into something higher-quality, even on-par with the likes of Mario.

    Or they could just hand Sonic over to Miyamoto...
    • Wow. Just, wow. That video sure gives some insight on just how concered Sega is with releasing a good product. I mean, how in the world can anyone release something that bad?!? I think I'd want to crawl in a hole and die if I released a prodcut that bad.
      • Zug Zug!

        -- sorry, I make a point about never replying to .sigs, but I had to make an exception

  • Afraid of 2D Games (Score:4, Interesting)

    by matt74441 (1000572) on Tuesday February 13 2007, @12:49PM (#17999700)
    Unfortunately in this day and age, 2D games don't really come out for major consoles anymore. People seem to expect every game that is released to have beautiful 3D graphics and huge environments to play in. This isn't a problem if you're starting a new franchise, but if you're taking a game that has always been 2D on older consoles, then its a hit or miss in my opinion. Super Mario and Metroid have done this successfully, but Sonic has completely failed at this. Like its said in the article, Sonic is too slow in 3D and that makes it almost painful to play for me. If Sega released a new 2D Sonic game, I'd buy it without hesitating.
    • I think that game makers think that every game has to be beautiful 3D, but that the customers don't really care. They just want a game that's fun to play. Games like Paper Mario, Viewtiful Joe, and Animal Crossing (not 2D, but graphics don't matter) are very popular. I don't think that the gamers care as much as the Execs that approve which games get made believe they care.
      • There's also the problem that Sony often didn't license 2D games for the US market. Interestingly, there are already quite a few 2D games on the Wii...
      • I own all 3 of those games, so I agree with you. Thing is I don't know anyone else who owns even one of those games, so I also disagree with you.
        • I think the graphics in Paper Mario are great. Viewtiful Joe also has pretty good graphics. Animal crossing isn't even 3D, unless you consider Zelda 1 or Zelda 3, to also be 3D. However, there's a lot of game companies that wouldn't produce a game like that simply because it's not 3D. There's a lot of companies that would rather put out some crappy 3D game, than put out some really good 2D game that only costs a quarter as much to make.

    • Unfortunately in this day and age, 2D games don't really come out for major consoles anymore.

      Speak for yourself. I'm waiting for Super Paper Mario [wikipedia.org] to come out. And if I had a Nintendo DS, I'd be all over the New Super Mario Bros. [wikipedia.org]

      Granted, modern consoles allow for more complex effects in 2D (all you're really doing is ignoring the Z axis), but that doesn't make the gameplay any less 2D. :)

  • Since the let down of the 3D Sonic games, I'm quite anxious to play Secret of the Rings (Wildfire was a better name, but that's usually how it goes). Last I heard, it's due out on the 20th of this month (though Circuit City's pre-order things say March). Supposedly, the game will have you playing as just Sonic, not 13 other characters, and is all about going forward and jumping. The previews I've seen have the level being a bit too linear, but the speed was fairly high. The camera is fixed behind Sonic, a n
  • Sonic isn't about the gamers any more. Go look at Deviantart or any major furry site and you'll see the type of people who buy Sonic games. They don't care about the game play, they just want more "story" (aka new characters to poorly draw having sex).

    The best Sonic game in ages has been Rush and that still didn't play very well, if not for the music it wouldn't have been half as good as it was.
    • lol, conspiracy theory. :)

      If Sega did sell out to us, then they do a piss-poor job of representing what we* want, namely:
      • better and more sophisticated ("sophisticated" not necessarily meaning "complex" nor "mature") plotlines (Sega wouldn't know a good story if it bit them on the ass)
      • better dialog, though it might be a translation problem
      • development of existing characters (quality, not quantity)
      • English voice acting that does justice to the franchise, like the Japanese voice acting.
      • Did I mention that we
    • As a furry.. I can safely say that they have not been sold out to. ANOTHER hedgehog? A stupid FF + BTTF rip-off story? Strange GFX (something is comically wrong with a large, fur-less, talking hedgehog walking around in an otherwise realistic environment)? Sucky gameplay (I haven't played the new game, but from what I hear it sucks)?

      Nah. They haven't sold out to us. If they did, they did it very, VERY poorly. If you think any game sold out to furries, that would be Starfox, but you can't blame SFA's awfu

  • Maybe it's timeto let him pass on. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by hal2814 (725639) on Tuesday February 13 2007, @01:17PM (#18000206)
    Pull the plug already. Let him die in peace and hopefully he'll be remembered in his Genesis glory days instead of in his 3D form that never did quite work out. Not every franchise can or should last forever.

  • 3D is the problem (Score:4, Insightful)

    by tgibbs (83782) on Tuesday February 13 2007, @01:22PM (#18000262)
    3D is the heart of the problem. In full 3D, there is just too much freedom of movement to manage the speed required for a Sonic game. I can't understand why Sega doesn't release a "3D on a 2D track" Sonic game, along the lines of Nights.

    • In full 3D, there is just too much freedom of movement to manage the speed required for a Sonic game.

      Maybe if they stopped making the levels so linear and more planar. Falling into a void to one's death is so passé. If I'm in a forest, make it a big forest with a few roads, leading to the objective, but put all the goodies deep in there; if I'm in a city, let me run around the whole damn thing. Maybe have a few static parts to a level, but generate most of it as needed.

      I also think the controls can use some creativity. Make the forward/side control more throttle-like/rudder-like using an analog stick

      • I have Sonic Rush, and I agree that it is an excellent game, but it's not what I'm talking about.

        What I have in mind is a game with 3D graphics and (mostly) 2D gameplay, along the lines of Nights on the Dreamcast or Pandemonium on the PS1, providing the 3D eye candy that players of console (as opposed to handheld) games expect, but with classic 2D Sonic speed and gameplay.
          • I hadn't seen Sonic Rivals. I looked at some screenshots, and it does seem to be doing what I had in mind, at least in terms of 2D gameplay in a 3D world. I'm not sure about the race aspect, though--I think that I'd rather have a solo game more like the traditional Sonic titles. I'd like to try it, but I don't have a PSP, and I don't know anybody who does. But it least it sounds like Sega is thinking in a promising direction regarding the franchise.
  • Sonic 3 & Knuckles was the pinnacle of what Sonic could be, IMO. It had the best music (thanks possibly to Michael Jackson...look it up on Wikipedia!) the best levels, and a great variety in gameplay. Frankly, They just need to make a psuedo-3D sonic game with some RPG-ish elements. The paths between various locations in the world would be a bunch of branching pathways made in the old 2D style way of level making. Just make Sonic 4 for god's sake, and undo the last 10 years of furry shit.
  • Maybe I'm just not a big Sonic fan as I've always been a Nintendo guy, but doesn't this show that Sonic just can't really be kept "cool" forever? The fact that Sonic can only be in one type of game, and has to go back to it's roots of fast action sidescroller shows that it's a limited mascot, whereas Mario can (and is) put to any number and genre of games from sports, to racing, to puzzle to 3d platformer and still maintain the integrity of the mascot as well as have a fun game (Not even mentioning the spin
  • Dude. This is totally gonna reinvent Sonic Team. Get this, now: Big the Cat's Big Adventures
  • The beginning of the problem was in the transition from 2D to 3D. Some franchises weathered this well, Sonic did not.

    Certainly, Sonic Adventure was a good game, but very quickly it and its successors revealed that SEGA had forgotten what made the 2D games so great.

    All the previous Sonic games were great because 90% of the time you were running like crazy, screaming across the screen and trying to keep up with everything that was being thrown at you. Often, you wouldn't and a shower of rings would signal you
  • Maybe sega should just drop Sonic all together? Most Project Plans have a 'Do Nothing' option when the Business Case doesn't fit the solutions available.

    They have 2 other famous (and slower) Icons to fall back onto if they wanted to release a game; Namely Alex Kidd and Wonderboy. Both have HEAPS of potential for the creation of a 3d world adventure game similar in style to perhaps the new Zelda game on the Wii or something more innovative.
  • The key to saving Sonic: make a game that doesn't suck. The end.
Search
"Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." -- Vince Lombardi, football coach

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.