Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
PlayStation (Games) Sony

A Million PS3s Sold in Japan 164

Reuters is reporting that the PlayStation 3 has reached 1 million units sold in Japan. The article notes that the eight months the console took to reach this mark is roughly four times slower than it took the Wii. Of course, the 360 has only managed to eek out 420,705 units sold in a much longer timespan. To put things in perspective, an aging news report suggests that the PlayStation 2 sold 1 million units the first weekend it was released in Japan. Even the Wii didn't hit that, though that may have been an issue of supply rather than demand. Do you think there is a specific reason the PS3 isn't selling as well as the PlayStation 2 did, or is the market just a different place than it was 7 years ago?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A Million PS3s Sold in Japan

Comments Filter:
  • The numbers (Score:5, Informative)

    by MeanderingMind ( 884641 ) * on Wednesday July 18, 2007 @12:23PM (#19902645) Homepage Journal
    The last numbers reported on Japanese hardware sales: July 2nd - 8th [gamesarefun.com]

    That would mean in the past 10 days, at least 24,129 PS3s were sold. That is approximately 16,890 PS3s last week, and 7,239 so far this week.

    For comparison, the Wii was at 2,949,774 units sold the week before last. Given that they've been consistantly selled 70k+ per week, the Wii probably surpassed 3 million consoles last week. The Xbox 360 has yet to break 400k units.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by AuMatar ( 183847 )
      The truely interesting thing to me on that list is the DS. The lifetime Japan sales of the DS are showing as 18M, and PS2 is 20M. If thats right, the DS is about to surpass the PS2 in number of units sold!
      • Re:The numbers (Score:4, Informative)

        by meringuoid ( 568297 ) on Wednesday July 18, 2007 @04:06PM (#19905991)
        The truely interesting thing to me on that list is the DS. The lifetime Japan sales of the DS are showing as 18M, and PS2 is 20M. If thats right, the DS is about to surpass the PS2 in number of units sold!

        DS did that long ago. Look again at the chart: eighteen million is the figure for 'DSL', while lower down the chart you'll see that something called 'NDS' has sold 6.5 million.

        Between the DS and DS Lite, Nintendo have shifted nearly 26 million in Japan. That's about one in five of the entire Japanese population.

        • by AuMatar ( 183847 )
          I missed that. Its absolutely insane. The best selling console in Japan of the generation was a handheld. It makes me wonder if eventually consoles won't go the way of the dodo.
    • by LKM ( 227954 )

      For comparison, the Wii was at 2,949,774 units sold the week before last. Given that they've been consistantly selled 70k+ per week, the Wii probably surpassed 3 million consoles last week. The Xbox 360 has yet to break 400k units.

      Even more astonishing: The Wii is only constrained by production, not by demand. Nintendo could probably sell about twice as many if they managed to get production capacity up.

  • No idea (Score:5, Funny)

    by eln ( 21727 ) * on Wednesday July 18, 2007 @12:24PM (#19902653)

    Do you think there is a specific reason the PS3 isn't selling as well as the PlayStation 2 did, or is the market just a different place than it was 7 years ago?
    No, we have no idea why the PS3 is not selling well. There has certainly not been countless posts complaining about the price on any of our thrice-weekly PS3 vs. Wii vs. 360 Slashdot threads. None of us have any idea why this is happening, and it has caught us totally off guard. No one on Slashdot ever predicted that the PS3 would have a hard time selling, and there was certainly never any speculation that the price was too high.

    This is all entirely new and interesting information. I'm sure we will have a lively and enlightening discussion where multiple new and logically sound theories based on solid economic and sociological data will be presented.
    • by Goaway ( 82658 )
      There have, however, been countless posts about how the PS3 will "do well in Japan anyway".

      Of course, none of the people making those posts had any clue about the Japanese market in the first place, and were just parroting something they'd heard on the internet.

      Meanwhile, the Japanese were making fun of the price just as much as us westerners, if not more so. More hilariously, at least.
    • by Guppy06 ( 410832 )
      "I'm sure we will have a lively and enlightening discussion where multiple new and logically sound theories based on solid economic and sociological data will be presented."

      Your mother!
  • Yes (Score:3, Informative)

    by rob1980 ( 941751 ) on Wednesday July 18, 2007 @12:26PM (#19902697)
    Do you think there is a specific reason the PS3 isn't selling as well as the PlayStation 2 did, or is the market just a different place than it was 7 years ago?

    Playstation 2 launch price: ¥39,800
    Playstation 3 launch price: ¥49,980 (basic), ¥59,980 (premium)

    That might have had something to do with it.
    • Re:Yes (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 18, 2007 @12:34PM (#19902833)
      What is that Y with the lines through it?

      Is ¥ anime for $?
    • While the ps2 had 1,000,000 units it's first weekend the ps3 had a few thousand and it was shared with oversea's buyers and the homeless. In addition to that online auctioneers. The result, actual japanese gamers and american gamers didn't really get their hands on it to spread any hype. Everything seems to have been botched.

      THe "worldwide launch aka u.s./japan" just meant retarded shortages at launch since they didn't make enough.
      The ridiculous price.
      The lack of good games at launch to justify the price
  • reasons? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Thanatos69 ( 993924 ) on Wednesday July 18, 2007 @12:32PM (#19902791)

    Do you think there is a specific reason the PS3 isn't selling as well as the PlayStation 2 did, or is the market just a different place than it was 7 years ago?


    If this isn't a setup for a flame war, I don't know what is.
    • by jZnat ( 793348 ) *
      Only if anyone on /. gave a shit about the PS3 in the first place could I agree with that. After the PS3 flopped, there aren't any more supporters of it here...
      • I'm a supporter! I think the Playstation 3 actually has wonderful potential to be the top notch gaming system in the next couple of years, once developers have learned to better utilize its hardware. It's price point is a turn off, sure, but that will come down...and developers will still be making games for it at that point.

        That being said, although I really respect Nintendo for taking a different course and building a new, innovate gaming platform, I am frankly not very impressed with the end resul
        • by LKM ( 227954 )

          I'm a supporter! I think the Playstation 3 actually has wonderful potential to be the top notch gaming system in the next couple of years, once developers have learned to better utilize its hardware. It's price point is a turn off, sure, but that will come down...and developers will still be making games for it at that point.

          But the thing is, if there are no killer games on the PS3, people won't buy it, so there's no incentive for developers to learn how to program it correctly. I think for the foreseeable future - and maybe for the entire lifetime of the system - most really good games will come out of Sony's own dev studios. The PS3 seems to become this generation's Gamecube.

          I think its great that games developed for the Wii probably won't be ports from other systems (in the future), because the control scheme is simply too different...

          Yeah, most probably won't be, but interestingly, some ports arrived with really great results - Godfather, for example.

          I think its just going to take a while for developers to really make this new way of playing games work.

          ...as seen with the DS.

          That being said, the activity involved isn't a real selling point for me. While I can't speak for anyone else on Slashdot, I suspect I'm not alone when I say I get enough physical activity on my own for said activity to be required when I want to sit down and game.

    • "If this isn't a setup for a flame war, I don't know what is."

      Well I suppose you have a point. Afterall, there are actually people here that think Zonk caused Sony's bad PR.
  • Maybe... (Score:4, Funny)

    by rbarreira ( 836272 ) on Wednesday July 18, 2007 @12:33PM (#19902813) Homepage
    Maybe the reason is that people only have one job? Those slackers...
  • shipped != sold (Score:3, Insightful)

    by sidb ( 530400 ) on Wednesday July 18, 2007 @12:34PM (#19902827) Homepage
    Sony typically reports the number of units shipped to retailers, not actually sold through to consumers. If there as many PS3s stacked in Best Buys in Japan as here, it may be a few more weeks (or possibly months) before a million PS3s are actually hooked up to Japanese TVs in people's homes.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by AndyG314 ( 760442 )
      Most companies report the number of shipped units rather than the number of units sold there are a few reasons for this: 1) Shipped is a bigger number, there is always a few more shipped than have actually been sold. 2) Shipped is way easer to estimate, as you know how many you have sent out the door, it's very difficult to get sales estimates from the countless different realtailers. 3) Shipped is good enough.
      • Thats always been a sticking point with consoles, and more of late with sony. 1) Because Nintendo always reports sold units as oppossed to shipped. 2) Because Sony tries to pass off shipped as "They are selling like hot cakes!", coupled in with the unsold PS3 bounty they did (Find a PS3 on the shelves and we'll pay you $$$, causing most gaming sites to post pictures of local shops with PS3's stacked on shelves, Sony became quiet about the bounty).
      • Shipped is way easer to estimate, as you know how many you have sent out the door, it's very difficult to get sales estimates from the countless different realtailers.
        Nintendo seems to have no trouble reporting sold figures. I don't think it would be that hard to count the console warranty activations when retailers scan the console's serial barcode.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by badasscat ( 563442 )
      Sony typically reports the number of units shipped to retailers, not actually sold through to consumers.

      This is counting units sold, not shipped. Sony can report whatever number it wants, but there are third party organizations and companies devoted to counting units sold at retail, and Enterbrain (where this number is coming from) is one of them.

      All manufacturers, not just Sony, count units shipped and announce those numbers. MS does the same (they just announced 11.6 million Xbox 360's shipped, not sol
      • Re:shipped != sold (Score:5, Insightful)

        by rlp ( 11898 ) on Wednesday July 18, 2007 @12:50PM (#19903053)
        As long as Wii manufacturing is not meeting demand, for Nintendo: shipped == sold.
      • Beyond the point of the sibling post, Nintendo has consistantly reported the units they sell rather than the units they ship for years. The "shipped" numbers are only cited by them in as far as they inform the public of what kind of volume to expect (i.e. Announcing there will be 4 million Wiis shipped to stores by March '07, later announcing the actual sales come March).
    • Agreed, this trend with Console's taking a loss is also problematic. Should metrics get back to the gaming aspect of this and look at the number of games shipped (As well as the top selling game which should indicate the total number of gaming systems in use?)... These PS3's are likely sitting around as Blu-Ray players or sitting in stores, these metrics should mean nothing to game developers and without developer interest no console can survive.
    • Right, but those PS3's stacked in Best Buys are being sold, they're just not being sold faster than they can restock them. Shipped numbers can be misleading, but as long as PS3's are not being returned it's a fairly accurate count.
  • by Kohath ( 38547 )
    The PS2 worked on your old TV. The PS3 does too, but you might as well buy a PS2 if you're running on old TV -- or wait on consoles altogether and save your money for a new TV.

    If there were as many HDTVs now as there were SDTVs when the PS2 was released, the PS3 would probably have sold as well as the PS2.
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by tzhuge ( 1031302 )

      "but you might as well buy a PS2 if you're running on old TV"
      That's really just not true. There's still worlds of difference between a PS3 on a SDTV and a PS2 on a SDTV. Certainly there are other things to recommend the PS2 (price and the huge games library), but this notion that this new crop of consoles isn't any better than the previous generation on SDTV is just plain false.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by GeckoX ( 259575 )
        It's not an exclusive argument though, but of course, this is /. so I must forgive the expected assumption that all is binary.

        The PS2 had extra selling features that for those with a PS2 and a SDTV already, the PS3 just doesn't offer. The PS2 was the first DVD player for a LOT of people, and that worked with their SDTV as well.

        Most people do NOT have HDTV's, so those people do not care about BluRay being a feature. People also tend to feel that they'd be missing out on the game experience if they were to pl
    • by jZnat ( 793348 ) *
      You could say the same thing about the 360 regarding HDTV (have you tried playing Xbox 360 games on an SDTV? good luck reading the text if you don't have an enormous TV in the first place).
      • by Raenex ( 947668 )

        have you tried playing Xbox 360 games on an SDTV? good luck reading the text if you don't have an enormous TV in the first place
        Yeah, that really pisses me off. There's no excuse for it, yet nearly every damn game suffers this problem. No quality control from Microsoft.
  • For what it can do, the PS3 is not at all too expensive for me -- I'll qualify that I'm an American, I know that Europeans are getting a raw deal -- but there's a simple reason I still don't have one: no games. Seriously, take a look at ebGames, and virtually every title is scheduled for the end of the year or next year. And the titles that are out frankly don't do much for me.

    Perhaps I'll get one in 2008, but by then I bet I can pick up newer-generation XBox360 and a ton of used games for it. Viva Pinat
    • Overlord has been released on the PC.
  • The same thing is happening to sony that happened to nintendo during the N64 generation. Both companies had 2 generations of market dominance (nes.snes, ps1,ps2). Then they got cocky and thought the fan base would overlook obvious flaws, with nintendo it was carts on the N64 and sony its the price tag, lack of innovation in the controller (really now how long is sony going to hang on to the dual shock disgn) and lack of any major exclusive games at launch.
    • by Dan Ost ( 415913 )
      really now how long is sony going to hang on to the dual shock disgn

      Sony managed to design a great controller early on. Why change it if they can't improve on it?

      In my opinion, it's the best controller design out there. It's comfortable to hold, none of the buttons are awkward to hit, and I can play it for hours without getting cramps or stiffness in my hands. I can't say that about any other controller (especially the 360 controller...something about it makes my left hand hurt after an hour or so of play).
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by Squarewav ( 241189 )
        I suppose its a matter of opion. I personaly cant stand the spot the analog stick is, I find it hard to hold my thumb that far down for long periods of time esp after using a 360 or even gamecube controller. If the analog stick was ware the d-pad is and vice versa I would like it alot more. The dual shock was pritty much a hack to add analog sticks to the original ps1 controller w/o changing the button layout for older games.
  • Tom Waits
    "Big In Japan"

    I got the style but not the grace
    I got the clothes but not the face
    I got the bread but not the butter
    I got the winda but not the shutter

    But I'm big in Japan I'm big in Japan But heh I'm big in Japan

    I got the house but not the deed
    I got the horn but not the reed
    I got the cards but not the luck
    I got the wheel but not the truck

    But heh I'm big in Japan I'm big in Japan I'm big in Japan

    I got the moon I got the cheese I got the whole damn nation
    On its knees I got the rooster I got the crow
    I
  • 599 reasons (Score:5, Funny)

    by mapmaker ( 140036 ) on Wednesday July 18, 2007 @01:46PM (#19903973)
    Do you think there is a specific reason the PS3 isn't selling as well as the PlayStation 2 did?

    No, there isn't a single specific reason. It's a combination of 599 reasons.

  • I don't enjoy the realistic simulations/games to fycking depressing ... I am good at FPS.

    I have all the PS2 R&C and want another R&C for the PS3 before I upgrade to a 32in WQXGA monitor.

    !HAVEFUN!
    • Here you go. [insomniacgames.com] Better start saving your pennies...
      • Dear 31!7!57,

        You are so 5W337 for giving me that link .... I have been looking out for the PS3 R&C for far to long. I was beginning to wonder (@+55yo) if I would be dead before the next release. I am comforted to know that I only need to survive until winter (I'll need a little playtime). Then again ... if the new R&C is really good ... it may give me a good reason for trying to survive for another decrepit year. I know, I should get a life, but I did not know who William Shatner was until I saw "Bo
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • The PS2 when it came out was almost half what the PS3 costs, all things else being equal that should equate to more than double the PS3 sales right there, add in the fact that the PS2 was a cheap DVD player when people actually needed a DVD player, add in a whole bunch more sales. There was little to no competition for the PS2 when it was released, add in even more sales. Sony had not released a rootkit or 50 new memory formats for people to balk at.

    My guess is the 2 biggest problems for Sony in Japan is
    • by ivan256 ( 17499 )
      You better put on your asbestos clothing, 'cause that "No competition" comment is about to get you roasted by all the Dreamcast fanboys out there.

      Anyway, I think the two biggest problems really are #1 the lack of HDTVs, and #2 the lack of franchise titles.
  • a PS2, I was waiting for the PS3 (I wanted backwards compatibility never having owned the earlier consoles) but was disapointed.

    I have $3000 I don't know what to do with but I've decided to hold off on a $400 purchase to go with a $100 purchase (Ps2 Craigslist, 1 wireless controller memory card, 40 games) I just didn't want to subsidize Microsoft and the other consoles haven't consolidated yet (:P).

    The PS3 kicks ass for 1 reason, downloadable free content, tonnes of demos and previews. Once you get beyo
  • The problem with the PS3 is not price. The iPhone costs as much as a PS3 and people are happily spending money on that. I'd argue that the PS3 provides more value for the money. Well, except for one big problem. There are few good games available for the PS3 and virtually no great games. That is why the PS3 isn't selling. I guarantee if the library of games were stronger we'd see far fewer people complaining about price.
  • "Do you think there is a specific reason the PS3 isn't selling as well as the PlayStation 2 did, or is the market just a different place than it was 7 years ago?"

    Ummm... PRICE? In 2000, the PS2 released with a price of 39,800 Yen (with an exchange rate of 106.31 Yen to US Dollar), which made it ~$375 US. The 60GB PS3 (the only one with full functionality) launched at a price of 62,800 Yen. So not quite double the launch price, but that is pretty high.
    • Ummm... PRICE? In 2000, the PS2 released with a price of 39,800 Yen (with an exchange rate of 106.31 Yen to US Dollar), which made it ~$375 US. The 60GB PS3 (the only one with full functionality) launched at a price of 62,800 Yen. So not quite double the launch price, but that is pretty high.

      Both currencies have dipped int he last several years so it's a bit of an unfair comparison. For the cash of value of a ps2 you would have spent on other stuff in 2000 you can get slightly more (20-30%) for the value of
  • Hmm, other than Price ...

    Let's see, only one good release game, tons of time wasted on graphics and close to zilch on game play, being stuck with Blu-Ray which means little if you are one of the two-thirds with 480i or lower TV reception, ...

    Nope, can't think of anything.
  • Nuf said... I think that's why the PS2 was popular. Now that DVD players are cheap as dirt, nobody cares about the XBox platform or the PS3 in Japan. DVD is way more compelling a switch than Blu-Ray, considering everyone emptied their pockets on the DVD generation. It's going to take quite a few more years yet to inspire people to switch to the high-def formats and equipment.
  • 1. The PS3's price is too high for some people, mind you, I have a PS3 and didn't mind paying the price (mind you, I didn't mind paying a mere few hundred bucks for the PS3, but others do). 2. When the PS2 shipped, it was the cheapest DVD player out there; if you look at the initial statistics on what people were playing on their PS2, the top discs played were DVDs. To be honest, people aren't nearly as excited about Blu-ray and HD-DVD as they were about DVDs (with good reasons).

Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.

Working...