Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education Entertainment Games

GameStop Manager Suspended After "Games for Grades" 539

mikesd81 writes "A manager at a GameStop has been suspended for instituting a 'games for grades' policy. 'Brandon Scott says he started a unique new policy in his store to promote good grades in school but now his employer has sent him to detention for speaking out of turn. Scott says he's been suspended by GameStop in the wake of his unconventional "games for grades" policy at an Oak Cliff store.' Apparently, on his own, Scott decided to stop selling video games to any school-age customer unless an adult would vouch for the student's good grades."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

GameStop Manager Suspended After "Games for Grades"

Comments Filter:
  • by AuMatar ( 183847 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @06:05PM (#20643845)
    Manager decides to create a new policy. The owners don't like it and discipline him. Totally within their rights. If the manager owned the store, he could do this. Since he doesn't, his boss makes the rules.

    Now if he had made it a discount, it could have been a win-win. It would save the kid some money (and possibly be an incentive to work harder) and make good publicity for his store. But just stopping is bad business sense. The customer will just go elsewhere.
  • by Doc Ruby ( 173196 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @06:08PM (#20643893) Homepage Journal
    Yeah, and that sucks.
  • by cduffy ( 652 ) <charles+slashdot@dyfis.net> on Monday September 17, 2007 @06:21PM (#20644101)
    The story is that a policy that's popular within the community where it was implemented was terminated with prejudice by upper management.

    It doesn't have to be a legal or ethical violation to be news.
  • really? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by nobodyman ( 90587 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @06:27PM (#20644183) Homepage
    Idiolistic? certainly. Misguided? probably. But why is he an idiot? He wanted to do have a positive effect on kids in a position that is generally associated with destroying our childrens minds (just ask Jack Thompson). Furhermore, he knew that he was probably going to get suspended and/or fired and was not surprised when it finally happened. So it's not as though he's shocked that he got fired.

    Gamestop is famous (or infamous) for having generally odd store managers. You typically get the Simpsons Comic-Book Guy variety, the hyperactive upseller, or you get the nutjob that tells you that he spoke with the Bungie devs and that "Halo 3 is TOTALLY coming out on the Playstation 3 in Q4. You should really pre-order it". So a gamestop manager that wants my kids to have good grades is a welcome change.

      I think Gamestop was justified in firing the guy, but I applaud him for at least sparking a dialog on the issue. If GameStop is smart, they'd find some way to turn this into a promotional deal ($20 off with a straight-A report card etc., etc.).
  • by cduffy ( 652 ) <charles+slashdot@dyfis.net> on Monday September 17, 2007 @06:29PM (#20644209)

    He just made customers go another block to the 'other of a million' game stores and buy there for the same competitive price.
    Some customers. Other customers (like parents, who tend to be the people bankrolling Christmas and birthday gifts) are liable to appreciate the move quite a bit. If (for the sake of an argument) he loses 100% of his non-parent sales but gets 1% of the parents in the Dallas area to go to his store when they want to buy a game as a gift for a child, that's a massive win: When he was "just another game store", there was no reason for people to select his store over others (with comparable pricing and selection) other than location. Making a policy and getting publicity that makes his store stand out, on the other hand, means people might be willing to drive further to get there, and distinguishes him from the competition. From a business perspective, it's potentially a great move.

    He also took away a pretty basic freedom / right from all of his younger customers.
    Beg your pardon? There's no right to be sold video games. If he were discriminating on the basis of being part of a protected class (age/race/disability/etc), that would be one thing -- but it's not the case here. Deciding you don't want your store to serve children with poor grades until they shape up is perfectly legitimate.
  • Not necessarily (Score:2, Interesting)

    by DogDude ( 805747 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @06:34PM (#20644277)
    If he was the business owner, and he didn't have any franchise agreements that prevented him from doing so, he would be able to refuse to sell to anybody he'd like, so long as it wasn't discrimination. In fact, an advanced retailing technique is to be selective with customers, which usually in turn, drives up demand (think "Soup Nazi"). It's not always bad business to turn away customers, depending on the situation. In many cases, the best thing a business owner can do is to turn away certain customers. It's pretty common among good business owners, in fact.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 17, 2007 @06:35PM (#20644285)
    IMHO, he did the RIGHT damn thing. If anyone within Gamestop corporate had a backbone, they should have supported it too. My logic? Simple. Name one other sport in high school that does NOT consider your GPA as a factor for participation. And yes, this is a SPORT now, thanks to marketing giants like the CPL. When EVERYONE starts realizing this, they'll realize how to treat it more and more like any other professional sport.
  • by the_tsi ( 19767 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @06:49PM (#20644433)
    They're not parenting in lieu of parents, they're empowering parents to participate in the decision making process on what their kids are playing. Or at least, the guy who got shitcanned was.
  • Faulty logic? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Falcon_Delta00 ( 1156119 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @06:55PM (#20644513)
    What's ridiculous about this policy is that it's a denial of access based on the principle that children with good grades should be allowed to play computer games, while those with bad grades shouldn't. What's the assumption that is being made here? Games are the cause of bad grades? OR playing games prevents children from getting good grades? It's true that games can be a huge waste of time, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they should be linked to merit in the educational system. What if my kid isn't that smart and he gets C's whether he plays video games or not. Is this guy at the store going to prevent him from buying a vieo game?
  • Bad rap (Score:5, Interesting)

    by rossz ( 67331 ) <ogre&geekbiker,net> on Monday September 17, 2007 @07:40PM (#20645079) Journal
    At the moment, you have to pass a test to graduate to prove you actually learned something. Most kids don't have any real comprehension that slacking off today is going to have dire consequences tomorrow. So this guy decides to get their attention through something they actually give a shit about, and everyone here on slashdot calls him an idiot.

    "It's not his job to be those kids mom". Yep, you are right. So mom could lie and say he got good grades, or just buy her idiot son (with a promising future in the fast food service industry) the latest game. Problem solved.

    I don't have a problem with what he was doing, though I think he would have been in a better position to offer discounts for good grades.

    I also don't have a problem with certain types of games requiring an adult to purchase them. Again, it's not the store deciding if the kid gets the game or not. The parent will make the ultimate decision. Without the limitation, the parent doesn't get any say.

    Oh, for you idiot teenagers with mod points today that will be modding me down as flamebait or a troll. Kiss my ass. You'll have kids one day. Your entire attitude will change.

    Note to dad: Uhm, you remember when I was a teenager and was a complete asshole. I'm sorry about that. You were right.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 17, 2007 @07:44PM (#20645127)
    Please name one high school that reduces grades based on a curve. I write assessment software, and the only time users ever use the curve function is to raise the high score in the event that too many failed. Nobody ever uses it to lower scores; no parent would stand for it these days.
  • by dindi ( 78034 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @08:29PM (#20645655)
    What is so surprising? Really.

    I am sure the kids who buy the most are not the ones who have the best grades. Inventing something like this at someone else's store is not acceptable because it will kill sales.

    He is not a marketing expert there and this special promo is definitely not a good promo to be honest.....

    just my 2c ...

    ps: yes I also felt like making a lot of changes ... free internet for nice chicks, let's not answer the phone if the boss is nasty, and pay 50% back to the customer in cash if our service sucks .... all kinds of nice ideas, which were all bad for the business .....

    So how old was this educational marketing genius ? That will suck on his resume, unless his next application is in education...
  • by blahplusplus ( 757119 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @08:42PM (#20645765)
    I'm sure those interested (both boys and girls) would raise their marks if they could have sex with hot women and men...

    Prostitution? Please... this is just business. I am such a capitalist, sometimes I scare myself.

    Speaking seriously though, I can see things like Virginia tech not happening if guys had a sexual outlet to deal with stress. I've often wondered if we should legalize prostitution and have laws regarding involuntary celibacy (i.e. government sponsored sex, to keep men from turning into rapists / pedophiles)
  • by PunkOfLinux ( 870955 ) <mewshi@mewshi.com> on Monday September 17, 2007 @10:43PM (#20646759) Homepage
    "Your DayCare comment makes no sense... I doubt this story is about the guy not selling to kids in daycare. As for non-daycare school, I had some tough times because I was bored (thus didnt do my work, and had to struggle at the last minute to stay on the honor roll)... but I found that with the right motivation, that changed... got into AP classes, got more mentally challenged (pun possibly intended), and did far better in those classes than in the standard level classes."

    PLEASE tell me that was sarcasm. When he was talking about daycare, he WAS talking about everything from 3 years to high school graduation. I just graduated from high school, and it would seem that school only exists now to serve two purposes: 1) to indoctrinate kids with the belief that authority is beyond reproach and 2) to give kids a place to go for 7-8 hours a day.

    Honestly, I was constantly harassed by the tougher kids. Whenever a teacher would see it and report it, the principal would always say "Oh, well, we can't fix him, so we won't even bother." I hated school. I hated the fact that the kid who copied his homework from someone else 2 minutes before class and then failed the test got the same grade as me, just because he did the homework. high school isn't about learning to think; now it's about rote memorization and busywork.
  • by DavidShor ( 928926 ) * <supergeek717&gmail,com> on Monday September 17, 2007 @10:51PM (#20646811) Homepage
    Yeah, you nailed it. I did very badly in high-school, and dropped out when I was 14. Though video games had very little to do with it, unless you count Slashdot and Wikipedia as games.

    Anyway, I studied for some AP tests and audited college classes until I could get into a university as a math major. I'm 16 now, in my senior year in college as a math major.

    So let me get to the root of my anger. If someone had tried to make me "get off my ass and get responsible" when I was a 14 year old based on my grades, they would have not known that I skipped my Algebra class to sneak into Calculus lectures at a nearby university, or that I poured over Physics and Economics textbooks at home instead of performing pointless county mandated busy work at home.

    I invested a lot of thought into my choices, and if he has any advice I will be happy to take it into consideration. But I highly resent any attempt to actively discriminate against me and make my life more difficult solely on the basis of something that does not affect anyone else but me.

    The grades of his customers are not the business of this Manager, and I'm glad he was suspended.

  • by Dolohov ( 114209 ) on Monday September 17, 2007 @11:21PM (#20647033)
    High school was never about learning to think. It's about keeping a whole lot of untrained kids out of the work force where they would drive down wages and push out older folks. For the brighter kids, it's also a holding pen until you're old enough for college.

    You may not think so now, but you'll be glad later that school was like that in terms of authority. Yes, schools try to indoctrinate kids that way, but thankfully they do it BADLY. You've been blessed with a healthy skepticism and disrespect for authority that will hopefully serve you well through the rest of your life. It's one thing to get it from a cultural perspective, it's another to see first hand that many adults really don't know what they're doing, and can't always muddle through.
  • Re:Bad idea (Score:3, Interesting)

    by photomonkey ( 987563 ) on Tuesday September 18, 2007 @12:46AM (#20647645)

    This mentality goes directly against the sense of community that forms civilization.

    Parents now, nor at any point throughout history, are not able to watch their children 24/7. Much in the way that animals play and socialize to learn how to fit into the pack (and hence survive), we have evolved as a social species for much the same purpose.

    When I was a kid, if I was playing in a neighbor's yard uninvited, you bet I would be chased off by an angry property owner. Even more, I could expect the owner to have a talk with my mom or dad later on. When I was in high school, a bunch of my friends and I went swimming in a privately-owned pond one summer night. We had apparently awoken the guy who owned the pond, and he chased us off with a shotgun. He never shot it, and he never pointed it at anyone.

    In those days, and they weren't THAT long ago, even if we had complained to the police about the old man and the shotgun, they would have laughed and asked us what the hell we were doing there anyway. Today, he would be in some pretty serious shit, despite doing nothing to harm anyone.

    These days, we are so scared of repercussions, that we let kids get away with whatever they want. We let other adults get away with everything they want. Everybody's so willing to play the lawsuit lottery that we'd rather let the guy at the bar make inappropriate comments than to shove a beer bottle up his ass sideways.

    We'd rather let kids run riot than to step up and place community limits on what they can get away with.

    I'm certainly not suggesting that someone else should discipline my kids, but they can yell at them all they want if it's merited.

  • my 2 cents (Score:3, Interesting)

    by neuro88 ( 674248 ) on Tuesday September 18, 2007 @01:24AM (#20647891)
    Okay, flat out denying sales to kids, because of bad grades is a bad idea.

    Offering a discount to kids with good grades is a good idea.

    So far a lot of slashdotters have stated the first, and many have stated the 2nd as a good idea (I think it's probably a good idea myself).

    But what I haven't really seen is that denying sales to kids with bad grades might be a bad idea,
    because bad grades are not necessarily an indicator of playing too many video games or being lazy.
    My grades in high school were often bad (and at times very bad though sometimes I got pretty good grades),
    because I hated being there so much. I hated all the busy work. I wasn't learning anything interesting
    (I wasn't learning much at all), I was just being told what to do. It wasn't until college that I finally
    realized why I did so bad in high school. I did pretty well at the junior college, and I'm currently doing
    well pretty well at the university. Both of which are far more difficult academically-wise (my high school
    before it was shut down was one of the worst performing schools in San Francisco).

    So yeh, giving a discount to kids with good grades while neither rewarding nor punishing the kids who
    didn't get good grades would have been a much smarter route to go.

  • by cherokee158 ( 701472 ) on Tuesday September 18, 2007 @07:00AM (#20649503)
    Y'know, I think if someone conclusively proved video games caused global warming, the slashdot crowd would still be screaming about parental involvment while poo pooing any attempt by society to pry their bent little fingers from their joysticks.

    And you guys wonder why many people think of the stuff as digital crack.

    Face it, these things are going to be so immersive in less than twenty years that they'll have to be a controlled substance. Otherwise, when the apocalypse comes, no one is even going to notice until their controller stops working.
  • by drakaan ( 688386 ) on Tuesday September 18, 2007 @09:50AM (#20651093) Homepage Journal

    You know what? There's an old saying: "It takes a village to raise a child"

    Fat jokes aside, that's substantially true. It seems to me that before everyone went lawsuit-happy, other adults that didn't even *know* a kid would tell them to stop doing something (assuming they were being miscreants), and maybe even drag them home by the ear to their parents.

    Now, we have one of the very first responses to an article about a guy that was worried about kids wasting too much time on video games and not enough on homework displaying an attitude that suggests that he not only doesn't have children, but that he doesn't give a crap about how any prospective children he might have will do in school.

    I love that idea...of course, if my kids aren't getting good grades, they're usually doing a lot of homework and complaining that dad gets to play video games, but they have to do homework...

    It probably doesn't make good business sense, especially in this day and age, for a manager to try and make that kind of decision on his own, and I have no problem with GameStop for firing him...social engineering isn't his job. I get that. On the other hand, if said manager opened a similar store nearby on his own, and with the same policy, I'd probably shop there instead of GameStop.

    If you think this is a reward or punishment, you're nuts. And "socialists" would have made a lot more sense than "communists" in your bold declaration.

  • by RingDev ( 879105 ) on Tuesday September 18, 2007 @10:07AM (#20651439) Homepage Journal

    There are parents who don't care about grades. Why should the values of others (good grades are important) be imposed on them? ... "Right & wrong" are opinions of individuals and society.
    In most decently populated geographic areas in the US there are multiple video game stores, and the ease of purchasing online. If the parents don't care about their child's grades, they can either a) lie or b) let the kid buy the game elsewhere. This is a private company dealing with a private consumer, the is no state involvement and no constitutional issue. The medical field on the other hand has enough legislation wrapped around it that it takes the Supreme Court and teams of lawyers just to work around the tiniest issue.

    -Rick
  • by InsaneProcessor ( 869563 ) on Tuesday September 18, 2007 @11:13AM (#20652793)
    Who gave this moron mod points for interesting. What is "interesting" about calling high school a day care center. That is the flaw in much of our society. These statements are the biggest pile of crap I have read in ages.
    I have two in high school and aside from learning math, English, history (yes event the correct history), science, engineering, and music; they are having fun at it. Sure, they admit it is work, but, they see the end goal of it.
    My boys may be unique this way but it is the reason for high school.
  • by ElleyKitten ( 715519 ) <kittensunrise AT gmail DOT com> on Tuesday September 18, 2007 @12:01PM (#20653757) Journal
    The problem with legalizing prostitution is that it doesn't really help prostitutes. Most prostitution in an area that has legal prostitution is technically illegal, in the sense that it doesn't follow any of the laws because most places don't have the resources to regulate it and it isn't a priority to get those resources, so you still have just as many street prostitutes and sex trafficking in just as bad conditions. Even for the women working under legal conditions, the laws aren't made to protect them, they're made to protect their clients. Look at mandatory STD testing. That sounds good, right? But, it's something she could get for free at any Planned Parenthood, so instead of helping her it's just something she can worry about losing her job for. If we wanted to protect prostitutes, we'd test the men before they could see them so they wouldn't get the STDs in the first place, but I've never heard of any place doing that. Legalized prostitution also means that there's now a record that she was a prostitute, so she can't move on and forget about it, it's on her credit report under past jobs and sometimes there's even government databases other people can access. In Nevada, some cities have laws against prostitutes living there, so there's another thing infringing on her freedom that she wouldn't have had if she worked illegally. We think that legalizing prostitution would help them, but for the most part prostitutes don't want to deal with the hassles that brings.

    There's also ways of making prostitution illegal without locking up prostitutes. In Sweden, the laws against prostitution effectively make pimping and being a john illegal, but the prostitutes themselves are not criminals and are given resources (drug treatment, job training) to help them out of it. They've significantly reduced the levels of prostitution and sex trafficking is almost nil, while the neighboring countries that have legal prostitution have huge problems with sex trafficking. It's not perfect, but it's done a lot of good.

Suggest you just sit there and wait till life gets easier.

Working...