Wii 'Popularity Bubble' to Burst? 426
A combination of industry and developer observations has prompted Tech.co.uk to wonder if the Wii's overwhelming popularity is due to end sometime soon. This is based on a report from Japanese business newspaper The Nikkei, which published an article recently entitled 'Software Houses Miscalculate Audience, Demand For Wii'. "The report goes on to discuss the likelihood that many Wiis are gathering dust in owners' cupboards, citing one software house president as saying, 'People bought it out of curiosity, and it's likely a lot of them haven't used it.' Given that September saw Wii sales fall sharply in Japan for the second consecutive month, it seems reasonable to speculate that the bubble inflated by the novelty factor is starting to deflate, but writing Nintendo off at any stage is a perilous course to steer." Is this just worrying, or is there validity to this?
Sort of (Score:3, Interesting)
Oh please. (Score:3, Interesting)
Who could've guessed!? (Score:2, Interesting)
Welcome to 4 months ago. That's the last time I bought a game for mine.
It was fun at first, and my dad still asks me to play a game of golf with him on it, but seriously, the novelty wears off very quickly.
I think most of the problem stems from the lack of original gameplay. The games that I bought were ones that just wouldn't work nearly as well with a different control scheme. Kororinpa is the best example. Using the wiimote to move the screen around is very intuitive and very fun.
But look at the raft of games coming out at the moment: Fifa 2008, Madden 08 and about 6 different kid's films adaptations. What makes me get this for my Wii instead of my 360? The control scheme is the Wii's only advantage, and what advantage does it have in anything that's coming out at the moment?
Most of the time when they do try and take advantage of the controls, it comes off worse anyway. Apparently Trauma Centre: Second Opinion is just far too fiddly and how many of us have stood spinning in a circle looking at the sky in an FPS?
I would love to see this succeed because for once someone tried something new, but with a lack of original content, what could you possibly achieve over the competition? To be honest, we all saw this coming
A similar case? (Score:4, Interesting)
In the months leading up to the release of [Super Mario Galaxy], [Wiis] dropped and dropped in monthly sales.
Not to say the Wii's popularity isn't dropping, I just think it's too early to draw a definitive conclusion here.
Re:Nintendo's new motto: (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Redirect shipments... (Score:2, Interesting)
So unless your chosen store has stock right now, it'll be a good couple of weeks before they see new inventory. Of course, there are tons on ebay.
Re:That's what I thought about the Dreamcast too (Score:3, Interesting)
Not strictly true. Hasn't had a US game made in a long time, but it's still possible to get new releases for it from Japan. At least as of a year ago, I think I heard somewhere that they finally stopped making Dreamcast games even in Japan recently.
Re:Really bad assumptions (Score:4, Interesting)
Second, Nintendo's "casual gamer" idea seems to really be happening, and the usage patterns of a "casual" hobbiest(is that a word?) are irregular and can leave a console sitting idle. My tennis racket has been sitting untouched in the garage for a couple years, but that doesn't mean that I don't like tennis or that tennis isn't popular. It means that I don't have time to play tennis anymore.
And third, sort of connected to the casual gamer deal, a good number of the games that are out are geared towards more casual and social play, so it's difficult for a hardcore gamer to sit down and spend entire days playing it.
From the point of view of a traditional hardcore gamer, those three things might look pretty discouraging for the Wii. But what Nintendo has discovered is that to have a successful console, it's not really necessary to give that sort of gamer everything they want. A couple months of sales fluctuations to not make a trend, and it seems silly to try and figure that sort of stuff out right now, when the big christmas season is right around the corner.
Re:Who could've guessed!? (Score:3, Interesting)
The control scheme makes a world of difference in Metroid Prime 3.
Not True (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Redirect shipments... (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Nintendo's new motto: (Score:4, Interesting)
That's really the only difference other then story between them. Weapon upgrades, new items to access new locations you couldn't get to before, beat a big boss to get new items/power ups. I know lots of anti-FPS people that love Metriod Prime because it's more of a platformer then a shooter.
And constantly shooting at things is a terrible argument, ever play Xevious? That wasn't first person
Re:Redirect shipments... (Score:3, Interesting)
The other bit is that Wiis sitting in closets have nothing to do with new sales. People don't generally buy a second unit unless the previous one is lost, stolen or broken. Just having one sitting around idle.
At this point, I'd chalk it up to FUD. People may very well be waiting for the holiday season to buy them as well
Re:Poor timing (Score:4, Interesting)
Smash Bros wasn't the only anticipated game release this Q4 though
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Mario_Galaxy [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resident_Evil:_The_Umbrella_Chronicles [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guitar_Hero_III:_Legends_of_Rock [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LEGO_Star_Wars:_The_Complete_Saga [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_Emblem:_Radiant_Dawn [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_Squad [wikipedia.org]
(Ugh...
Re:The better question (Score:4, Interesting)
This little box has a lot of broad appeal. Mine? No dust. Had it since January and still play it 4 or 5 hours a week, but only because I don't have more time. Beat Zelda, finished Paper Mario, almost done with RE4. Metroid is next. Also, I keep coming back to Tiger Woods. But my wife and I honestly get the most replay value out of bowling, billiards and tennis. I'll admit there aren't too many other titles out there I'm itching to play at the moment, but I've got such value out of the ones I've picked (with IGN's help) that I am happy to wait for the pipeline to get going.
Others have said it, I'll concur: graphics be damned. If the games make you smile, people will line up for them.
Re:Who could've guessed!? (Score:3, Interesting)
This is the problem with purists. (Score:4, Interesting)
I see this in music all the time. You get "purists" who believe that it's somehow helpful to have jazz fusion and Indo-jazz fusion and Indo-jazz Bollywood fusion and Indo-jazz Bollywood fusion fuzz-pop. The same with games. Is it a first person shooter? I don't know; is it in the first person, and do you spend a lot of time shooting? The answer to this question seems pretty straight-forward.
Of course now some purist purist is going to come along and tell me why it's important that purists constantly and consciously engage in follicle division, and why there are seven kinds of purists, and this is their genus, et cetera. You know what? We're not 19th century scientists any more. Not everything needs a rigorous classification system.
I say this as a nerd, a gamer, and a slashdotter (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:The better question (Score:5, Interesting)
Too much dependency on the motion controls alone (Score:3, Interesting)
Of course, a lot of the problem, is that Nintendo has yet to provide Wii users a true, wireless controller for more traditional games aside from that crappy classic controller you have to plug into the Wii remote. Sure, there's the wavebird, but a true, Wii-native controller would be better. (Perhaps Nintendo could take a page from Sony and create a Wavebird/Wii-remote hybrid that does both traditional controls and motion controls in a single unit.)