Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Games Government Entertainment Politics

Halo In Church Points Out ESRB Flaws 185

The recent controversy over church groups making use of Halo 3 to attract young men to their services continues to be a subject of debate outside of the fan press. GamePolitics notes that the debate is indicative of flaws in the ESRB's system, and in mainstream culture's understanding of those ratings. "When you look at it like that, it's hard to blame those who criticize bringing Halo into sacred space. For the most part the critics are not gamers and have no concept of the vast difference between Halo and GTA. All they know is that the games share a common M rating, a designation assigned by the game industry itself, theoretically for the protection of impressionable youth. For the uninitiated it's only logical to assume the content must be of a similar character as well. As someone who has played both, I'd argue that there is a world of difference between Halo and GTA."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Halo In Church Points Out ESRB Flaws

Comments Filter:
  • by ObiWanStevobi ( 1030352 ) on Monday October 15, 2007 @04:05PM (#20986837) Journal

    It should be pretty commonly known these days that "Thou shalt not kill" does not apply to war according to religious leadership. And since Master Chief is at war with the aliens, it's all good.

    Personally, I think it's great. Now we all get to teabag us some choir boys, not just the Priests.

  • by Applekid ( 993327 ) on Monday October 15, 2007 @04:21PM (#20987103)
    I interpret that as it's only ok to kill aliens if you're going to eat them.
  • by chubs730 ( 1095151 ) on Monday October 15, 2007 @04:34PM (#20987305)

    "Also, it just strikes me of bribery - they should be there because they're interested in the religion, not because they wanna get a mad sic [sic] deathmatch in after church lets out. But maybe that's just me."

    Yeah I don't really have a comment, I just wanted to do that. :)

  • by HTH NE1 ( 675604 ) on Monday October 15, 2007 @04:52PM (#20987581)
    Compare to Viva Piñata which is rated E where part of the game is beating crying piñatas to death, their final release from life at the final death blow also releasing their candy and confetti insides to the delighted cheering of children.
  • by IthnkImParanoid ( 410494 ) on Monday October 15, 2007 @07:16PM (#20989159)
    Although the game may be non-violent, it is equally dangerous due to its irresponsible depiction of an unhealthy diet. Won't somebody think of the obese children?! I'd change your game to have the player (a loquacious charming-but-tomboyish little girl) deliver cold, refreshing, Free Trade mountain spring water.

    Also, the use of the truck promotes both inactivity and CO2 emissions, so the character should deliver the water from a bike, wearing a helmet and wrist, elbow, and knee guards of course. If you run a stop sign or ride on the sidewalk, it's an immediate game over, and you have to ride slow enough that your riding partner, a slightly retarded child with a heart of gold (of indeterminant ethnic minority status) can keep up with you so the buddy system stays intact.

    You only have one cup that everyone drinks out of so as to minimize waste; a mini-game sterilizes the cup with antibiotics between uses. Points are scored for each person served, but taken away for not keeping your heart rate up, not wearing a flag lapel pin, supporting the iraq war, or passing a breast cancer donation box without throwing in some change.
  • by Bill, Shooter of Bul ( 629286 ) on Monday October 15, 2007 @10:32PM (#20990655) Journal
    No dumb ass we don't worship a corpse on display. We eat it. But its cool, he told us to.

Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.

Working...