40GB PS3 Coming to the States

Sony Computer Entertainment of America has finally confirmed that the 40GB PlayStation 3 sku will be released in the US. This release will coincide with a price drop on the 80GB sku, from $600 to $500. "The 40-gigabyte model has already made its debut in Europe and Japan, and was widely expected to come to the United States ahead of the crucial year-end shopping season that accounts for the largest single chunk of annual video game software and hardware sales." (Via GI.biz)

Where is my 500 gig PS3?

[BiggestPOS]

With the drives now RETAILING for around $100, I can't imagine why 40 gig drives are still being made. What is the point where the overall cost of the materials reaches the floor and the drives can't get any cheaper? Seriously, a 40 gig hard-drive is just laughable, they must be using up over-stock or putting refurbs in. Are single platter drives with that little capacity even being produced anymore in the 3.5" form factor?

Re:Where is my 500 gig PS3?

[ucblockhead]

1) Buy a 500 GB USB drive for $109.
2) Plug it into the PS3's USB port.
3) Profit!

In the next month or so:

[Tony]

Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction
Haze
Assassin's Creed (also for the 360)

Stay away from Conan, if the whole game is anything like the demo. It seemed like a cheezy ripoff of God of War. (Which is different from Heavenly Sword, which is an excellent ripoff of God of War.)

Depends on your definition of "compelling." Me, I absolutely love my PS3. It's the best money I've ever wasted. (Granted, the Wii was a pretty damned good waste of money, too.) I play the hell out of Warhawk.

Re:Where is my 500 gig PS3?

[Anonymous Coward]

If you want it so much, make it yourself. Buy a 2.5in 500GB SATA drive and stick it in a PS3.

BTW, the reason PS3's are still so expensive despite the small hard drive is because of the price on Blu-Ray drive, both PS3's saviour and it's curse.

Re:Yawn

[feepness]

There are others, but if you only need one: Warhawk.

Bagging on the PS3 for lack of games is so six months ago...

Re:Yawn

[AuMatar]

The cost of high def- more time on engine development and art asset development means higher costs to make a game. And that cost is passed on. Wii games are cheaper, in part because they don't need to do HD.

Re:This is great

[vonPoonBurGer]

To be honest, I think you're nuts. I can't imagine buying a PS3 when there are so many top-notch 360-only or 360-and-PC-only titles available right now. The only top-shelf title the PS3 currently has access to is Oblivion, everything else is essentially good [metacritic.com] but not great [metacritic.com]. Furthermore, with only 17% [vgchartz.com] of the next-gen market currently, the PS3 has a lot of ground to make up. The quirky and interesting games that represent a risky investment for publishers are going to show up on the system(s) with the largest market share. I wouldn't want to buy into a platform that is unlikely to see this generation's Guitar Hero, or Katamari, or Shadow of the Colossus. I'm not talking about the sequels to those games, I'm talking about the wholly new games that no one's heard about yet, but everyone will be playing a year or two from now. In the previous generation, all of those titles appeared on the PS2 because its market share was so dominant, but that's not going to be anywhere near the case for the PS3 at this rate.

Comment removed

[account_deleted]

Comment removed based on user account deletion