Gibson Accuses Guitar Hero of Patent Violation 192
robipilot writes "Video game publisher Activision Inc. has asked a federal court to declare that its popular "Guitar Hero" game does not violate a patent held by real-guitar maker Gibson Guitar Corp. Gibson's 1999 patent covers a virtual-reality device that included a headset with speakers that simulated participating in a concert, according to a complaint filed on Tuesday by Santa Monica, Calif.-based Activision in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles."
Why did they wait this long? (Score:4, Insightful)
WHa? (Score:5, Insightful)
This is interesting... (Score:3, Insightful)
We don't want it (Score:3, Insightful)
I like that phrase. You would have thought that whether they want one or not is fairly irrelevant. Have you ever seen a case where a company wanted a license under a patent, but didn't need one?
Re:We don't want it (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes... ask any of the companies who bought licenses from SCO...
Patent Holders are like Trolls... (Score:5, Insightful)
In this case they're a little less interested in attention and a little more interested in money but the concept is the same. The entire patent system, software or otherwise, is somewhat flawed since it lasts too long and holds back the marketplace which it was original created to help.
They should change the system so you only get five-ish years of protection on research with an automatic extension by a further ten years if you release a product using that patent into the marketplace. This will stop these silly troll companies like IBM hoarding tons of patents with very few actual products.
Re:Crucify me, baby (Score:5, Insightful)
"Overly broad" would not a problem, and this patent isn't "overly broad".
The problem with the patent is obviousness.
If this is allowed to stand, then for any human activity, people could patent doing that activity in virtual reality, and that's simply absurd.
The whole point of virtual reality is that it lets you do real human activities, but permits you to get into situations that you couldn't get into in real life. That includes performing with a band as much as dating a super model.
From the patent..."audio" signal. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Crucify me, baby (Score:5, Insightful)
"'simulate participation in a concert by playing musical instrument and wearing a head-mounted 3-D display that includes stereo speakers.' The device described in the patent also includes playback of audio and video of a prerecorded concert and a separate track of audio from the user's instrument, according to the patent form."
- Real musical instrument
- Head mounted 3-D display
- Prerecorded concert
VS.
- Plastic guitar
- TV display
- Animated characters
Saying this patent applies to Guitar Hero is like saying that milk is the same as beer. You can drink them both, but the experience is completely different.
Re:Crucify me, baby (Score:5, Insightful)
If you start reading the claims, the entire thing falls apart at every level. First off - there's no instrument, and certainly no audio signal generated by the Guitar Hero "guitar", which appears to be the crux of their patent. Then again, IANAIP/PL (IP/Patent Lawyer).
I'm not even sure what exactly they're patenting here. There's no "System" that I can see, other than a very high level concept drawing and what looks like a basic high level distortion processor schematic. I was under the impression that "methods" like the abstract idea being described could not be patented.
Re:Crucify me, baby (Score:-1, Insightful)
That's very astute of you. Now can you say that in a civilized fashion?
Re:Crucify me, baby (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Patenting games (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:This is interesting... (Score:2, Insightful)
I have a slight suspision what might have happened here:
Gibson: "Now, folks, we hear that you're about to make GH4. What Gibson guitar will you use this time to model the controller after? And how much money do you pay us this time for the guitar and the logo?"
Activision: "See, now that GH is a brand itself, we don't need that logo or those guitar models from you anymore. We'll do our own thing this time."
Gibson: *Shakes fist, sends its lawyers down to the basement where all the old patents are stored* "Await our written answer to this!"
Re:WHa? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:jealous much? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Patenting games (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Patenting games (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't know whether Guitar Hero solves the given problem in the same way that Gibson did it. If they came up with a novel way to do it, then they should be allowed to make a product using that method. If it's the same solution (with different code or with minor variations in hardware) then the patent should apply (assuming the patent itself is valid).
Claims Examination by Patent examiner (Score:2, Insightful)