NASA Holding Space Vs. Earth Chess Game 36
A few days ago, NASA and the US Chess Federation teamed up to host a space vs. Earth chess game. Astronaut Greg Chamitoff is playing one side, while the other side's moves will be determined by a public vote. Four potential moves will be selected each weekday by a chess club comprised of students from kindergarten through third grade. Once the selections are made, visitors to the USCF's site can vote for the move they like best. The USCF is maintaining a blog to update the moves and board position, and to provide commentary.
Re:Cool! (Score:3, Interesting)
Do the kids determine the moves on their own or can they use help from a chess computer? If they can use a chess computer then space has no chance.
By the way the Slashdot poll asks if you'd like to own the space shuttle. That makes me wonder if NASA will sell it when they retire it. I'd think there would be some buyers. A commercial operation might be able to operate it much cheaper than NASA could.
Re:Space is going to win (Score:2, Interesting)
That's what I thought, too, but this guy challenged a large group of people who voted on the next move against him in a wiki and lost:
http://www.zefrank.com/thewiki/Fabuloso_Friday_2/Fabuloso_Chess [zefrank.com]
Re:NASA getting desperate for PR (Score:5, Interesting)
If one of the astronauts wants to play chess by mail, that's fine.
They actually did a game over the summer between Mission Control and Chamitoff, which ended with MCC resigning on 8-13: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/expeditions/expedition17/chess_chamitoff.html [nasa.gov].
Regarding the PR stunt, yes, it is one because it's try to draw lot's of attention, but so is every outreach program run by any kind of organization.
Part of NASA's mission, to quote Michael Griffin, is that "NASA is in the inspiration business." (http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=29218) That in itself is PR.
Space exploration needs to be on the forefront of science, along with things like the LHC, etc. Our country is on a decline on the science, technology, and innovation front. Our government has let it go by the wayside (see http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=29133 [spaceref.com] specifically for the space program), and too much of Generation Y is ignoring science, going into "soft" fields (preaching to the choir).
Like I said, NASA needs to inspire more young children to get into science and technology. If what it takes is a "PR stunt" like this, then so be it. Sure, NASA benefits from it, but the real beneficiaries, if it works out right, are the children, and by extension, future society.