Licensed C64 Emulator Rejected From App Store 277
Miasik.Net writes "A fully licensed Commodore 64 iPhone emulator has been rejected from the App Store. The excuse Apple used is a clause in the SDK agreement which doesn't allow for applications that run executable code. It seems Sega is exempt from that clause, because some of its games on the iPhone are emulators running original ROM code."
Backwards, I hope (Score:5, Funny)
An iPhone emulator that runs on a Commodore 64? Color me surprised!
Hopefully this means that I can upgrade my old boxes by emulating dual core processors on them. Links, anyone? ;)
-b
GET THE FACTS: Not rejected from the App Store (Score:5, Funny)
Apple is about quality first and they are just holding back the release date until the iPhone's cassette tape inferface is ready.
Way to go, Apple. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The hell are they thinking? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Right idea, wrong reason (Score:5, Funny)
So, you're saying that whining on Slashdot is actually useful?
The mind boggles, it does.
Re:Editorialise much ? (Score:1, Funny)
BASIC isn't code. It's not even script by today's standards.
Re:Editorialise much ? (Score:5, Funny)
And what exactly is so important about the app store that it cannot be bypassed?
Profit.
Re:Right idea, wrong reason (Score:3, Funny)
10 IF iphoneosver=2.x OR 1.x THEN H4X0R ELSE GOTO 20
20 PRINT "pls wait a couple of weeks kthxbai"
30 END
(Apologies for not getting BASIC right - I'm a muso, not a programmer)
Re:Editorialise much ? (Score:3, Funny)
>I'm still giggling over the idea of the next hacktool being written in BASIC, tho.
Me too. I'm waiting for the obligatory "The 1980s called and they want their language back" jokes. :o)
Re:Editorialise much ? (Score:4, Funny)
Me too. I'm waiting for the obligatory "The 1980s called and they want their language back" jokes. :o)
Even the 1980's don't want that language back