5054349
story
Comments: 79 + - Games: Dave Perry Shows Off Cloud Gaming Service "Gaikai" on Wednesday July 01 2009, @10:23AM
Posted
by
Soulskill
on Wednesday July 01 2009, @10:23AM
from the all-things-through-the-browser dept.
from the all-things-through-the-browser dept.
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topicgamespcgames.gif); width:60px; height:78px;
pcgames
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topicinternet.gif); width:70px; height:73px;
internet
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topicentertainment.gif); width:62px; height:44px;
entertainment
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topicgames.gif); width:68px; height:77px;
games
jasoncart writes "Veteran gaming man Dave Perry has shown off his OnLive-rivalling, cloud gaming service called Gaikai in a new video that is drawing a lot of attention. As you can see from the video, Perry plays World of Warcraft, EVE Online, Mario Kart 64, Spore and more — all running on a bog-standard computer through the Gaikai website, itself running in a normal version of Firefox."
More details about the service are available at Perry's website. He spoke about Gaikai in an interview a few months ago, and he seems confident that this will work better than OnLive (which we've discussed in the past).
Related Stories
So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what
is the root of money?
-- Ayn Rand
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2010 Geeknet, Inc.
perfect execution (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
bog-standard.. (Score:2, Offtopic)
http://www.bog-standard.org/ [bog-standard.org]
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Who needs standards to bog down people's gaming experience when we already have Windows Vista?
Head in the cloud(s) (Score:2)
What exactly is the point of having games run in The Cloud, other than the wish to remain buzzword compliant? It seems like such a waste of network resources, and a pointless centralization of computing resources as well.
Frankly, I can't wait for the "cloud computing" bubble to finally burst.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
One thing I can think of is completely cross-platform gaming...
Re: (Score:2)
You forgot the "get off my lawn". I don't see "cloud" computing leaving anytime soon, or ever, because it makes the most sense from both a business and a consumer perspective.
1. Company X develops "product" Y which remains on their servers.
2. Charge people for an account to gain access.
3. ???
4.Profit!
From the consumer perspective, cheaper PC's and what "appears" to be cheaper software (pay-as-you-go, "low monthly fee", etc), access to all your shit from anywhere (via some universal wireless not yet develope
Re: (Score:2)
I heartily agree. But only on the grounds that it's not actually possible for something to leave before it arrives.
We've been bombarded with hype about the "cloud" for a while now, but where's the beef? So far the only application that used to be run on desktops and has really taken off online is webmail. And that's ancient technology. I'd been using webmail for years before the first dotcom bubble.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The point is that you don't have to spend lots of money on expensive hardware, a simple web browser with internet connectivity (over a fat pipe!) is all it takes. This saves you large amounts of cash.
It also opens up the possibility of allowing your games and applications to stay with you wherever you go. You could bring up a GaiKai iPhone app and play WoW during lunch or on the train or wherever. Once you get home you can fire it up on your big screen TV via the media center's web browser.
For the software
Re: (Score:2)
What exactly is the point of having games run in The Cloud, other than the wish to remain buzzword compliant?
Gamers spend serious cash on hardware. AIUI, a typical gamer will put down an average of $500-1000 per annum on hardware, just so that they can continue running the latest and greatest games. That hardware sits unused most of the time.
The idea of cloud gaming is to put some fraction of that money into shared hardware instead. You'll spend maybe $180 per annum renting access to the hardware, but y
Re: (Score:2)
Casual gamers can try the game instantly, at work, in the library, anywhere.
Try Before You Buy is a really nice model.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Except they won't actually be able to do that at all. Workplaces will block these services. Libraries will block these services. And if you can afford to regularly stream HD video to a mobile device, you can probably afford a Playstation.
Except this isn't "try before you buy". It's "pay per play". Remember arcades? Well, this won't be "insert coin", it'll be "insert credit card". And
Re: (Score:2)
It *enables* Try Before You Buy. Developers will take advantage of that. Eve Online would probably *love* to expose that.
Yes, some developers will act as you describe, but you're just as welcome to NOT play their games as you've always been.
Re: (Score:2)
It *enables* Try Before You Buy. Developers will take advantage of that. Eve Online would probably *love* to expose that.
Erm... EVE Online has a free trial already. OK, so you have to download a 2GB game client...
No plugins?! (Score:3, Funny)
So... they're using the <video> tag, and use javascript to redirect the input to the remote server?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Notably missing from the video: (Score:3, Interesting)
- Why no mention of what connection he is on? Or for that matter, why no mention of where the server is located? (besides some vague "Oh, I've never been as far from a server as I am at the moment!")
- Where's the fullscreen? I can see how it would be quite hard to properly stream current screensizes (such as 1680x1050, or even 1280x1024)
Other than that, I noticed a few odd things, such as:
- When playing MarioKart 64, at the end he all of a sudden crashes into a wall, which he tells is because "he hasn't been playing the game for quite some time"; Seems quite odd, and looked more like it had to do with the actual command not properly coming through.
- Howcome he's allowed to have MK64 running on an emulator anyways? I thought it was illegal to do so (even if you have the game yourself); though I might be wrong on that.
Whereas I like the idea (but can't see myself using it in the next decades), I think the price has to be really low for people to actually use it. Though I can definitely see a use for it for some new sort of console (Phantom, anyone?
Still, I always wondered how this would scale if it got really popular: I can't imagine a computer being able to stream multiple high-graphics game for multiple clients.
Re: (Score:2)
Howcome he's allowed to have MK64 running on an emulator anyways? I thought it was illegal to do so (even if you have the game yourself); though I might be wrong on that.
Nope it's legal [copyright.gov]:
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure the law requires that you use your own ROM dumper. As I read it it requires you to own "a copy" which authorizes you to make "another copy" of "that computer program". So by my reading if you own "a copy (of Mario Kart 64)" the law authorizes you to make "another copy (of Mario Kart 64)". A ROM of Mario Kart 64 downloaded from the internet is "another copy (of Mario Kart 64)".
Of course, any copy made of the ROM may only be used for running the program on a computer. Since making further copi
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. The person distributed the ROM online is likely violating the law, but the downloader is probably not. Some theories indicate that the downloading is technically legal even if you do not own the game. If you do have the game, then it is very likely not an issue.
Making the ROM yourself, or having somebody make it for you (pay them to dump you game cart) is virtually indisputably legal. (Although for some systems like the DS, this requires circumventing a copy control mechanism.) Nintendo has some sor
Re:Notably missing from the video: (Score:4, Insightful)
It does also seem to me that fullscreen means more bandwidth. All that's going his way is the video, but streaming full-screen video is obviously more bandwidth intensive then streaming a lower resolution.
He crashes into the wall because he's stopped playing, as far as I can tell. I suspect he's using a gamepad or something, because playing mario cart with a mouse just isn't feasible. I assume he set the gamepad down, and then a second or so later we see the mouse going to the "close" button. And I believe that it's only downloading ROM's that's illegal. The emulator itself and using your own ROMs should both be fair use.
Honestly, I like the idea of remote-running programs - I'd assumed that's the way things would end up going as soon as I heard people actually buying netbooks. I think it's something I'll use extensively eventually. Of course, I completely reject the idea of letting someone else host them for me - I suspect eventually people will have home servers plus netbooks or something like that. So I won't be using *this* service, but I don't doubt that I'll eventually be running something like it. Also I'm certain I won't be running photoshop inside flash inside firefox. If this sort of thing gets popular there will be a custom application for it.
Parent
Won't anyone think of the ISPs? (Score:3, Insightful)
They're already complaining about those pesky high-bandwidth users, they aren't upgrading their infrastructure, and they're charging fees for just about anything they can think of. Now wait until their metered plan really takes off, and tell me about gaming in the cloud. Any savings from hardware cost with this setup will be eaten by increasing ISP charges.
Besides, really, aren't we reaching the point where mandatory PC upgrades for games are much farther apart, really mitigating that factor?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm certainly not signing up for anything that absolutely requires an active high bandwidth connection to play single player offline games until companies like Comcast have been brought to heel.
The two things that peaked my attention to this were not the offline games but rather the online ones such as WoW and Eve.
This means I could play Eve on a crappy laptop rather than my gaming rig when I want to do tedious tasks downstairs while watching TV with the girlfriend rather than sitting upstairs.
Still needs a
Re: (Score:2)
Comcast won't be brought to heel, US internet consumers will be forced to accept bandwidth caps which means Comcast won't need to be assholes to make a profit. All you can eat doesn't work anymore, but the US consumers won't let ISPs end it, so they have to be even more evil than usual.
This is cool and worrisome at the same time (Score:3, Interesting)
While some claim that bandwidth isn't up to snuff, and maintaining enough servers to support a massive number of gamers is not feasible, etc, etc, this will all change in a short amount of time. This type of service is on the cusp of being a reality, and it will change computing forever. If a video game can be supported through a remote terminal, then ANY application could be supported. Eventually more and more apps will be available only on the cloud, and hardware costs will go down, then you'll find that 20 years later only dumb terminals exist in the hands of the average consumer. As wireless connectivity matures even phones will all just be dumb terminals. You never need to upgrade your phone, unless you want a bigger screen or different input method. The applications you RENT will be unpiratable, because there is no publicly available platform to run them on, and you can use the same app across your desktop and phone, but with modified interfaces as the device would report it's capabilities to the cloud, and the cloud would change the interface appropriately.
How does linux fit into all of this? Will there be a new ideological movement in the future to keep processing power in the hands of consumers? How do you install linux on a dumb terminal?
LS
Re: (Score:2)
That may be true in the sense that the dumb terminals will be using an embeddable form of Linux with little capability. When virtually all computing power is on the cloud, in the hands of private corporations, who's going to be coding open source apps for the cloud platform? There will probably be several platforms out there, but they will all probably work on something similar to the Apple store model, where your rights are severely limited. Is that where we want the open source community to flourish?
Ping (Score:2)
I want to run my own server (Score:2)
How about being able to stream your own games like this when you're on the go. Say I'm at a friends who has a good net connection, nice screen, but some crippled onboard video (not to mention I'm not going to bring my games and do the install/update/patch setup the config thing). It would be nice to log into your own 'kaigai' server and play your collection. Sell me this as a product instead of a service and I'm onboard.
Re:Just needs a better name (Score:5, Insightful)
I must agree it looked to work somewhat nicely, but people are taking this cloud computing thing way too far. I want to run the stuff on my own box and not somewhere else. Aside privacy conserns, it doesn't make that much sense to run games via internet line. Theres lag issues, bandwidth issues, connectivity issues and latency issues. Sometimes the old model works better than the new 'cool' model.
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
2) Privacy concerns in games is dubious argument.
3) Avid gamers save $$$ on lower power consumption.
Re: (Score:2)
However, the video doesn't tell anything about the lag when used via internet. The server might be sitting just next to him. I dont really think it can stream stable, fullscreen 1680x1020 video at 30-60fps over the internet and still also be as responsive to mouse and keyboard as you would be playing it on your computer. Hell, that's practically impossible in lan too, even basic remote desktoping or X sessions are somewhat laggy in lan.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
No one says you can't still run things locally if you want to. Why do people see something that isn't a good fit for them, and immediately think it's an either/or thing? This whole system is for people who want to play on the go, who don't like to install stuff, who like the convenience, or who are new to a game and want to try it out. It is an expansion to the modern gaming experience, not a replacement, and it's a very positive thing.
Unless the publisher makes it a replacement (Score:3, Insightful)
No one says you can't still run things locally if you want to. Why do people see something that isn't a good fit for them, and immediately think it's an either/or thing?
Because the publisher of a specific game might choose to make it an either/or thing by releasing it exclusively on one of these services.
This whole system is for people who want to play on the go
On the go? In that case, let me know when EVDO or HSPA bandwidth can keep up with this service, both per second and per month.
or who are new to a game and want to try it out.
I imagine that playing a twitch game in such a laggy environment as a "rental" will leave the player with a poor impression of its control feel.
Re: (Score:2)
If they release it exclusively, then choose another game that plays locally. The market will provide, if there is demand. The real mitigating factor is piracy, which is the main reason publishers pulled back from the PC in the first place.
As for the rest of your arguments, I share your concerns for the present, but ultimately it boils down to "640k should be enough for anybody" - stuff will only get faster, pipes bigger, etc. These are early days.
Substitution effect; speed of light (Score:3, Insightful)
If they release it exclusively, then choose another game that plays locally.
Do you have some tips on how I can convince a family member who has specified a specific title on a wish list to want a different game instead? If one really wants to play Halo 3, for instance, Metroid Prime 3 isn't a close enough substitute.
ultimately it boils down to "640k should be enough for anybody" - stuff will only get faster
Not necessarily. If I'm in Chicago, and their servers are in Virginia and California, the speed of light establishes a lower bound on the latency between a keypress and its reflection on the client.
pipes bigger, etc. These are early days.
The reality of the non-market for Internet access in the United States i
Re: (Score:2)
Do you have some tips on how I can convince a family member who has specified a specific title on a wish list to want a different game instead?
Fair enough. Presumably, if demand is strong enough, a standalone version would be available, but if not, and if their world will end if they don't get a particular game, then life can be hard.
Not necessarily. If I'm in Chicago, and their servers are in Virginia and California, the speed of light establishes a lower bound on the latency between a keypress and its reflection on the client.
Well, the speed of light is pretty fast...like, for all practical purposes instantaneous for the distances we're talking about.
The reality of the non-market for Internet access in the United States is that "early days" will last significantly longer than if there were a market.
Yes, this is a real issue, for sure - infrastructure not keeping up with demand for new services.
Ultimately, I prefer to see the glass as half-full when it comes to new services, and if they e
Twitch games (Score:2)
Well, the speed of light is pretty fast...like, for all practical purposes instantaneous for the distances we're talking about.
Twitch games, such as Tetris Shirase [youtube.com], can be totally ruined with even 33 ms (two frames at 60 Hz) of additional lag. A round trip from Chicago to LA and back is 5600 km. At the speed of light, that takes 18.7 ms, not even counting router delays.
Re: (Score:2)
You'll still be able to buy copies of games. Did you even read my comment, idiot?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Uh, no. X11 apps forwarded over LAN is 99.9% indistinguishable from local (ie, very fast, the other 0.1% is the <@otherhost> in the titlebar).
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Just think of the required bandwidth though. I play my games in 1900x1200, so using 30fps and 3 bytes per pixel (granted an arbitrary assumption) comes out to 205,200,000 bytes/second. I don't know about you guys, but that is slightly faster than my current internet connection. You could use video compression, but the requirements for that both for the cloud and f
Re: (Score:2)
You're forgetting here that multiplayer games transfer significantly less data. Pretty much only player movements/positions and some small information. Besides that, the pings usually range from 50 (own country) to 200-400 (some other country near you). If you live in USA, replace country with state, tho interstate connections are probably better than off country. Now imagine moving your mouse in the game to look around. How is that 50-400ms lag working for you now? Sure, bandwidth and speeds can get better
Re: (Score:2)
Perry alludes to the distance, indicating that he's further than he's ever been from the servers. We don't know if that's 300 miles, or 10 feet. He goes on and on about the importance of latency in gaming, meaning I think they are at least properly sensitive to the importance of getting that aspect right.
Even more significantly, he's looking for closed beta testers, meaning he's actually ready to show the tech to the public in some form. Finger's crossed!
Re: (Score:2)
And just imagine the bill when your kids go over the bandwidth cap! Seriously unless all these 'cloud computing" bunches are going to start buying out the telecos and running fiber everywhere these kinds of thing will be a non starter.
The places where you have a teleco/cable duopoly (which is most places in the USA) simply haven't been running the backbone they need or investing in infrastructure and instead took all those tax breaks we gave them for nationwide broadband and all the money we paid for serv
Re: (Score:2)
Aside privacy conserns, it doesn't make that much sense to run games via internet line.
I don't mean to sound silly but what sensitive information does one put into your video games?
I mean, I try to not name my WoW characters using my SSN or my secrete password hints.
Re: (Score:2)
I want to run the stuff on my own box and not somewhere else.
Oh and one more thing...
What about all the times you want to play games on someone else's computer?
Say like when you are at work... When you should be working... Not like I'd do something like that.
Re: (Score:2)
He needs to get back to making games. Dude ported some great games back in the day, Smash TV, Cool Spot, Aladdin. Then started Shiny which put out some real classics, Earthworm Jim, Wild 9, MDK. Then Shiny made 2 crappy Matrix games and did nothing else of note until getting bought out.
Perry, quit dicking around on the business side of the industry and make some fucking games again!
It needs a lot more than better name (Score:2)
It needs a better backer.
Seriously, David Perry is a shitheel in the gaming community.
Acclaim's 2moons is so bot and hack infested as to be nearly unplayable.
Likely because no one at Acclaim, and certainly not David Perry, has written a line of code in a decade.
Welcome to Outsourced Gaming.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would it be a single machine? You probably reserve a box in the gaming farm. Whether they can make enough money renting out 10,000 high-end gaming boxes to stay afloat is the question.
Re: (Score:2)
What worries me is the 3D as it would be done in software but then again.
It's fairly easy to get a 3D card to render to an off-screen buffer and then grab that buffer for encoding. My suspicion is he has the graphics card piping data to a custom hardware video encoder (probably based on an off-the-shelf FPGA PCIe card, which are available for about $3-400 each) in order to reduce latency. Realtime video compression is hard, and he'll have to be doing everything he can to minimize latency.