5696227
story
Comments: 163 +- Games: How an Online-Only TV Series Stays Successful on Thursday August 27, @03:06PM
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topicmediaall.gif); width:73px; height:59px;
media
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topictv.gif); width:50px; height:50px;
tv
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topicentertainment.gif); width:62px; height:44px;
entertainment
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topicgames.gif); width:68px; height:77px;
games
ChronoDragon writes "The Wall Street Journal points out that it is possible to make a successful web series without the backing of a studio. With the release of a music video, Do you Wanna Date My Avatar, and the start of Season of 3, the web series The Guild is ready for even more success. The Guild, created by Felicia Day (Doctor Horrible), is a low-budget comedy series about a group of MMORPG gamers and their interactions both online and off. While there are a lot of references that will be instantly recognized by gamers, the show is still very accessible to non-gamers."
leverage, n.:
Even if someone doesn't care what the world thinks
about them, they always hope their mother doesn't find out.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2010 Geeknet, Inc.
You mean... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
And don't forget low-budget!
Re:You mean... (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Amazon.com Sales Rank: #8 in MP3 Songs (See Bestsellers in MP3 Songs)
Popular in these categories: (What's this?)
#1 in MP3 Songs > Dance & DJ
#5 in MP3 Songs > Pop
Oh shi-
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B002JEEJ2A?tag=you09f-20 [amazon.com]
Eek. (Score:4, Funny)
World of Warcraft: Destroying relationships with girls since... well, the day it came out.
-- No. I mean this. I've got about six female friends that either bought it as a anniversary or birthday present, or their boyfriend bought it... and the relationship has always ended within eight months after that fateful purchase. My last friend got so fed up that she took the laptop (with the CD still in it) and smashed it in the driveway, drove over it a few times, then hit it with a hammer. Then she called all her friends and went to have ice cream. That game is pure evil -- it makes boys think dating a high level elf huntress is better than having a real girlfriend.
Legions of geeks coming to the defense of the game in 5...4...
Re:Eek. (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:Eek. (Score:5, Funny)
Undeniably a very daunting limit. How do you even survive?
Parent
Re:Eek. (Score:5, Insightful)
FWIW... I'm not sure that fits the definition of in moderation.
I mean, sure, some people watch TV seven nights a week, and compared to that, 4 nights only is limited... but for me, as a married guy with a kid, a hobby done in moderation means once a week, tops.
YMMV, of course -- I have no idea what your life is like, etc. But for me, just the thought of spending more than one night a week playing games makes my skin crawl with the thought of all the chores that wouldn't be getting done.
Parent
Re:Eek. (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm just curious about what people are supposed to be doing at night after the kids are all in bed. Well, activities that don't involve making more kids aside.
Why is there this sense that we have to be busy doing things all the time? My parents used to watch TV at night, I prefer to play video games to unwind. I think it provides more mental stimulation than popping open a beer and sitting on the couch.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Why is there this sense that we have to be busy doing things all the time?
Please remain in your location. A squad will be sent over shortly, and you will be "optimized".
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Eek. (Score:5, Funny)
All things in moderation
Especially moderation.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Dating a high level elven huntress is fine, as long as she belongs to your RL girlfriend. WoW is also great as long as you can limit your usage so your RL girlfriend and job get more usage than WoW.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Hardly accurate for all relationships. I played with my girlfriend for quite a while, and I must say nothing made her more attractive to me than her dancing as her troll priest avatar.
Here is an idea for your friends, why don't they try to take interest in what their guys enjoy? Then instead of bitching and moaning that their boyfriends don't spend enough time with them, they will want to find ways not to spend so much time together.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
nothing made her more attractive to me than her dancing as her troll priest avatar.
... and this is why geeks have the female stigma that we do. You're saying that *nothing* makes your girlfriend more attractive than when she logs in to a video game and presses a key. I mean, you've seen the girl naked before, right? But you would prefer watching a character dance onscreen than actually interacting with your girlfriend's physical body?
To each his own I guess..
Re:Eek. (Score:5, Funny)
You haven't seen his girlfriend.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I know, but "nothing more attractive"? Really?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
10 - watching her install Ubuntu... naked!
(Peels lacquer layer off disk.) Okay, Ubuntu's naked, where do I get the girl?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
This is the exact reason I avoid MMO's like the plague. I know what would happen to me, because it's happened before with IRC. At least then I was 17 and had nothing to lose.
Re: (Score:2)
My toons are all celibate. Since my beloved IRL doesn't play, I don't even allow myself the fantasy of another SO relationship. Problem solved.
Flirting is flirting, even on line. There's a real live person behind the character. Don't do it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My toons are all celibate. Since my beloved IRL doesn't play, I don't even allow myself the fantasy of another SO relationship. Problem solved.
Flirting is flirting, even on line. There's a real live person behind the character. Don't do it.
Common sense on Slashdot? Inconceivable! =p
My wife and I play Guild Wars together and have the same understanding. If she's not on, I'm not flirting with any females. If she is, she's the only female I am flirting with.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So she's got you by the virtual balls as well?
Who is Pure Evil?!? (Score:3, Interesting)
The game itself is neutral. Playing the game isn't evil, just a waste of time. However, willful and wanton destruction of other people's properly certainly could be considered pure evil! (Wouldn't just hiding the CD be sufficient?) Elf Huntresses don't get pr
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
World of Warcraft: Destroying relationships with girls since... well, the day it came out.
-- No. I mean this. I've got about six female friends that either bought it as a anniversary or birthday present, or their boyfriend bought it... and the relationship has always ended within eight months after that fateful purchase.
I'd be sold, except for the fact that your math doesn't work. I have six female friends that either bought [insert product here] as an anniversary or birthday present and they all broke up with their boy/girl friends within 8 months! That's almost certainly true for anyone who has at least 8 female friends.
WoW is a time sink, as are all MMOs. If you introduce a time sink into a relationship without an understanding around what you both want out of it, there's going to be trouble. The same is true for any ho
Re: (Score:2)
it makes boys think dating a high level elf huntress is better than having a real girlfriend.
I hate to be the one to point it out, but if someone thinks that way, it's not the game's fault. They were already like that before they got the game, your friends just either weren't able to pick up on it, or thought they could "fix" the guy.
Re:Eek. (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
I mod you -1 stupid for referring to girlintraining as "man".
Simple answer (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh, and wall street journal articles and front-page slashdots don't hurt either.
Tiny budgets help a lot (Score:4, Insightful)
Don't get me wrong, I enjoy The Guild, and am quite impressed how good the show is with what they have to work with, but if all TV had to be made with the tiny budgets they work with (each episode is like 10 minutes long, very limited sets, etc), you wouldn't get shows like Star Trek, Babylon 5, Firefly, or Battlestar Galactica, to name but a few.
I for one, am happy that at least *some* bigger budget shows are made (yes, yes, not all big-budget shows are any good - some are just big money holes), but I'd like to see a successful larger-budget online show, to pave the way for a gradual move to more television being online.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
but I'd like to see a successful larger-budget online show, to pave the way for a gradual move to more television being online.
The main problem is control. With a small-budget show, you have a group of friends who generally agree on most things. With a larger budget you have more roles, more people, with more people becomes more disagreement. With TV you have the network more or less as a moderator, approve the content and distribute it. But with online its different, -anyone- can host it and its usually distributed over many channels, so do you put the content up for free on YouTube? Do you have ads on it? Do you have another si
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
", you wouldn't get shows like Star Trek, "
haha. star trek had almost no budget. In fact one episode had a props budget of less then a dollar.
Re:Tiny budgets help a lot (Score:5, Informative)
According to this site:
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/TOS_Season_1 [memory-alpha.org]
That would be the equivalent of $1,322,201 per episode in today's dollars.
Parent
Re:Tiny budgets help a lot (Score:5, Funny)
[citation needed]. "My big brother told me" is not a credible source.
Parent
Re:Tiny budgets help a lot (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re: (Score:3)
That's called "the exception that proves the rule".
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah I got a kick out of how Tink's iMac turned into a plain old LCD with a Vista sticker slapped on it in Season 2...it made me chuckle.
And seriously MS, those LCDs are dull....why not get a nice shiny Samsung or something if you're trying to flash that Vista orb?
Re: (Score:2)
Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed (Score:5, Informative)
If you have access to the Blizzcon feed via DirectTV or the internet, there is an extensive interview with Felicia Day and accompanying video regarding the background, making, and future of the Guild.
It's around 5:45 PM in the Saturday feed. It's in a filler time that many people who bought the package might not have watched.
Alas for the majority of us, she talks about how so much of the needed resources are loaned to her from friends and other kind people who want her to succeed. While that's all well and good, that can't be counted on as a viable business model. (Almost any business can be profitable if it can acquire most or all of its resources for free and convert them into a product to sell.)
Re:Felicia Day in Blizzcon feed (Score:5, Funny)
And let us not forget this lovely bit [youtube.com] from the interview.
Cue "this is why we don't have women around" debate in 3.. 2.. 1...
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
How can people call something that works "not viable"? What is wrong with getting support from people who like you and your work, directly? As you said in your last sentence, it would work for almost ANY endeavor.
answer: it doesn't. (Score:2, Informative)
"successful" is a relative term (Score:5, Interesting)
As another comment noted, they were not really that successful until actually receiving distribution. As a cast member in a web series (Break A Leg [breakaleg.tv]) we have been struggling not to gain an audience, respect, or critical acclaim since we have all of that. We just need money. Even the brushes we've had with sponsorship and major network distribution tend to fall apart through no fault of our own. It's just the way the business works.
We poke fun at The Guild from time to time, but it's a great show. I don't think though that's it's really a model of how to "stay successful" as an online-only series. You can't replicate what they did or follow their path like a recipe.
It just doesn't seem possible to actually BE successful as a web-only series, if success is defined at all in terms of money, without real money backing you. We even had a marketing firm whoring us around for awhile, and while it led to a few sponsorship deals here and there it never really led to independence for anybody from their day-to-day careers. There's just no real monetizing of the online-only series going on unless you have a patron or distributor who's willing to take a loss on you in order to get some other intangibles out of it.
That said, Break A Leg has a major distribution deal in the works, but it only proves the point. We're never going to be "successful" sticking to the web. The internet was just a way to get our show out there, and the show initially was just a way to showcase our talents (as writers, actors, editors, sound designers, directors, cinematographers). We need someone to get us OUT of the internet in some form in order to really get us see and heard of on a scale massive enough for everyone to quit their jobs.
Oh well, that's just me ranting. I love internet episodics, I hope they never go away. I just also hope some way materializes for people to earn real money doing them without needing a Microsoft distro deal or a major network buy-out.
Joss Whedon? (Score:2)
Anyone know if she and Joss retain any professional connection?
I guess I just kinda assumed that Joss was helping her out on this.
Re: (Score:2)
Question: Who directed Do You Wanna Date My Avatar?
Answer: Jed Whedon.
Question: What else did Jed Whedon work on?
Answer: Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog with his brother Joss.
Question: How many times during Commentary: The Musical (on the Dr. Horrible DVD) does Felicia Day mention The Guild?
Answer: At least 3, but it's all part of one song on it.
Huge built in audience (Score:3)
Part of The Guilds success is no doubt due to their vast built in audience... A show for players of Puzzle Pirates or City of Heroes/Villains has much less of a potential audience. It also no doubt helps that those audiences are used to fan made material and have very low expectations as to writing, acting, and production values.
(As a side note: Has everyone forgotten RvB [wikipedia.org] already?)
I don't however agree with summaries conclusion that the video's are 'accessible to non gamers'. I'm a gamer (though mostly out on the fringe, UO, CoX, YPP!), and I found them somewhat hard to understand because the terminology used was so WoW centric.
Wow... this is terrible. (Score:2)
I watched what I think was the first episode of season 2.
That was awful. Thankfully it was only 5 minutes.
I see why it's online and not on TV.
Re: (Score:2)
Did you start from the beginning of season 1? It's character driven. If you've followed it from the beginning it'll make a lot more sense.
I'm not saying it's great or anything, but it makes me smile.
Re: (Score:2)
Also on Miro:
https://www.miroguide.com/feeds/8889 [miroguide.com]
(looks like it's way behind though).
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.mininova.org/tor/2882031 [mininova.org]
The submitter says they are crap web quality though (ripped from website). Couldn't find a DVD rip, but I didnt look very hard.
Never heard of this show. Hopefully it will be along the lines of pure pwnage [purepwnage.com], which incidentally has all their eps in decent quality up for free download (and has apparently been picked up by showcase ?!?).
Now thats a real success story!