Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Censorship Games

NIMF To Close Its Doors 68

Posted by Soulskill
from the but-where-will-nicodemus-go dept.
eldavojohn writes "One of the driving forces behind the ESRB toughening its ratings is closing its doors on December 31st, 2009. The National Institute on Media and the Family was funded by Fairview Health Services, and simply could no longer justify the yearly $750,000 price tag given today's economic climate. NIMF's reign of nagging has been pretty consistent since 1996, and was often indirectly featured on Slashdot. Don't worry, president and founder Dr. David Walsh promises to keep writing and giving speeches ... and imploring us all to think of the children."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NIMF To Close Its Doors

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 21 2009, @02:20PM (#30186220)

    before the PC crowd managed to tamp that down as "civil rights violations"; this is one of the few times I've seen a government agency actually doing it's job effectively and properly

    That's the problem with the two party system in America. It's the Democrats' job to be pansies for the sake of being pansies. It's the Republicans' job to be pansies in order to prove that the government can't do anything right.

    This is also why there's psychos roaming the streets: Democrats said insitutionalizing the insane is inhumane (won't anyone think of the murderers?!), Republicans said institutionalizing the insane is too expensive (won't anyone think of my wallet?!), and so all the institutions were closed.

    Pansies, the whole fucking lot of them.

  • Re:Fortunately (Score:2, Interesting)

    by morethanapapercert (749527) on Saturday November 21 2009, @02:40PM (#30186418)
    so what you're saying is that we can look forward to a huge wave of ignosticism to sweep the world? I think that would be wonderful, but I do see a small problem with that prediction. When times are tough, when the common person feels helpless in the face of forces and circumstances larger than they are, they tend to seek out explanations that are larger than they are. Religion *thrives* when things are toughest. "There are no athesists in a foxhole" is one common way of phrasing that. As I see it, every generation looks at it's kids, looks at the way society is evolving and finds that they don't really understand either one. They also tend to fear the worst. It is all too easy to take heed of those who prophesy a doom that we already suspect ourselves and at the same time promise that doom can be averted if we all just make a few changes in what we are doing.

    To my mind; the fundamental problem with groups like NIMF isn't that they View With Alarm, that is a enshrined tradition of priests, politicians and the power-hungry since the dawn of human history. The real problem is human arrogance and an inability to keep from meddling. If can't we can't accurately imagine the future, how can we hope to shape it as we desire? The law of unintended consequences still reigns supreme

  • Re:Fortunately (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Machtyn (759119) on Saturday November 21 2009, @02:48PM (#30186500) Homepage Journal
    While I disagree that this is an idiotic and wasteful idea, I will agree that it is inefficient. It is not idiotic, because it gives us a baseline of what content to expect. It's not wasteful, because some of us use these ratings. It is inefficient because it makes the more hardcore games seem more appealing and some parents just don't care and will let their kids play anything. And when they find out their little precious boy is severely depressed, grades have dropped, and has no social life they are *shocked*!

    Be it known, I am not saying that playing violent games will lead to this, but it can be a side effect of playing violent games too much.
  • by Tim C (15259) on Saturday November 21 2009, @02:53PM (#30186568)

    Either that, or the Video Game Bogeyman has been replaced by the Terrorism Bogeyman, and people are simply concentrating on that instead.

  • Re:Fortunately (Score:3, Interesting)

    by hairyfeet (841228) <[bassbeast1968] [at] [gmail.com]> on Saturday November 21 2009, @09:45PM (#30190080) Journal

    I think the problem isn't the games, it is parents that use the games as a babysitter and don't actually interact with their kids. My boys have always been allowed to play any game they want, but I actually interacted with them. I showed them how things like DOOM Wads (remember those) could be manipulated to alter what is rendered on the screen, showed them how 3D graphics are drawn, explained and showed them scripts work and how voice actors gave voices to the monsters, etc.

    Of course it ended up with a rather funny side effect, they way my oldest 'curses" at the screen-"Who designed these levels? Look at all the tearing! I can see seams everywhere! What do they think this is, 1995? And what lamer wrote the AI for this thing? Can't they see I am standing not 30 feet away with a big rocket launcher? DUCK YOU DUMMY!"

    I don't worry about my boys because there is no chance of them mistaking fantasy for reality. It has also made them shy away from the games that are all about violence and bad language, as they have seen how often that is used as a crutch to sell an otherwise piss poor game. The problem is too many parents just dumping little Billy in front of a screen and not caring WHAT little Billy is doing, as long as he ain't bugging them. How sad that some of my boy's friends have never even had a story read to them, just dropped in front of a game or DVD player and left. My mom read Asimov to the boys just as she did to me all those years ago, and the difference between them and their friends is just unreal. My boys think and question everything, and after playing a game it is like listening to Siskel and Ebert do game reviews.

    To paraphrase an old movie "You need a license to drive a car, hell you even need a license to catch a fish, but they'll let any asshole be a parent". Sad but true. I have NO problems with ratings, except when companies like MSFT and Sony use them to ensure adults can't have certain games. But sadly too many times these things are just used as yet another excuse on why they don't need to interact with their kids. Like all 10,12,14 year olds have the same maturity level. It is just sad.

Think of it! With VLSI we can pack 100 ENIACs in 1 sq. cm.!

Working...